SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 77% 79% 86% 30 4 1 35 54% 64% 74% 68% 34 9 7 50 41% 54% 65% 62% 34 19 2 55 63% 57% 69% 73% 43 7 9 59
Bonham 62% 67% 70% 47 16 4 67 63% 77% 67% 71% 56 14 9 79 55% 49% 61% 67% 60 23 7 90 61% 65% 68% 66% 73 23 14 110
Bowie 52% 65% 58% 15 7 4 26 38% 56% 62% 65% 30 10 6 46 33% 46% 54% 45% 19 17 6 42 67% 72% 74% 68% 41 14 5 60
Crockett 53% 61% 83% 15 3 18 81% 69% 82% 93% 26 2 28 49% 48% 51% 50% 27 14 13 54 45% 56% 56% 63% 35 10 11 56
Dishman 62% 62% 62% 23 4 10 37 53% 71% 76% 86% 36 4 2 42 65% 81% 86% 76% 38 11 1 50 66% 72% 71% 69% 40 10 8 58
Houston 43% 58% 67% 24 6 6 36 40% 48% 61% 64% 39 17 5 61 46% 47% 58% 54% 40 25 9 74 56% 49% 65% 58% 29 14 7 50
Jefferson 43% 46% 51% 19 7 11 37 47% 58% 57% 55% 18 4 11 33 51% 54% 73% 74% 29 6 4 39 70% 68% 69% 71% 34 8 6 48
Lamar 30% 44% 47% 18 11 9 38 48% 68% 67% 69% 43 9 10 62 39% 42% 52% 49% 31 22 10 63 48% 55% 52% 59% 37 16 10 63
Long 65% 69% 77% 51 7 8 66 60% 67% 69% 70% 57 15 10 82 56% 55% 59% 54% 44 26 12 82 56% 56% 60% 59% 60 25 17 102
Means 57% 53% 69% 31 7 7 45 53% 68% 65% 69% 44 14 6 64 64% 65% 78% 67% 53 19 7 79 74% 69% 76% 77% 56 12 5 73
Milam N/T 41% 50% 12 3 9 24 36% 49% 55% 50% 23 12 11 46 35% 50% 64% 56% 27 14 7 48 53% 57% 58% 67% 31 3 12 46
Rodriguez 65% 58% 59% 32 9 13 54 51% 71% 71% 70% 56 15 9 80 40% 57% 58% 57% 62 25 22 109 54% 48% 55% 60% 56 12 26 94
Stuart 60% 68% 73% 48 8 10 66 63% 71% 76% 78% 71 11 9 91 65% 67% 74% 67% 72 23 13 108 71% 79% 80% 82% 96 13 8 117
Travis 38% 42% 50% 15 6 9 30 49% 66% 70% 71% 27 6 5 38 38% 48% 56% 51% 18 9 8 35 55% 55% 63% 56% 33 12 7 52
THE 51% 61% 63% 52 15 15 82 53% 63% 72% 74% 73 21 5 99 62% 64% 68% 64% 85 27 21 133 74% 72% 76% 83% 110 15 7 132
Wilson 52% 80% 69% 24 9 2 35 65% 65% 71% 67% 34 9 8 51 58% 69% 75% 70% 42 16 2 60 76% 68% 76% 71% 53 16 6 75
Zavala 44% 56% 57% 16 6 6 28 52% 57% 65% 62% 31 11 8 50 45% 50% 56% 48% 26 21 7 54 54% 53% 59% 59% 30 12 9 51
Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 64% 65% 61% 70% 37 9 7 53 51% 53% 49% 60% 29 12 7 48 56% 69% 59% 63% 31 8 10 49 All Students assessed on campus
Bonham 58% 62% 59% 67% 72 20 15 107 59% 60% 65% 65% 71 22 17 110 65% 72% 65% 65% 61 15 18 94 Tier 1 % By GRD LVL&Campus
Bowie 65% 79% 73% 72% 38 10 5 53 69% 64% 67% 68% 34 10 6 50 64% 69% 66% 71% 39 11 5 55 Source: Istation
Crockett 64% 63% 68% 60% 37 14 11 62 42% 46% 43% 46% 33 20 18 71 63% 67% 73% 63% 34 11 9 54 Data pulled: 12/14/2017
Dishman 63% 65% 66% 61% 31 15 5 51 60% 51% 51% 55% 24 9 11 44 49% N/T 56% 55% 27 10 12 49 For Internal Use Only
Houston 57% 54% 62% 61% 40 12 14 66 52% 48% 59% 65% 43 14 9 66 79% 69% 76% 73% 37 8 6 51
Jefferson 75% 73% 76% 76% 28 5 4 37 69% 67% 64% 74% 26 7 2 35 78% 73% 69% 65% 36 11 8 55
Lamar 41% 40% 43% 39% 37 25 32 94 41% 47% 40% 52% 60 22 33 115 55% 54% 52% 57% 53 22 18 93
Long 59% 63% 66% 69% 63 20 8 91 70% 70% 71% 73% 72 15 12 99 64% 72% 71% 68% 73 25 9 107
Means 64% 68% 67% 72% 67 17 9 93 68% 74% 73% 70% 65 16 12 93 73% 67% 69% 69% 54 15 9 78
Milam 50% 53% 54% 46% 31 16 21 68 57% 48% 50% 46% 25 17 12 54 66% 66% 66% 73% 45 9 8 62
Rodriguez 56% 59% 60% 56% 59 22 25 106 50% 54% 58% 57% 73 29 25 127 65% 70% 69% 59% 63 24 19 106
Stuart 76% 78% 81% 74% 92 26 7 125 75% 77% 79% 80% 105 16 11 132 79% 79% 74% 78% 85 15 9 109
Travis 44% 60% 55% 56% 27 13 8 48 74% 79% 82% 77% 34 6 4 44 64% 69% 67% 65% 35 6 13 54
THE 72% 78% 77% 78% 104 22 8 134 70% 73% 74% 67% 91 30 15 136 65% 62% 54% 64% 70 28 12 110
