Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR

DR RANJIT SINGH
DNB TRAINEE
DR RMLIMS
Definition:
Rate at which a substance is cleared from the plasma in unit time by the glomeruli (in
ml/min)
i. Best for assessing excretory renal function
ii. Varies according to age/sex/body surface area (BSA)
iii. Also depends on renal blood flow and pressure
iv. Normal GFR = 125ml/min/1.73m2.
GLOMERULAR FILTERATION RATE:
GLOMERULAR FILTERATION RATE:
GFR declines with age after 40 years at 1ml/min/year due to progressive glomerular
sclerosis.
 Amount of plasma ultrafiltrate formed each minute
 Normal GFR : 125 ml/min ( in a healthy adult of average size)
 Or 7.5 L/hr or 180 L/day
 But urine output : about 1 L/day ( 99 % or more of the filtrate is normally
reabsorbed)
 10% lower in females
Plasma volume (70-kg young adult man) = about 3L
kidneys filter amount of fluid equal to 4 times of TBW, 15 times of ECF volume and
60 times theplasma volume in a day
Direct assessment
(Clearance Tests)
Indirect assessment
from
Substances
 Volume of plasma from which a substance is completely removed by the kidney in a given
amount of time ( usually minutes)
C = UV/P
C = clearance of substance (ml/min)
U=Concentration of substance in urine (mg/dl)
V=Volume of urine per min (ml/min)
P=concentration of substance in plasma (mg/dl)
Ideal agent for clearance studies:
No ideal agent has been found, however the agent used should fulfill most
of the following criteria :
• Distributed freely and instantaneously throughout the extracellular space
• Not bound to plasma proteins
• Freely filtered at the glomerulus
• Not secreted or absorbed at the tubules
• Eliminated wholly by the kidney
• Resistant to degradation
• Easy and inexpansive to measure
Agents used to estimate
GFR
EXOGENOUS COMPOUNDS
1. Inulin
2. 51Cr EDTA
3. DTPA
4. Iohexol
5. Iothalamate
ENOGENOUS COMPOUNDS
1. Creatinine
2. Cystatin C
3. Urea
4. Beta trace protein
5. Beta 2 microglobulin
6. Symmetrical
dimethylarginine
 Gold Standard filtration marker
 Polymer of fructose
 Distribute in ECF, does not bound to plasma proteins, freely filtered at
glomerulus
 Neither reabsorbed nor secreted by renal tubules
Method:
 Bolus dose is administered followed by constant i.v. infusion for maintaining
constant plasma levels
 Timed urine samples are collected and blood samples are obtained at mid
points of urine collection.
Disadvantage:
Rarely used in practice because
1. Time consuming
2. Expensive
3. Difficult to dissolve and maintain into solution
4. Need to maintain steady plasma levels
Normal Values of Inulin clearance:
Males : 125 ml/min/1.73 m2
Females: 110 ml/min/1.73 m2
Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR
 Most commonly used endogenous marker for measuring GFR
 Produced constantly from creatine in muscles
 completely filtered by glomeruli, not bound to plasma proteins, not reabsorbed
 But secreted by tubules
 Does not measure GFR but varies inversely with GFR and so is an indirect
marker of GFR
 Serum creatinine – used in estimation equations
 Urinary creatinine clearance- used to approximate GFR
factors affecting creatinine level
Muscle mass
age, sex, race and physical activity
Injury
rhabdomyolysis
Consumption of non vegetarian ( meat ) diet
factors affecting secretion of creatinine from renal tubules
(a) drugs : pyrimethamine, cimetidine, trimethoprim, dapsone
(b)decreased renal function: secretory procss is saturate when
S creat level exceeds 1.5 to 2 mg/dl
Creatinine clearance:
• 24 hour urine sample is preferred
• First voided sample is discarded, Subsequently all urine
passed is collected in containers. Next morning voided
sample is collected and all containers are sent to laboratory
• A blood sample is obtained at midpoint of urine collection
• Cimetidine which blocks renal secretion can be used to
prevent overestimation
• Final calculation is by the formula UV/P, (with adjustment
of 10% for secretion)
Disadvantages:
• Small amounts of creatinine secreted by renal tubules can
increase further in advanced renal failure
• Affected by intake of meat and muscle mass
• Collection of urine is incomplete/ inaccurate timed urine
collection
• Creatinine levels are affected by drugs such as cimetidine,
probenecid and trimethoprim that block tubular secretion.
