Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Se está descargando tu SlideShare. ×

Prospects and problems in marine Ornamental Aquaculture India

Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Próximo SlideShare
FISHING CRAFT AND GEARS
FISHING CRAFT AND GEARS
Cargando en…3
×

Eche un vistazo a continuación

1 de 15 Anuncio

Prospects and problems in marine Ornamental Aquaculture India

Descargar para leer sin conexión

very lack of data of Marine ornamental fish sector. it will help for fisheries student to know about Prospects and problems in marine Ornamental Aquaculture India.

very lack of data of Marine ornamental fish sector. it will help for fisheries student to know about Prospects and problems in marine Ornamental Aquaculture India.

Anuncio
Anuncio

Más Contenido Relacionado

Presentaciones para usted (20)

Similares a Prospects and problems in marine Ornamental Aquaculture India (20)

Anuncio

Más reciente (20)

Prospects and problems in marine Ornamental Aquaculture India

  1. 1. PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS IN MARINE ORNAMENTAL AQUACULTURE: INDIAN PERSPECTIVE Prepared by Sachin sahu AQC-MA5-12 Batch- 2015-17 M.F.Sc. 2nd yr 4th Semester ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education (University Under Section 3 of UGC Act-1956) Indian Council of Agricultural Research Versova, Mumbai-400061 Credit Seminar on
  2. 2. Introduction • Aquaculture is one of the billion dollar firms in recent past, which is ensuring the food security and livelihood of millions of people all over the world. • Domestication of marine ornamentals is gaining popularity in several countries, because of the rise of home and public aquaria. • Aquarium fishes are selling at an average of US$ 248 per pound compared to food fishes at an average of US$ 3 per pound (NOAA,2011). • Whittington (2007) said that over 100 countries are involved in the trade constitute with 37% tropical freshwater fish, 28% coldwater fish, 16% marine fish, 8% coral and 11% other invertebrates.
  3. 3. Overview of marine ornamental Aquaculture • Total ornamental fishes used in aquarium keeping, 10 to 15 % constitute marine spp. and rest from fresh and brackish water (Tissera, 2010). • According to Gopakumar (2010) 1.5 to 2 million people are engaged in marine aquarium keeping either for recreation or livelihood. • Annually, 20 to 24 million people are involved in the international trade with an estimate of 1,471 marine fish spp., and only 30-40 sp. are domesticated and rest from capture fishery.(Wabnitz et al., 2003; Ajit Kumar et al., 2012). • According to Bruckner (2005), more than 45 countries supply marine fishes to the global market. • Total value of marine ornamental fish trade was USD 200-300 million per year (Gopakumar, 2010a).
  4. 4. Prospects of the sector • India is endowed with rich marine ornamental resources from Gulf of Mannar, Gulf of Kutch, Andaman & Nicobar and Lakshadweep islands. • Indian fisheries comprise of more than 350 ornamental fishes and contribute 24% of the total fish species in trade (Ajithkumar and Balamurugan,2016). • Recent advancements in scientific technologies and husbandry equipments make this system ease at any corner. • Many innovative research programmes such as selective breeding, colour enhancement, SPF broodstocks, Recirculation Aquaculture System (RAS) has helped to pull out the technologies commercially. • Agencies like National Fisheries Development Board (NFDB) and Marine Products Exports and Development Authority (MPEDA) are providing subsidies for developing ornamental fish hatcheries to support entrepreneurs.
  5. 5. Angelfish AngelfishButterfly fish Clownfish Cardinalfish Goby Azure damselDartfish
  6. 6. Constraints in domestication  Adequate supply of- Quality brooders with reasonable price.  Complex pattern of sex changes.  Sexual dimorphism and larval rearing(Gopakumar,2005).  Unknown biology and behaviours (Ajihtkumar et al., 2010;Gopakumar,2010).  Unclear:- Selection species, nutritional supplements, Feeding regime, feeding schedule of broodstocks and larval, water quality parameters.
  7. 7. ContD.  Lack of successful induced breeding activities, poor egg quality and quantity, lower hatch rate.  Availability in the coral reef ecosystem.  Inadequate literatures of new species.  Disease outbreaks during unhealthy practices.  Usage of banned antibiotics and toxic chemicals.  Some species and their status must be under the permissible limit of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).
  8. 8. ECONOMIC PROBLEMS • Inequitable profit distribution between importers and exporters reflects imbalance between each other, which favors the importers (Whittington et al., 2007; Dykman,2012). • Collectors increase their catch and use destructive fishing practices cause long term damage to the environment(Whittington,2000). • Collectors due to the low price they increase their catch, often by using unsustainable or harmful fishing methods, ultimately causing long-term damage to the environment and the industry.
