Narrative Essay On The Lottery

Narrative Essay On The Lottery
It was June 27th, the flowers were blossoming profusely, it smelled like freshly cut grass, everyone was out playing, but most importantly, it was the
day of the lottery. For the kids, the lottery was a very enjoyable day. We had gotten to collect the best stones we could find so we can use them for the
person who is chosen from the lottery. "Are you excited Harry?" Bobby Martin. "Of course! I can finally show off my arm to you guys." I replied. "Hey
guys come over here," Dickie said. Dickie and some other kids had made a whole pile of rocks. "Take some," Dickie said. Bobby and I put as many
rocks we could fit in our pockets. The rocks felt cold and rough. "Harry!" my mom called for me. I ran to her and everyone else followed reluctantly.
...show more content...
Summers and the postmaster started to get the lottery all set up. They had to make up lists of families and they had to swear in as the officials of
the household. I couldn't see anymore because someone was standing right in front of me but I heard someone come join the crowd "Well, now,"
Mr. Summers said soberly, "guess we better get started, get this over with, so's we can go back to work. Anybody ain't here?" "Clyde Dunbar,"
many people in the audience shouted. Mr. Summers made sure for everyone who wasn't here there was someone drawing for them. He then started
stating the rules which I found very tedious. What seemed like centuries the lottery had finally started. Even though there was only 300 people in
the village I heard plenty of last names that were new to me. I didn't pay much attention to the names being called until I heard Mr. Summers call out
"Jones." My father went up and selected a sheet of white paper. He turned it over nervously and luckily it was blank. Mr. Summers continued calling
out names. "Watson" "Zanani" After that, there was a long pause, until Mr. Summers, holding his slip of paper in the air, said, "All right, fellows." For
a minute, no one moved, and then all the slips of paper were opened. "It's Hutchinson, It's Bill Hutchinson," I could hear many people in the audience
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Winning The Lottery Essay
1.The lottery tickets have not been selling for a while now and I have to find a way to fix that problem. One way of fixing this problem is giving the
people a better chance at winning the lottery like increasing the odds of someone getting the correct numbers in an area that is very poor so that
someone who really needs it would get the money. This would create a buzz that anyone could win thelottery money even the poor because it's been
known that the lottery is rigged for only the middle class and the rich people. This would throw that idea out the window and ensure to people that
they could possibly win the lottery. But in reality the odds are still the same and every two week or so we do the same method of letting a small town
family...show more content...
I believe that Abraham Maslow and the novelist Dostoyevski were both right about the their situation. Maslow is right because if we are lacking food,
love, and self–esteem as humans we need food more than love or self–esteem to live a long life. We could go our whole lives without love or
self–esteem. Dostoyevski is correct because if we have all the bread we need to survive for a while but no water then won't survive long. If there
was something we need more than food to survive to live it would be water. We can survive longer without food than we can without water because
water provides us with energy and if we have no energy than we can't do anything. That is the reason for when you are hungry you try to drink water
or some liquid to keep yourself from being as

The Lottery By Shirley Jackson Literary Analysis
The Lottery Literary Analysis
In 'The Lottery', written by Shirley Jackson, a village goes about their annual ritual of pulling strips of paper out of a box in belief that it will help
their harvest. They believe that if they randomly kill one person, the entire community will benefit. Shirley Jackson uses a village of basic farmers and
a light mood at the beginning, irony, foreshadowing, and shock to convey the message that if something is wrong someone should stand up against it,
before looking like a hypocrite.
The characters are portrayed as poor, basic countryfolk, and the setting is conveyed as a happy, warm place when the narrator states, "The morning of
June 27th was clear and sunny, with the fresh warmth of a full–summer day; the flowers...show more content...
Finally, the theme of the story is that if something is wrong, someone should stand up against it before it is too late or that person will look like a
hypocrite who simply does not want something, that was wrong in the first place, to happen because it is happening to that person. An example of this
is when Tessie Hutchinson says, "It isn't fair, it isn't right,"(Jackson) only because she was picked.
Other elements in this story include foreshadowing of what is to come. At the point Tessie Hutchinson says "You didn't give him time enough to take
any paper he wanted. I saw you. It wasn't fair!"(Jackson) it is first revealed to the reader that maybe the lottery isn't something to be happy about but
instead, terrified. Also, included in foreshadowing, of something dark and scary to come, is when the narrator states, "They stood together, away from
the pile of stones in the corner, and their jokes were quiet and they smiled rather than laughed."(Jackson). Finally the last example of foreshadowing
that something is very much wrong is the narrator stating "Mr. Summers set the black box down on it. The villagers kept their distance"(Jackson).