• Nonlinear relationship between creatinine and GFR
- Compensatory hyperfiltration of remaining nephrons
- Secretion of creatinine
- Extrarenal elimination of creatinine as GFR declines
 LMW basic protein, produced at constant rate
 Freely filtered by kidney and is not secreted
 reabsorbed at PCT, catabolized and filtered, so can not be used
as a conventional urinary excretory marker for GFR
 Considered as one of the markers of kidney injury
Advantages
1. Independent of sex, muscle mass and age after 12 months of
age
2. Highest in the 1st days of life and stabilize after 1 yr of age
Disadvantages
1.Affected by factors independent of renal function:
corticosteroids use, thyroid dysfunction, obesity,
Smoking, Diabetes, high C reactive protein values.
2.Not suitable for transplant patients
subclinical inflammation and long use of steroids
3. Variation in production
4. Absence of universal assay standardization
5. Not shown superior to estimated eGFR using
Creatinine.
1. Cockcroft-Gault : 1976
2. MDRD equation : 1999
MDRD equation without ethnicity factor
3. CKD-EPI equation : 2009
CKD-EPI cystatin C : 2012
CKD-EPI creatinine- cystatin C : 2012
 Cockcroft – Gault equation:
In 1969, 249 men
estimates creatinine clearance rather than GFR
Overestimates the GFR and should not be used
CrCl ( ml/min) =(140-age)x lean body weight (Kg)/Cr (mg.dl)x 72
 MDRD equation, 1999, 1628 subjects
 S creatinine ( jaffe method)
 Updated MDRD , 2004 ( IDMS
method)
 Compared against a gold standard,
urinary clearance of iothalamate
 Ideal between age group 18- 70 yrs
 Good for estimation if GFR <
60ml/min
 Limitations
Tendency to underestimate GFR
Low accuracy at higher GFR value
 CKD-EPI, 2009, 8254 subject
 Compared against a gold std, urinary
clearance of iothalamate
 Less biased and has greater accuracy
than MDRD equation especialy at higher
GFR
 Good for all age groups
 Updated CKD-EPI : 2012
(i)cystatin C ( not superior to creatinine)
(ii)cystatin C + serum creatinine ( more
accurate than either marker alone)
(A) CHILDREN- Adult GFR equations are inappropriate to asses GFR in children < 9 yrs
Schwartz equation : e GFR = k X L/S creat ( K depends upon age of child)
systematically overestimates GFR
cystatin C : more accurate than creatinine as an indirect marker of renal function in children
(C ) ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY- No steady creatinine state
Creatinine is insensitive to substantial decrease in GFR
needs kinetic estimation of GFR
best to asses for others new biomarkers ( more sensitive and early recognized)
 The current staging system for CKD is largely based on the notion that a
GFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2 is normal;
60–89 ml/min/1.73 m2 is reduced
<60 ml/min/ 1.73 m2 is always abnormal
 This is a rigid approach which ignores biological variability and renal reserve
sufficient enough to meet homeostatic needs.
 The objective evidence for insufficiency of GFR or abnormal kidney function would
hypertension, a blunted erythropoietin axis causing anaemia, disturbed calcium and
phosphate balance causing secondary hyperparathyroidism.
 Homeostatic failure seems to occur with increasing frequency at a GFR < 60
ml/min/1.73 m2 and most obviously at <45 ml/min/ 1.73 m2 [5].
 A low GFR implies a reduced reserve and vulnerability to drug overdosing (especially
with water-soluble drugs that depend on GFR for excretion), and the insults which can
precipitate AKI.
 Structural changes: Increase in sclerotic glomeruli, less glomerular lobulation
 Increase in aglomerular arterioles- shunt from afferent to efferent side
 Thickening of basement membrane
 Hyalinosis of arterioles
 Decrease in glomeruli : Number of glomeruli decrease with age
 More sclerotic glomeruli- compensatory hyperfilteration which cause HTN and further
glomerular injury.
