A New Perspective on AcuteA New Perspective on Acute
Kidney InjuryKidney Injury
by Steve Chenby Steve Chen
Director of Nephrology,
Shin-Chu Branch of Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Temporal trends in the hospital-based & population-based
incidence of AKI: a growing problem
Acute kidney Injury(AKI)Acute kidney Injury(AKI)
Definition and Stage
Etiology
KDIGO-AKI 2012 Guideline
Nutritional support
Diuretic role
Renal Replacement Therapy
Outcomes
Specific type acute kidney injury
S-Cr based definitions of AKIS-Cr based definitions of AKI
Parameter Definitions
Acute Kidney Injury Network Stage 1: ≧0.3 mg/dl increase or 50%
increase
(AKIN) over baseline
within 48Hr
Stage 2:≧100% increase over
baseline
Stage 3: ≧200% increase or 0.5mg/dl
increase
to at least 4.0 mg/dl
Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative RIFLE(R) ≧50%
increase over baseline
RIFLE(I) ≧100%
increase over baseline
RIFLE(F) ≧200%
increase over baseline or
Cr kinetics based definition of AKICr kinetics based definition of AKI
SS Waikar: JASN 2009( Harvard Medical School, Boston)
BUN/Cr >15BUN/Cr >15
Increased urea formation:
High protein intake
Increased intestinal absorption of urea/NH4- GI
bleeding, ureteral diversion
Catabolic state- fever, tissue necrosis, steroid
use, tetracycline use, sepsis
Decreased urea elimination:
Volume depletion
Heart failure
Obstructive nephropathy
KDIGO:Grading of evidence
Level 1 ‘We recommend Most patients should receive the recommended
course of action
Level 2 ‘We suggest’
Grade A high quality
Grade B good quality
Grade C moderate quality
Grade D poor quality
Different choices will be appropriate for different
patients. Each patient needs help to arrive at a
management decision consistent with her or his
values and preferences
Evidence obtained from at least one properly
designed randomized controlled trial (≧ 1 RCT)
Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled
trials without randomization (CT)
Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or
case-control analytic studies, preferably from more
than one center or research group
Evidence obtained from multiple time series with
or without the intervention and uncontrolled trials
PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF
AKI
3.1.1
In the absence of hemorrhagic shock, we
suggest using isotonic crystalloids rather
than colloids (albumin or starches) as initial
management for expansion of intravascular
volume in patients at risk for AKI or with
AKI. (2B)
3.1.2
We recommend the use of vasopressors in
conjunction with fluids in patients with
vasomotor shock with AKI or at risk for
AKI. (2C)
3.1.3
We suggest using protocol-based
management of hemodynamic and
oxygenation parameters to prevent
development or worsening of AKI in high-
risk patients in the perioperative setting
(2C) or in patients with septic shock (2C).
The best-known study is the Early Goal
Directed Therapy
3.3.1
In critically ill patients, we suggest
insulin therapy targeting plasma glucose
of 110–149mg/d (6.1–8.3mmol/l). (2C)
3.3.3
We suggest avoiding restriction of
protein intake with the aim of preventing
or delaying initiation of RRT. (2D)
3.3.4
We suggest administering 0.8–1.0 g/kg /D
of protein in non-catabolic AKI patients
without need for dialysis (2D)
1.0–1.5 g/kg/D in patients with AKI on
RRT (2D)
Up to a maximum of 1.7 g/kg/D
inpatients on continuous renal
replacement therapy (CRRT) and in
hyper-catabolic patients. (2D)
Guideline 3.4: The use of
diuretics in AKI
3.4.1: We recommend not using diuretics to
prevent AKI. (1B)
3.4.2: We suggest not using diuretics to
treat AKI, except in the management of
volume overload. (2C)
Guideline 3.5: Vasodilator
therapy
3.5.1: We recommend not using low-dose
dopamine to prevent or treat AKI. (1A)
3.5.2: We suggest not using fenoldopam to
prevent or treat AKI. (2C)
3.5.3: We suggest not using atrial
natriuretic peptide (ANP) to prevent (2C) or
treat (2B) AKI.
