Hi FI Call Girl Ahmedabad 7397865700 Independent Call Girls
July 29-350-Pranay Ranjan
1. Explaining the use of
online agricultural
decision support tools
with weather or climate
information in the
Midwestern United States
1
Pranay Ranjan, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Research Associate
Purdue University
Email: ranjanp@purdue.edu
Junyu Lu, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Research Associate
Purdue University
Email: lu727@purdue.edu
2. Background
Increasingly variable weather patterns due
to climate change significantly impact
agricultural productivity
Agricultural decision support tools (DSTs)
can reduce risks and uncertainty
A variety of online agricultural DSTs have
been developed from different sources
Adoption rate of DSTs is low
2
3. Decision support tools from different sources
Climate FieldView™ MyDTNTM
Pioneer Field360
ISU Corn Nitrogen Calculator
UNL CornSoyWater
Subscription or
purchased
weather/climate tools
Free and publicly
available
weather/climate
information provided
by a company
Free weather/climate
services provided by
a university or
government agency
including Extension
3
4. The Theory of Planned Behavior
Intention
Attitude towards the
behavior
Subjective
norms
Perceived behavior
control
Descriptive
social norms
Injunctive
social norms
Behavior
(Ajzen, 1988, 1991; Fishbein & Ajzen, 2010)
Intervening
factors
4
5. Adoption
of DSTs
Attitude towards DSTs
Concerns about weather or climate
affecting farm management
Climate change beliefs
Perceived risks of
climate variability
Adaptation attitude
towards climate change
Social-demographic
characteristics (e.g., age,
gender, year of farming/working,
education, farm size)
General propensity to
adopt a new technology
Descriptive social norm
and reference group
Injunctive social norm and
reference group
Perceived behavioral control to deal
with weather-related risks and threats
The
Theory of
Planned
Behavior
Perception
and belief
Personal
Characteristics
5
6. Research Questions
What percentage of farmers and advisors use online
DSTs?
Do farmers and advisors differ significantly with
respect to their use of online DSTs?
What factors significantly influence the use of online
DSTs?
6
7. Methods
Farmer’s Survey (Mailed
Questionnaire)
Distribution time: June 14, 2016 to
October 7, 2016
Targets: corn producers in 12 states
Survey sent out: 6,840; Response rate:
39.1%
Advisor’s Survey (Online
Questionnaire)
Distribution time: November 7, 2016 to
December 14, 2016
Targets: all relevant agricultural
advisors in 12 states, including crop
advisors, agricultural extension
employees, agronomist, conservation
employee, etc.
Survey sent out: 10,760; Response
rate: 29.0%
Maps credit: Prokopy et al., 2017 7
9. Percentage of respondents using DSTs
47%
23%
31%
17%
80%
67%
49%
19%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Any of above three providers
Free weather/climate services provided by a university or
government agency including Extension (e.g., ISU corn
nitrogen rate calculator, UMissouri Nitrogen Watch,
UNL CornSoyWater, etc.)
Free and publicly available weather/climate information
provided by a company (e.g., FieldViewTM Prime,
Pioneer360 tools, etc.)
Subscription or purchased weather/climate tools (e.g.,
MyDTNTM, Fieldview Plus or Pro, etc.)
Advisors Farmers
Hypothesis
Testing
p-value
0.114
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Dependent
Variable
9
10. Theory of Planned Behavior & DST usage
3.07
3.04
3.4
3.56
3.14
3.9
3.59
3.87
2.5 3 3.5 4
I have the knowledge and technical
skill to deal with any weather-related
threats to the viability of my farm
operation [to my clients’ farms].
I want to meet the expectations of
others [my clients’expectations] when
it comes to using decision support tools
with weather or climate information.
Other farmers [advisors] like me are
using decision support tools with
weather or climate information to help
with farm decisions [in their advising
work].
