Marriott Corporation. Cost of Capital

Marriott Corporation:
The Cost of Capital
Presented by Rassul Turumbayev
ID: 20171063
Background information
Marriott was founded by John Willard Marriott in 1927 when he and his
wife, Alice Sheets Marriott, opened a root beer stand “Hot Shoppes” in
Washington, D.C. Over the next 60 years, the business grew into one of the
leading lodging and food service companies in the US.
“It's the little things that make
the big things possible. Only
close attention to the fine details
of any operation makes the
operation first class.”
--John WillardMarriott--
Historical timeline 1927 - 1967
1927
1937
Open the first A&W
root beer stand with
business partner
Hugh Colton
1939
1953
1957 1967
1966
"In-flight" airline
catering debuts at
Hoover Airport, south of
Washington, D.C.
Food service management
business in U.S. Treasury
and government defense
plant cafeterias
Hot Shoppes, Inc. stock
becomes public at
$10.25/share and sells out in
two hours of trading
Historic shift into the hotel
business. The world’s first
motor hotel opened in
Arlington, Virginia
Marriott becomes
international, acquiring
airline catering kitchen in
Caracas, Venezuela.
Acquisition of 22-unit
Big Boy restaurant.
Hot Shoppes, Inc.
becomes Marriott
Corporation.
1969
1972
Opens its first
international hotel
in Acapulco,
Mexico.
1983
1984
1985 1987
1986
Marriott partners with
Sun Line, becoming the
first lodging company to
enter the cruise business.
Marriott debuts lodging for
business travelers with the
first Courtyard hotel.
The first JW Marriott, named
in honor of founder J.
Willard Marriott, opens in
downtown Washington, D.C.
Acquisition of Gladieux Corp,
Service Systems & Howard Johnson
Co (Prime Motor Inns, with 350
restaurants & 68 turnpike units)
J.W.Marriott passes away at age
84.
Acquisition of Saga
Corporation
One company, many brands.
Becomes the #1 hospitality
company in the world.
Worldwide Reservation
Center. The Residence Inn
Company. Tokyo Stock
Exchange. Economy lodging
segment. Franchising.
Historical timeline 1969 -
1987
Marriott’s Brands
PREMIUM
SELECT SERVICE
LONGER STAYS
LUXURY LODGING
Elements of Financial Strategy
MANAGE INVEST
OPTIMIZE REPURCHASE
Manage rather than own
hotel assets. Sold its hotel
assets to limited partners to
reduce assets and thus, it can
increase ROA and thereby
increase potential
profitability.
Optimize the use of debt in the
capital structure. Determined the
amount of debt in its capital
structure by focusing on its
ability to service its debt. Interest
coverage target instead of a
target debt-to-equity ratio. $2,5
billion of debt, 59% of its total
capital.
Invest in projects that increase
shareholder value. Used discounted
cash flow techniques to evaluate
potential investments allow the
company to invest only in profitable
projects. Therefore, it can maximize
the use of its CF to gain profits..
Repurchase undervalued shares.
By buying back its under valued
shares, Marriott can increase PE
(price to earnings) ratio when
needed and can make its
investors’ holdings more valuable
because share prices will increase
in ROE.
Three main lines of business
Lodging
In 1987
Sales 41%
Profit 51%
Contract
ServicesIn 1987
Sales 46%
Profit 33%
Restaurants
In 1987
Sales 13%
Profit 16%
WACC, Cost of Equity, Cost of Debt
Calculations
WACC
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a calculation of
a firm's cost of capital in which each category of capital is
proportionately weighted. All sources of capital, including common
stock, preferred stock, bonds and any other long-term debt, are
included in a WACC calculation. A firm’s WACC increases as the
beta and rate of return on equity increase because an increase in
WACC denotes a decrease in valuation and an increase in risk.
WACC
Cost of Equity (by CAPM formula)
The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a model that
describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected
return for assets, particularly stocks.
It is an integral part of the weight average cost of capital
(WACC) as CAPM calculates the cost of equity.
(Rm – Rf) = Market Risk Premium
Beta Estimation
Question and Answer session
1) Are the four components of Marriott’s financial
strategy consistent with its growth objective?
a) Manage rather than own – consistent with growth strategy,
because Marriott attracts additional capital, which gives an
opportunity to invest more in the future, shares some risks with
limited partners. Partnership may be also a good way of saving on
taxes.
b) Invest in projects – consistent with growth. Positive NPV
projects increase shareholders value (SV).
c) Optimizing capital structure – consistent with growth. Optimal
capital structure generally should lead to a higher SV. It also gives a
good way to control default risk by aiming at certain coverage ratio.
d) Repurchase of undervalued assets – generally does not
consistent with growth strategy. It can lead to a lower growth, because
company uses it’s free funds to buyback shares and therefore will
under in NPV positive projects (that leads to lower growth). We
should be very clear why shares going down – it may be a result of a
bad investment decisions that led to losses. In this case, buybacks will
lead to overpricing of Marriott’s shares. Additional argument against
from the position of shareholders – buybacks, if shares are temporary
undervalued, than it might be a cheap way of paying dividends to
shareholders.
2) How does Marriott use its estimate of its cost of