Wilson 60% 65% 61% 62% 44 19 8 71 53% 62% 57% 61% 57 20 17 94 75% 66% 69% 73% 52 10 9 71
Zavala 65% 71% 68% 70% 43 13 5 61 63% 72% 68% 65% 33 8 10 51 72% 69% 69% 71% 35 8 6 49
Istation Reading December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student # by Tier
PK KG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
5TH4TH3RD Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 100% 100% 100% 1 1 25% 42% 44% 38% 3 2 3 8 22% 50% 60% 60% 3 2 5 36% 36% 50% 58% 7 3 2 12
Bonham 0 0% 0% 0% 0 50% 0% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 26% 24% 30% 26% 5 4 10 19
Bowie 50% 83% 63% 5 1 2 8 29% 60% 67% 60% 6 1 3 10 25% 43% 57% 43% 3 3 1 7 43% 57% 64% 47% 7 5 3 15
Crockett 0% 83% 15 3 18 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 2 25% 25% 29% 38% 8 7 6 21 44% 61% 58% 70% 14 3 3 20
Dishman 17% 17% 1 1 4 6 100% 100% 80% 4 1 5 57% 86% 86% 71% 5 2 7 56% 67% 60% 50% 5 3 2 10
Houston 0% 0% 1 1 43% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 45% 100% 67% 100% 2 2 22% 50% 100% 50% 2 1 1 4
Jefferson 0% 0% 33% 1 2 3 50% 60% 50% 50% 1 1 2 13% 6% 0% 0% 2 1 3 78% 72% 78% 76% 13 3 1 17
Lamar 0% 0% 33% 1 2 3 100% 60% 67% 80% 4 1 5 18% 60% 50% 50% 2 2 4 30% 60% 60% 80% 4 1 5
Long 50% 67% 67% 2 1 3 25% 50% 50% 100% 2 2 22% 44% 44% 56% 5 2 2 9 50% 50% 46% 55% 6 2 3 11
Means 0% 1 1 0% 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 3 3 100% 75% 75% 60% 3 2 5
Milam N/T 0% 25% 1 3 4 31% 0% 43% 33% 1 1 1 3 21% 20% 33% 23% 3 4 6 13 39% 28% 28% 41% 7 3 7 17
Rodriguez 0 0% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 43% 58% 50% 50% 3 3 6 29% 33% 28% 42% 8 1 10 19
Stuart 18% 55% 45% 5 3 3 11 36% 42% 33% 42% 5 1 6 12 65% 53% 56% 39% 7 6 5 18 67% 76% 76% 71% 15 5 1 21
Travis 0% 25% 0% 1 1 2 25% 0 6% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 62% 53% 64% 64% 9 1 4 14
THE 25% 0% 0% 1 2 3 44% 44% 50% 30% 3 5 2 10 23% 31% 38% 17% 2 5 5 12 67% 22% 56% 57% 4 1 2 7
Wilson 100% 0% 1 1 100% 75% 100% 100% 1 1 33% 50% 50% 100% 2 2 100% 80% 88% 67% 6 2 1 9
Zavala 0% 0% 1 1 50% 55% 55% 45% 5 3 3 11 29% 57% 43% 29% 2 2 3 7 56% 56% 61% 50% 9 6 3 18
AVG 27% 34% 31% 66 47% 53% 51% 61% 73 35% 46% 47% 48% 123 53% 53% 60% 57% 223
Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 71% 56% 56% 50% 4 4 8 17% 57% 43% 67% 4 1 1 6 25% 33% 75% 33% 1 2 3 Students w/ LEP Indicator Y
Bonham 44% 25% 38% 60% 3 2 5 30% 27% 25% 25% 3 2 7 12 20% 33% 29% 14% 1 6 7 Tier 1% By Grade Lvl&Campus
Bowie 59% 76% 65% 71% 12 4 1 17 56% 50% 50% 50% 8 5 3 16 56% 63% 63% 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation
Crockett 57% 65% 68% 55% 12 6 4 22 47% 42% 56% 50% 15 8 7 30 69% 33% 50% 56% 5 4 9 Data pulled:
Dishman 50% 75% 46% 54% 7 6 13 40% 60% 60% 33% 2 2 2 6 38% 0% 36% 25% 3 5 4 12 For Internal Use Only
Houston 25% 25% 50% 20% 1 1 3 5 38% 33% 50% 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 57% 57% 71% 5 2 7
Jefferson 80% 73% 73% 71% 10 3 1 14 67% 45% 46% 67% 8 2 2 12 67% 55% 50% 53% 10 6 3 19
Lamar 39% 36% 36% 43% 18 7 17 42 36% 39% 38% 47% 15 8 9 32 44% 43% 36% 36% 8 7 7 22
Long 50% 50% 45% 45% 5 3 3 11 40% 40% 40% 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 14% 25% 13% 1 5 2 8
Means 36% 39% 42% 54% 13 7 4 24 58% 47% 50% 32% 6 8 5 19 71% 57% 46% 62% 8 2 3 13
Milam 47% 41% 16% 25% 5 7 8 20 61% 36% 47% 43% 6 4 4 14 33% 31% 40% 53% 8 2 5 15
Rodriguez 36% 58% 56% 46% 13 9 6 28 41% 52% 54% 42% 11 9 6 26 33% 33% 35% 35% 7 3 10 20
Stuart 60% 40% 70% 50% 5 3 2 10 25% 46% 54% 62% 8 1 4 13 88% 50% 78% 78% 7 2 9
