C H A P T E R                            18Performance and Remedies         It is an immutable law in business         tha...
Learning Objectives• Explain the effect of conditions on  the duty to perform a contract• Distinguish strict from substant...
Overview• Entering into a contract evidences an  intention to perform (complete)  obligations under the contract  – Genera...
Conditions in a Contract• Sometimes a promisor’s duty to perform  depends on the occurrence of some  event or condition, a...
Condition Precedent• A future, uncertain event creating a duty  to perform  – Example: Tisha contracts to buy a house on t...
Condition Concurrent• When the contract calls for parties to  perform at the same time  – Example: Bryan promises to buy S...
Condition Subsequent• A future, uncertain event that discharges  the duty to perform  – Example: Lee agrees to work for Wo...
Classification of Conditions Based           Method of Creation• Express condition: condition specified in the  language o...
Excuse of Conditions• Occurrence of a condition may be  excused  – Estoppel: when a person whose duty is    conditional le...
Excuse of Conditions• Occurrence of condition  excused  – When occurrence of    condition was prevented or    hindered by ...
Harbor Park Market v. Gronda• Facts:  – Grondas agreed to sell assets to Harbor Park    Market (Harbor) expressly conditio...
Harbor Park Market v. Gronda• Issue and Reasoning:  – Issue on appeal is whether Grondas    interfered with (and waived) t...
Performance of Contracts• To determine whether a promisor is  discharged by performance, courts consider  the standard of ...
Performance of Contracts• A substantial performance standard is slightly  lower standard applied to duties that are  diffi...
Substantial Performance                          18-15
Breach of Contract• Under the implied covenant of good faith  and fair dealing, every contract includes an  obligation to ...
Determining Materiality• Standard for determining materiality is  flexible, but generally based on the amount  of the brea...
Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C• Facts:  – Sellers agreed to sell farmland to developer    Ocean Atlantic (Buyer), bu...
Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C • Procedural History and Issue:   – Buyers sued Sellers seeking specific performance ...
Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C • Legal Reasoning and Holding:   – The materiality inquiry focuses on two     interre...
Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C • Legal Reasoning and Holding:   – In examining the totality of the     circumstances...
Anticipatory Repudiation• When promisor indicates before time for  performance that promisor is unwilling or  unable to ca...
Excuses for Non-Performance• Nonperformance of a duty generally is a  breach of contract, but nonperformance may  be excus...
Other Reasons for Discharge• Discharge by mutual agreement• Accord and satisfaction  – Accord is an agreement in which a  ...
Other Reasons for Discharge• Discharge by alteration  – One party alters and other does not consent• Discharge by statute ...
Remedies for Breach of Contract• Legal remedies (money damages)  – Compensatory damages, nominal    damages, liquidated (c...
Relevant Cases• George v. AL Hoyt & Sons, Inc.: consequential damages that could have been reasonably anticipated by the p...
Test Your Knowledge• True=A, False = B  – When a condition precedent occurs, the    contract arises, creating duties to pe...
Test Your Knowledge• True=A, False = B  – Legal remedies for breach of contract    include specific performance or injunct...
Test Your Knowledge• Multiple Choice  – Steve promised to work for his employer on    Saturday morning. Steve didn’t show ...
Test Your Knowledge• Multiple Choice  – Robert contracted to paint Stan’s house by    the end of June, but realized after ...
Thought Questions• Should a non-  breaching party  always file suit  against a breaching  party?• What are the ethical  is...
Próxima SlideShare
Cargando en…5
×