capital? Does this make sense?
Marriott uses the WACC to estimate the opportunity cost of
capital for investments with similar risks and used this approach for to
determine the cost of capital for each of its division and for the
corporation as a whole. The cost of capital for each division was also
updated annually. This makes sense because each division's debt
capacity, debt cost and equity cost is likely to differ so calculating it
separately, gives an accurate weight per division and tie the cost of
debt and equity to the market value.
Secondly, the WACC is an important factor in determining hurdle
rate. In this case, hurdle rates are used to allow managers to monitor
the company’s performance more efficiently. Since most of the
projects are division related, by capturing the individual inputs and
hence WACC for each divisions, Marriott ensures that it embarks on
projects with valuable expected NPV and optimize the use of debt in
the capital structure.
Finally, for simplicity purposes, the distinction between floating
rate and fixed coupon rate debts will be ignored.
3) What is the WACC for Marriott Corporation?
a) What risk free rate and risk premium did you use to calculate the cost of
capital?
b) How did you measure Marriott’s cost of debt?
WACC for Marriott is 11,88% (Consist of Lodging – 9,47%; Contract
Services – 14,79%; Restaurants – 14,16%)
a) For the Marriott corporation - from Table B, used rate with 30 years
maturity. For the lodging - 10 years. For CS and Restaurants - 1 year rate
numbers. The main reason for choosing LT and ST rates depends on the maturity
of the investment under consideration. Corporation and Lodging division will
definitely be invested in a LT while others in ST investment.
(CAPM) = risk-free rate + (company’s beta x risk premium)
b) Cost of Debt (rD) = Government rate of borrowing (Table B) + Premium
above Government rate – (Table A)
4) What type of investments would you value using
Marriott’s WACC?
Since the WACC is 11,88%, any investments with a WACC equal or lower
than 11,88% would be an investment to be considered of value by Marriott. The
company will continue to look at other investments that will lower their WACC.
The type of investment to be considered is issuing bonds to get the financing more
cheaply. The firm is built upon lodging, CS and restaurants as the three key
operations. By continuing investments in their three key operations has created
different WACC for each operation versus the whole company.
5) If Marriott used a single corporate hurdle rate
for evaluating investment opportunities in each of
its lines of business, what would happen to the
company over time?
Investopedia online defines a hurdle rate as the minimum rate of return on a
project or investment required by a manger or investor. In order to compensate for
risk, the riskier the project, the higher the hurdle rate.
As different divisions have different systematic risks and leverage levels,
using a single corporate hurdle rate to evaluate investment opportunities would be
inappropriate. Risk for the whole company would be lower than the risk for the
single project because risk for the whole company is more diversified.
If hurdle rate is too low, more projects will be accepted. If too high, fewer
projects will be accepted.
This could ultimately result in investments which are not aligned with overall
objectives.
6) What is the cost of capital for the lodging and
restaurant division of Marriott?
a) What risk-free rate and risk premium did you use to calculating the cost of
equity for each division? Why did you choose these numbers?
b) How did you measure the cost of debt for each division? Should the debt cost
differ across divisions? Why?
Questions a and b, already answered before.
c) How did you measure the beta of each division?
7) What is the cost of capital for Marriott’s contract services
division? How can you estimate its equity costs without
publicly traded comparable companies?
To calculate the cost of capital for the contract services is more complex
because there are not any publicly traded peer companies to compare against.
Privately held companies do not report their results because they do not have to be
compliant with the financial reporting requirements of publicly traded companies.
Conclusion
Marriott has to choose a risk value for each of the business and then go for
combining the Hurdle rates for different business to form a portfolio and decide
upon which business to invest in.
Based on the WACCs stated for Marriott and its various departments it’s
obvious that the values are different
If Marriott has used only one hurdle rate then it would be used the 11.88%
rate which is for the entire company.
As the risk in a business changes, the β value would change thus changing the
hurdle rate. The future rates that the firm has used to predict the WACC are
themselves prone to change with time. That is why WACC needs to be updated
regularly to make accurate decisions.
We represent the cost of capital with risk, so therefore the risk in the lodging
department is lower when compared with other departments that have a higher
WACC.
While Marriott used this rate, other projects would be rejected exact Lodging
because of its cost of capital of 9.47% which is lower than Marriott’s WACC as
entire.
A higher rate effects in a negative NPV as well as a reduced cash flow.
In summary, the risk that Marriott assumes will increase over time as Marriott
continues to invest in high risk projects.
Good bye!
1 de 20

