LinkedIn emplea cookies para mejorar la funcionalidad y el rendimiento de nuestro sitio web, así como para ofrecer publicidad relevante. Si continúas navegando por ese sitio web, aceptas el uso de cookies. Consulta nuestras Condiciones de uso y nuestra Política de privacidad para más información.
LinkedIn emplea cookies para mejorar la funcionalidad y el rendimiento de nuestro sitio web, así como para ofrecer publicidad relevante. Si continúas navegando por ese sitio web, aceptas el uso de cookies. Consulta nuestra Política de privacidad y nuestras Condiciones de uso para más información.
This is how it works: Corruption.
Je drinkt een glas, doet een plas en alles blijft bij hoe het was. Translated from Dutch: One drinks a
glass, makes a pee, and still everything stays the same as it was. Corruption survives people, because
it knows no time-limit or money-problems. And those being corrupted know that, next to the leaks in
legislation for their ‘escape’, so that behavior passes on generations long in theirs. I am talking about
modern slavery. True, the Dutch held regular slavery 100 years longer than all the other, and being a
paradox: it is the woman’s movement in early feminism, which raised the demand for abolishment...
Women instead of practicing mother earth’s wisdom, they were the first natural slaves: the only right
they had was the kitchen (‘het enige recht is het aanrecht’); and this had been so for centuries long.
Talking of the origin of corruption: it is a power-play to conceal. Everyone in learning makes mistakes
or in reverse by mistakes we learn. It is human to make mistakes, but it is inhuman to hide them (the
slogan of the Dutch Association of Medical Dissidents). Covering up each other’s ‘ass’ it is, when
mistakes are being made and also this is even a culture learned aspect inside organizations of control
(I heard many years ago already), but it is not only an abusive culture, it even has legal grounds to
stand upon in cooperation: PROTECTION OF CORRUPTION BY THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHT OF SILENCE!
The warnings about modern industry-society in the book of Maurice Jolie (Discussion in Hell between
Machiavelli and Montesquieu (whereof also Mein Kampf came forth)) already mentioned it: Industry
benefits by a relative peace, the labor slave has to have a relative easy life, then within one can be
corrupted as one likes, including destroying people. But do make sure, that what happens to those
people even is so extreme, -if a listening ear would be there for them- nobody will believe what they
tell. And of course those who control the media, controls the public opinion: ‘sell decent lies ’. Next
to the book of Maurice Jolie also Franz Kafka inspired them? Be corrupted, but be it modest…
There even is a legislation for: the professional right of silence is meant to protect the image of the
profession first above the interest of clients. The so called silent code of non-transparency, where
under every crime within the field of corruption can be committed as long as the group of profession
permits is, because by the professional right of silence no telephone taps, no house search, or seizure
is even possible, and also the criminal investigation team then is permitted to withdraw from their
criminal investigation, and also the expert in court-procedures is allowed to withdraw when claiming
the professional right of silence. But things are even worse, because next (to the office of justice
frustrating cases when wanted (I have collected some examples of in cases of medical abuse in the
Netherlands), if a case is there: the expert also has the ‘right to commit fraud to sabotage a case
from coming up. WHY? Next to the extreme setting of professional right of silence, when the expert
has to supply an opinion, the rule is: he should not be informed about early findings (he is supposed
to find them himself), he must make his conclusion all alone from ground. That sounds good if the
expert is honest, but in the Netherlands (and I also heard about Belgium) false declarations for court
are quiet normal, because other evil interests prevail. The right to be a false expert of justice… so the
expert is allowed to declare ‘the moon is made out of cheese’ and everybody in court will accept that
supposing their dream of justice etc., because they have to work seriously with that ‘expert’ reading.
But their fake system of law thus, by which the rights of the simple civilian is high-jacked, justifies the
reason to reject their (deliberate) suppression by wrong law-enforcement and how come vigilantism
(Roman Law) may become restorable. And I am not talking about the Jihad (, which originally actually
is an imagery for spiritual solitude for evolving spiritual discipline), but the rejection of false corrupt
installment of justice. I have only investigated the field of medical crime, but I fear this is common.
The ground-law-obligation to protect the individual civilian in practice is a shallow misleading joke.