Essay on The Lottery
Shirley Jackson's insights and observations about man and society are reflected in her famous short story "The
Lottery". Many of her readers have found this story shocking and disturbing. Jackson reveals two general attitudes in this story: first, the
shocking reality of human's tendency to select a scapegoat and second, society as a victim of tradition and ritual.
Throughout history we have witnessed and participated in many events, where, in time of turmoil and hardship, society has a tendency to seize upon
a scapegoat as means of resolution. The people of the village had been taught to believe that in order for their crop to be abundant for the year, some
individual had to be sacrificed. "Lottery in June, corn be heavy...show more content...
She does not appear to take the ritual seriously, as she comes rushing to the square because she "clean forgot what day it was". The
villagers are aware of her rebellious attitude and they are weary that she may be a possible cause for their crops not to be plentiful. "It isn't fair, it
isn't right," Mrs. Hutchinson screamed, and then they were upon her.
We can understand how traditions are easily lost through the handing down of information, beliefs, and customs by word of mouth or by example from
one generation to another. It is how traditions that lose their meaning due to human forgetfulness can cause dreadful consequences to occur. Although
"the villagers had forgotten the ritual and lost the original box, they still remembered to use stones".
Do people just pick and choose which part of a tradition they want to keep? We tend to remember the actions and the objects necessary to proceed
with a ritual, but we always seem to forget the purpose or the reason behind it.
Are we correct in still continuing the tradition even though there is a victim involved? It seems we, as part of a society, are scared of being ridiculed
if we change or end a tradition because everyone around us will still behave in the manner they were taught. "The people had done it so many
times that they only half listened to the directions," shows that the meaning and purpose behind the ritual had been lost and they were just acting

Essay on The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson
Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" is a story littered with warnings and subtext about the dangers a submissive society can pose. While the opening is
deceptively cheery and light Jackson uses an array of symbols and ominous syntax to help create the apprehensive and grim tone the story ends with.
Her portrayal of the town folk as blindly following tradition represents the world during World War II when people's failure to not mindlessly accept
and heed authority lead to disastrous consequences. . Shirley Jackson uses a large array of techniques to help convey the idea that recklessly following
and accepting traditions and orders can lead to disastrous consequences.
The opening paragraphs of the story contain a light and carefree tone...show more content...
As Tessie's protests continue and the Hutchinson family prepares to draw again the sense of apprehension is one again mounting, this time fearing
for whoever wins yet still not knowing what their "prize" will be. "The crowd was quiet. A girl whispered, 'I hope it's not Nancy'", the silence and fear
of the crowds manifests in the reader as the three children and their parents all draw slips of paper. Tessie "wins"the lottery and when the narrator
explains "although the villagers had forgotten the ritual, and lost they original black box, they still remembered to use stones" (6) its suddenly
shockingly clear to the readers what the winner is to receive. The drastic switch from a light and cheerful tone with talk of the beautiful day and
children playing to the closing like of "and they were upon her" (7) is in part why this story is so effective. The unforeseen sinister end of the story
makes the revelation of the tradition much more shocking and unsettling than had the reader known from the beginning what the outcome would be.
Jackson very effectively builds a sense of apprehension and foreboding as she slowly cues the reader into the reality of the situation.
"The Lottery" has many symbols that help create the sinister and somber tone of the story. The black box from which the papers are drawn as well as
the black dot on the paper are both symbolic of death. Black is a universally accepted

