Ch17
- 1. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
WWW.PRENHALL.COM/ROBBINS
T E N T H E D I T I O N
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
- 2. O B J E C T I V E S
AFTER STUDYING THIS CHAPTER,
YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:
1. Contrast job descriptions with job
specifications.
2. List the advantages of performance simulation
tests over written tests.
L E A R N I N G
3. Define four skill categories.
4. Describe how career planning has changed in
the past 20 years.
5. Explain the purposes of performance
evaluation.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
All rights reserved. 17–2
- 3. O B J E C T I V E S (cont’d)
AFTER STUDYING THIS CHAPTER,
YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:
6. Describe actions that can improve the
performance-evaluation process.
7. Clarify how the existence of a union affects
employee behavior.
8. Identify the content in a typical diversity-
training program.
L E A R N I N G
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
All rights reserved. 17–3
- 5. Popular Job Analysis Methods
Popular Job Analysis Methods
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. EXHIBIT 17-1
All rights reserved. 17–5
- 6. Selection Practices- Job Analysis (cont’d)
Selection Practices- Job Analysis (cont’d)
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
All rights reserved. 17–6
- 7. Selection Devices
Selection Devices
Interviews
– Are the most frequently used selection tool.
– Carry a great deal of weight in the selection process.
– Can be biased toward those who “interview well.”
– Should be structured to ensure against distortion due
to interviewers’ biases.
– Are better for assessing applied mental skills,
conscientiousness, interpersonal skills, and person-
organization fit of the applicant.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
All rights reserved. 17–7
- 8. Selection Devices (cont’d)
Selection Devices (cont’d)
Written Tests
– Renewed employer interest in testing applicants for:
• Intelligence: trainable to do the job?
• Aptitude: could do job?
• Ability: can do the job?
• Interest (attitude): would/will do the job?
• Integrity: trust to do the job?
– Tests must be show validated connection to job-related
performance requirements.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
All rights reserved. 17–8
- 9. Selection Devices (cont’d)
Selection Devices (cont’d)
Performance-Simulation Tests
– Based on job-related performance requirements
– Yield validities (correlation with job performance)
superior to written aptitude and personality tests.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
All rights reserved. 17–9
- 10. Training and Development Programs
Training and Development Programs
Basic Literacy
Basic Literacy Technical Skills
Technical Skills
Types of
Types of
Training
Training
Problem Solving
Problem Solving Interpersonal Skills
Interpersonal Skills
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 10
- 11. Individualizing Formal Training to Fit the
Individualizing Formal Training to Fit the
Employee’s Learning Style
Employee’s Learning Style
Readings
Readings Lectures
Lectures
Learning
Learning
Methods
Methods
Participation and
Participation and
Experiential
Experiential Visual Aids
Visual Aids
Exercises
Exercises
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 11
- 12. Career Development Responsibilities
Career Development Responsibilities
Organization Employees
– Clearly communicate – Know yourself.
organization’s goals – Manage your reputation.
and future strategies. – Build and maintain
– Create growth network contacts.
opportunities. – Keep current.
– Offer financial – Balance your generalist
assistance. and specialist
– Provide time for competencies.
employees to learn. – Document your
achievement.
– Keep your options open.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 12
- 13. Performance Evaluation
Performance Evaluation
Purposes of Performance Evaluation
– Making general human resource decisions.
• Promotions, transfers, and terminations
– Identifying training and development needs.
• Employee skills and competencies
– Validating selection and development programs.
• Employee performance compared to selection
evaluation and anticipated performance results of
participation in training.
– Providing feedback to employees.
• The organization’s view of their current performance
– Supplying the basis for rewards allocation decisions.
• Merit pay increases and other rewards
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 13
- 14. Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Performance Evaluation and Motivation
– If employees are to be motivated to perform, then:
• Performance objectives must be clear.
• Performance criteria must be related to the job.
• Performance must be accurately evaluated.
• Performance must be properly rewarded.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 14
- 15. Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
What Do We Evaluate?