 Reduced permeability, reduced total surface area (fewer intact glomeruli)
 Sporodic Insults: Chronic systemic disease Accelerate renal aeging
 Scarring dur to AKI, Pyelonephritis, Hypotension
 Advanced Glycation End products
 Molecular Mechanisms: Telomere Shortening
 Oxidative Stress
 Impaired vasodilation: more dependent on prostaglandin and NO production for Vasodialation
 Lower creatinine production- decreased
muscle mass.
 Reduced dietary protein intake,
malnourishment reduce creatinine
Levels.
 Plasma creatinine may remain stable
despite loss of GFR in elderly.
 Non linear relationship between serum
creatinine and GFR.
 A numerically similar change in
creatinine indicate far greater
deterioration in kidney function for
patients with better preserved renal
function at baseline.
 Estimated GFR from serum creatinine:
- GFR can be calculated by equations that use age, weight, gender, race as surrogate markers for
creatinine generation.
- Despite ongoing refinements GFR estimates remain imprecise and none of the equations
expected to work well in patients with extreme levels of creatinine generation- ammputees, large
or small individuals, patients with muscle wasting, elderly patients .
- Equation Currently recommended for use:
- CKD EPI 2009- developed in large database including with and without kidney disease, diabetes
and history of organ transplantation. It includes age, race, sex and std creatinine and is accurate
across full range of GFR. 2012 KDIGO guidelines recommend that clinical laboratories use CKD-
EPI to report eGFR for all adults.
- Equations previously recommended for use:
- Cockcroft gault equation estimates CrCl from age, gender, body weight, serum creatinine.
- CG formula has several limitations- it is not precise if GFR is below 60.
- It estimates creatinine clearence rather than GFR therefore expected to over estimate GFR.
- It overestimates CrCl in edematous and obese individuals. In older indviduals will have lower
levels of eGFR according to CG formula.
- MDRD equation- Underestimates the measured GFR in populations with higher levels of GFR
 Estimated eGFR from Serum Cystatin C.
 Cystatin C is less affected by muscle mass than creatinine, but eGFR based on
Serum Cystatin C is not more accurate than eGFR by s.creatinine.. Equations
combining both these filtration markers appear to be more precise than equations
using either marker alone.
 The 2012 CKD – EPI cystatin c and Creatinine- cystatin c equations are
recommended by 2012 KDIGO guidelines.
 Drawbacks- Full implementation will require standardization, greater availability
and cost reduction of cystatin based assays.
 Neither the Cockcroft–Gault nor the 2 most frequently used estimating equations, the MDRD
study equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration equation
were developed in older adults.
 Although the CKD-EPI incorporated approximately 650 participants in this age group .
 These equations are based on serum creatinine levels, which are influenced by alterations in
muscle mass and dietary protein intake as well as by chronic disease (common conditions in older
adults).
 Equations based on cystatin C, an alternative marker of GFR, may be advantageous at older ages.
However, validation studies using a reference method against a gold standard to measure GFR
are scarce.
 Elderly persons have generally been under represented— even in large cross-sectional data sets of
equation development for GFR.
 Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) – to assess kidney function in an elderly population-
based cohort by comparing existing equations with a gold standard measurement
and to derive a novel estimating equation that would estimate GFR more correctly
in persons aged 70 years or older.
 This is clinically relevant because it would lead to less misclassification of persons
 The final BIS2 equation for estimating GFR includes serum creatinine, serum
cystatin C, sex, and age:
 BIS2 = 767 x Cystatin C-0.61 x Creatinine-0.40 x age-0.57 x 0.87(if female)
 For practicability, developed a creatinine-based equation that did not include
cystatin C
 BIS1= 3736 x creatinine-0.87 x age-0.95 x 0.82 (if female).
 BIS includes only white participants with mild to moderately reduced kidney
function; thus, we can- not necessarily extend these results to other ethnicities or to
patients with more severe kidney function
 Iohexol measurements revealed lower GFRs than predicted by BIS equations used
to estimate GFR in participants aged 70 years or older who have normal or mild to
moderately reduced kidney function.
 The newly developed BIS equations may provide more precise and accurate tools for
estimating GFR in elderly age group.
Conclusions
• Serum creatinine concentration is an insensitive measure for evaluating renal function in the elderly
because it correlated poorly with the gold stand.