The Lottery Theme Essay
In both The Lottery, and The Possibility of Evil there is a very evident theme that is horror lies in the most everyday settings and situations. This is
shown in The Lottery by the "lottery" being considered an everyday normal aspect of life.We know that the "lottery" is the act of a name being
drawn from a box, and the person who is drawn is going to be stoned to death, with frankly no reason at all. Also in The Lottery, no one is emotionally
phased to the cruelty shown in the town, and throughout the story, as if it is apart of their everyday life. In The Possibility of Evil, we see this theme
during the whole story, considering the main idea of the story is a woman who is trying to stop all of the evil in her and her towns everyday...show more
content...
Old Man Warner is appalled by this idea saying, "Pack of crazy fools... there has always been a lottery." Old Man Warner is very adamant about
continuing this tradition, and is very critical to the people who are trying to end the tradition, almost as if he has no empathy for others. We view the
lottery as something horrific and something that in today's time would be socially unacceptable.
In The Possibility of Evil, we see the horror in everyday situations in a very different way. The main idea of The Possibility of Evil is that the
protagonist, Miss Strangeworth, is that Miss Strangeworth is trying to prevent all of the evil in her small town by passing letters about gossip that
she heard to other people anonymously. In the story, we are first told of Miss Strangeworth's roses, which are her most prized possession. In the
beginning of the story, Miss Strangeworth encounters new parents, Don and Helen Crane. Helen Crane makes a comment about her baby seeming to
be "slow." Miss Strangeworth tells Helen that she is worrying for no reason and that "some of them develop much quicker than others others." Later
in the story Miss Strangeworth writes a letter to the Crane's and says, "Didn't you ever see an idiot child before? Some people just shouldn't have
children, should they?" Even though Miss Strangeworth views herself as the epitome of a citizen in her town, she is a factor to the evil in the town by
creating these letters and spreading lies and

Evidence For The Lottery
"The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson is about a small village where they have a strange annual tradition. The tradition is a lottery where whoever "wins"
is stoned to death by the other townspeople. Why would they do such a horrible thing to their friends and family members? They started the lottery as
a sacrifice for good luck. They wanted good crops for the year and they thought a human sacrifice would help them. But, now most of the people no
longer think it helps the crops. Most probably think it's wrong to murder someone just because they lost the lottery, but they are terrified to upset
tradition, so they blindly continue the lottery.
The first piece of evidence is on page 13, line 8. Here it talks about how the town is small, only around...show more content...
Evidence for that is on page 22 line 260, where Old Man Warner says the old sayings, "Lottery in june, corn be heavy soon." This shows that they
thought the lottery would bring them luck. Another piece of evidence is one page 28 line 427. Here, Steve Adams says, "Come on, come on,
everyone." This indicates that the people need to be riled up and they probably don't want to, but ome people, specifically Old Man Warner, feel they
have to.
Another quote from Old Man Warner is on page 23 line 268, after hearing some towns are giving up their lottery, he says, "Nothing but trouble in that.
Pack of crazy fools." This shows that he disapproves of not doing the lottery. It is all he has ever known and it scares him to think that the town could
be giving up something from him parents and grandparents generations.
This story is about speaking up for up you believe in and to not blindly follow what others in the past have laid down as the norm. If no one spoke out
when people were being discriminated against, it would never have changed. Instead of standing up and questioning the lottery, everyone just kind of
went along with it and people continued to

The Lottery Reflection
The Lottery begins like any other day. Clear and sunny skies, flowers blossoming, and green grass. Seemingly nothing out of the ordinary. Then people
begin to gather in the town square. What is this lottery that is taking place? Do the people of the town agree with it? These questions can only be
answered by exploring the minds of the people in the town. Throughout this short story the audience is introduced to many characters. Bobby Martin,
Mr. Summers, Mr. Graves, Mr. Martin, Baxter, Old Man Warner, Bill Hutchinson, Tessie Hutchinson, Mrs. Delacroix, Mrs. Dunbar, Watson boy, Bill
Jr., Nancy, and little Davey. These characters are a key aspect tothe lottery. Each character has their own feelings about the lottery at the beginning,
but what happens when the lottery affects them and their family? To understand this, the thoughts of individual characters have to be explored. Mr.
Summers is the leader, he runs the show. He isn't against the lottery and treats it like a normal day. Mr. Summers doesn't want it to take long, he
has other things to do, he wants to get it done as quickly as possible. The fact the someone will be killed barely crosses his mind. He is an
organized man who treats the lottery as part of his job, he needs to have lists and know exactly where everyone is. From the beginning of the story
until the end Mr. Summers shows no emotion to what is going down in the village. Mr. Martin and his son Baxter are the first people to show
hesitancy, they feel like