Travis 40% 53% 40% 33% 5 8 2 15 75% 82% 70% 90% 9 1 10 13% 25% 13% 13% 1 3 4 8
THE 58% 67% 89% 60% 6 2 2 10 63% 67% 50% 40% 2 3 5 43% 43% 0% 50% 3 1 2 6
Wilson 56% 50% 60% 53% 8 5 2 15 50% 67% 46% 62% 8 4 1 13 83% 56% 70% 80% 8 1 1 10
Zavala 57% 52% 64% 67% 14 5 2 21 47% 29% 17% 0% 3 4 7 67% 43% 50% 80% 4 1 5
AVG 51% 52% 54% 50% 280 47% 48% 47% 47% 237 47% 39% 44% 48% 182
Istation Reading December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP
Student # by Tier
PK KG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
5TH4TH3RD Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 100% 100% 50% 2 1 1 4 56% 44% 30% 30% 3 4 3 10 25% 0% 0% 0% 2 4 6 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 100% 1 1
Bonham 33% 50% 38% 3 5 8 67% 33% 67% 58% 7 2 3 12 73% 62% 77% 71% 10 4 14 0 0
Bowie 73% 82% 64% 7 2 2 11 50% 29% 100% 100% 3 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 2 1 3 50% 50% 0
Crockett 83% 83% 83% 10 1 1 12 67% 67% 67% 73% 8 2 1 11 0% 0% 0 0 0
Dishman 0% 5 5 0% 17% 20% 50% 2 2 4 17% 0 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1
Houston 63% 86% 86% 6 1 7 67% 44% 56% 78% 7 2 9 73% 67% 42% 67% 8 2 2 12 11% 50% 29% 2 2 3 7 75% 31% 75% 67% 2 1 3
Jefferson 40% 50% 0% 2 1 3 55% 82% 92% 91% 10 1 11 57% 43% 50% 64% 9 3 2 14 0 0
Lamar 60% 63% 48% 11 6 6 23 37% 53% 71% 79% 11 3 14 58% 58% 55% 58% 18 5 8 31 73% 69% 85% 92% 12 1 13 36% 44% 42% 45% 15 3 15 33
Long 38% 40% 2 1 2 5 ~~ 25% 57% 4 1 2 7 ~~ 20% 20% 1 1 3 5 ~~ 0% 1 1 ~~ 0
Means 38% 56% 57% 8 3 3 14 36% 43% 47% 67% 10 2 3 15 72% 72% 66% 57% 16 11 1 28 73% 52% 75% 77% 23 6 1 30 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 1
Milam 36% 40% 6 4 5 15 29% 48% 55% 65% 13 5 2 20 39% 42% 36% 39% 14 11 11 36 30% 30% 34% 26% 7 9 11 27 26% 28% 26% 24% 8 6 20 34
Rodriguez 67% 91% 55% 6 3 2 11 38% 69% 85% 100% 14 14 33% 36% 38% 62% 8 3 2 13 0 33% 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3
Stuart 55% 80% 40% 2 1 2 5 36% 36% 63% 50% 4 1 3 8 44% 41% 47% 8 2 7 17 0 0% 100% 100% 0
Travis 57% 25% 33% 3 3 3 9 38% 29% 40% 50% 7 3 4 14 50% 31% 25% 38% 6 3 7 16 33% 33% 50% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1
Treasure
Hills
67% 33% 20% 1 4 5 40% 50% 50% 67% 2 1 3 33% 0% 0% 33% 1 2 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 33% 33% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3
Wilson 44% 67% 50% 3 2 1 6 54% 57% 38% 62% 8 3 2 13 80% 50% 60% 89% 8 1 9 100% 100% 100% 3 3 80% 75% 100% 0
Zavala 40% 43% 38% 3 4 1 8 8% 55% 36% 80% 8 2 10 14% 29% 2 2 3 7 67% 100% 100% 100% 2 2 0
AVG 57% 63% 44% 151 42% 46% 57% 68% 178 49% 34% 34% 45% 212 54% 50% 59% 52% 90 44% 44% 51% 45% 80
All Students assessed in Español
Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Source: Istation
Data pulled: 12/15/2017
~~ No students assessed in Español
For Internal Use Only
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Istation Reading Español December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
PK Student # by Tier3RDKG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 100% 100% 100% 1 1 25% 50% 0 25% 25% 20% 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 0% 14% 14% 1 2 4 7
Bonham 50% 75% 25% 1 3 4 100% 50% 20% 0% 2 2 0 33% 33% 29% 33% 2 2 2 6
Bowie 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 2
Crockett 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 4 7
Dishman 50% 50% 50% 1 1 2 50% 50% 100% 100% 2 2 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 33% 20% 20% 20% 1 1 3 5