• Estimating the GFR based on serum cystatin C concentration has not been studied extensively in the
elderly.
• Based on the available studies, it is not possible to say which of these two formulas is better for
evaluating renal function in people aged 65 years and older.
• Guideline made no specific suggestions or recommendations for use of any markers in the elderly.
• However, because serum cystatin C is less dependent on muscle mass than serum creatinine and is
virtually completely cleared from the circulation by glomerular filtration with subsequent proximal
tubular uptake and degradation, it is generally considered as an ideal alternate marker of kidney
function, particularly in older individuals.
• Cystatin C in combination with creatinine appears to be superior in estimating GFR and needs to be
considered in special circumstances.
• BIS equations appear to be the more accurate in estimating GFR in the elderly but there is not yet any
recommendation for an eGFR equation specific to this age group.
1 de 28

Recomendados

Renal function tests por
Renal function testsRenal function tests
Renal function testsMalini Garg
7.1K vistas90 diapositivas
limitation and scope.pptx por
limitation and scope.pptxlimitation and scope.pptx
limitation and scope.pptxroshanchanchlani
7 vistas32 diapositivas
Cystatin c por
Cystatin cCystatin c
Cystatin cBrijesh Mukherjee
3.2K vistas35 diapositivas
Rft por
RftRft
RftKrishna Kishore
12K vistas92 diapositivas
Interpretation of renal diagnostic tests por
Interpretation of renal diagnostic testsInterpretation of renal diagnostic tests
Interpretation of renal diagnostic testsChristos Argyropoulos
6.5K vistas77 diapositivas
KIDNEY FUNCTION TEST por
KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTKIDNEY FUNCTION TEST
KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTPremal Vaghela
139 vistas79 diapositivas

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR

Pharmacotherapy of renal failure por
Pharmacotherapy of renal  failurePharmacotherapy of renal  failure
Pharmacotherapy of renal failureMuhammed Rashid Ak
641 vistas37 diapositivas
Kidney function test por
Kidney function testKidney function test
Kidney function testVenkata Karthik
1.2K vistas37 diapositivas
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure por
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failureDose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failurePallavi Kurra
70K vistas49 diapositivas
Kideny function test por
Kideny function testKideny function test
Kideny function testMuhammad Muneer Shad Karachi Pakistan
911 vistas35 diapositivas
Mesurement of GFR and creatinine clearence por
Mesurement of GFR and creatinine clearenceMesurement of GFR and creatinine clearence
Mesurement of GFR and creatinine clearencepavithra vinayak
3.2K vistas24 diapositivas
Renal function test por
Renal function test   Renal function test
Renal function test docmveg
20.1K vistas43 diapositivas

Similar a Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR(20)

Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure por Pallavi Kurra
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failureDose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
Pallavi Kurra70K vistas
Mesurement of GFR and creatinine clearence por pavithra vinayak
Mesurement of GFR and creatinine clearenceMesurement of GFR and creatinine clearence
Mesurement of GFR and creatinine clearence
pavithra vinayak3.2K vistas
Renal function test por docmveg
Renal function test   Renal function test
Renal function test
docmveg20.1K vistas
Renal function test por apeksha40
Renal function testRenal function test
Renal function test
apeksha401.1K vistas
Kidney function test por beedkar
Kidney function testKidney function test
Kidney function test
beedkar685 vistas
Renal Disease biochemical investigation.pdf por Mohamed Afifi
Renal Disease biochemical investigation.pdfRenal Disease biochemical investigation.pdf
Renal Disease biochemical investigation.pdf
Mohamed Afifi24 vistas
INTERPRETATION OF RENAL FUNCTION TESTS.pdf por samthamby79
INTERPRETATION OF RENAL FUNCTION TESTS.pdfINTERPRETATION OF RENAL FUNCTION TESTS.pdf
INTERPRETATION OF RENAL FUNCTION TESTS.pdf
samthamby79152 vistas
E Gfr 2008 por atbeat
E Gfr  2008E Gfr  2008
E Gfr 2008
atbeat2.7K vistas
Renal Function tests.pdf por EdwinOkon1
