3-The SHARE main objective

3. The main objective of SHARE

The main objective of SHARE ,[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],The main objective of SHARE

Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) & SHARE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) & SHARE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

MCA: how does it work? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT ,[object Object],PROBLEM 1. Identification of objectives and stakeholders involved ,[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],1. Identification of objectives and stakeholders involved

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT NO WATER ABSTRACTION WATER ABSTRACTION as required from HP project WATER ABSTRACTION limited to 80% of amount required from HP project ,[object Object],Identify different possible management ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVES PROBLEM 2. Identification of different alternatives ,[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],2. Identification of different alternatives

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT NO WATER ABSTRACTION AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION as required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION limited to 80% of amount required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH ,[object Object],Alternatives are detailed by one or more CAUSAL FACTORS Identify different possible management ALTERNATIVES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ALTERNATIVES PROBLEM 2. Identification of different alternatives ,[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],2. Identification of different alternatives

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT HP PRODUCTION OTHER CRITERION RIVER CONSERVATION NO WATER ABSTRACTION AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION as required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION limited to 80% of amount required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH ,[object Object],[object Object],Alternatives are detailed by one or more CAUSAL FACTORS Identify different possible management ALTERNATIVES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ALTERNATIVES SYSTEM DESCRIPTION PROBLEM 3. Identification of criteria and indicators ,[object Object]

3. Identification of criteria and indicators ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT HP PRODUCTION OTHER CRITERION RIVER CONSERVATION ANNUAL POWER PRODUCED LIM FISH FAUNA INDICATOR x INDICATOR y IBE MACROPHYTES NO WATER ABSTRACTION AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION as required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION limited to 80% of amount required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH POWER INSTALLED ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Alternatives are detailed by one or more CAUSAL FACTORS Identify different possible management ALTERNATIVES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ALTERNATIVES SYSTEM DESCRIPTION PROBLEM 3. Identification of criteria and indicators ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

4. Assessment of Utility Functions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

4. Assessment of Utility Functions ,[object Object],[object Object],PRESENCE OF VULNERABLE SYSTEMATIC UNITS ( VSU )= it considers the presence of one or more sensitive systematic units according to the indications and the order indicated in the Chart. NUMBER OF SYSTEMATIC UNITS ( NSU )= total number of systematic units that compose the benthic macroinvertebrate community; Faunistic Groups Total number of Systematic Units (U.S.) constituting the community 0 - 1 2 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 35 Plecoptera ( Leuctra° ) More than one U.S. / / 8 9 10 11 12 13 Only one U.S. / / 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ephemeroptera (Baetidae and Caenidae°°) More than one U.S. / / 7 8 9 10 11 12 Only one U.S. / / 6 7 8 9 10 11 Tricoptera More than one U.S. / 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Only one U.S. / 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gammaridae, Attidae, Palemonidae All the below U.S. absent / 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Asellidae All the below U.S. absent / 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Oligochaeta o Chironomidae All the below U.S. absent 1 2 3 4 5 / / / All the previous Taxa absent There could be some organisms with aerial respiration 0 1 / / / / / /

4. Assessment of Utility Functions ,[object Object],IBE Quality Ranks ,[object Object],LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 I.B.E. (score) > 10 8 – 9 6 – 7 4 – 5 1, 2, 3 INDICATOR INDICATOR VALUE VALUATION IBE < 3,5 BAD IBE 3,5 - 5,5 SUBSTANDARD IBE 5,5 - 7,5 SUFFICIENT IBE 7,5 - 9,5 GOOD IBE > 9,5 HIGH

4. Assessment of Utility Functions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Max value of the indicator (typically corresponding to the Reference Status) UF max value INDICATOR INDICATOR VALUE NORMALISED SCORE VALUATION IBE < 3,5 0 BAD IBE 3,5-5,5 0,25 SUBSTANDARD IBE 5,5-7,5 0,50 SUFFICIENT IBE 7,5-9,5 0,75 GOOD IBE >9,5 1 HIGH

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT HP PRODUCTION OTHER CRITERION RIVER CONSERVATION ANNUAL POWER PRODUCED LIM FISH FAUNA INDICATOR x INDICATOR y IBE MACROPHYTES NO WATER ABSTRACTION AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION as required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION limited to 80% of amount required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH 0,1 0,1 0,3 0,5 0,8 0,7 0,3 0,2 POWER INSTALLED 0,4 0,4 0,2 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Assign a WEIGHT to each indicator / criterion indicating its importance in relation to the others Alternatives are detailed by one or more CAUSAL FACTORS Identify different possible management ALTERNATIVES RELATIVE IMPORTANCE ASSESSMENT EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ALTERNATIVES SYSTEM DESCRIPTION PROBLEM 5. Criteria weighting ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

(0.66*0.50) + (0.33*0.75)=0.577 CRITERION STATUS INDICATORS SUB-NDICATORS weight indicator value weight indicator value

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT HP PRODUCTION OTHER CRITERION RIVER CONSERVATION ANNUAL POWER PRODUCED LIM FISH FAUNA INDICATOR x INDICATOR y IBE MACROPHYTES NO WATER ABSTRACTION AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION as required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION limited to 80% of amount required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH 0,1 0,1 0,3 0,5 0,8 0,7 0,3 0,2 POWER INSTALLED 0,4 0,4 0,2 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Assign a WEIGHT to each indicator / criterion indicating its importance in relation to the others ,[object Object],Alternatives are detailed by one or more CAUSAL FACTORS Identify different possible management ALTERNATIVES RELATIVE IMPORTANCE ASSESSMENT EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ALTERNATIVES SYSTEM DESCRIPTION PROBLEM 6. “Performance” evaluation of each alternative ,[object Object]

page Graz - Austria, 9th April 2010 i.e. NEW HP PLANT HP PRODUCTION OTHER CRITERION RIVER CONSERVATION ANNUAL POWER PRODUCED LIM FISH FAUNA INDICATOR x INDICATOR y IBE MACROPHYTES NO WATER ABSTRACTION AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION as required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH WATER ABSTRACTION limited to 80% of amount required from HP project AVERAGE RESIDUAL INSTREAM FLOW RIVER LENGTH 0,1 0,1 0,3 0,5 0,8 0,7 0,3 0,2 POWER INSTALLED 0,4 0,4 0,2 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Assign a WEIGHT to each indicator / criterion indicating its importance in relation to the others ,[object Object],Alternatives are detailed by one or more CAUSAL FACTORS Identify different possible management ALTERNATIVES RELATIVE IMPORTANCE ASSESSMENT EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ALTERNATIVES SYSTEM DESCRIPTION PROBLEM Summarizing..

7. Sensitivity Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Why to use multi-criteria analysis? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

3-The SHARE main objective

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado

Destacado (20)

Similar a 3-The SHARE main objective

Similar a 3-The SHARE main objective (20)

Más de SHAREPROJECT

Más de SHAREPROJECT (20)

Último

Último (20)

3-The SHARE main objective