Houston 0 0% 0% 50% 50% 1 1 2 25% 25% 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 0% 0% 25% 1 1 2 4
Jefferson 20% 40% 33% 2 3 1 6 0% 0% 0% 5 5 0% 50% 33% 0% 1 1 2 40% 40% 40% 40% 2 3 5
Lamar 0% 0% 0% 1 1 2 0% 0% 1 1 25% 0% 17% 0% 2 5 7 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 5 7
Long 100% 100% 1 1 33% 25% 67% 67% 2 1 3 17% 33% 20% 20% 1 3 1 5 17% 15% 14% 17% 2 2 8 12
Means 100% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 2 2 4 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 67% 67% 57% 67% 4 2 6
Milam 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 2 50% 50% 33% 33% 1 2 3
Rodriguez 0% 100% 0% 1 1 33% 25% 25% 50% 2 2 4 17% 14% 14% 14% 1 1 5 7 25% 0% 14% 17% 1 5 6
Stuart 0% 100% 100% 2 2 67% 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3 20% 20% 17% 0% 3 3 6 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1
Travis 0 0% 50% 50% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2 50% 0% 50% 50% 1 1 2
Treasure Hills 0% 0% 50% 1 1 2 80% 50% 80% 60% 3 1 1 5 33% 20% 40% 20% 1 1 3 5 33% 33% 20% 40% 2 2 1 5
Wilson 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 0% 0% 100% 100% 1 1 0% 100% 0% 1 1
Zavala 33% 67% 0% 3 3 40% 40% 57% 43% 3 2 2 7 0% 20% 0% 20% 1 1 3 5 67% 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3
AVG 28% 67% 42% 25 41% 36% 41% 39% 44 16% 19% 24% 20% 56 39% 31% 39% 37% 82
Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 40% 20% 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 29% 17% 20% 1 3 1 5 13% 33% 25% 13% 2 1 5 8 All Students w/SPED Indicator(Y)
Bonham 20% 0% 20% 13% 1 1 6 8 17% 13% 9% 9% 1 1 9 11 14% 29% 18% 18% 2 9 11 Tier 1 % By Grd Lvl & Campus
Bowie 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 4 0% 20% 17% 17% 1 5 6 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 3 5 Source: Istation
Crockett 42% 17% 33% 27% 3 1 7 11 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8 13% 10% 17% 0% 4 7 11 Data pulled:
Dishman 0% 33% 0% 0% 2 1 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 4 5 25% 0% 25% 25% 1 3 4 For Internal Use Only
Houston 13% 0% 17% 0% 1 5 6 11% 0% 0% 22% 2 2 5 9 50% 30% 36% 18% 2 3 6 11
Jefferson 33% 0% 0% 0% 1 4 5 0 0% 0% 0% 50% 1 1 2
Lamar 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 7 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 14 15 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8
Long 7% 21% 14% 23% 3 4 6 13 0% 0% 10% 0% 1 9 10 6% 0% 6% 13% 2 6 8 16
Means 0% 0% 0% 20% 1 4 5 50% 33% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 25% 14% 25% 33% 3 1 5 9
Milam 17% 0% 0% 25% 2 6 8 0% 0% 0% 13% 1 1 6 8 14% 14% 17% 0% 2 3 5
Rodriguez 25% 22% 20% 18% 2 9 11 25% 18% 18% 17% 2 2 8 12 7% 7% 6% 6% 1 4 12 17
Stuart 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 2 33% 33% 33% 33% 2 2 2 6 0% 50% 0% 0% 1 1
Travis 0% 25% 0% 20% 1 1 3 5 25% 0% 50% 20% 1 1 3 5 11% 11% 8% 0% 2 10 12
Treasure Hills 33% 40% 50% 50% 4 2 2 8 17% 13% 7% 21% 3 3 8 14 25% 0% 20% 0% 2 2
Wilson 9% 20% 17% 8% 1 5 6 12 10% 10% 10% 10% 1 5 4 10 36% 27% 36% 27% 3 3 5 11
Zavala 33% 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3 33% 33% 17% 0% 5 5 13% 25% 11% 11% 1 3 5 9
AVG 22% 19% 19% 21% 115 14% 13% 14% 13% 132 15% 15% 15% 13% 142
*1stAssessmentinOctober
5TH4TH3RD Student # by TierStudent # by TierStudent # by Tier
Istation Reading December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED
PK KG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier

More Related Content

What's hot

Global Views on Immigration and the Refugee Crisis
Global Views on Immigration and the Refugee CrisisGlobal Views on Immigration and the Refugee Crisis
Global Views on Immigration and the Refugee Crisis
Ipsos
 
Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008
Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008
Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008
mensa25
 

What's hot (20)

Global Views on Immigration and the Refugee Crisis
Global Views on Immigration and the Refugee CrisisGlobal Views on Immigration and the Refugee Crisis
Global Views on Immigration and the Refugee Crisis
 
Censo
CensoCenso
Censo
 
Tablas propoleos
Tablas propoleosTablas propoleos
Tablas propoleos
 
ECO303- Introduction to Econometrics- term paper
ECO303- Introduction to Econometrics- term paperECO303- Introduction to Econometrics- term paper
ECO303- Introduction to Econometrics- term paper
 
Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008
Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008
Corporate Venture Capital Group Investment Analysis 1995 to Q2 2008
 
(EN) 2021 Korea Social Media Marketing Benchmark Index Report [SM2Networks]
(EN) 2021 Korea Social Media Marketing Benchmark Index Report [SM2Networks](EN) 2021 Korea Social Media Marketing Benchmark Index Report [SM2Networks]
(EN) 2021 Korea Social Media Marketing Benchmark Index Report [SM2Networks]
 
Résultats élections régionales 20151206
Résultats élections régionales 20151206Résultats élections régionales 20151206
Résultats élections régionales 20151206
 
Mantenimiento
MantenimientoMantenimiento
Mantenimiento
 
COMPLETE Phase 2, Questions 1-257 (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
COMPLETE Phase 2, Questions 1-257 (Anonymous) - FREE Survey ResultsCOMPLETE Phase 2, Questions 1-257 (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
COMPLETE Phase 2, Questions 1-257 (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
 
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistasResultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
 
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey ResultsCOMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
 