The Lottery Research Paper
How do our relationships with others define who we are? Others affect us greatly. The people who surround us everyday have a great impact on our
own life. Friends and family are the people who create you, and are part of the reason of who you are today. For example, when there's a new trend,
or when someone says a mean comment, you might change something about you at one point or another. Who affects your life? "The Lottery" is a
short story that may have opened people's eyes onto what you follow. This story shows how you may not let go of a tradition, here showing it in a
negative way. A lottery, which in turn, the winner gets stoned. An example of a tradition is a quinceanera. Although it's not a negative tradition, this has
been something

Analysis of The Lottery by Shirley Jackson Essay
Analysis of The Lottery by Shirley Jackson
"The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson was written in 1948. The story takes place in a village square of a town on June 27th. The author does not use
much emotion in the writing to show how the barbaric act that is going on is look at as normal. This story is about a town that has a lottery once a
year to choose who should be sacrificed, so that the town will have a plentiful year for growing crops. Jackson has many messages about human nature
in this short story. The most important message she conveys is how cruel and violent people can be to one another. Another very significant message
she conveys is how custom and tradition can hold great power over people. Jackson also conveys the message of...show more content...
The children do it, as do the family members of whoever is picked. No one stands up and says how horrible this act is. Jackson demonstrates how
people everywhere can do these horrible things to others and everyone just think of it as ordinary. Another message that Jackson illustrates is the
blind following of tradition and how that can be a terrible thing. All the members of the community participate in this horrible act because it is a
tradition. The people believe that if it is a tradition it then the lottery must not be a bad thing. When Old Man Warner heard that some communities
had stopped the lottery he called them a "pack of crazy fools." He said, "There's always been a lottery."(247) Jackson shows how a tradition can be
so brutal yet everyone will go with it because it's in fact tradition. To go against tradition would be to go against the community, so no one is willing to
do that. Jackson shows the long running tradition when the black box that is used to hold the slips of paper never changes. It shows the inability for
change in the community. A minor message that Jackson conveys is the idea that men treat women as subordinate in their society. In the story the men
always draw from the box for the families. Jackson proves how men treat the women like objects when Tessie, the women who in the end gets stoned,
questions the fact that the drawing wasn't fair and her husband just told her to shut up.

The Lottery By Michael Jackson Analysis
The tradition is very important, yet it's not the most important one in our modern society. From the sectionв… пјЊthe author wants to show the fact
that a tradition is a kind of faith and people should absorb the essence and reject the dross from it rationally instead of being the blindness. Tradition
plays a necessary role in society and it affects people's behavior and thinking but not means it should be the dominate one. As the sectionв… mentions
that both Mrs. Delacroix and Mr. Hutchinson are very close to Tessie, but when she became the sacrifice, they all just wanted to finish the lottery and
hoped that Tessie could die quickly. Both of them are the typical examples in this town, they are so loyal to the tradition and they don't have the