Guideline 3.6: Growth factor
intervention
3.6.1
We recommend not using recombinant
human(rh)IGF-1 to prevent or treat AKI.
(1B)
Guideline 3.7: Adenosine
receptor antagonists
3.7.1
We suggest that a single dose of
theophylline maybe given in neonates with
severe perinatal asphyxia who are at high
risk of AKI. (2B)
Guideline 3.8: Prevention of
aminoglycoside-related AKI
3.8.1: We suggest not using aminoglycosides for
the treatment of infections unless no suitable,
less nephrotoxic, therapeutic alternatives are
available. (2A)
3.8.2: We suggest that in patients with normal
kidney function in steady state, aminoglycosides
are administered as a single dose daily rather
than as multiple-dose daily treatment regimens.
(2B)
Guideline 3.8: Prevention of
aminoglycoside-related AKI
3.8.3: We recommend monitoring
aminoglycoside drug levels when treatment
with multiple daily dosing is used for more
than 24h. (IA)
3.8.4: We suggest monitoring
aminoglycoside drug levels when treatment
with single-daily dosing is used for more
than 48h. (2C)
Guideline 3.9: Other methods of
prevention of AKI in the critically ill
3.9.1: We suggest off-pump CABG surgery not
be selected solely for the purpose of reducing
perioperative AKI or the need for RRT. (2C)
3.9.2: We suggest not using NAC to prevent AKI
in critically ill patients with hypotension. (2D)
3.9.3: We recommend not using oral or IV NAC
for prevention of postsurgical AKI. (1A)
Initiation of dialysisInitiation of dialysis
Kt/V <2.0/week; GFR<10.5,
Kcr<14.5,Kurea<7 ml/min per 1.73m2
Symptoms(progressive or unexplained)
Anorexia, Nausea, Vomiting
Fatigue
Sleep disturbance
Nutritional status
Decreasing edema-free BW
Hypo-albuminemia
Low SGA( 5)≦
Dialysis for ARFDialysis for ARF
BUN>100mg/dl, Cr>10mg/dl
Hyperkalemia(>6.5meq/L,intractable)
Severe metabolic acidosis(pH<7.1)
Dysnatremia(Na>160 or <110meq/L)
Uremic symptoms
Uremic encephalopathy, pericarditis,
bleeding, gastroenteritis, neuromuscular p.
Organ edema,especially lung edema
Oliguria
Overdose with dialysable toxin
Hyperthermia
SLEDDSLEDD
Sustained Low Efficient Daily Dialysis
Low Qb and low Qd: 200ml/min≦
Filtration rate: 25-30 ml/min
Session duration: 6 ~ 12Hr/D
Advantages of both CRRT and IHD
Kt/V targeting 1.2 ~ 1.4 per session with
a frequency of 6 times a week (Intensive);
TIW(less intensive)
AVVHAVVH
Casey et al: AJKD 2008(Ruch University Medical Center, Chicago)Casey et al: AJKD 2008(Ruch University Medical Center, Chicago)
Accelerated VenoVenous Hemofiltration
Low Qb : 350 ~ 400 ml/min
Net fluid removal rate: 2.5L/Treatment
Replacement fluid in pre-dilution mode:36L
No anticoagulation
Session duration: 9 Hr/D
Advantages of both CRRT and IHD
Outcomes after acute kidney injuryOutcomes after acute kidney injury
Study design: Systemic review and meta-analysis
48 studies/N=47017
15 studies reported long-term data for patients without AKI
Selection criteria:
MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1985 to October 2007: hospital case
Excluded for F-U ≦ 6M
Results:
1> Incidence rate of mortality: 2.59 X (rate ratio)
8.9/100 P-Y in survivors of AKI
and 4.3/100 P-Y in survivors without
2> Mortality risk in 6 of 6 studies: 1.6~ 3.9 by adjusted RR
3> Myocardial infarct in 2R of 2 studies: 2.05 by RR
4> Incidence rate of CKD: 7.8events/100 P-Y
5> Rate of ESRD: 4.9events/100 P-Y
SG Coca et al: AJKD 53: 961-973, 2009 (Yale University)
Causes of AKI: exposures &Causes of AKI: exposures &
susceptibilities forsusceptibilities for
non-specific AKInon-specific AKI
Exposures Susceptibilities
Sepsis
Critical illness
Circulatory shock
Burns
Trauma
Cardiac surgery
Major non-cardiac surgery
Nephrotoxic drugs
Radio-contrast agents
Poisonous plants and animals
Dehydration or volume
depletion
Advanced age
Female
Black race
CKD
Chronic diseases(heart, lung,
liver)
DM
Cancer
AKI in Sepsis/SIRS: 11%AKI in Sepsis/SIRS: 11%
Yegenaga et al, AJKD 43: 817-824, 2004Yegenaga et al, AJKD 43: 817-824, 2004
Age↑
S-Cr > 2.0 mg/dl
S-bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dl
CVP ↑: pulmonary/cardiac involvement
Risk factors
AKI in acute liver failureAKI in acute liver failure
Incidence: 50%
Precipitants: ↓IVF , ↓ CO, Hypoxia, ↓SVR;
Sepsis, nephro-toxins; IIAP
Prevention: timely elective liver
transplantation(LT) for non-acute hepatic
failure
LT: ↓ mortality( from 80% to 40%)
Hepatorenal syndromeHepatorenal syndrome (1)(1)
Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003
Incidence: 40% over 5 years in cirrhotic
ascites
Renal failure: progressive oliguria
Hyponatremia, dilutional: often
Hyperkalemia, moderate: common
Severe metabolic acidosis→ infection
Hemodynamic instability →infection
Major cause of death: severe bacterial
infection
Hepato-renal syndromeHepato-renal syndrome (2)(2)
Chronic/ acute liver disease with advanced
hepatic failure&portal HTN
Low GFR: S-Cr > 1.5mg/dl / GFR <
40ml/min
R/O shock, infection, toxin, &fluid loss
No sustained improvement in renal
function: after diuretic withdrawal/IV NS
1500cc
Proteinuria < 500mg/D; negative sonogram
IV albumin: 1.5G/Kg if SBP; 1G/Kg at D3
↓Mortality and ↓renal impairment
Hepatorenal syndromeHepatorenal syndrome (4)(4)
Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003Seminar, Lancet 362: 1819-27, 2003
Type I Type II
Definition ↑100% S-Cr in < 2
W: →>2.5 mg/dl
Other
Clinical GFR < 20mL/min
S-Cr, av : 3.1 mg/dl
Severe renal failure
GFR >20 mL/min
S-Cr, av : 1.6mg/dl
Recurrent ascites
Survival at
4M
<0.1 <0.6
Mortality of AKI after first acute strokeMortality of AKI after first acute stroke
Tsagalis G et al: Clinical J Am Soc Nephrology 2009( University of Athens, Greece)Tsagalis G et al: Clinical J Am Soc Nephrology 2009( University of Athens, Greece)
Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicityAminoglycoside nephrotoxicity
GM.Tobramycin>Amikacin>Netrilmycin
Risk factors:
pre-existing renal disease
advanced age
dose&duration
concurrent use of nephrotoxic agents
sepsis
hepatic failure
volume depletion; salt-restriction
metabolic
acidosis,hypokalemia,hypomagnesemia (?)