Your Grade
Your GradeYour Grade
Your Grade
 
Contoh laporan harian
Contoh laporan harianContoh laporan harian
Contoh laporan harian
 
Avoid email meltdown through segementation (web edit)
Avoid email meltdown through segementation (web edit)Avoid email meltdown through segementation (web edit)
Avoid email meltdown through segementation (web edit)
 
CorrelationMIDWPV
CorrelationMIDWPVCorrelationMIDWPV
CorrelationMIDWPV
 
The Woodlands Demographics 2015
The Woodlands Demographics 2015The Woodlands Demographics 2015
The Woodlands Demographics 2015
 
Bang nhan chia tieu hoc vn
Bang nhan chia tieu hoc vnBang nhan chia tieu hoc vn
Bang nhan chia tieu hoc vn
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 관태기를 겪고 있는 20대의 인간관계 인식 및 실태조사 (연구리포트 2016-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 관태기를 겪고 있는 20대의 인간관계 인식 및 실태조사 (연구리포트 2016-09)[대학내일20대연구소] 관태기를 겪고 있는 20대의 인간관계 인식 및 실태조사 (연구리포트 2016-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 관태기를 겪고 있는 20대의 인간관계 인식 및 실태조사 (연구리포트 2016-09)
 
F.table
F.tableF.table
F.table
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 여자 대학생의 달라진 생각을 읽다 (연구리포트 2017-11)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 여자 대학생의 달라진 생각을 읽다 (연구리포트 2017-11)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 여자 대학생의 달라진 생각을 읽다 (연구리포트 2017-11)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 여자 대학생의 달라진 생각을 읽다 (연구리포트 2017-11)
 

Similar to Istation monthly report for 2018 rdg dec

Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdfEstimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
karimshaikh24
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
tuan_azuan
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
tuan_azuan
 
Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)
Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)
Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)
Romain Chion
 
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
Tx  -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7Tx  -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
satoriwatersfl
 
Federer nadal-djokovic-murray
Federer nadal-djokovic-murrayFederer nadal-djokovic-murray
Federer nadal-djokovic-murray
Vakho Ted
 

Similar to Istation monthly report for 2018 rdg dec (20)

Istation Report - 1 September
Istation Report - 1 SeptemberIstation Report - 1 September
Istation Report - 1 September
 
Fases de la Luna 2013 en México
Fases de la Luna 2013 en MéxicoFases de la Luna 2013 en México
Fases de la Luna 2013 en México
 
日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
 
Konversi toefl ac_ept
Konversi toefl ac_eptKonversi toefl ac_ept
Konversi toefl ac_ept
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
 
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdfEstimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
 
Basic course exam 2 scores (pdf)
Basic course exam 2 scores (pdf)Basic course exam 2 scores (pdf)
Basic course exam 2 scores (pdf)
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
 
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 인턴십에 대한 3개국 인식 비교 (연구리포트 2018-3)
[대학내일20대연구소]  인턴십에 대한 3개국 인식 비교 (연구리포트 2018-3) [대학내일20대연구소]  인턴십에 대한 3개국 인식 비교 (연구리포트 2018-3)
[대학내일20대연구소] 인턴십에 대한 3개국 인식 비교 (연구리포트 2018-3)
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 소비&라이프스타일 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-09)
 
Dr. azad hama sharif
Dr. azad hama sharifDr. azad hama sharif
Dr. azad hama sharif
 
Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)
Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)
Presentation Internship Brain Connectivity Graph 2014 (ENG)
 
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
 
Backgammon MWC estimator by pr difference and match length v03
Backgammon MWC estimator by pr difference and match length v03Backgammon MWC estimator by pr difference and match length v03
Backgammon MWC estimator by pr difference and match length v03
 
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to PredictiveAnalytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
 
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
Tx  -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7Tx  -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
 
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
Tx  -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7Tx  -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
Tx -demo_stat_fy12_414977_7
 
Federer nadal-djokovic-murray
Federer nadal-djokovic-murrayFederer nadal-djokovic-murray
Federer nadal-djokovic-murray
 

More from albertrodriguez5150 (20)

District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020
 
Early spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power pointEarly spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power point
 
Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618
 
Ode' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual educationOde' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual education
 
Ode' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual EducationOde' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual Education
 
Why garden
Why gardenWhy garden
Why garden
 
Action plan
Action planAction plan
Action plan
 
Design team 3
Design team 3Design team 3
Design team 3
 
Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30
 
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
 
Iu 5 final
Iu 5 finalIu 5 final
Iu 5 final
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5
 
Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5
 
Strengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie modelStrengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie model
 