Reader Response: the Lottery
Reader Response #2: The Lottery "The Lottery" is a short story written by Shirley Jackson and published in 1948. The title of the story initially
leads readers to believe the story is going to be about someone winning some kind of prize. Even the opening of the story seems to protest any foul
play or cruel behavior. What the reader is introduced to is a seemingly friendly gathering of a small village community, members all gathered around
anxiously awaiting their drawing for the lottery. The village members all chatter amongst one another in a tone that kind neighbors would take with one
another. To the surprise of the reader, the story provides a shocking twist. The story is not about someone winning a prize. Instead the story reveals
...show more content...
She certainly succeeded in shocking her audiences with the unforeseeable twist that arose at the end of the story. I did not expect the ending that I
read. Even when I realized that the woman of the family who drew the winning ticket was arguing against the winnings, I had not ever thought that
perhaps someone would die as a result. The fact that children were also allowed to participate in the drawing is what really made my stomach
churn. Jackson certainly provided a detailed enough picture in such a few short pages to pull a physical reaction from me. I cannot rightfully say
that the story was a good one, but it definitely was brilliant. It still amazes me that an author can write so descriptively and so intelligently that he or
she can pull physical, mental, and emotional reactions from the person reading the story. In this case, I had several reactions to the story. Not only did
I feel disgusted at how the community members were so eager to stone the woman to death, I also felt a mind–numbing sensation at the fact that such
violence and cruelty closely mirrors our own modern society without the archaic practices. As a modern society, we cut down the individual members
of society in new ways. While we may not string them up to hang them, we do string them up publicly for the purpose of cruelty and humiliation. Just
look at cyberbullying or mass

The Lottery Essay
"People see what they want to see and what people want to see never has anything to do with the truth", said by Roberto Bolano. There are many
different perceptions on the events that occur in "The Lottery", "The Fun They Had", and also "Eye of the Beholder." I feel that in "The Lottery",
Tessie was right for arguing against winning the yearly tradition of the lottery. Margie was right for feeling that the past schools were better in "The
Fun They Had", and Janet was right for contrasting herself from the others in "Eye of the Beholder." Individuals may distinguish their interpretations on
distinct feelings or statements. In "The Lottery", a yearly tradition of a lottery takes place in a small town except the winner gets stone to death....show
more content...
Margie feels that the school experience was much more enjoyable back then. I agree because life surrounded by people would be much better
rather than life surrounded by only technology. As Tommy told Margie, "The teachers didn't live in the house. They had a special building, and
all the kids went there.' Also, Margie stating from knowing more about schools back then, "All the kids from the whole neighborhood came,
laughing and shouting in the schoolyard, sitting together in the schoolroom, going home together at the end of the day." Social interaction barely
existed in Margie's life. Many differ on if technology advanced is for the better but no one can justify what is truly normal. Some people think all
readers would agree that a world where technology is advanced would include a very amusing surrounding to live in. They may feel this way
because in a world today, majority relies on technology. Yet, there are always two sides to every story. We lose direct socialization and hardly
communicate to others. As shown in"The Fun They Had", Margie and Tommy really only talked for a little bit since school had broken them up. It
states, "He walked away whistling, the dusty old book tucked between his arm." This shows how not all readers agree on all literature. Concluding,
different people vary their interpretation on things based on their view of perception of the normality they are used to. As seen in "The Lottery", Tessie
had argued on winning the lottery and I agreed

Thesis For The Lottery
Being stoned to death by 300 of your friends and family is possibly the worst way anyone would ever want to be killed. In the short story "The
Lottery" written by an author Shirley Jackson, she mentions about a small village consisting of 300 residents who most reluctantly participate in an
annual lottery drawing. I know, who in their right mind would hesitate to be a part of an event that gives you a possibility of winning a prize, which
makes you wonder what the prize is. At the end of the story the protagonist, Mrs. Hutchinson, who also happens to be the winner of the lottery is stoned
to death. I argue that Jackson wrote this story to inform us how living in a small community isn't always a great thing because in a small population
people start gossiping about one another, which can lead to issues and could turn into hatred.
I believe that winning is not always a good thing because it can be...show more content...
One can say that there are certain demons that inhabit the closest people in your life, such as betrayal and jealousy to protect themselves. To shed more
light on this, in the short story "The Lottery" stated that, "And someone gave little Davy Hutchinson a few pebbles" –– and closes in on her" (Jackson).
As I read this section of the story, I strongly believe that money tends to destroy the strong bonds one has with their own family members.
Furthermore, after seeing a movie clip of this story, I seen Davy Hutchinson and Mr. Hutchinson moving away from Mrs. Hutchinson in a clam way,
they had no expression in their face that made them look hurt after what was going to happen to Mrs. Hutchison (Jackson, Rando). I think that Jackson
was showing us that your own family turns against you and that cruel things would continue to happen in life. In addition, Jackson is trying to say that
winning is not always a positive thing or it's not guaranteed a happy