Renal Function tests.pdfRenal Function tests.pdf
Renal Function tests.pdf
EdwinOkon127 vistas
GFR ,plasma load,clearence,ACR,CCR,eGFR by dr.Tasnim por dr Tasnim
GFR ,plasma load,clearence,ACR,CCR,eGFR by dr.TasnimGFR ,plasma load,clearence,ACR,CCR,eGFR by dr.Tasnim
GFR ,plasma load,clearence,ACR,CCR,eGFR by dr.Tasnim
dr Tasnim2.4K vistas
Chronic Kidney Disease por medtutor
Chronic Kidney DiseaseChronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease
medtutor5.7K vistas

Último

Opportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdf por
Opportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdfOpportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdf
Opportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdfRIPE NCC
9 vistas12 diapositivas
𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲 por
𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲
𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲Infosec train
7 vistas6 diapositivas
informing ideas.docx por
informing ideas.docxinforming ideas.docx
informing ideas.docxMollyBrown86
12 vistas10 diapositivas
zotabet.pdf por
zotabet.pdfzotabet.pdf
zotabet.pdfzotabetcasino
6 vistas1 diapositiva
IETF 118: Starlink Protocol Performance por
IETF 118: Starlink Protocol PerformanceIETF 118: Starlink Protocol Performance
IETF 118: Starlink Protocol PerformanceAPNIC
124 vistas22 diapositivas
WEB 2.O TOOLS: Empowering education.pptx por
WEB 2.O TOOLS: Empowering education.pptxWEB 2.O TOOLS: Empowering education.pptx
WEB 2.O TOOLS: Empowering education.pptxnarmadhamanohar21
15 vistas16 diapositivas

Último(20)

Opportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdf por RIPE NCC
Opportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdfOpportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdf
Opportunities for Youth in IG - Alena Muravska RIPE NCC.pdf
RIPE NCC9 vistas
𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲 por Infosec train
𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲
𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲
Infosec train7 vistas
IETF 118: Starlink Protocol Performance por APNIC
IETF 118: Starlink Protocol PerformanceIETF 118: Starlink Protocol Performance
IETF 118: Starlink Protocol Performance
APNIC124 vistas
We see everywhere that many people are talking about technology.docx por ssuserc5935b
We see everywhere that many people are talking about technology.docxWe see everywhere that many people are talking about technology.docx
We see everywhere that many people are talking about technology.docx
ssuserc5935b6 vistas
google forms survey (1).pptx por MollyBrown86
google forms survey (1).pptxgoogle forms survey (1).pptx
google forms survey (1).pptx
MollyBrown8614 vistas
Existing documentaries (1).docx por MollyBrown86
Existing documentaries (1).docxExisting documentaries (1).docx
Existing documentaries (1).docx
MollyBrown8613 vistas
Serverless cloud architecture patterns por Jimmy Dahlqvist
Serverless cloud architecture patternsServerless cloud architecture patterns
Serverless cloud architecture patterns
Jimmy Dahlqvist17 vistas
AI Powered event-driven translation bot por Jimmy Dahlqvist
AI Powered event-driven translation botAI Powered event-driven translation bot
AI Powered event-driven translation bot
Jimmy Dahlqvist16 vistas
PORTFOLIO 1 (Bret Michael Pepito).pdf por brejess0410
PORTFOLIO 1 (Bret Michael Pepito).pdfPORTFOLIO 1 (Bret Michael Pepito).pdf
PORTFOLIO 1 (Bret Michael Pepito).pdf
brejess04107 vistas
IGF UA - Dialog with I_ organisations - Alena Muavska RIPE NCC.pdf por RIPE NCC
IGF UA - Dialog with I_ organisations - Alena Muavska RIPE NCC.pdfIGF UA - Dialog with I_ organisations - Alena Muavska RIPE NCC.pdf
IGF UA - Dialog with I_ organisations - Alena Muavska RIPE NCC.pdf
RIPE NCC15 vistas

Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR

  • 1. DR RANJIT SINGH DNB TRAINEE DR RMLIMS
  • 2. Definition: Rate at which a substance is cleared from the plasma in unit time by the glomeruli (in ml/min) i. Best for assessing excretory renal function ii. Varies according to age/sex/body surface area (BSA) iii. Also depends on renal blood flow and pressure iv. Normal GFR = 125ml/min/1.73m2. GLOMERULAR FILTERATION RATE: GLOMERULAR FILTERATION RATE: GFR declines with age after 40 years at 1ml/min/year due to progressive glomerular sclerosis.
