Sloan-C Emerging Technology Conference presentation

1. The Human Element: A MOOC on the Community of Inquiry
Sloan-C Emerging Technologies Conference
Whitney Kilgore
Samantha Duque
April 9th

2. The Human Element:
An Essential Online Course
Component

3. Tools
Blogs (Blogger, Wordpress)
Twitter
YouTube
VoiceThread
Facebook
LinkedIn
Many more…

4. “A critical community of learners, from an educational perspective, is composed of
teachers and students transacting with the specific purposes of facilitating,
constructing, and validating understanding , and of developing capabilities that will
lead to further learning.”
-Garrison and Anderson
Understanding the Community of Inquiry

5. Roles
Role of Facilitator
Wayfinding
Amplifying
Curating
Aggregating
Filtering
Modeling
Staying Present
Role of Learner
Autonomous
Self Organize
Connect with Peers
Peer Support
Creation
Sharing
Build Personal Network

6. #HumanMOOC
Structure

8. The Human Element:
Essential Online Course Component

9. Participation
Discussion Posts Active
Participants
# of
submissions
Files

10. Speedgrader

11. Learner Demographics
RQ: What are the learner demographics of the individuals that
enrolled in the MOOC and why did they enroll?

12. Educational Background
4 year degree
2%
Some graduate
school
7%
Master
Degree
55%
Doctorate
Degree
36%

13. Age
21-29
2%
30-39
17%
40-49
30%
50-59
33%
60 -older
18%

14. MOOC Experience
0-1
59%
2-3
25%
4-5
11%
6-8
5%
How many MOOCs have you participated in?

15. Online Teaching
Experience
Yes
74%
No
26%
Do you currently teach online classes?

16. Instructor Presence
RQ: What kind of teaching methods and tools assist in increasing
instructor presence?

18. Announcements

19. Sense of Community
strongly
disagree
0%
disagree
0%
neutral
9%
agree
59%
strongly agree
32%
Instructor actions reinforced the development of
a sense of community among course
participants.

20. Using Video Instructor Introductions to enhance instructor presence

21. Helpful
strongly
disagree
2%
disagree
0% neutral
17%
agree
51%
strongly agree
30%
The instructor was helpful in guiding the class
towards understanding course topics in a way that
helped me clarify my thinking.

22. Using VoiceThread to enhance the Community of Inquiry

23. Cognitive Presence
RQ: How did the community of inquiry inform the activities and
interactions in the MOOC?

24. Curiosity Piqued
strongly
disagree
0%
disagree
2%
neutral
9%
agree
51%
strongly agree
38%
Course activities piqued my curiosity.

25. Motivation
strongly
disagree
0%
disagree
0%
neutral
9%
agree
53%
strongly agree
38%
I felt motivated to explore content related
questions.

26. Discussions
strongly
disagree
0%
disagree
7% neutral
9%
agree
50%
strongly agree
34%
Online discussions were valuable in helping me
appreciate different perspectives.

27. Knowledge Applicability
strongly
disagree
0%
disagree
0%
neutral
7%
agree
49%
strongly agree
44%
I can apply the knowledge created in this
course to my work or other non-class related
activites.

28. TED Ideas worth spreading

29. Social Presence
RQ: How can social media be used to increase social presence in
an online classroom?

30. Online Tools
strongly
disagree
0%
disagree
0%
neutral
11%
agree
55%
strongly agree
34%
Online or web-based communication is an
excellent tool for social interaction.

31. Comfort with Tools
strongly
disagree
0%
disagree
9% neutral
9%
agree
49%
strongly agree
33%
I felt comfortable conversing through the online
tools.