  9. 9. ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS  Lack adequate resources and mechanisms for reef conservation in developing countries.  Globally 25% of coral reefs already died and 30% are under serious threat (Best and Bornbusch,2001).  Global warming and ocean acidification causes unrestricted pressure on the coral reef ecosystem.  Top ten aquarium fish species has decreased by 59% over the last 20 years (Moore and Best,2001).  Trade is also highly mobile is another characteristic that is conducive to environmental degradation  Exporting countries, which often lack the “institutional or financial capacity” to mitigate the damage to coral reefs.
  10. 10. Conservation & eco-friendly fishing practices • The rising trade and high demand, overexploitation of valuable resources and destructive fishing practices lead to the risk of bio-resource depletion. • Domestication of resources and regulated fishing practices are being alternative to alleviate the pressure on reefs(Pomery et al. 2006). • Sustainable management plans by enforcing code of conduct (Moore and Best, 2001). • Marine stewardship council (MSC) and Marine Aquarium Council (MAC) initiated certification program to promote legal and safer fishing and for sustainable fisheries (Potts and Haward, 2005; Moore and Best, 2001). • In India certification system launched by MPEDA to regulate and better marine ornamental trade.
  11. 11. Recommendations • Establishment of marine reserves to preserve stocks for the maintenance of biodiversity. • Implementation of clerical trade combined with sustainable wild catch, quota system have to be followed with the proper support from the government. • Establishment of a national centre for ornamental aquaculture or ornamental aqua park can help get more captive propagation technologies for various species. • Establishment of a national quarantine facility for ornamental organisms to combat invasive parasites and it will help in stop the entry of exotics. • Establishment of live gene bank for the prioritized marine ornamental organisms will help in conserve these genetic resources.
  12. 12. Conclusion • The historic rise in trade of marine ornamental fish and aquarium supplies around the globe is ensuring sustainable income generation, livelihood and more foreign exchange of a country. Sustainable firm will be a good income generator to coastal communities, small entrepreneurs. At this point, further research programmes are looked-for developing breeding technology of demandable species with the aid of new scientific technologies. Setting-up of Backyard hatcheries, Ornamental Aqua Parks and Marine Ornamental Villages would helpful in promoting this sector and also open local employment and livelihood.
  13. 13. References • Ajith Kumar, T. T., J. Balamurugan, and T. Balasubramanian, 2012. Aquatic resources for eradicating hunger and malnutrition-opportunities and challenges, Asian Fisheries Society Indian Branch. Manglore, India, 171-176. • Ajithkumar, T.T., V. Gunasundari, P. Murugesan, and T. Balasubramanian.2010. backyard hatchery for clownfish: A measure towards promoting marine ornamental fish export from India. In: (Eds. Kurup et. Al) Souvenier, Ornamentals Kerala. Dept. Of Fisheries, Govt. Of Kerala, 67-73. • Dykman, M. 2012. The environmental and economic benefits of eco- certification within the ornamental fish trade. International journal of trade, economics and finance.. 3:1-6. • Gopakumar, G. 2005. Marine Ornamental Fish Culture Status, Constraints and Potential. Proceedings of Ocean Life Food & Medicine Expo. Chennai, 347-359. • Moore, F. And B. Best. 2001. Coral reef crisis: causes and consequences. Annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California. • MPEDA, 2014. http://www.mpeda.com [ Assessed on 12-06-2017] • NOAA, 2011. Marine aquarium trade, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce.
  14. 14. CONTD. • Pomeroy, R.S.,J.E. Parks and C.M. Balboa. 2006. farming the reef: is aquaculture a solution for reducing fishing pressure on coral reef? Marine Policy 30:111-130. • Potts, T. And M. Harward. 2005. International trade, eco-labeling, and sustainable fisheries-recent issues, concepts and practices. Environment, development and Sustainability 9:629-630. • Silas, E.G., A. Gopalkrishna, A., Ramachandran, T.V. Anna Mercy, Kripan sarkar, K.R. Pushpagandan, P. Anil Kumar, M.K. Ram mohan and K.K Anikuttan. 2011. Guidelines for green certification of freshwater ornamental fish, MPEDA, Kochi, Kerala. • Thomas, k.2010. Interventions in the Indian ornamental fishes in the by-catch of Ponnami fishing harbor, Kerala. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 51(1): 69-73. • Wabnitz, C., M., Taylor, E., Green and T., Razak. 2003. From Ocean to Aquarium. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, U.K.64. • Whittington, m., M.A.M. Pereira, M. Gonalves and A.Costa. 2000. An investigation of the ornamental fish trade in mozambique. Report for the Coastal Management Unit, MICOA.

×