When farmers [advisors] use tools with
weather or climate information to aid
decisions, it can result in better farm
outcomes (related to yield, profit,
and/or the environment).
Advisors Farmers
Attitude
towards the
use of DSTs
Descriptive
social norm
and reference
group
Injunctive
social norm
and reference
group
Perceived
behavioral
control
MWW test
p-value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.011
Note: the scale of those items is 1: Strongly disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither agree nor disagree, 4: Agree, and 5: Strongly agree;
the statements listed in bracket are for advisors. 10
11. Concerns about weather or climate affecting
farm management
Perceived risks of climate variability
Note: the scale of those items is 1: Strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: Neither agree nor disagree, 4: Agree, and 5: Strongly agree
2.96
3.51
3.51
3.13
3.66
3.76
2.5 3 3.5 4
Changes in weather patterns are hurting my
farm operation [the operations of farmers I
advise].
In the past 5 years, I have noticed more
variable/unusual weather across the Corn
Belt.
In the past 5 years, I have noticed more
variable/unusual weather on my farm [in
my area].
Advisors Farmers
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
MWW test
p-value
2.84
3.04
2.5 3 3.5 4
How concerned are you about weather
or climate affecting farm management
in your area?
MWW test
p-value
< 0.001
Note: the scale of this item is 1: Not at all concerned, 2: Slightly concerned, 3: Moderately concerned, and 4: Very concerned
11
12. 3.24
3.28
3.22
3.41
3.47
3.49
3.49
3.65
3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4
There is enough evidence that climate is
changing.
Climate change will cause more extreme
weather events in my area.
Human activities are contributing to
climate change.
Climate change is happening. < 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
MWW test
p-value
< 0.001
Climate change beliefs
3.39
3.43
3.71
3.67
3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4
Changing practices to cope with increasing
climate variability is important for the long-
term success of my farm [the farmers I
advise].
It is important for farmers to adapt to
climate change to ensure the long-term
success of U.S. agriculture.
Advisors Farmers
Note: the scale of those items is 1: Strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: Neither agree nor disagree, 4: Agree, and 5: Strongly agree
Adaptation attitude towards climate change
< 0.001
< 0.001
12
13. General propensity to adopt a new technology
< 0.001
MWW test
p-value
2.91
3.53
2 2.5 3 3.5 4
On a continuum of "early adopter" to
"late adopter", where would you
place yourself?
Advisors Farmers
13
14. Independent Variables
Farmers Advisors
𝛃 Significance 𝛃 Significance
Attitude towards the use of DSTs - -
Descriptive social norm and reference group + *** + ***
Injunctive social norm and reference group - + ***
Perceived behavioral control to deal with weather-related
risks and threats + + **
Concerns about weather or climate affecting farm
management + *** + **
Perceived risks of climate variability - +
Climate change beliefs - -
Adaptation attitude towards climate change + ** +
Farmers: farm size in 1000 acres
Advisor: average size of clients' farms in 1000 acres + *** + **
Farmers: year of farming
Advisors: year of working as an agricultural advisor + ` -
Age - ** + *
Education + * + `
Gender (Female as baseline) + ` + ***
General propensity to adopt a new technology + *** + **
Significance level: ` indicate significant at 0.1 (marginal evidence), * indicate significant at 0.05, **
indicate significant at 0.01, *** indicate significant at 0.001
Logistic regression model results
14
15. Conclusions
Advisors report significantly higher adoption rate
than farmers in using DSTs from free sources.
Farmers and advisors differ in number of ways.
Use of DSTs can be partly attributed to the Theory of
Planned Behavior.
Factors predicting the use of DSTs are different
between farmers and advisors.
15
16. Implications
Partnering or collaborating with local community to
share the success story in using DSTs.
Building up both farmers’ and advisors’ knowledge
and technical skills in using DSTs.
Leveraging farmer networks of “innovators” and
“early adopters”.
