Publicidad

A New Perspective on AKI

Director of Nephrology at Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Hsin Chu Branch
10 de Mar de 2015
Publicidad

Más contenido relacionado

Publicidad

A New Perspective on AKI

  1. A New Perspective on AcuteA New Perspective on Acute Kidney InjuryKidney Injury by Steve Chenby Steve Chen Director of Nephrology, Shin-Chu Branch of Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  2. Temporal trends in the hospital-based & population-based incidence of AKI:  a growing problem
  3. Acute kidney Injury(AKI)Acute kidney Injury(AKI) Definition and Stage Etiology KDIGO-AKI 2012 Guideline Nutritional support Diuretic role Renal Replacement Therapy Outcomes Specific type acute kidney injury
  4. S-Cr based definitions of AKIS-Cr based definitions of AKI Parameter Definitions Acute Kidney Injury Network Stage 1: ≧0.3 mg/dl increase or 50% increase (AKIN) over baseline within 48Hr Stage 2:≧100% increase over baseline Stage 3: ≧200% increase or 0.5mg/dl increase to at least 4.0 mg/dl Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative RIFLE(R) ≧50% increase over baseline RIFLE(I) ≧100% increase over baseline RIFLE(F) ≧200% increase over baseline or
  5. Cr kinetics based definition of AKICr kinetics based definition of AKI SS Waikar: JASN 2009( Harvard Medical School, Boston)
  6. RIFLE stageRIFLE stage Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative
  7. RIFLE and mortality in AKIRIFLE and mortality in AKI Z Ricci et al: KI 73: 538-546, 2008 (Italy)Z Ricci et al: KI 73: 538-546, 2008 (Italy)
  8. AKI: long-term mortality(>3M) 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 AKIN-I AKIN-II AKIN-III All P<0.001 N=864933 Lafrance et al: JASN 21: 345-352, 2010
  9. AKI-induced distant organ effectsAKI-induced distant organ effects KC: karatinocyte-derived chemokine GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein VP: vascular permeability
  10. Acute renal failure: etiologyAcute renal failure: etiology type Clinical Conditions Pre-renal (40 ~ 80%) Heart failure Hypotention Volume loss/sequestration --- --- --- Renal (10 ~ 30%) Vascular disorders GN Interstitial disorders Tubular necrosis Vasculitis --- --- Ischemia/Toxin Post-renal (5 ~ 15%) Intra-renal Extra-renal Crystal/protein ---
  11. Hospital-acquired AKIHospital-acquired AKI Nash et al, AJKD 39: 930-936, 2002Nash et al, AJKD 39: 930-936, 2002 Causes Episodes Mortality ↓Renal perfusion Medications Contrast media Post-operative Sepsis S/P liver transplant S/P heart transplant Obstruction 147 61 43 35 25 14 8 7 13.6% 15% 14% 2.8% 76% 28.6% 37.5% 28.6%
  12. Acute renal failure:Acute renal failure: pre-renal/renalpre-renal/renal pre-renal renal U/A Hyaline casts abnormal S.G. >1.020 ~ 1.010 Uosm(mOsm/Kg) >500 <300 Una (meq/L) <20 >40 FE Na (%) <1 >1 FE UA(%) <7 >15 FE lithium(%) <7 >20 LMW proteins Brush border enzymes
  13. Daily change in ARFDaily change in ARF BUN(mg/dl) 10-20 >30 Cr <1.5 >1.5 K(meq/L) <0.5 >0.5 HCO3 <2 >2 Pi(mg/dl) <1 >1 Noncatabolic Catabolic
  14. BUN/Cr >15BUN/Cr >15  Increased urea formation: High protein intake Increased intestinal absorption of urea/NH4- GI bleeding, ureteral diversion Catabolic state- fever, tissue necrosis, steroid use, tetracycline use, sepsis  Decreased urea elimination: Volume depletion Heart failure Obstructive nephropathy
  15. KDIGO:Grading of evidence Level 1 ‘We recommend Most patients should receive the recommended course of action Level 2 ‘We suggest’ Grade A high quality Grade B good quality Grade C moderate quality Grade D poor quality Different choices will be appropriate for different patients. Each patient needs help to arrive at a management decision consistent with her or his values and preferences Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial (≧ 1 RCT) Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization (CT) Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies, preferably from more than one center or research group Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention and uncontrolled trials
  16. PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF AKI 3.1.1 In the absence of hemorrhagic shock, we suggest using isotonic crystalloids rather than colloids (albumin or starches) as initial management for expansion of intravascular volume in patients at risk for AKI or with AKI. (2B)
