SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Enviar búsqueda
Cargar
Sigrid__Carstairs_scales_cls_-_feedback_report
Denunciar
Compartir
S
Sigrid Carstairs
Seguir
•
1 recomendación
•
439 vistas
Sigrid__Carstairs_scales_cls_-_feedback_report
•
1 recomendación
•
439 vistas
S
Sigrid Carstairs
Seguir
Denunciar
Compartir
Sigrid__Carstairs_scales_cls_-_feedback_report
1 de 4
Descargar ahora
Recomendados
Shapes (sales) - Work related behaviour por
Shapes (sales) - Work related behaviour
Sigrid Carstairs
987 vistas
•
6 diapositivas
Sigrid__Carstairs_shapes_(management)_-_participant_report por
Sigrid__Carstairs_shapes_(management)_-_participant_report
Sigrid Carstairs
264 vistas
•
5 diapositivas
Big Data Privacy Standard Requirements por
Big Data Privacy Standard Requirements
Gerardus Blokdyk
49 vistas
•
40 diapositivas
Hitech Act por
Hitech Act
Alana Cartwright
2 vistas
•
78 diapositivas
20151008 REx Predictive presentation v 1 0 - distributed por
20151008 REx Predictive presentation v 1 0 - distributed
Jefferson Lynch
157 vistas
•
53 diapositivas
Business Continuity Standard Requirements por
Business Continuity Standard Requirements
Gerardus Blokdyk
53 vistas
•
38 diapositivas
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a Sigrid__Carstairs_scales_cls_-_feedback_report
360 Degree Customer Experience: A Practical Approach to Holistic CX por
360 Degree Customer Experience: A Practical Approach to Holistic CX
suitecx
2.8K vistas
•
36 diapositivas
business analyst interview questions and answers por
business analyst interview questions and answers
Congress Man
9.3K vistas
•
4 diapositivas
Business analysis1.9 - business side por
Business analysis1.9 - business side
Anton Galitskiy
703 vistas
•
82 diapositivas
College of Business worldwide.erau.eduAll rights are reser por
College of Business worldwide.erau.eduAll rights are reser
WilheminaRossi174
2 vistas
•
28 diapositivas
CommonAnalyticMistakes_v1.17_Unbranded por
CommonAnalyticMistakes_v1.17_Unbranded
Jim Parnitzke
190 vistas
•
65 diapositivas
The top 2 reasons why Knowledge Management Fails por
The top 2 reasons why Knowledge Management Fails
David Griffiths, PhD (Edin), CMgr FCMI, FCIEA
1.6K vistas
•
9 diapositivas
Similar a Sigrid__Carstairs_scales_cls_-_feedback_report
(20)
360 Degree Customer Experience: A Practical Approach to Holistic CX por suitecx
360 Degree Customer Experience: A Practical Approach to Holistic CX
suitecx
•
2.8K vistas
business analyst interview questions and answers por Congress Man
business analyst interview questions and answers
Congress Man
•
9.3K vistas
Business analysis1.9 - business side por Anton Galitskiy
Business analysis1.9 - business side
Anton Galitskiy
•
703 vistas
College of Business worldwide.erau.eduAll rights are reser por WilheminaRossi174
College of Business worldwide.erau.eduAll rights are reser
WilheminaRossi174
•
2 vistas
CommonAnalyticMistakes_v1.17_Unbranded por Jim Parnitzke
CommonAnalyticMistakes_v1.17_Unbranded
Jim Parnitzke
•
190 vistas
The top 2 reasons why Knowledge Management Fails por David Griffiths, PhD (Edin), CMgr FCMI, FCIEA
The top 2 reasons why Knowledge Management Fails
David Griffiths, PhD (Edin), CMgr FCMI, FCIEA
•
1.6K vistas
How to do data-analytics on a shoestring por Abyrint
How to do data-analytics on a shoestring
Abyrint
•
408 vistas
Process mapping por Inga Tanaino-Mitenberga
Process mapping
Inga Tanaino-Mitenberga
•
1.2K vistas
ba-navigator-sample.pdf por LoanL50
ba-navigator-sample.pdf
LoanL50
•
1 vista
Effective demand planning - our vision at Solventure por Solventure
Effective demand planning - our vision at Solventure
Solventure
•
1.4K vistas
Machine Learning for Business - Eight Best Practices for Getting Started por Bhupesh Chaurasia
Machine Learning for Business - Eight Best Practices for Getting Started
Bhupesh Chaurasia
•
172 vistas
201505 Statistical Thinking course extract por Jefferson Lynch
201505 Statistical Thinking course extract
Jefferson Lynch
•
158 vistas
Analytic Strategy Value Map por Jaap Vink
Analytic Strategy Value Map
Jaap Vink
•
199 vistas
Project Scope por Andrea Olin
Project Scope
Andrea Olin
•
2 vistas
Data model scorecard article 2 of 11 por Analytics8
Data model scorecard article 2 of 11
Analytics8
•
432 vistas
Innovation audit introduction v3.2 por Assentire Ltd
Innovation audit introduction v3.2
Assentire Ltd
•
711 vistas
Data model scorecard (Article 5 of 11) por Analytics8
Data model scorecard (Article 5 of 11)
Analytics8
•
340 vistas
Dit yvol2iss19 por Rick Lemieux
Dit yvol2iss19
Rick Lemieux
•
233 vistas
Deploying a data centric approach to enterprise agility por Comparative Agility
Deploying a data centric approach to enterprise agility
Comparative Agility
•
165 vistas
Success Through an Actionable Data Science Stack por Domino Data Lab
Success Through an Actionable Data Science Stack
Domino Data Lab
•
909 vistas
Sigrid__Carstairs_scales_cls_-_feedback_report
1.