  • 3.  Amount of plasma ultrafiltrate formed each minute  Normal GFR : 125 ml/min ( in a healthy adult of average size)  Or 7.5 L/hr or 180 L/day  But urine output : about 1 L/day ( 99 % or more of the filtrate is normally reabsorbed)  10% lower in females Plasma volume (70-kg young adult man) = about 3L kidneys filter amount of fluid equal to 4 times of TBW, 15 times of ECF volume and 60 times theplasma volume in a day
  • 4. Direct assessment (Clearance Tests) Indirect assessment from Substances
  • 5.  Volume of plasma from which a substance is completely removed by the kidney in a given amount of time ( usually minutes) C = UV/P C = clearance of substance (ml/min) U=Concentration of substance in urine (mg/dl) V=Volume of urine per min (ml/min) P=concentration of substance in plasma (mg/dl)
  • 6. Ideal agent for clearance studies: No ideal agent has been found, however the agent used should fulfill most of the following criteria : • Distributed freely and instantaneously throughout the extracellular space • Not bound to plasma proteins • Freely filtered at the glomerulus • Not secreted or absorbed at the tubules • Eliminated wholly by the kidney • Resistant to degradation • Easy and inexpansive to measure
  • 7. Agents used to estimate GFR EXOGENOUS COMPOUNDS 1. Inulin 2. 51Cr EDTA 3. DTPA 4. Iohexol 5. Iothalamate ENOGENOUS COMPOUNDS 1. Creatinine 2. Cystatin C 3. Urea 4. Beta trace protein 5. Beta 2 microglobulin 6. Symmetrical dimethylarginine
  • 8.  Gold Standard filtration marker  Polymer of fructose  Distribute in ECF, does not bound to plasma proteins, freely filtered at glomerulus  Neither reabsorbed nor secreted by renal tubules Method:  Bolus dose is administered followed by constant i.v. infusion for maintaining constant plasma levels  Timed urine samples are collected and blood samples are obtained at mid points of urine collection.
  • 9. Disadvantage: Rarely used in practice because 1. Time consuming 2. Expensive 3. Difficult to dissolve and maintain into solution 4. Need to maintain steady plasma levels Normal Values of Inulin clearance: Males : 125 ml/min/1.73 m2 Females: 110 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • 11.  Most commonly used endogenous marker for measuring GFR  Produced constantly from creatine in muscles  completely filtered by glomeruli, not bound to plasma proteins, not reabsorbed  But secreted by tubules  Does not measure GFR but varies inversely with GFR and so is an indirect marker of GFR  Serum creatinine – used in estimation equations  Urinary creatinine clearance- used to approximate GFR
  • 12. factors affecting creatinine level Muscle mass age, sex, race and physical activity Injury rhabdomyolysis Consumption of non vegetarian ( meat ) diet factors affecting secretion of creatinine from renal tubules (a) drugs : pyrimethamine, cimetidine, trimethoprim, dapsone (b)decreased renal function: secretory procss is saturate when S creat level exceeds 1.5 to 2 mg/dl
  • 13. Creatinine clearance: • 24 hour urine sample is preferred • First voided sample is discarded, Subsequently all urine passed is collected in containers. Next morning voided sample is collected and all containers are sent to laboratory • A blood sample is obtained at midpoint of urine collection • Cimetidine which blocks renal secretion can be used to prevent overestimation • Final calculation is by the formula UV/P, (with adjustment of 10% for secretion)
  • 14. Disadvantages: • Small amounts of creatinine secreted by renal tubules can increase further in advanced renal failure • Affected by intake of meat and muscle mass • Collection of urine is incomplete/ inaccurate timed urine collection • Creatinine levels are affected by drugs such as cimetidine, probenecid and trimethoprim that block tubular secretion. • Nonlinear relationship between creatinine and GFR - Compensatory hyperfiltration of remaining nephrons - Secretion of creatinine - Extrarenal elimination of creatinine as GFR declines
  • 15.  LMW basic protein, produced at constant rate  Freely filtered by kidney and is not secreted  reabsorbed at PCT, catabolized and filtered, so can not be used as a conventional urinary excretory marker for GFR  Considered as one of the markers of kidney injury Advantages 1. Independent of sex, muscle mass and age after 12 months of age 2. Highest in the 1st days of life and stabilize after 1 yr of age
  • 16. Disadvantages 1.Affected by factors independent of renal function: corticosteroids use, thyroid dysfunction, obesity, Smoking, Diabetes, high C reactive protein values. 2.Not suitable for transplant patients subclinical inflammation and long use of steroids 3. Variation in production 4. Absence of universal assay standardization 5. Not shown superior to estimated eGFR using Creatinine.