The Lottery Paragraph Analysis
Paragraph 1 The Lottery, a short story by Shirley Jackson, was published in 1948 in the magazine The New Yorker. The plot is that It starts in a
small town with 300 people on a sunny day June 28th people gathered in the town square with lots of farmers 1st the slips are prepared 1 for each
family. head of the family draws and draw notes the ones with black dot draw again. but it's the family the family member with the black dot gets
stoned to death. The theme of the story. The theme was blindly following tradition. First, When people gather in the town square forthe lottery because
it's tradition and they don't want to break it. Second, When people throw rock nobody apise because they think no one will stand beside the to help.
Next, fear...show more content...
First, In the book it was a lot more suspenseful. When you read the book it start on a sunny day in June when the town people get of work or leave
home to go to the town square it puts suspense because you're wondering what's going on until they throw rocks at Mrs, Dunbar, Next, The kids
playing around. When the boys were grabbing rocks in the movie it showed a boy tackle another boy for a rock which showed in that they were
exited to kill/ stone someone. In the book the kids were just playing and grabbing rock which made you think nothing of it. Last People grabbing
rocks. When one of Mrs, Dunbar's friends in the book grabbed the rock they said it was heavy and they were tired so they couldn't go on, wich
showed she cared for her friend and didn't want to kill her or anybody. In the movie Mrs, dunbar's friend grabbed a big rock a brought it and through
it, which showed she didn't care much for her and wanted to get it done and over

The Lottery: A Short Story
Who doesn't want to win the lottery? I certainly want to win. However in this town winning the lottery means certain death. On June 27, the
townspeople performed the annual lottery in a small village called Stoneridge.
The lottery is a tradition that has been going on for many years, and consists of a lottery worker letting people draw out slips of paper out of a tatty
black box. After they draw the slip, the townspeople look at their paper if they have a mark their families have to draw slips of paper. Whoever gets
the black mark gets brutally stoned.
This warm summer morning the children and grownups of Stoneridge gathered in the center of the village. The people never laughed during this
time they only smiled. We asked Mr. Summers, how much preparation goes into this he said, " I have to do so many things, I have to get the box
ready, I have to write out all the slips, it takes a lot of time."...show more content...
Summers comes out after all the preparation is done and announces it to the crowd. His assistant then placed the box on a stand, and he declared the
lottery open. People started coming up one by one to draw their slip.
The Hutchinson's end up drawing the mark. We caught Tessie's answer to this, "It was fair, you didn't let him pick the one he wants," she proclaimed.
The Hutchinson family went up and drew to see who is going have the black mark of death.
Tessie Hutchinson ends up drawing the strip of paper with a black mark. She gets dragged up to the area where everybody waits anxiously with their
stones ready to pounce.
"She was screaming as she was brutally beaten with stones." said one of the little kids who helped stone her.
We had a sit down and asked him how he felt about his daughter getting stoned he replied, "I am obviously very sad but i'm glad it was not me." The
brutal and cruel

Following the crowd can have disastrous consequences is something both first they came by Martin Niemoller and The lottery by Shirley Jackson
have in common. But for different reasons. Both stories are different but are also the same. Both stories share the same theme but for different reasons.
So these two stories have a lot in common but somethings that are different, so in this essay I will talk about how they are the same and also different.
Some ways that The Lottery and First they came are the same is that they both share the same theme. For example, they both share the theme that
they both have disastrous consequences from following the crowd. For instance, in the lottery Tessie follows the crowd by participating in the
lottery with everyone else. And in First they came martin followed the crowd by not speaking up. The two characters not speaking up led to their
death. Which is something both stories had in common. Another way that you can compare both stories is that both of the characters didn't stand up
for what's right when they should have. For instance, in the poem First they came in lines 1, 3, and 4 it says ''and I did not speak out'' so this means
he did not speak out for other people. But when he got called he expected someone to speak out instead. In the story The Lottery Tessie did not speak
out about how the bad The Lottery was. For example, the entire story Tessie didn't say the lottery was a bad idea until she was chosen to get stoned.
For instance,