32. BLOGS, VOICETHREAD, TWITTER

33. Webinar with
Michelle Pacansky-Brock

34. Creator of
“Explain Everything”
Dr. Reshan Richards

35. #HumanMOOC

37. Conclusion:
Advice to Other Faculty

38. What to view the slides?
http://www.slideshare.net/humanmooc/sloanc-et4-online-
presentation-themooc4814

39. References
Akyol, Z. & Garrision, D.R. (n.d.). The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online
Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive, and Teaching Prescence.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22. Retrieved from
http://sloanconsortium.org/system/files/v11n1_8garrison.pdf
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy . The International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Retrieved from
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1663
Brinthaupt, T.M., Fisher, L.S., Gardner, J.G., Raffo, D.M., & Woodard, J.B. (2011). What the best online
teachers should do. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7 (4), 515-524. Retrieved from
http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no4/brinthaupt_1211.htm
Broup, J., West, R., & Graham, C. (2011). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video.
Internet and Higher Education, (15), 195-203.
deWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., and Rodriguez, O., (2011).
Using mlearning and moocs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 94-115. Retrieved from
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1046/2026
Downes, S. (2012, March 23). [Web log message]. Retrieved from
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2012/03/education-as-platform-mooc-experience.html
Dunlap, J.C. & Lowenthal, P.R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence.
Journal of Information Systems Education, 20 (2)
ELI (2013). 7 things you should know about... Calibrated Peer Reviews. Retrived from
https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7101.pdf.

40. Fini, A., (2009). The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the
CCK08 Course Tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance
Learning, 10(5), 1-26. Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1402
Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2013). Community matters: Social presence and learning
outcomes. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13 (1), 11-86. Retrived from
http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/views/3268/3623
Ice,P., Curtis, R., Phillips,P. & Wells, J. (2007). Using Asynchronous Audio Feedback to
Enhance Teaching Presence and Students’ Sense of Community. Jones, P., Naugle, K.
Kolloff, M.(2008, March). Teacher Presence: Using Introductory Videos in Online and Hybrid
Courses.Learning Solutions Magazine, 1-5. Retrived
from http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/107/teacher-presence-using-
introductory-videos-in-online-and-hybrid-courses/pageall%20.
Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence of adult students.
Computers & Education, 55, 808-820, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013.
Keengwe, J. Adjei-Boateng, E., & Diteeyont, W. (2012). Facilitating active social presence and
meaningful interactions in online learning. Education Information Technology, (18), 597-607. doi:
10.1007/s10639-012-9197-9
Kop, R., & Carroll, F. (2011). Cloud computing and creativity: Learning on a massive open online
course. European Journal of Open, Distance, and eLearning, Retrieved from
http://www.eurodl.org/?article=457
Kop, R., Fournier, H., and Mak, J. (2011). A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support
Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. The International Review of
Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93. Retrieved from
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1041/2025

41. Levy, D., and Schrire, S., (2012, June). The case of a massive open online course at a college of education. Paper
presented at New Media Consortium Nmc summer conference, Boston, MA. Retrieved from
http://conference.nmc.org/files/smkbMOOC.pdf
Mak, W., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a mooc. Paper
presented at 7th international conference on networked learning 2010. Retrieved from
http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Mak.pdf
McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The mooc model for digital practice. (Master's
thesis, University of Prince Edward Island, Prince Edward Island, Canada). Retrieved from
http://davecormier.com/edblog/wp-content/uploads/MOOC_Final.pdf
Mills, B.J (2010).Idea Paper #47: Promoting Deep Learning. The Idea
Center.http://www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/IDEA_Paper_47.pdf
Mitra, S., Dangwal, R., Chatterjee, S., Jha, S., Bisht, R., & Kapur, P. (2005). Acquisition of computing literacy on shared
public computers: Children and the "hole in the wall". Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 407-426.
Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/mitra.html
Nagel, L., & Kotze, T. (2010). Supersizing e-learning: What a coi survery reveals about teaching prescence in a large
online class. Internet and Higher Education, (13), 45-51.
Rodriguez, C. (2012). Moocs and the ai-stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive
open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, Retrieved from
http://www.eurodl.org/?p=current&article=516
Siemens, G. (2004, December 12). [Web log message]. Retrieved from
http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Small, G. W., Moody, T. D., Siddarth, P., & Bookheimer, S. (2009). Your brain on google: patterns of cerebral activation
during internet searching. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry, 17(2), 116-126. Retrieved from
http://www.psychologytoday.com/files/attachments/5230/136.pdf
Williams, R., Karousou, R., and Mackness, J., (2011). Emergent Learning and Learning Ecologies in Web 2.0. The
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 39-59. Retrieved from
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/883/1686

42. Image Credits
http://www.aceonlineschools.com/vintage-correspondence-
course-ads/
https://sites.google.com/site/themoocguide/3-cck08---the-
distributed-course
www.sxc.hu
http://www.omghub.com/Portals/238/images/PedagogyTechn
ologHumanity_001.jpg