Risk score for developing AKI due to
contrast nephropathy
Risk factors Points awarded
Hypotension
Intra-aortic balloon pump
Chronic heart failure
Age >75 years
Anemia
Diabetes
Iodinated contrast volume
Serum creatinine >1.5mg/dl
or eGFR<60ml/min
Score
5
6-10
11-16
>16
5
5
5
4
3
3
1/100ml
4
2 if eGFR 40–60ml/min
4 if eGFR 20–40ml/min
6 if eGFR<20ml/min
7.5% risk CN-AKI 0.04% risk dialysis
14% risk CN-AKI 0.12% risk dialysis
26.1% risk CN-AKI 1.09% risk dialysis
57.3% risk CN-AKI 21.6% risk dialysis
Dye induced nephropathyDye induced nephropathy
University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003
Indications:
S-Cr > 2.0 mg/dl ( C-Cr>4 mg/dl with greatest positive effect
of long-term survival)
multiple interventions
Hemo-filtration:
fluid replacement rate 1000ml/Hr
saline hydration 1ml/Kg/Hr
Time: 4-8Hr before ~18-24Hr after
In hospital mortality: 2% vs 14% p=0.02
Cumulative 1-Y mortality 10% vs 30% p=0.01
Dye induced nephropathyDye induced nephropathy
University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003University of Milan, NEJM 349: 1333-1340,2003
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
D0 D1 D2 D4 Dis
S-Cr, control
Hemofiltration
Cardio-renal syndromeCardio-renal syndrome
Definition:
Baseline renal function: S-Cr > 1.3 mg/dl and
estimated C-Cr 60 ml/min; Worsening renal≦
function( 0.3mg/dl)≧
Risk factors: prior CHF/older/DM/HTN/Renal
dysfunction
LVEF 40%: 37≧ ~ 55% not characterized by
low-output state but by fluid retention
ACEI/ARB: empirical
Effective diuresis: ? Maybe in some cases
Natriuretic peptides: Nesiritide ?
Acute phosphate nephropathyAcute phosphate nephropathy
Markowitz et al: JASN 2007 Columbia UniversityMarkowitz et al: JASN 2007 Columbia University
Definition: 1.16 ~ 6.3%
Baseline renal function: S-Cr > 1.3 mg/dl and
estimated C-Cr 60 ml/min; Worsening renal≦
function( 0.5≧ ~ 1.0mg/dl) 6 ~ 12M after colonoscopy
Risk factors: Female/older/CHF/Diuretic use/ACEI use
Hydration: 72 ounces of clear liquids for 30≧ ~ 45 ml
OSP
Avoidance of anesthesia regimens: no oral intake for 4-
6 Hrs
Alternative agents in female: PEG (polyethylene glycol)
Dose reduction or avoidance in the elderly/risk factors
Diuretic status on mortalityDiuretic status on mortality
Urine
volume(cc/D)
Mortality
(%)
OR for death
≦50 80 1.95
50 ~ 400 76 1.76
400 ~ 1000 43 1
1000 ~ 2000 22 0.5
≧2000 13 0.3
CVVH dose in ARFCVVH dose in ARF
Prospective randomized trial: N= 425 in ICU ARF
CVVH with post-dilution; Qb 145 ~ 207 ml/min
Gr I: Uf=20ml/H/Kg Gr
II: Uf=35ml/H/Kg Gr
III: Uf=45ml/H/Kg
Survival at 15 days after CVVH: (adjusting)
Gr I: 41% < Gr II: 57% (p=0.0007) ∞ Gr III:
58% (p=0.0013)
Renal recovery of survivors at D15:
Gr I: 95%; Gr II: 92%; Gr III: 90%
Early start in all group survivors
Ronco et al, Lancet 355: 26-30, 2000
CVVHDF dose in ARFCVVHDF dose in ARF
Tolwani et al: JASN 2008( University of Alabama at Birmingham)Tolwani et al: JASN 2008( University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Prospective randomized trial: N= 200 in ICU ARF
CVVHDF with pre-filter replacement fluid; Qb
100 ~ 150 ml/min
Survival at ICU discharge or 30 days
Gr I: 56%; Gr II: 49% (p=0.32)
Renal recovery in survivors:
Gr I: 80%; Gr II: 69% (p=0.29)
Gr I: Effluent rate=20ml/H/Kg
Gr II: Effluent rate=35ml/H/Kg
A difference in survival or renal recover: not
detected
Dialysis dosing in critically ill patientsDialysis dosing in critically ill patients
with AKIwith AKI
Multicenter randomized trial: enrollment of 1164
to achieve a 10% difference in morality rate with
statical power of 90% with P value of 0.05
Hemo-dynamically stable: IHD
Unstable: CVVHDF(total effluent rate: 35 or 20
ml/Kg/Hr) or SLED( 6 or 3 times per week)
Primary end point: 60-day all cause mortality
Mortality: 53.6% in intensive; 51.5% in less-
intensive
Renal/Non renal organ recovery rate: similar
Palevsky PM et al NEJM 359: 7-20, 2008 (VA/NIH Acute renal failure Trial Network)