  17. 3.1.2 We recommend the use of vasopressors in conjunction with fluids in patients with vasomotor shock with AKI or at risk for AKI. (2C)
  18. 3.1.3 We suggest using protocol-based management of hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters to prevent development or worsening of AKI in high- risk patients in the perioperative setting (2C) or in patients with septic shock (2C). The best-known study is the Early Goal Directed Therapy
  19. 3.3.1 In critically ill patients, we suggest insulin therapy targeting plasma glucose of 110–149mg/d  (6.1–8.3mmol/l). (2C) 
  20. 3.3.2 We suggest achieving a total energy intake of 20–30kcal/kg/D  in patients with any stage AKI. (2C)
  21. 3.3.3 We suggest avoiding restriction of protein intake with the aim of preventing or delaying initiation of RRT. (2D)
  22. 3.3.4 We suggest administering 0.8–1.0 g/kg /D  of protein in non-catabolic AKI patients without need for dialysis (2D) 1.0–1.5 g/kg/D in patients with AKI on  RRT (2D) Up to a maximum of 1.7 g/kg/D  inpatients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and in hyper-catabolic patients. (2D)
  23. 3.3.5 We suggest providing nutrition preferentially via the enteral route in patients with AKI. (2C)
  24. Guideline 3.4: The use of diuretics in AKI 3.4.1: We recommend not using diuretics to prevent AKI. (1B) 3.4.2: We suggest not using diuretics to treat AKI, except in the management of volume overload. (2C)
  25. Guideline 3.5: Vasodilator therapy 3.5.1: We recommend not using low-dose dopamine to prevent or treat AKI. (1A) 3.5.2: We suggest not using fenoldopam to prevent or treat AKI. (2C) 3.5.3: We suggest not using atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) to prevent (2C) or treat (2B) AKI.
  26. Guideline 3.6: Growth factor intervention 3.6.1 We recommend not using recombinant human(rh)IGF-1 to prevent or treat AKI. (1B)
  27. Guideline 3.7: Adenosine receptor antagonists 3.7.1 We suggest that a single dose of theophylline maybe given in neonates with severe perinatal asphyxia who are at high risk of AKI. (2B)
  28. Guideline 3.8: Prevention of aminoglycoside-related AKI 3.8.1: We suggest not using aminoglycosides for the treatment of infections unless no suitable, less nephrotoxic, therapeutic alternatives are available. (2A) 3.8.2: We suggest that in patients with normal kidney function in steady state, aminoglycosides are administered as a single dose daily rather than as multiple-dose daily treatment regimens. (2B)
  29. Guideline 3.8: Prevention of aminoglycoside-related AKI 3.8.3: We recommend monitoring aminoglycoside drug levels when treatment with multiple daily dosing is used for more than 24h. (IA)  3.8.4: We suggest monitoring aminoglycoside drug levels when treatment with single-daily dosing is used for more than 48h. (2C) 
  30. Guideline 3.9: Other methods of prevention of AKI in the critically ill 3.9.1: We suggest off-pump CABG surgery not be selected solely for the purpose of reducing perioperative AKI or the need for RRT. (2C) 3.9.2: We suggest not using NAC to prevent AKI in critically ill patients with hypotension. (2D) 3.9.3: We recommend not using oral or IV NAC for prevention of postsurgical AKI. (1A)
  31. Initiation of dialysisInitiation of dialysis Kt/V <2.0/week; GFR<10.5, Kcr<14.5,Kurea<7 ml/min per 1.73m2 Symptoms(progressive or unexplained) Anorexia, Nausea, Vomiting Fatigue Sleep disturbance Nutritional status Decreasing edema-free BW Hypo-albuminemia Low SGA( 5)≦
  32. Dialysis for ARFDialysis for ARF BUN>100mg/dl, Cr>10mg/dl Hyperkalemia(>6.5meq/L,intractable) Severe metabolic acidosis(pH<7.1) Dysnatremia(Na>160 or <110meq/L) Uremic symptoms Uremic encephalopathy, pericarditis, bleeding, gastroenteritis, neuromuscular p. Organ edema,especially lung edema Oliguria Overdose with dialysable toxin Hyperthermia
  33. Renal replacement therapyRenal replacement therapy IHD: intermittent HD CVVH/CVVHDF: continuous veno-venous hemofiltration/continuous veno-venous hemo-diafiltration Hybrid RRT
  34. Hybrid RRT: EDD-fHybrid RRT: EDD-f Extended Daily Diafiltration: EDD-f The future in critical care nephrology Sustained Low Efficiency Daily Diafiltration: SLEDD-f AVVH: Accelerated VenoVenous Hemofiltration
