4. • Microservices - a definition of
this new architectural term
James Lewis
Martin Fowler
5. Microservice
• An approach to developing a single application as
a suite of small services, each running in its own
process and communicating with lightweight
mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. These
services are built around business capabilities
and independently deployable by fully automated
deployment machinery. There is a bare minimum
of centralized management of these services,
which may be written in different programming
languages and use different data storage
technologies
6. Microservice
• An approach to developing a single application as
a suite of small services, each running in its own
process and communicating with lightweight
mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. These
services are built around business capabilities
and independently deployable by fully automated
deployment machinery. There is a bare minimum
of centralized management of these services,
which may be written in different programming
languages and use different data storage
technologies
7. Microservice
• An approach to developing a single application as
a suite of small services, each running in its own
process and communicating with lightweight
mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. These
services are built around business capabilities
and independently deployable by fully automated
deployment machinery. There is a bare minimum
of centralized management of these services,
which may be written in different programming
languages and use different data storage
technologies
8. Microservice
• An approach to developing a single application as
a suite of small services, each running in its own
process and communicating with lightweight
mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. These
services are built around business capabilities
and independently deployable by fully automated
deployment machinery. There is a bare minimum
of centralized management of these services,
which may be written in different programming
languages and use different data storage
technologies
12. Characteristic
• Componentization via Services
• Organized around Business Capabilities
• Products not Projects
• Smart endpoints and dumb pipes
• Decentralized Governance
• Decentralized Data Management
• Infrastructure Automation
• Design for failure
• Evolutionary Design
13. Melvyn Conway
Any organization that designs a system
(defined broadly) will produce a design
whose structure is a copy of the
organization's communication structure.
14.
15. Characteristic
• Componentization via Services
• Organized around Business Capabilities
• Products not Projects
• Smart endpoints and dumb pipes
• Decentralized Governance
• Decentralized Data Management
• Infrastructure Automation
• Design for failure
• Evolutionary Design
16. Characteristic
• Componentization via Services
• Organized around Business Capabilities
• Products not Projects
• Smart endpoints and dumb pipes
• Decentralized Governance
• Decentralized Data Management
• Infrastructure Automation
• Design for failure
• Evolutionary Design
17. Characteristic
• Componentization via Services
• Organized around Business Capabilities
• Products not Projects
• Smart endpoints and dumb pipes
• Decentralized Governance
• Decentralized Data Management
• Infrastructure Automation
• Design for failure
• Evolutionary Design
18. Characteristic
• Componentization via Services
• Organized around Business Capabilities
• Products not Projects
• Smart endpoints and dumb pipes
• Decentralized Governance
• Decentralized Data Management
• Infrastructure Automation
• Design for failure
• Evolutionary Design