Recomendados

FIN4140 Corporate Finance: Marriott corporation case study solution por
FIN4140 Corporate Finance: Marriott corporation case study solutionFIN4140 Corporate Finance: Marriott corporation case study solution
FIN4140 Corporate Finance: Marriott corporation case study solutionNURHANI MUIS
14.6K vistas15 diapositivas
Marriott case por
Marriott caseMarriott case
Marriott caseTHAO BUI
61.8K vistas14 diapositivas
Presentation marriott study case cost of capital por
Presentation marriott study case cost of capitalPresentation marriott study case cost of capital
Presentation marriott study case cost of capitalBm Hakim
2.1K vistas16 diapositivas
Marriot Corp Case por
Marriot Corp CaseMarriot Corp Case
Marriot Corp CaseHervert Mendez, MSc Finance
9.6K vistas17 diapositivas
Nike Cost of Capital por
Nike Cost of Capital Nike Cost of Capital
Nike Cost of Capital Fadila Pratika Alimuddin
10.2K vistas10 diapositivas
Marriott Corporation- Corporate Finance presentation por
Marriott  Corporation- Corporate Finance presentationMarriott  Corporation- Corporate Finance presentation
Marriott Corporation- Corporate Finance presentationnroopraj24
63.5K vistas19 diapositivas

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Netscape IPO case study Analysis por
Netscape IPO case study AnalysisNetscape IPO case study Analysis
Netscape IPO case study AnalysisTony Sebastian
18.5K vistas15 diapositivas
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire por
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to AcquireThe Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to AcquireEric Moon
73.3K vistas24 diapositivas
Atlantic computer case analysis por
Atlantic computer case analysisAtlantic computer case analysis
Atlantic computer case analysisFarhan Khan
88.2K vistas11 diapositivas
Case study- Newell por
Case study- NewellCase study- Newell
Case study- Newelltanveerahmed336
2.4K vistas11 diapositivas
Linear technology case analysis dividend payout policy por
Linear technology case analysis dividend payout policyLinear technology case analysis dividend payout policy
Linear technology case analysis dividend payout policyHimanshu Gulia
10.9K vistas30 diapositivas
The Fashion Channel por
The Fashion ChannelThe Fashion Channel
The Fashion Channelshiva chegini
68.8K vistas30 diapositivas