  35. SLEDDSLEDD Sustained Low Efficient Daily Dialysis Low Qb and low Qd: 200ml/min≦ Filtration rate: 25-30 ml/min Session duration: 6 ~ 12Hr/D Advantages of both CRRT and IHD Kt/V targeting 1.2 ~ 1.4 per session with a frequency of 6 times a week (Intensive); TIW(less intensive)
  36. AVVHAVVH Casey et al: AJKD 2008(Ruch University Medical Center, Chicago)Casey et al: AJKD 2008(Ruch University Medical Center, Chicago) Accelerated VenoVenous Hemofiltration Low Qb : 350 ~ 400 ml/min Net fluid removal rate: 2.5L/Treatment Replacement fluid in pre-dilution mode:36L No anticoagulation Session duration: 9 Hr/D Advantages of both CRRT and IHD
  37. Outcomes after acute kidney injuryOutcomes after acute kidney injury Study design: Systemic review and meta-analysis 48 studies/N=47017 15 studies reported long-term data for patients without AKI Selection criteria: MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1985 to October 2007: hospital case Excluded for F-U ≦ 6M Results: 1> Incidence rate of mortality: 2.59 X (rate ratio) 8.9/100 P-Y in survivors of AKI and 4.3/100 P-Y in survivors without 2> Mortality risk in 6 of 6 studies: 1.6~ 3.9 by adjusted RR 3> Myocardial infarct in 2R of 2 studies: 2.05 by RR 4> Incidence rate of CKD: 7.8events/100 P-Y 5> Rate of ESRD: 4.9events/100 P-Y SG Coca et al: AJKD 53: 961-973, 2009 (Yale University)
  38. Causes of AKI: exposures &Causes of AKI: exposures & susceptibilities forsusceptibilities for non-specific AKInon-specific AKI Exposures Susceptibilities Sepsis Critical illness Circulatory shock Burns Trauma Cardiac surgery Major non-cardiac surgery Nephrotoxic drugs Radio-contrast agents Poisonous plants and animals Dehydration or volume depletion Advanced age Female Black race CKD Chronic diseases(heart, lung, liver) DM Cancer
  39. AKI in Sepsis/SIRS: 11%AKI in Sepsis/SIRS: 11% Yegenaga et al, AJKD 43: 817-824, 2004Yegenaga et al, AJKD 43: 817-824, 2004 Age↑ S-Cr > 2.0 mg/dl S-bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dl CVP ↑: pulmonary/cardiac involvement Risk factors
  40. AKI in acute liver failureAKI in acute liver failure Incidence: 50% Precipitants: ↓IVF , ↓ CO, Hypoxia, ↓SVR; Sepsis, nephro-toxins; IIAP Prevention: timely elective liver transplantation(LT) for non-acute hepatic failure LT: ↓ mortality( from 80% to 40%)
  41. Hepatorenal syndromeHepatorenal syndrome (1)(1) Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003 Incidence: 40% over 5 years in cirrhotic ascites Renal failure: progressive oliguria Hyponatremia, dilutional: often Hyperkalemia, moderate: common Severe metabolic acidosis→ infection Hemodynamic instability →infection Major cause of death: severe bacterial infection
  42. Hepato-renal syndromeHepato-renal syndrome (2)(2) Chronic/ acute liver disease with advanced hepatic failure&portal HTN Low GFR: S-Cr > 1.5mg/dl / GFR < 40ml/min R/O shock, infection, toxin, &fluid loss No sustained improvement in renal function: after diuretic withdrawal/IV NS 1500cc Proteinuria < 500mg/D; negative sonogram IV albumin: 1.5G/Kg if SBP; 1G/Kg at D3 ↓Mortality and ↓renal impairment
  43. Hepato-renal syndromeHepato-renal syndrome (3)(3) Urine volume < 500ml/D Urine Na < 10meq/L Urine osmolality > plasma osmolality Serum Na < 130meq/L Urine RBC < 50/HPF
  44. Hepatorenal syndromeHepatorenal syndrome (4)(4) Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003 Type I Type II Definition ↑100% S-Cr in < 2 W: →>2.5 mg/dl Other Clinical GFR < 20mL/min S-Cr, av : 3.1 mg/dl Severe renal failure GFR >20 mL/min S-Cr, av : 1.6mg/dl Recurrent ascites Survival at 4M <0.1 <0.6
  45. Mortality of AKI after first acute strokeMortality of AKI after first acute stroke Tsagalis G et al: Clinical J Am Soc Nephrology 2009( University of Athens, Greece)Tsagalis G et al: Clinical J Am Soc Nephrology 2009( University of Athens, Greece)
  46. Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicityAminoglycoside nephrotoxicity  GM.Tobramycin>Amikacin>Netrilmycin  Risk factors: pre-existing renal disease advanced age dose&duration concurrent use of nephrotoxic agents sepsis hepatic failure volume depletion; salt-restriction metabolic acidosis,hypokalemia,hypomagnesemia (?)
