Assessing the economic and environmental benefits adusumilli
1. Assessing the Economic and Environmental Benefits
and Costs of Cover Crops in Cotton Production
System in Northwest Louisiana
Naveen Adusumilli, Water Economist, LSU Agricultural Center,
nadusumilli@agcenter.lsu.edu
Daniel Fromme, Corn and Cotton Specialist, LSU Agricultural Center,
DFromme@agcenter.lsu.edu
71st SWCS International Annual Conference
July 24-27, 2016. Louisville, KY
2. The Tool…
• Cover crop economics tool, an excel spreadsheet based economic
assessment tool (NRCS)
Cost categories Benefit categories
• Cover crop seed • Nutrient credits
• Planting • Chemical inputs reduction
• Termination • Yield increase
• Management • Reduced erosion
• Long term soil fertility improvement
• Long term improved water storage and
infiltration capacity of soils
• Net Present Value is used to estimate long-term profitability
3. Cover Crop data
Study title Year Study duration Location Soil type
The long term effects of winter cover crops on
cotton production in Northwest Louisiana
1991 1973-1988 Bossier City, LA Sandy Loam
Tillage and cover crops affect cotton growth and
yield and soil organic matter
1997 1987-1996 Winnsboro, LA Silt loam
Effects of tillage systems and winter cover crops
on yield and maturity of cotton on a loess soil in
Northeast Louisiana
1993 1987-1992 Winnsboro, LA Silt Loam
Cotton yield and growth responses to tillage
and cover crops on sharkey clay
1993 1989-1992 St. Joseph, LA Sharkey clay
4. Erosion reduction calculation!
• Value of soil productivity for the Delta states (Louisiana, Arkansas,
and Mississippi) as $0.43/ton, estimated in 1990 dollars, which is
$0.71/ton in 2015 dollars
• Value of reduced costs of removing sediments is $0.12/ton in 2007
dollars, which is $0.14/ton in 2015 dollars
• Annual soil loss per acre per year in Louisiana, which is 2.32
tons/acre/year
Hansen L, Ribaudo M (2008) Economic measures of soil conservation benefits. TB-1922. Economic Research Service, USDA.
5. No Till vs Conventional Till
Study
duration
Location Soil type
Cover
crop(s)
evaluated
Costs of
planting and
terminating
cover crops,
$/acre
Benefits, $/acre
Short-term Long-term Total Net
1987-
1996
Winnsboro
, LA
Silt loam
Hairy
vetch
No Till $62 $52 $38 $90 $28
C-Till $84 $14 $32 $46 -$38
1987-
1992
Winnsboro
, LA
Silt Loam
Hairy
vetch
No Till $65 $61 $32 $93 $28
C-Till $85 $41 $40 $81 -$4
6. Study
duration
Location Soil type
Cover
crop(s)
evaluated
Costs of
planting and
terminating
cover crops,
$/acre
Benefits,$/acre
Short-ter
m
Long-term Total Net
1989-
1992
St. Joseph,
LA
Sharkey
clay
Hairy
vetch
No-Till $70 $48 $12 $60 -$10
C-Till $83 $123 $11 $135 $52
1973-
1988
Bossier City,
LA
Sandy
Loam
Hairy
vetch
No-Till
C-Till $120 $139 $30 $169 $49
No Till vs Conventional Till
7. The Tool…
• Cover crop economics tool, an excel spreadsheet based economic
assessment tool (NRCS)
Cost categories Benefit categories
• Cover crop seed • Nutrient credits
• Planting • Chemical inputs reduction
• Termination • Yield increase
• Management • Reduced erosion
• Long term soil fertility improvement
• Long term improved water storage and
infiltration capacity of soils
• Net Present Value is used to estimate long-term profitability
8. What’s next!!!
• A choice to have tillage system benefit accounted
• Do these benefits vary by soil type – Could Be!!
• Moisture retention benefit premium by soil type, tillage
system, and cover crop
• Carbon benefit premium by cover crop, tillage system
9. What can change!!!
• Unified message is missing!!
• In face of climate challenges a cost-share structure that recognizes
agronomic and environmental benefits
• Currently, the national program relies on covering production related
costs. In most cases, that incentive amounts to $70 per acre.
• A recent change has increased the period of participation for
farmers from three years to five years.
• Although such improvements can be useful, a comprehensive
approach in developing incentive payments accounting for the on-
site and off-site benefits is needed.