La actualidad más candente(20)

Netscape IPO case study Analysis por Tony Sebastian
Netscape IPO case study AnalysisNetscape IPO case study Analysis
Netscape IPO case study Analysis
Tony Sebastian18.5K vistas
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire por Eric Moon
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to AcquireThe Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
Eric Moon73.3K vistas
Atlantic computer case analysis por Farhan Khan
Atlantic computer case analysisAtlantic computer case analysis
Atlantic computer case analysis
Farhan Khan88.2K vistas
Linear technology case analysis dividend payout policy por Himanshu Gulia
Linear technology case analysis dividend payout policyLinear technology case analysis dividend payout policy
Linear technology case analysis dividend payout policy
Himanshu Gulia10.9K vistas
The Fashion Channel por shiva chegini
The Fashion ChannelThe Fashion Channel
The Fashion Channel
shiva chegini68.8K vistas
Apex corporation case study por Utkarsh Shivam
Apex corporation case studyApex corporation case study
Apex corporation case study
Utkarsh Shivam16.7K vistas
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis por mbartugs
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case AnalysisHarrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
mbartugs24.2K vistas
A HBR case study on Depreciation at delta airlines and singapore airlines por Swaraj Mishra
A HBR case study on Depreciation at delta airlines and singapore airlinesA HBR case study on Depreciation at delta airlines and singapore airlines
A HBR case study on Depreciation at delta airlines and singapore airlines
Swaraj Mishra16K vistas
Acquisition of Mercury Athletic por JB Gough
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticAcquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
JB Gough30.7K vistas
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study por Santhosh Kumar
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Santhosh Kumar23.2K vistas
Wilkerson Company Case por Ella Shen
Wilkerson Company CaseWilkerson Company Case
Wilkerson Company Case
Ella Shen37.7K vistas
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis por Shashank Srivastava
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case AnalysisMountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
Mountain Man Brewing Company: Case Analysis
Shashank Srivastava70.7K vistas
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 por Sharon
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Sharon 14.9K vistas
Presentation Case Tri Star - Final por Spencer Cheung
Presentation Case Tri Star - FinalPresentation Case Tri Star - Final
Presentation Case Tri Star - Final
Spencer Cheung20K vistas

Similar a Marriott Corporation. Cost of Capital

Essay On Cost Of Capital por
Essay On Cost Of CapitalEssay On Cost Of Capital
Essay On Cost Of CapitalNikki Smith
4 vistas65 diapositivas
A Managing General Agent ( Mga ) por
A Managing General Agent ( Mga )A Managing General Agent ( Mga )
A Managing General Agent ( Mga )Amanda Marie
8 vistas50 diapositivas
Nike Cost Of Capital por
Nike Cost Of CapitalNike Cost Of Capital
Nike Cost Of CapitalBrenda White
6 vistas59 diapositivas
Cost Of Capital End Of Book Solutions por
Cost Of Capital End Of Book SolutionsCost Of Capital End Of Book Solutions
Cost Of Capital End Of Book SolutionsKimberly Jones
4 vistas173 diapositivas
The Weighted Average Cost Of Capital por
The Weighted Average Cost Of CapitalThe Weighted Average Cost Of Capital
The Weighted Average Cost Of CapitalBarbara Taylor
6 vistas65 diapositivas
(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docx por
(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docx(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docx
(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docxhoney725342
9 vistas36 diapositivas

Similar a Marriott Corporation. Cost of Capital(20)