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguezReviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
 
Tac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsettingTac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsetting
 
How the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earthHow the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earth
 
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menuJefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
 

Recently uploaded

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
MateoGardella
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 

Istation monthly report for 2018 rdg dec

  • 1. Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # Austin 77% 79% 86% 30 4 1 35 54% 64% 74% 68% 34 9 7 50 41% 54% 65% 62% 34 19 2 55 63% 57% 69% 73% 43 7 9 59 Bonham 62% 67% 70% 47 16 4 67 63% 77% 67% 71% 56 14 9 79 55% 49% 61% 67% 60 23 7 90 61% 65% 68% 66% 73 23 14 110 Bowie 52% 65% 58% 15 7 4 26 38% 56% 62% 65% 30 10 6 46 33% 46% 54% 45% 19 17 6 42 67% 72% 74% 68% 41 14 5 60 Crockett 53% 61% 83% 15 3 18 81% 69% 82% 93% 26 2 28 49% 48% 51% 50% 27 14 13 54 45% 56% 56% 63% 35 10 11 56 Dishman 62% 62% 62% 23 4 10 37 53% 71% 76% 86% 36 4 2 42 65% 81% 86% 76% 38 11 1 50 66% 72% 71% 69% 40 10 8 58 Houston 43% 58% 67% 24 6 6 36 40% 48% 61% 64% 39 17 5 61 46% 47% 58% 54% 40 25 9 74 56% 49% 65% 58% 29 14 7 50 Jefferson 43% 46% 51% 19 7 11 37 47% 58% 57% 55% 18 4 11 33 51% 54% 73% 74% 29 6 4 39 70% 68% 69% 71% 34 8 6 48 Lamar 30% 44% 47% 18 11 9 38 48% 68% 67% 69% 43 9 10 62 39% 42% 52% 49% 31 22 10 63 48% 55% 52% 59% 37 16 10 63 Long 65% 69% 77% 51 7 8 66 60% 67% 69% 70% 57 15 10 82 56% 55% 59% 54% 44 26 12 82 56% 56% 60% 59% 60 25 17 102 Means 57% 53% 69% 31 7 7 45 53% 68% 65% 69% 44 14 6 64 64% 65% 78% 67% 53 19 7 79 74% 69% 76% 77% 56 12 5 73 Milam N/T 41% 50% 12 3 9 24 36% 49% 55% 50% 23 12 11 46 35% 50% 64% 56% 27 14 7 48 53% 57% 58% 67% 31 3 12 46 Rodriguez 65% 58% 59% 32 9 13 54 51% 71% 71% 70% 56 15 9 80 40% 57% 58% 57% 62 25 22 109 54% 48% 55% 60% 56 12 26 94 Stuart 60% 68% 73% 48 8 10 66 63% 71% 76% 78% 71 11 9 91 65% 67% 74% 67% 72 23 13 108 71% 79% 80% 82% 96 13 8 117 Travis 38% 42% 50% 15 6 9 30 49% 66% 70% 71% 27 6 5 38 38% 48% 56% 51% 18 9 8 35 55% 55% 63% 56% 33 12 7 52 THE 51% 61% 63% 52 15 15 82 53% 63% 72% 74% 73 21 5 99 62% 64% 68% 64% 85 27 21 133 74% 72% 76% 83% 110 15 7 132 Wilson 52% 80% 69% 24 9 2 35 65% 65% 71% 67% 34 9 8 51 58% 69% 75% 70% 42 16 2 60 76% 68% 76% 71% 53 16 6 75 Zavala 44% 56% 57% 16 6 6 28 52% 57% 65% 62% 31 11 8 50 45% 50% 56% 48% 26 21 7 54 54% 53% 59% 59% 30 12 9 51 Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # Austin 64% 65% 61% 70% 37 9 7 53 51% 53% 49% 60% 29 12 7 48 56% 69% 59% 63% 31 8 10 49 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 58% 62% 59% 67% 72 20 15 107 59% 60% 65% 65% 71 22 17 110 65% 72% 65% 65% 61 15 18 94 Tier 1 % By GRD LVL&Campus Bowie 65% 79% 73% 72% 38 10 5 53 69% 64% 67% 68% 34 10 6 50 64% 69% 66% 71% 39 11 