  47. Contrast-agent induced AKIContrast-agent induced AKI C.M. Sandler, NEJM 348: 551-553, 2003C.M. Sandler, NEJM 348: 551-553, 2003 Ionic monomers: Sodium Diatrizoate Nonionic monomers: Iohexol Nonionic dimers: Iodixanol Osmole (mOsm/Kg) 1500 ~ 1800 600 ~ 850 iso-osmolar Clinical Nephrotoxicity indications: 1 1 1 Safer : 6X Expensive:25X ≤1 DM with RF? <1 DM with RF S-cr 1.5 ~ 3.5
  48. Risk factors for contrast nephropathy Iodinated contrast risk factors Dose Intra-arterial administration Osmolality Charge Repeated administration<72 h  Procedure risk factors Interventional versus diagnostic Blood loss Hypotension Patient factors Hypovolemia Pre-existing chronic kidney disease Comorbidity (diabetes, heart failure, myeloma, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease) Concomitant drugs (NSAIDs, calcineurin inhibitors, aminoglycosides, cisplatin, amphotericin B)
  49. Risk score for developing AKI due to contrast nephropathy Risk factors Points awarded Hypotension Intra-aortic balloon pump Chronic heart failure Age >75 years Anemia Diabetes Iodinated contrast volume Serum creatinine >1.5mg/dl  or eGFR<60ml/min  Score 5 6-10 11-16 >16 5 5 5 4 3 3 1/100ml 4 2 if eGFR 40–60ml/min  4 if eGFR 20–40ml/min  6 if eGFR<20ml/min  7.5% risk CN-AKI 0.04% risk dialysis 14% risk CN-AKI 0.12% risk dialysis 26.1% risk CN-AKI 1.09% risk dialysis 57.3% risk CN-AKI 21.6% risk dialysis
  50. Dye induced nephropathyDye induced nephropathy University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003  Indications: S-Cr > 2.0 mg/dl ( C-Cr>4 mg/dl with greatest positive effect of long-term survival) multiple interventions  Hemo-filtration: fluid replacement rate 1000ml/Hr saline hydration 1ml/Kg/Hr  Time: 4-8Hr before ~18-24Hr after  In hospital mortality: 2% vs 14% p=0.02 Cumulative 1-Y mortality 10% vs 30% p=0.01
  51. Dye induced nephropathyDye induced nephropathy University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 D0 D1 D2 D4 Dis S-Cr, control Hemofiltration
  52. Cardio-renal syndromeCardio-renal syndrome  Definition: Baseline renal function: S-Cr > 1.3 mg/dl and estimated C-Cr 60 ml/min; Worsening renal≦ function( 0.3mg/dl)≧  Risk factors: prior CHF/older/DM/HTN/Renal dysfunction  LVEF 40%: 37≧ ~ 55% not characterized by low-output state but by fluid retention  ACEI/ARB: empirical  Effective diuresis: ? Maybe in some cases  Natriuretic peptides: Nesiritide ?