Essay On Cost Of Capital por Nikki Smith
Essay On Cost Of CapitalEssay On Cost Of Capital
Essay On Cost Of Capital
Nikki Smith4 vistas
A Managing General Agent ( Mga ) por Amanda Marie
A Managing General Agent ( Mga )A Managing General Agent ( Mga )
A Managing General Agent ( Mga )
Amanda Marie8 vistas
Cost Of Capital End Of Book Solutions por Kimberly Jones
Cost Of Capital End Of Book SolutionsCost Of Capital End Of Book Solutions
Cost Of Capital End Of Book Solutions
Kimberly Jones4 vistas
The Weighted Average Cost Of Capital por Barbara Taylor
The Weighted Average Cost Of CapitalThe Weighted Average Cost Of Capital
The Weighted Average Cost Of Capital
Barbara Taylor6 vistas
(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docx por honey725342
(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docx(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docx
(Each question must be a minimum of 200 words)1. If you think .docx
honey7253429 vistas
Personal Finance Unit 2 Term Paper por Jill Crawford
Personal Finance Unit 2 Term PaperPersonal Finance Unit 2 Term Paper
Personal Finance Unit 2 Term Paper
Jill Crawford3 vistas
Notes On Investment Policy And Portfolio Development por Karen Hennings
Notes On Investment Policy And Portfolio DevelopmentNotes On Investment Policy And Portfolio Development
Notes On Investment Policy And Portfolio Development
Karen Hennings3 vistas
Mercer Capital | Valuation Insight | Capital Structure in 30 Minutes por Mercer Capital
Mercer Capital | Valuation Insight | Capital Structure in 30 MinutesMercer Capital | Valuation Insight | Capital Structure in 30 Minutes
Mercer Capital | Valuation Insight | Capital Structure in 30 Minutes
Mercer Capital393 vistas
Midland Energy Resources, Inc. por Abby Johnson
Midland Energy Resources, Inc.Midland Energy Resources, Inc.
Midland Energy Resources, Inc.
Abby Johnson10 vistas
Lost profits -discount rate-- part 2 por Robert Lloyd
Lost profits -discount rate-- part 2Lost profits -discount rate-- part 2
Lost profits -discount rate-- part 2
Robert Lloyd662 vistas
Swot Analysis For Lululemon Athletica por Jenny Smith
Swot Analysis For Lululemon AthleticaSwot Analysis For Lululemon Athletica
Swot Analysis For Lululemon Athletica
Jenny Smith2 vistas
r 22© 2013 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This documen.docx por makdul
r 22© 2013 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This documen.docxr 22© 2013 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This documen.docx
r 22© 2013 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This documen.docx
makdul6 vistas
Ration Analysis Between Two Companies por Gina Buck
Ration Analysis Between Two CompaniesRation Analysis Between Two Companies
Ration Analysis Between Two Companies
Gina Buck4 vistas
Incorporating Hybrids into WACC Calculations - Feb 2007 por Adrian Crockett, CFA
Incorporating Hybrids into WACC Calculations - Feb 2007Incorporating Hybrids into WACC Calculations - Feb 2007
Incorporating Hybrids into WACC Calculations - Feb 2007

Último

duck railing.pdf por
duck railing.pdfduck railing.pdf
duck railing.pdfaluminumdeckrailingc
8 vistas1 diapositiva
PMU Launch - Guaranteed Slides por
PMU Launch - Guaranteed SlidesPMU Launch - Guaranteed Slides
PMU Launch - Guaranteed Slidespmulaunch
15 vistas64 diapositivas
voice logger software aegis.pdf por
voice logger software aegis.pdfvoice logger software aegis.pdf
voice logger software aegis.pdfNirmal Sharma
30 vistas1 diapositiva
Accel_Series_2023Autumn_En.pptx por
Accel_Series_2023Autumn_En.pptxAccel_Series_2023Autumn_En.pptx
Accel_Series_2023Autumn_En.pptxNTTDATA INTRAMART
78 vistas75 diapositivas
Coomes Consulting Business Profile por
Coomes Consulting Business ProfileCoomes Consulting Business Profile
Coomes Consulting Business ProfileChris Coomes
45 vistas10 diapositivas
Top 10 Web Development Companies in California por
Top 10 Web Development Companies in CaliforniaTop 10 Web Development Companies in California
Top 10 Web Development Companies in CaliforniaTopCSSGallery
42 vistas27 diapositivas

Último(20)