Chapter 18 – Performance and Remedies

3.281 visualizaciones

Publicado el

  • Sé el primero en comentar

Chapter 18 – Performance and Remedies

  1. 1. C H A P T E R 18Performance and Remedies It is an immutable law in business that words are words, explanations are explanations, promises are promises – but only performance is reality. Harold S. Geneen, CEO of ITT Managing (co-written with Alvin Moscow, 1984) 18-1
  2. 2. Learning Objectives• Explain the effect of conditions on the duty to perform a contract• Distinguish strict from substantial performance• Discuss the various remedies for breach of contract• List circumstances that can excuse performance 18-2
  3. 3. Overview• Entering into a contract evidences an intention to perform (complete) obligations under the contract – Generally, each party performs the promise and is discharged (released) from further obligation• If a party fails to perform as expected, courts may be asked to determine the respective rights and duties of the parties 18-3
  4. 4. Conditions in a Contract• Sometimes a promisor’s duty to perform depends on the occurrence of some event or condition, an uncertain, future event• A condition may be classified as a: – Condition precedent – Condition subsesequent – Condition concurrent 18-4
  5. 5. Condition Precedent• A future, uncertain event creating a duty to perform – Example: Tisha contracts to buy a house on the condition she is able to obtain financing. Contract arises and she is obligated to purchase the house once she obtains financing 18-5
  6. 6. Condition Concurrent• When the contract calls for parties to perform at the same time – Example: Bryan promises to buy Stevie’s guitar for $1000. Stevie must give Bryan the guitar when Bryan gives Stevie $1000. 18-6
  7. 7. Condition Subsequent• A future, uncertain event that discharges the duty to perform – Example: Lee agrees to work for WoolCo until he returns to college. Lee returns to college in August and discharges his obligation under the contract. 18-7
  8. 8. Classification of Conditions Based Method of Creation• Express condition: condition specified in the language of the parties’ contract• Implied-in-fact condition: condition not specifically stated by the parties but implied by the nature of the parties’ promise• Constructive condition: Also known as implied-in-law conditions; conditions imposed by law rather than by agreement of parties to do justice between the parties 18-8
  9. 9. Excuse of Conditions• Occurrence of a condition may be excused – Estoppel: when a person whose duty is conditional leads other party to rely on his noninsistence on the condition – Waiver: when a person whose duty is conditional voluntarily gives up his right to the occurrence of the condition 18-9
  10. 10. Excuse of Conditions• Occurrence of condition excused – When occurrence of condition was prevented or hindered by party benefiting from the condition – When performance of the act that constitutes the condition becomes impossible 18-10
  11. 11. Harbor Park Market v. Gronda• Facts: – Grondas agreed to sell assets to Harbor Park Market (Harbor) expressly conditioned: • “This Purchase Agreement is subject to review & approval of attorney Lynn Stedman…” – Before Stedman approved Harbor contract, Gronda conditionally accepted another offer, also expressly conditioned on Stedman’s approval – Stedman approved second contract and Harbor sued for specific performance, winning at trial 18-11
  12. 12. Harbor Park Market v. Gronda• Issue and Reasoning: – Issue on appeal is whether Grondas interfered with (and waived) the condition precedent by submitting to second contract to Stedman – Contract language gave attorney complete discretion to approve or disapprove the agreement for whatever reason, and Grondas performed condition as required – Reversed and remanded in favor of Grondas 18-12
  13. 13. Performance of Contracts• To determine whether a promisor is discharged by performance, courts consider the standard of performance expected• A strict performance standard requires full or perfect compliance with the contract terms – Example: Buyer agrees to finalize a home purchase (close) by 5:00 pm on Nov. 21. If Buyer does not close by that time, the contract ends. Buyer is discharged from buying and Seller is discharged from turning over the house, but there may be legal remedies to Seller for Buyer’s breach 18-13
  14. 14. Performance of Contracts• A substantial performance standard is slightly lower standard applied to duties that are difficult to perform without some deviation from perfection in minor respects – Example: Bob Builder built a home for Jason. Bob met the contract terms except he didn’t paint the baseboards the right shade of white. Bob is discharged and Jason has the duty to pay the contract price less any damages (repainting) resulting from the defects in performance 18-14
  15. 15. Substantial Performance 18-15
  16. 16. Breach of Contract• Under the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, every contract includes an obligation to perform in good faith• If a promisor fails to perform, breach occurs• At minimum, breach of contract gives the non-breaching party the right to sue and recover for damages caused by the breach• For a material (serious) breach, further legal remedies are available 18-16
  17. 17. Determining Materiality• Standard for determining materiality is flexible, but generally based on the amount of the breach and timing for performance – Example: if contract contains a “time is of the essence” provision, any delay by either party may constitute a material breach – Example: if time for performance immaterial, promisee must accept late performance if within reasonable time after performance due, but may deduct costs of delay 18-17