Individual Task
Individual Task Behaviors
Behaviors
Outcomes
Outcomes
Performance
Performance
Evaluation
Evaluation
Traits
Traits
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 15
- 16. Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Who Should Do the Evaluating?
Immediate
Supervisor
Peers
Self-Evaluation
Immediate
Subordinates
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 16
- 17. 360-Degree
360-Degree
Evaluations
Evaluations
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. EXHIBIT 17–
17-3
All rights reserved. 17
- 18. Methods of Performance Evaluation
Methods of Performance Evaluation
written essay
A narrative describing an
employee’s strengths,
weaknesses, past
performances, potential, and
suggestions for improvement.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 18
- 19. Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Keeps up with current
policies and regulations.
1 2 3 4 5
X
Completely Fully
Unaware Informed
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 19
- 20. Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Passes next examination
and graduates on time.
Pays close attention and
regularly takes notes.
Alert and takes
occasional notes.
Stays awake but is
inattentive.
Get to class on time,
but nods off immediately.
Oversleeps for class.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 20
- 21. Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Forced Comparisons
– Evaluating one individual’s performance relative to the
performance of another individual or others.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 21
- 22. Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Methods of Performance Evaluation (cont’d)
Forced Comparisons (cont’d)
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 22
- 23. Suggestions for Improving Performance Evaluations
Suggestions for Improving Performance Evaluations
Emphasize behaviors rather than traits.
Emphasize behaviors rather than traits.
Document performance behaviors in a diary.
Document performance behaviors in a diary.
Use multiple evaluators to overcome rater biases.
Use multiple evaluators to overcome rater biases.
Evaluate selectively based on evaluator competence.
Evaluate selectively based on evaluator competence.
Train evaluators to improve rater accuracy.
Train evaluators to improve rater accuracy.
Provide employees with due process.
Provide employees with due process.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 23
- 24. Providing Performance Feedback
Providing Performance Feedback
Why Managers Are Reluctant to Give Feedback
– Uncomfortable discussing performance weaknesses
directly with employees.
– Employees tend to become defensive when their
weaknesses are discussed.
– Employees tend to have an inflated assessment of
their own performance.
Solutions to Improving Feedback
– Train managers in giving effective feedback.
– Use performance review as counseling activity rather
than as a judgment process.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 24
- 25. Providing Performance Feedback (cont’d)
Providing Performance Feedback (cont’d)
What About Team Performance Evaluations?
1. Tie the team’s results to the organization’s goals.
2. Begin with the team’s customers and the work
process the team follows to satisfy customer needs.
3. Measure both team and individual performance.
4. Train the team to create its own measures.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 25
- 26. The Union-Management Interface
The Union-Management Interface
No More Layoffs
More Wages
Better Working
Conditions
Keep
Jobs
Here
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 26
- 27. The Union’s Impact on Employee Performance
The Union’s Impact on Employee Performance
and Job Satisfaction
and Job Satisfaction
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. EXHIBIT 17–
17-4
All rights reserved. 27
- 28. International HR Practices: Selected Issues
International HR Practices: Selected Issues
Selection
– Few common procedures, differ by nation.
Performance Evaluation
– Not emphasized or considered appropriate in many
cultures due to differences in:
• Individualism versus collectivism.
• A person’s relationship to the environment.
• Time orientation (long- or short-term).
• Focus of responsibility.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 28
- 29. Managing Diversity in Organizations
Managing Diversity in Organizations
Work -Life Conflicts
Work -Life Conflicts
Work Integration or Personal
Segmentation Life
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 29
- 33. Managing Diversity in Organizations (cont’)
Managing Diversity in Organizations (cont’)
Diversity Training
– Participants learn to value individual differences,
increase cross-cultural understanding, and confront
stereotypes.
– A typical diversity training program:
• Lasts for half a day to three days.
• Includes role-playing exercises, lectures,
discussions, and sharing experiences.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. 17–
All rights reserved. 33