PMU Launch - Guaranteed Slides por pmulaunch
PMU Launch - Guaranteed SlidesPMU Launch - Guaranteed Slides
PMU Launch - Guaranteed Slides
pmulaunch15 vistas
voice logger software aegis.pdf por Nirmal Sharma
voice logger software aegis.pdfvoice logger software aegis.pdf
voice logger software aegis.pdf
Nirmal Sharma30 vistas
Coomes Consulting Business Profile por Chris Coomes
Coomes Consulting Business ProfileCoomes Consulting Business Profile
Coomes Consulting Business Profile
Chris Coomes45 vistas
Top 10 Web Development Companies in California por TopCSSGallery
Top 10 Web Development Companies in CaliforniaTop 10 Web Development Companies in California
Top 10 Web Development Companies in California
TopCSSGallery42 vistas
Building Careers at Specialty TRE 2023 por Jennifer Sanborn
Building Careers at Specialty TRE 2023Building Careers at Specialty TRE 2023
Building Careers at Specialty TRE 2023
Jennifer Sanborn42 vistas
Presentation on proposed acquisition of leading European asset manager Aermon... por KeppelCorporation
Presentation on proposed acquisition of leading European asset manager Aermon...Presentation on proposed acquisition of leading European asset manager Aermon...
Presentation on proposed acquisition of leading European asset manager Aermon...
KeppelCorporation137 vistas
Pitch Deck Teardown: Scalestack's $1M AI sales tech Seed deck por HajeJanKamps
Pitch Deck Teardown: Scalestack's $1M AI sales tech Seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Scalestack's $1M AI sales tech Seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Scalestack's $1M AI sales tech Seed deck
HajeJanKamps285 vistas
2023 Photo Contest.pptx por culhama
2023 Photo Contest.pptx2023 Photo Contest.pptx
2023 Photo Contest.pptx
culhama26 vistas
See the new MTN tariffs effected November 28, 2023 por Kweku Zurek
See the new MTN tariffs effected November 28, 2023See the new MTN tariffs effected November 28, 2023
See the new MTN tariffs effected November 28, 2023
Kweku Zurek29.4K vistas
Monthly Social Media Update November 2023 copy.pptx por Andy Lambert
Monthly Social Media Update November 2023 copy.pptxMonthly Social Media Update November 2023 copy.pptx
Monthly Social Media Update November 2023 copy.pptx
Andy Lambert13 vistas
Imports Next Level.pdf por Bloomerang
Imports Next Level.pdfImports Next Level.pdf
Imports Next Level.pdf
Bloomerang76 vistas
Navigating EUDR Compliance within the Coffee Industry por Peter Horsten
Navigating EUDR Compliance within the Coffee IndustryNavigating EUDR Compliance within the Coffee Industry
Navigating EUDR Compliance within the Coffee Industry
Peter Horsten35 vistas