scales cls inductive-logical thinking feedback
report Sigrid Carstairs Administration: 30.11.2015 Report generated on: 16.12.2015 Online AssessmentOnline Assessment
2.
scales cls -
feedback report: Sigrid Carstairs What does this test measure? In this test the task is to find out rules and interrelations which assign tables to two different categories. Therefore, the test measures the ability to draw inductive logical conclusions (inductive logical reasoning). The concentrated analysis of information and data bases and the recognition of rules behind them is vitally important in certain occupational areas. How to interpret your result Your performance score has been calculated out of your correct and incorrect answers. Please consider that this is only a snapshot of your performance which can be influenced by various factors. Your performance in the test can be described as follows: Compared to other participants, it is easier for you to handle the tasks in this test successfully. What is your processing style like? In addition to the performance score your processing style is measured. It indicates how many questions you completed in the default time (speed) and how many of those questions you answered correctly (accuracy). These two scores are compared with the scores of other participants as well. The optimal processing style is to complete as many questions as possible, as accurately as possible. Your processing style can be characterised as follows: Your completion of the test was quite fast and extremely accurate, this means that you completed approximately as many tasks as most other participants and answered almost all of these correctly. Questions in the test: 12 Number of completed questions (speed): 10 Number of questions correctly answered (accuracy): 9 Norm group: General adult population (Norwegian) Copyright © 2015 cut-e Group | cut-e and the cut-e logo are trademarks of cut-e Group Page 2
3.
scales cls -
feedback report: Sigrid Carstairs How can the capabilities in this area be improved? To improve the capability of inductive logical reasoning is not easy. The recognition and understanding of rules and relations is a complex cognitive process. The personal thinking style is built early on the basis of one’s own genetic fundamentals and the experienced support and can later only gradually but not basically be changed anymore. Nevertheless, much can be done to tap one’s full potential. If you are dissatisfied with your results in this test you’ll find some tips here that might help you to improve yourself. l Buy a magazine with brain puzzles containing tasks like continuing number sequences, complete matrices or eliminate the improper term out of a sequence of terms. Complete some of these tasks regularly. l Consider „dissimilar“ things deeply and find out in which aspects they are the same or similar (e.g. what do a monkey and a banana have in common?). l Consider „similar“ things deeply and find out in which aspects they are completely different (e.g. in which aspects differ „light“ and „shine“?). Copyright © 2015 cut-e Group | cut-e and the cut-e logo are trademarks of cut-e Group Page 3
4.
scales cls -
feedback report: Sigrid Carstairs Copyright © 2015 cut-e Group | cut-e and the cut-e logo are trademarks of cut-e Group Page 4 Imprints and Rights This report has been created using the cut-e mapTQ system. It comprises information from the cut-e system. All statements in this report are based upon the results of the assessment. This report has been produced electronically. The report is confidential and should not be published. cut-e accepts no liability for any consequences should the report be made publicly available. cut-e authorises you to copy the information included in this report for non-commercial purposes only. In the framework of this authorisation, you are obliged to keep all copyright and protective notes on all copies. The authorisation to use the information of this report for other than personal purposes has to be applied for in writing at cut-e group. cut-e and the cut-e logo are registered trademarks of cut-e group. © cut-e group, www.cut-e.com, all rights reserved, 2002-2015. Your local contact: cut-e norge as St. Olavsplass 3, 5. etg. 0165 Oslo Tel: +47 22 36 10 35 e-post: info.norge@cut-e.no cut-e worldwide Australia China Czech Republic Finland France Germany Greece India Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Malaysia Morocco Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Singapore Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland UAE UK USA
Descargar ahora