  • 17. 1. Cockcroft-Gault : 1976 2. MDRD equation : 1999 MDRD equation without ethnicity factor 3. CKD-EPI equation : 2009 CKD-EPI cystatin C : 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine- cystatin C : 2012
  • 18.  Cockcroft – Gault equation: In 1969, 249 men estimates creatinine clearance rather than GFR Overestimates the GFR and should not be used CrCl ( ml/min) =(140-age)x lean body weight (Kg)/Cr (mg.dl)x 72
  • 19.  MDRD equation, 1999, 1628 subjects  S creatinine ( jaffe method)  Updated MDRD , 2004 ( IDMS method)  Compared against a gold standard, urinary clearance of iothalamate  Ideal between age group 18- 70 yrs  Good for estimation if GFR < 60ml/min  Limitations Tendency to underestimate GFR Low accuracy at higher GFR value  CKD-EPI, 2009, 8254 subject  Compared against a gold std, urinary clearance of iothalamate  Less biased and has greater accuracy than MDRD equation especialy at higher GFR  Good for all age groups  Updated CKD-EPI : 2012 (i)cystatin C ( not superior to creatinine) (ii)cystatin C + serum creatinine ( more accurate than either marker alone)
  • 20. (A) CHILDREN- Adult GFR equations are inappropriate to asses GFR in children < 9 yrs Schwartz equation : e GFR = k X L/S creat ( K depends upon age of child) systematically overestimates GFR cystatin C : more accurate than creatinine as an indirect marker of renal function in children (C ) ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY- No steady creatinine state Creatinine is insensitive to substantial decrease in GFR needs kinetic estimation of GFR best to asses for others new biomarkers ( more sensitive and early recognized)
  • 21.  The current staging system for CKD is largely based on the notion that a GFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2 is normal; 60–89 ml/min/1.73 m2 is reduced <60 ml/min/ 1.73 m2 is always abnormal  This is a rigid approach which ignores biological variability and renal reserve sufficient enough to meet homeostatic needs.  The objective evidence for insufficiency of GFR or abnormal kidney function would hypertension, a blunted erythropoietin axis causing anaemia, disturbed calcium and phosphate balance causing secondary hyperparathyroidism.  Homeostatic failure seems to occur with increasing frequency at a GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and most obviously at <45 ml/min/ 1.73 m2 [5].  A low GFR implies a reduced reserve and vulnerability to drug overdosing (especially with water-soluble drugs that depend on GFR for excretion), and the insults which can precipitate AKI.
  • 22.  Structural changes: Increase in sclerotic glomeruli, less glomerular lobulation  Increase in aglomerular arterioles- shunt from afferent to efferent side  Thickening of basement membrane  Hyalinosis of arterioles  Decrease in glomeruli : Number of glomeruli decrease with age  More sclerotic glomeruli- compensatory hyperfilteration which cause HTN and further glomerular injury.  Reduced permeability, reduced total surface area (fewer intact glomeruli)  Sporodic Insults: Chronic systemic disease Accelerate renal aeging  Scarring dur to AKI, Pyelonephritis, Hypotension  Advanced Glycation End products  Molecular Mechanisms: Telomere Shortening  Oxidative Stress  Impaired vasodilation: more dependent on prostaglandin and NO production for Vasodialation
  • 23.  Lower creatinine production- decreased muscle mass.  Reduced dietary protein intake, malnourishment reduce creatinine Levels.  Plasma creatinine may remain stable despite loss of GFR in elderly.  Non linear relationship between serum creatinine and GFR.  A numerically similar change in creatinine indicate far greater deterioration in kidney function for patients with better preserved renal function at baseline.