Marriott Corporation. Cost of Capital

  • 1. Marriott Corporation: The Cost of Capital Presented by Rassul Turumbayev ID: 20171063
  • 2. Background information Marriott was founded by John Willard Marriott in 1927 when he and his wife, Alice Sheets Marriott, opened a root beer stand “Hot Shoppes” in Washington, D.C. Over the next 60 years, the business grew into one of the leading lodging and food service companies in the US. “It's the little things that make the big things possible. Only close attention to the fine details of any operation makes the operation first class.” --John WillardMarriott--
  • 3. Historical timeline 1927 - 1967 1927 1937 Open the first A&W root beer stand with business partner Hugh Colton 1939 1953 1957 1967 1966 "In-flight" airline catering debuts at Hoover Airport, south of Washington, D.C. Food service management business in U.S. Treasury and government defense plant cafeterias Hot Shoppes, Inc. stock becomes public at $10.25/share and sells out in two hours of trading Historic shift into the hotel business. The world’s first motor hotel opened in Arlington, Virginia Marriott becomes international, acquiring airline catering kitchen in Caracas, Venezuela. Acquisition of 22-unit Big Boy restaurant. Hot Shoppes, Inc. becomes Marriott Corporation.
  • 4. 1969 1972 Opens its first international hotel in Acapulco, Mexico. 1983 1984 1985 1987 1986 Marriott partners with Sun Line, becoming the first lodging company to enter the cruise business. Marriott debuts lodging for business travelers with the first Courtyard hotel. The first JW Marriott, named in honor of founder J. Willard Marriott, opens in downtown Washington, D.C. Acquisition of Gladieux Corp, Service Systems & Howard Johnson Co (Prime Motor Inns, with 350 restaurants & 68 turnpike units) J.W.Marriott passes away at age 84. Acquisition of Saga Corporation One company, many brands. Becomes the #1 hospitality company in the world. Worldwide Reservation Center. The Residence Inn Company. Tokyo Stock Exchange. Economy lodging segment. Franchising. Historical timeline 1969 - 1987
  • 6. Elements of Financial Strategy MANAGE INVEST OPTIMIZE REPURCHASE Manage rather than own hotel assets. Sold its hotel assets to limited partners to reduce assets and thus, it can increase ROA and thereby increase potential profitability. Optimize the use of debt in the capital structure. Determined the amount of debt in its capital structure by focusing on its ability to service its debt. Interest coverage target instead of a target debt-to-equity ratio. $2,5 billion of debt, 59% of its total capital. Invest in projects that increase shareholder value. Used discounted cash flow techniques to evaluate potential investments allow the company to invest only in profitable projects. Therefore, it can maximize the use of its CF to gain profits.. Repurchase undervalued shares. By buying back its under valued shares, Marriott can increase PE (price to earnings) ratio when needed and can make its investors’ holdings more valuable because share prices will increase in ROE.
  • 7. Three main lines of business Lodging In 1987 Sales 41% Profit 51% Contract ServicesIn 1987 Sales 46% Profit 33% Restaurants In 1987 Sales 13% Profit 16%
  • 8. WACC, Cost of Equity, Cost of Debt Calculations
  • 9. WACC The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a calculation of a firm's cost of capital in which each category of capital is proportionately weighted. All sources of capital, including common stock, preferred stock, bonds and any other long-term debt, are included in a WACC calculation. A firm’s WACC increases as the beta and rate of return on equity increase because an increase in WACC denotes a decrease in valuation and an increase in risk.
  • 10. WACC
  • 11. Cost of Equity (by CAPM formula) The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a model that describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets, particularly stocks. It is an integral part of the weight average cost of capital (WACC) as CAPM calculates the cost of equity. (Rm – Rf) = Market Risk Premium
  • 14. 1) Are the four components of Marriott’s financial strategy consistent with its growth objective? a) Manage rather than own – consistent with growth strategy, because Marriott attracts additional capital, which gives an opportunity to invest more in the future, shares some risks with limited partners. Partnership may be also a good way of saving on taxes. b) Invest in projects – consistent with growth. Positive NPV projects increase shareholders value (SV). c) Optimizing capital structure – consistent with growth. Optimal capital structure generally should lead to a higher SV. It also gives a good way to control default risk by aiming at certain coverage ratio. d) Repurchase of undervalued assets – generally does not consistent with growth strategy. It can lead to a lower growth, because company uses it’s free funds to buyback shares and therefore will under in NPV positive projects (that leads to lower growth). We should be very clear why shares going down – it may be a result of a bad investment decisions that led to losses. In this case, buybacks will lead to overpricing of Marriott’s shares. Additional argument against from the position of shareholders – buybacks, if shares are temporary undervalued, than it might be a cheap way of paying dividends to shareholders.