16
17. www.AgClimate4U.org
Authors:
Junyu Lu, Purdue University
Ajay S. Singh, California State University, Sacramento
Vikram Koundinya, University of California, Davis
Pranay Ranjan, Purdue University
Tonya Haigh, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Jackie M. Getson, Purdue University
Jenna Klink, University of Wisconsin - Madison
Linda S. Prokopy, Purdue University
Special thanks:
Members in Natural Resources Social Science Lab, Purdue University
Acknowledgement:
17
Agricultural decision support tools (DSTs) that incorporate weather or climate information can reduce risks and uncertainty in the agricultural planning and management decisions, for example, what crops and cultivars to plant, when to plant crops, when to apply fertilizers and pesticides, what is the forecast of weather, etc.
A variety of online agricultural DSTs integrating soil, weather, and crop information have been developed from different sources
To understand what factors will influence the use of DSTs, this study was built on the Theory of Planned Behavior
The Theory of Planned Behavior suggests that an individual’s intentions to perform a given behavior depend upon three types of evaluations they make: attitude towards performing the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control.
An attitude towards a behavior is based on an individual’s positive or negative evaluation of the likely outcome of a particular behavior.
Subjective norms refers to individuals’ perception and belief of how other important individuals think about them if they perform the behavior. There are two important types of social norms: descriptive social norms and injunctive social norms.
A descriptive social norm is defined as an individual’s perception of how others typically behave within a given settings
An injunctive social norm is defined as an individual’s perceptions about what should or ought to be done which is generally agreed or shared by the members of a social group.
Perceived behavioral control refers to an individual’s perception and belief of whether they are capable of performing a given behavior and whether they have controls over its performance
We hypothesized that the use of DSTs might be partly attributed to the constructs discussed in the Theory of Planned Behavior.
In addition to the Theory of Planned Behavior, according to previous literature, we also hypothesized that the use of DSTs also could be partly attributed to stakeholders’ psychological factors, for example, (see slides). We hypothesized that higher level of concerns about weather or climate affecting farm management, stronger perceived risks of climate variability, stronger climate change beliefs, and more positive attitudes towards climate change would all have a positive effect on the adoption of DSTs.
In order to understand those research questions, we distributed two surveys.
6,840 addresses were selected to receive a questionnaire.
email addresses were identified to receive a questionnaire
Only 17% of farmers and 19% of agricultural advisors have used the Subscription or purchased weather/climate tools. There is no statistically significant difference between farmers and advisors in using this type of DSTs.
The agricultural advisors show much higher adoption rate than the farmers in using free and publicly available weather/climate information, especially the service provided by a university or government agencies.
We combined those three sources and generate a new variable representing any of above three providers
Positive attitude towards the use of DSTs.
Positive adaptation attitude towards climate change.
Coefficient – indicates direction of the finding.
PBC – Advisors who are confident that they can deal with weather related risks are more likely to adopt one or more DSTs.
Age – Younger farmers more likely to adopt; older advisors more likely to adopt, which indicates more experience.
Gender – Marginal evidence that male farmers are more likely to use DSTs.
Our findings highlight the needs to promote or advertise free DSTs by a university or government agency including Extension for more use among farmers to increase the adoption rate.
To promote the use of DSTs, partnering or collaborating with farmers and advisors in local community to communicate or share the success story in using DSTs could enhance the trustworthiness of DSTs and hence increase the adoption rate.
The result indicates that both farmers and advisors are not confident that they have the knowledge and technical skill to deal with weather-related threats. This suggests the needs for building up both farmers’ and advisors’ knowledge and technical skills in using DSTs to reduce weather-related uncertainties and risks.
Since the general propensity to adopt a new technology has a positive effect on the probability of using DSTs, DST educators could consider leveraging farmer networks of “innovators” and “early adopters” in the watershed, to bolster the salience of descriptive social norms and subsequently promote usage and uptake of DSTs, for example, those farmers who adopted agricultural best management practices (BMPs).