  53. Acute phosphate nephropathyAcute phosphate nephropathy Markowitz et al: JASN 2007 Columbia UniversityMarkowitz et al: JASN 2007 Columbia University  Definition: 1.16 ~ 6.3% Baseline renal function: S-Cr > 1.3 mg/dl and estimated C-Cr 60 ml/min; Worsening renal≦ function( 0.5≧ ~ 1.0mg/dl) 6 ~ 12M after colonoscopy  Risk factors: Female/older/CHF/Diuretic use/ACEI use  Hydration: 72 ounces of clear liquids for 30≧ ~ 45 ml OSP Avoidance of anesthesia regimens: no oral intake for 4- 6 Hrs Alternative agents in female: PEG (polyethylene glycol) Dose reduction or avoidance in the elderly/risk factors
  54. Acute renal & hepatic failureAcute renal & hepatic failure Infectious: Leptospirosis; Hantaan vitus, Reyes syndrome Toxic: Acetaminophen, methoxyflurane, CCl4, tetracycline in pregnancy Collagen vascular disease: SLE, PAN Neoplastic: RCC, metastatic disease Genetic: PCKD, sickle cell disease Amyloidosis
  55. Mechanical ventilatorMechanical ventilator:: independent predictor of acute kidney injuryindependent predictor of acute kidney injury PEEP < 6: OR=2.89 ; PEEP>6: OR=20.7 Vivino et al, Intensive Care Med 24: 808-14, 1998 Incidence : PEEP>6: 73% PEEP<6: 36% Venturi mask: 17% Vivino et al, Intensive Care Med 24: 808-14, 1998 Predictors of mortality/ dialysis in PTS with ATN Chertow et al, JASN 9: 692-98, 1998
  56. Mechanical ventilatorMechanical ventilator:: renal failurerenal failure mechanismsmechanisms  Cardiovascular change: volume status; cardiac status; pulmonary status  Redistribution of intra-renal blood flow: ET-B→NO ↑and PG↑  Hormone pathways: ADH↑: barorecetor-mediated; non-baroreceptor-mediated Renin↑: β-mediated sympathetic tone↑;distal Na delivery↓ ANP↓
  57. Diuretic status on mortalityDiuretic status on mortality Urine volume(cc/D) Mortality (%) OR for death ≦50 80 1.95 50 ~ 400 76 1.76 400 ~ 1000 43 1 1000 ~ 2000 22 0.5 ≧2000 13 0.3
  58. CVVH dose in ARFCVVH dose in ARF  Prospective randomized trial: N= 425 in ICU ARF  CVVH with post-dilution; Qb 145 ~ 207 ml/min  Gr I: Uf=20ml/H/Kg Gr II: Uf=35ml/H/Kg Gr III: Uf=45ml/H/Kg  Survival at 15 days after CVVH: (adjusting) Gr I: 41% < Gr II: 57% (p=0.0007) ∞ Gr III: 58% (p=0.0013)  Renal recovery of survivors at D15: Gr I: 95%; Gr II: 92%; Gr III: 90%  Early start in all group survivors Ronco et al, Lancet 355: 26-30, 2000
  59. CVVHDF dose in ARFCVVHDF dose in ARF Tolwani et al: JASN 2008( University of Alabama at Birmingham)Tolwani et al: JASN 2008( University of Alabama at Birmingham)  Prospective randomized trial: N= 200 in ICU ARF  CVVHDF with pre-filter replacement fluid; Qb 100 ~ 150 ml/min  Survival at ICU discharge or 30 days Gr I: 56%; Gr II: 49% (p=0.32)  Renal recovery in survivors: Gr I: 80%; Gr II: 69% (p=0.29)  Gr I: Effluent rate=20ml/H/Kg Gr II: Effluent rate=35ml/H/Kg  A difference in survival or renal recover: not detected
  60. Dialysis dosing in critically ill patientsDialysis dosing in critically ill patients with AKIwith AKI  Multicenter randomized trial: enrollment of 1164 to achieve a 10% difference in morality rate with statical power of 90% with P value of 0.05  Hemo-dynamically stable: IHD  Unstable: CVVHDF(total effluent rate: 35 or 20 ml/Kg/Hr) or SLED( 6 or 3 times per week)  Primary end point: 60-day all cause mortality  Mortality: 53.6% in intensive; 51.5% in less- intensive  Renal/Non renal organ recovery rate: similar Palevsky PM et al NEJM 359: 7-20, 2008 (VA/NIH Acute renal failure Trial Network)
Publicidad