  • 15. 2) How does Marriott use its estimate of its cost of capital? Does this make sense? Marriott uses the WACC to estimate the opportunity cost of capital for investments with similar risks and used this approach for to determine the cost of capital for each of its division and for the corporation as a whole. The cost of capital for each division was also updated annually. This makes sense because each division's debt capacity, debt cost and equity cost is likely to differ so calculating it separately, gives an accurate weight per division and tie the cost of debt and equity to the market value. Secondly, the WACC is an important factor in determining hurdle rate. In this case, hurdle rates are used to allow managers to monitor the company’s performance more efficiently. Since most of the projects are division related, by capturing the individual inputs and hence WACC for each divisions, Marriott ensures that it embarks on projects with valuable expected NPV and optimize the use of debt in the capital structure. Finally, for simplicity purposes, the distinction between floating rate and fixed coupon rate debts will be ignored.
  • 16. 3) What is the WACC for Marriott Corporation? a) What risk free rate and risk premium did you use to calculate the cost of capital? b) How did you measure Marriott’s cost of debt? WACC for Marriott is 11,88% (Consist of Lodging – 9,47%; Contract Services – 14,79%; Restaurants – 14,16%) a) For the Marriott corporation - from Table B, used rate with 30 years maturity. For the lodging - 10 years. For CS and Restaurants - 1 year rate numbers. The main reason for choosing LT and ST rates depends on the maturity of the investment under consideration. Corporation and Lodging division will definitely be invested in a LT while others in ST investment. (CAPM) = risk-free rate + (company’s beta x risk premium) b) Cost of Debt (rD) = Government rate of borrowing (Table B) + Premium above Government rate – (Table A)
  • 17. 4) What type of investments would you value using Marriott’s WACC? Since the WACC is 11,88%, any investments with a WACC equal or lower than 11,88% would be an investment to be considered of value by Marriott. The company will continue to look at other investments that will lower their WACC. The type of investment to be considered is issuing bonds to get the financing more cheaply. The firm is built upon lodging, CS and restaurants as the three key operations. By continuing investments in their three key operations has created different WACC for each operation versus the whole company. 5) If Marriott used a single corporate hurdle rate for evaluating investment opportunities in each of its lines of business, what would happen to the company over time? Investopedia online defines a hurdle rate as the minimum rate of return on a project or investment required by a manger or investor. In order to compensate for risk, the riskier the project, the higher the hurdle rate. As different divisions have different systematic risks and leverage levels, using a single corporate hurdle rate to evaluate investment opportunities would be inappropriate. Risk for the whole company would be lower than the risk for the single project because risk for the whole company is more diversified. If hurdle rate is too low, more projects will be accepted. If too high, fewer projects will be accepted. This could ultimately result in investments which are not aligned with overall objectives.
  • 18. 6) What is the cost of capital for the lodging and restaurant division of Marriott? a) What risk-free rate and risk premium did you use to calculating the cost of equity for each division? Why did you choose these numbers? b) How did you measure the cost of debt for each division? Should the debt cost differ across divisions? Why? Questions a and b, already answered before. c) How did you measure the beta of each division?
  • 19. 7) What is the cost of capital for Marriott’s contract services division? How can you estimate its equity costs without publicly traded comparable companies? To calculate the cost of capital for the contract services is more complex because there are not any publicly traded peer companies to compare against. Privately held companies do not report their results because they do not have to be compliant with the financial reporting requirements of publicly traded companies.
  • 20. Conclusion Marriott has to choose a risk value for each of the business and then go for combining the Hurdle rates for different business to form a portfolio and decide upon which business to invest in. Based on the WACCs stated for Marriott and its various departments it’s obvious that the values are different If Marriott has used only one hurdle rate then it would be used the 11.88% rate which is for the entire company. As the risk in a business changes, the β value would change thus changing the hurdle rate. The future rates that the firm has used to predict the WACC are themselves prone to change with time. That is why WACC needs to be updated regularly to make accurate decisions. We represent the cost of capital with risk, so therefore the risk in the lodging department is lower when compared with other departments that have a higher WACC. While Marriott used this rate, other projects would be rejected exact Lodging because of its cost of capital of 9.47% which is lower than Marriott’s WACC as entire. A higher rate effects in a negative NPV as well as a reduced cash flow. In summary, the risk that Marriott assumes will increase over time as Marriott continues to invest in high risk projects. Good bye!