The Lottery Narrative Analysis
The Type Of Narration:
In the story The Lottery by: Shirley Jackson the type of narration used is third person objective.
The narrator describes the events that occur during the lottery without describing any of the characters thoughts or feelings. The narrator's
objective point of view is proven through the description of the villagers, "The villagers kept their distance, leaving a space between themselves
and the stool. and when Mr. Summers said, "Some of you fellows want to give me a hand?" There was a hesitation before two men" (pg.1) , in the
quote no emotion from the villagers is shared, the only way to judge the characters are by their mannerisms. The unbiased point of view is shown
because, the men are nervous and this is a known fact, not because the narrator said they were, but due to the type of gestures they exhibit. The third
person point of view becomes more clear throughout the story in quotes like, "They greeted one another and exchanged bits of gossip as they went to
join their husbands" (pg.1), the use of pronouns like; they, he, she, and it is used consistently from beginning to end of the story and pronouns like; I,
me, we and us are never used. The use of pronouns and impartial speak prove that the story is in fact third person objective.
3 events
#1: Exposition
The story begins with description of the setting and the town on the day of their annual lottery, "The morning of June 27th was clear and sunny, with
the fresh warmth of a full–summer day; the flowers were blossoming profusely and the grass was richly green. The people of the village began to
gather in the square, between the post office and the bank, around ten o'clock; in some towns there were so many people that the lottery took two days
and had to be started on June 25th"(pg 1), this is an important quote to the text because it forms much of the context in which the story takes place.
The first two sentences set up the plot of the story when referring to the people of the village gathering in town on the beautiful summer day. Next the
narrator begins to describe what the people of village are doing as they meet in the square. The narrator talks about how the children collect stones and
put them in the center of the square,

The Lottery Essay
In "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson and the historical event of blacklisting Americans during the 1950s, the authors convey that loyalty causes us to
turn against others around you through symbols. In "The Lottery", loyalty to tradition caused a society to turn on one another. "The Lottery" was an
annual tradition where each head of household (the dominant male in each home) picked a slip of paper. If the piece selected had a black dot on it,
you had to go through the selection process again, but this time each individual member of your family had to choose a slip out of the box. Whoever
chose the black dot out of there family had won the Lottery, and would be sacrificed for a good corn season. On the seventy–seventh lottery, the...show
more content...
Ethel's brother, David Greenglass was working in New Mexico on an atomic bomb. Because the Rosenbergs were communists, and their relationship
with Greenglass, they were accused of passing information regarding the bomb to the Soviet Union, when they really did nothing wrong. Despite
their desperate pleas of innocence, "President Dwight D. Eisenhower twice rejected pleas for clemency. The Rosenbergs were executed on June 19,
1953" (Reeves). The president's allegiance is a symbol because it represents American ideas. To Eisenhower and the House of Un–American Activities
Committee, communism was a threat to what the government already was. Communists were thought to support Russia, and they could not have those
ideas spread around America. Eisenhower cared more about what America stood for rather than his own innocent citizens. The House of Un–American
Activities Committee and Eisenhower's loyalty to what they wanted the image and ideas of America to be was greater than their own citizens, making
the decision to execute the Rosenbergs and easy one. The Rosenbergs did not do anything wrong, but in Eisenhower's mind, just like Bill Hutchinson's
mind in "The Lottery", they dismissed what the victims were saying and executed them. The innocent victims of both events had ideas that were never
shared because people of higher authority refused to listen to them, and they both suffered from them. The higher power stuck with the traditions and

Narrative Essay On The Lottery

Narrative Essay On The Lottery

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Narrative Essay On The Lottery

Similar a Narrative Essay On The Lottery(20)

Más de Write My Paper Reviews Sunnyvale

Más de Write My Paper Reviews Sunnyvale(20)

Último

Último(20)

Narrative Essay On The Lottery