fd

1. Quality
the quality of the work is really good and the
colours fit perfectly and the comic book effect
works really well and is simple to use. It makes the
human picture look like a cartoon and also the
background.
speed
It didn’t take long at all to produce and I found it
really simple to understand and complete.
audience
The audience Is aimed at a higher age of 10-20
because a more younger audience prefers a very
simple cartoon with not much detail, which my
picture has a lot of.
What resources are available
I created this image on Photoshop which is available
at College and also at home.
Similarity
It is like other comic strips although they
don’t normally have such a bright
background as most graphic narratives are
dark or have bright reds and oranges as
backgrounds, which I found out through
previous research.
Experiments-comic
book effect

2. Experiments-comic
book effect

3. ExperimentsRotoscoping
Quality
I think the quality is good for rotoscoping people which I can do well. But
objects I find more difficult. The detail in the armour and hair works really
well and with a low opacity it still looks animated.
Speed
It takes a long length of time to get a rotoscope perfect. This one took me
about 40 minutes and is still not to my best standards.
Audience
I am targeting an older generation for graphic narrative because they will
like rotoscoping as they see it a lot of TV. Also because they enjoy more
detailed characters and in depth stories in contrast to children's books and
very little detailed sketches and animations.
Resources available
I created this on Photoshop with is available at college and at home. Along
with the internet to get images from and a camera to take other images.
Similarity
It is similar to exciting products like in video games and TV animated
humour.

4. Examples of rotoscopes. i find it
easier to do humans rather then
other things which wouldn’t work
well in my graphic narrative as my
idea was to do jack in the beanstalk
which involves monsters and scenery.