  • 24.  Estimated GFR from serum creatinine: - GFR can be calculated by equations that use age, weight, gender, race as surrogate markers for creatinine generation. - Despite ongoing refinements GFR estimates remain imprecise and none of the equations expected to work well in patients with extreme levels of creatinine generation- ammputees, large or small individuals, patients with muscle wasting, elderly patients . - Equation Currently recommended for use: - CKD EPI 2009- developed in large database including with and without kidney disease, diabetes and history of organ transplantation. It includes age, race, sex and std creatinine and is accurate across full range of GFR. 2012 KDIGO guidelines recommend that clinical laboratories use CKD- EPI to report eGFR for all adults. - Equations previously recommended for use: - Cockcroft gault equation estimates CrCl from age, gender, body weight, serum creatinine. - CG formula has several limitations- it is not precise if GFR is below 60. - It estimates creatinine clearence rather than GFR therefore expected to over estimate GFR. - It overestimates CrCl in edematous and obese individuals. In older indviduals will have lower levels of eGFR according to CG formula. - MDRD equation- Underestimates the measured GFR in populations with higher levels of GFR
  • 25.  Estimated eGFR from Serum Cystatin C.  Cystatin C is less affected by muscle mass than creatinine, but eGFR based on Serum Cystatin C is not more accurate than eGFR by s.creatinine.. Equations combining both these filtration markers appear to be more precise than equations using either marker alone.  The 2012 CKD – EPI cystatin c and Creatinine- cystatin c equations are recommended by 2012 KDIGO guidelines.  Drawbacks- Full implementation will require standardization, greater availability and cost reduction of cystatin based assays.
  • 26.  Neither the Cockcroft–Gault nor the 2 most frequently used estimating equations, the MDRD study equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration equation were developed in older adults.  Although the CKD-EPI incorporated approximately 650 participants in this age group .  These equations are based on serum creatinine levels, which are influenced by alterations in muscle mass and dietary protein intake as well as by chronic disease (common conditions in older adults).  Equations based on cystatin C, an alternative marker of GFR, may be advantageous at older ages. However, validation studies using a reference method against a gold standard to measure GFR are scarce.  Elderly persons have generally been under represented— even in large cross-sectional data sets of equation development for GFR.
  • 27.  Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) – to assess kidney function in an elderly population- based cohort by comparing existing equations with a gold standard measurement and to derive a novel estimating equation that would estimate GFR more correctly in persons aged 70 years or older.  This is clinically relevant because it would lead to less misclassification of persons  The final BIS2 equation for estimating GFR includes serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, sex, and age:  BIS2 = 767 x Cystatin C-0.61 x Creatinine-0.40 x age-0.57 x 0.87(if female)  For practicability, developed a creatinine-based equation that did not include cystatin C  BIS1= 3736 x creatinine-0.87 x age-0.95 x 0.82 (if female).  BIS includes only white participants with mild to moderately reduced kidney function; thus, we can- not necessarily extend these results to other ethnicities or to patients with more severe kidney function  Iohexol measurements revealed lower GFRs than predicted by BIS equations used to estimate GFR in participants aged 70 years or older who have normal or mild to moderately reduced kidney function.  The newly developed BIS equations may provide more precise and accurate tools for estimating GFR in elderly age group.
  • 28. Conclusions • Serum creatinine concentration is an insensitive measure for evaluating renal function in the elderly because it correlated poorly with the gold stand. • Estimating the GFR based on serum cystatin C concentration has not been studied extensively in the elderly. • Based on the available studies, it is not possible to say which of these two formulas is better for evaluating renal function in people aged 65 years and older. • Guideline made no specific suggestions or recommendations for use of any markers in the elderly. • However, because serum cystatin C is less dependent on muscle mass than serum creatinine and is virtually completely cleared from the circulation by glomerular filtration with subsequent proximal tubular uptake and degradation, it is generally considered as an ideal alternate marker of kidney function, particularly in older individuals. • Cystatin C in combination with creatinine appears to be superior in estimating GFR and needs to be considered in special circumstances. • BIS equations appear to be the more accurate in estimating GFR in the elderly but there is not yet any recommendation for an eGFR equation specific to this age group.