This document discusses whether links are still important ranking factors for Google search. It presents arguments on both sides of the issue:
- Google says links are still important, but the company has been wrong before about technical details.
- Correlation studies between links and rankings are inconclusive, while brand awareness through branded search volume may better explain rankings.
- Anecdotal examples show links sometimes have an impact but other times rankings change dramatically without link changes.
- The conclusion is that while links may still be needed to reach the top competitive tier, other factors like content, usability, and brand awareness are increasingly important - users and a good experience are Google's priority. SEOs should focus on optimizing for people through
33. @THCapper
“And I can tell you what they are.
It is content. And it’s links pointing to your site.”
Andrey Lipattsev, Search Quality Senior Strategist, Google
https://youtu.be/l8VnZCcl9J4
37. Classic examples:
● HTTPS migrations pre-2016
● 302s are as good as 301s
● Subdomains are as good as sub-folders
● CCTLDs are as good as .com
@THCapper
51. Potential Mechanisms
1. Complete coincidence - Nicholas Cage and drownings are in fact unrelated
(!)
2. Linearity - both cheese consumption and bedsheet-related deaths are
trending linearly, and thus loosely correlated
@THCapper
52. Potential Mechanisms
1. Complete coincidence - Nicholas Cage and drownings are in fact unrelated
(!)
2. Linearity - both cheese consumption and bedsheet-related deaths are
trending linearly , and thus loosely correlated
@THCapper
53. Potential Mechanisms
1. Complete coincidence - Nicholas Cage and drownings are in fact unrelated
(!)
2. Linearity - both cheese consumption and bedsheet-related deaths are
trending linearly, and thus loosely correlated
3. Reverse causation - it is in fact drownings that cause Nicholas Cage films,
not vice versa
@THCapper
54. Potential Mechanisms
1. Complete coincidence - Nicholas Cage and drownings are in fact unrelated
(!)
2. Linearity - both cheese consumption and bedsheet-related deaths are
trending linearly, and thus loosely correlated
3. Reverse causation - it is in fact drownings that cause Nicholas Cage films,
not vice versa
4. Joint causation - both cheese consumption and deaths in bedsheets are
related to increasing affluence (& effluence)
@THCapper
61. @THCapper
Moz Study My Study
17,600 queries from KWP 4,900 queries from STAT
Top 50 results Top 10 results
62. @THCapper
Moz Study My Study
17,600 queries from KWP 4,900 queries from STAT
Top 50 results Top 10 results
Desktop only (?) Desktop & Smartphone
63. @THCapper
Moz Study My Study
17,600 queries from KWP 4,900 queries from STAT
Top 50 results Top 10 results
Desktop only (?) Desktop & Smartphone
Mean Spearman correlations Mean Spearman correlations
118. 1. At the competitive, data-rich top end,
links mean increasingly little
@THCapper
119. @THCapper
1. At the competitive, data-rich top end,
links mean increasingly little
2. But, for now, links might be a big part
of what gets you into that shortlist.
120. Has it already happened?
What could replace links?
What should you do next?
124. User testing for SEO: Places to start
1. Panda surveys
@THCapper
https://youtu.be/At51X-aZ4Y4
125. User testing for SEO: Places to start
1. Panda surveys
2. Click-through rate experiments
@THCapper
126. User testing for SEO: Places to start
1. Panda surveys
2. Click-through rate experiments
3. Plain old CRO - especially focusing on initial bounce
@THCapper
127. User testing for SEO: Places to start
1. Panda surveys
2. Click-through rate experiments
3. Plain old CRO - especially focusing on initial bounce
4. All of the above: Mobile first
@THCapper
128. User testing for SEO: Places to start
1. Panda surveys
2. Click-through rate experiments
3. Plain old CRO - especially focusing on initial bounce
4. All of the above: Mobile first
None of this is new!
@THCapper