  18. 18. Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C• Facts: – Sellers agreed to sell farmland to developer Ocean Atlantic (Buyer), but delays ensued – After negotiation and litigation, Sellers and Buyer signed a settlement agreement with a “time is of the essence” clause (basis of the lawsuit) – Shortly before closing date, Buyers again tried to extend the contract and Sellers refused, warning that “time is of the essence” – Buyers assured Sellers they would close, but failed to do so; Sellers notifed Buyers of termination 18-18
  19. 19. Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C • Procedural History and Issue: – Buyers sued Sellers seeking specific performance – Trial court found for Sellers and Buyers appealed – Issue: whether Buyers materially breached the agreement by failing to tender the purchase funds and close on the property on the specified date 18-19
  20. 20. Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C • Legal Reasoning and Holding: – The materiality inquiry focuses on two interrelated issues: (1) the intent of the parties with respect to the disputed provision; and (2) the equitable factors and circumstances surrounding the breach of the provision – Intent of the parties was clear – time was of the essence and timing was material 18-20
  21. 21. Arnhold v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland C • Legal Reasoning and Holding: – In examining the totality of the circumstances, the facts do not support Buyer’s argument • “Sellers displayed the patience of Job by waiting nearly 3 1⁄2 years” – Buyer treated material deadlines as trivial, thus Buyer has lost any right to purchase Sellers’ land – Affirmed in favor of Sellers 18-21
  22. 22. Anticipatory Repudiation• When promisor indicates before time for performance that promisor is unwilling or unable to carry out the contract, anticipatory repudiation or anticipatory breach occurs• Promisee has choices: – Withhold his/her own performance and sue for damages for total breach of contract immediately – Wait to sue until time for performance in case other party changes mind and decides to perform – Waive his/her rights to performance 18-22
  23. 23. Excuses for Non-Performance• Nonperformance of a duty generally is a breach of contract, but nonperformance may be excused in certain circumstances: – Impossibility: “it cannot be done by anyone” • See East Capitol View Community Development Corpo – Impracticability: when unforeseen developments make performance highly impracticable, unreasonably expensive, or of little value to promisee (UCC 2–615) 18-23
  24. 24. Other Reasons for Discharge• Discharge by mutual agreement• Accord and satisfaction – Accord is an agreement in which a promisee who has existing claim agrees with promisor that s/he will accept some performance different from that originally agreed on. When promisor performs the accord, that is called a satisfaction.• Discharge by waiver of promisee 18-24
  25. 25. Other Reasons for Discharge• Discharge by alteration – One party alters and other does not consent• Discharge by statute of limitations – One party takes too long to bring lawsuit – UCC 2–725: four-year statute of limitations for contracts involving the sale of goods• Discharge by decree of bankruptcy 18-25
  26. 26. Remedies for Breach of Contract• Legal remedies (money damages) – Compensatory damages, nominal damages, liquidated (contractual) damages, and in certain circumstances, punitive damages• Equitable remedies – Specific performance – Injunction• Restitution 18-26
  27. 27. Relevant Cases• George v. AL Hoyt & Sons, Inc.: consequential damages that could have been reasonably anticipated by the parties may be awarded to the nonbreaching party• Houseman v. Dare: some possessions, such as a dog, possess special subjective value similar to "heirlooms, family treasures, and works of art“ and specific performance will be ordered 18-27
  28. 28. Test Your Knowledge• True=A, False = B – When a condition precedent occurs, the contract arises, creating duties to perform – John agrees to work as Katy’s realtor until he sells her house. Katy closed on her house sale yesterday, so the contract has been discharged. – The standard for materiality of a breach is when only 50% of a contract has been performed 18-28
  29. 29. Test Your Knowledge• True=A, False = B – Legal remedies for breach of contract include specific performance or injunction – Nonperformance of a duty is always a breach of contract – Performance that falls short of complete performance in some minor respect, but does not deprive the other party of a material part of the consideration for which s/ he bargained is known as substantial performance. 18-29
  30. 30. Test Your Knowledge• Multiple Choice – Steve promised to work for his employer on Saturday morning. Steve didn’t show up for work on Saturday because he decided he didn’t need the overtime money. Steve: a) Is excused due to impracticality b) Breached his contract c) Breached the implied covenant of good faith d) Both B and C e) None of the above 18-30
  31. 31. Test Your Knowledge• Multiple Choice – Robert contracted to paint Stan’s house by the end of June, but realized after signing the contract that he had too many jobs to do and could not finish by the end of June. Robert called Stan and told him he could not fulfill the contract. Robert: a) Is excused due to impossibility b) Engaged in anticipatory breach c) Is excused because of condition precedent d) None of the above 18-31
  32. 32. Thought Questions• Should a non- breaching party always file suit against a breaching party?• What are the ethical issues involved in a breach of contract? 18-32

×