5 55 Source: Istation Crockett 64% 63% 68% 60% 37 14 11 62 42% 46% 43% 46% 33 20 18 71 63% 67% 73% 63% 34 11 9 54 Data pulled: 12/14/2017 Dishman 63% 65% 66% 61% 31 15 5 51 60% 51% 51% 55% 24 9 11 44 49% N/T 56% 55% 27 10 12 49 For Internal Use Only Houston 57% 54% 62% 61% 40 12 14 66 52% 48% 59% 65% 43 14 9 66 79% 69% 76% 73% 37 8 6 51 Jefferson 75% 73% 76% 76% 28 5 4 37 69% 67% 64% 74% 26 7 2 35 78% 73% 69% 65% 36 11 8 55 Lamar 41% 40% 43% 39% 37 25 32 94 41% 47% 40% 52% 60 22 33 115 55% 54% 52% 57% 53 22 18 93 Long 59% 63% 66% 69% 63 20 8 91 70% 70% 71% 73% 72 15 12 99 64% 72% 71% 68% 73 25 9 107 Means 64% 68% 67% 72% 67 17 9 93 68% 74% 73% 70% 65 16 12 93 73% 67% 69% 69% 54 15 9 78 Milam 50% 53% 54% 46% 31 16 21 68 57% 48% 50% 46% 25 17 12 54 66% 66% 66% 73% 45 9 8 62 Rodriguez 56% 59% 60% 56% 59 22 25 106 50% 54% 58% 57% 73 29 25 127 65% 70% 69% 59% 63 24 19 106 Stuart 76% 78% 81% 74% 92 26 7 125 75% 77% 79% 80% 105 16 11 132 79% 79% 74% 78% 85 15 9 109 Travis 44% 60% 55% 56% 27 13 8 48 74% 79% 82% 77% 34 6 4 44 64% 69% 67% 65% 35 6 13 54 THE 72% 78% 77% 78% 104 22 8 134 70% 73% 74% 67% 91 30 15 136 65% 62% 54% 64% 70 28 12 110 Wilson 60% 65% 61% 62% 44 19 8 71 53% 62% 57% 61% 57 20 17 94 75% 66% 69% 73% 52 10 9 71 Zavala 65% 71% 68% 70% 43 13 5 61 63% 72% 68% 65% 33 8 10 51 72% 69% 69% 71% 35 8 6 49 Istation Reading December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student # by Tier PK KG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
  • 2. Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 100% 1 1 25% 42% 44% 38% 3 2 3 8 22% 50% 60% 60% 3 2 5 36% 36% 50% 58% 7 3 2 12 Bonham 0 0% 0% 0% 0 50% 0% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 26% 24% 30% 26% 5 4 10 19 Bowie 50% 83% 63% 5 1 2 8 29% 60% 67% 60% 6 1 3 10 25% 43% 57% 43% 3 3 1 7 43% 57% 64% 47% 7 5 3 15 Crockett 0% 83% 15 3 18 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 2 25% 25% 29% 38% 8 7 6 21 44% 61% 58% 70% 14 3 3 20 Dishman 17% 17% 1 1 4 6 100% 100% 80% 4 1 5 57% 86% 86% 71% 5 2 7 56% 67% 60% 50% 5 3 2 10 Houston 0% 0% 1 1 43% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 45% 100% 67% 100% 2 2 22% 50% 100% 50% 2 1 1 4 Jefferson 0% 0% 33% 1 2 3 50% 60% 50% 50% 1 1 2 13% 6% 0% 0% 2 1 3 78% 72% 78% 76% 13 3 1 17 Lamar 0% 0% 33% 1 2 3 100% 60% 67% 80% 4 1 5 18% 60% 50% 50% 2 2 4 30% 60% 60% 80% 4 1 5 Long 50% 67% 67% 2 1 3 25% 50% 50% 100% 2 2 22% 44% 44% 56% 5 2 2 9 50% 50% 46% 55% 6 2 3 11 Means 0% 1 1 0% 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 3 3 100% 75% 75% 60% 3 2 5 Milam N/T 0% 25% 1 3 4 31% 0% 43% 33% 1 1 1 3 21% 20% 33% 23% 3 4 6 13 39% 28% 28% 41% 7 3 7 17 Rodriguez 0 0% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 43% 58% 50% 50% 3 3 6 29% 33% 28% 42% 8 1 10 19 Stuart 18% 55% 45% 5 3 3 11 36% 42% 33% 42% 5 1 6 12 65% 53% 56% 39% 7 6 5 18 67% 76% 76% 71% 15 5 1 21 Travis 0% 25% 0% 1 1 2 25% 0 6% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 62% 53% 64% 64% 9 1 4 14 THE 25% 0% 0% 1 2 3 44% 44% 50% 30% 3 5 2 10 23% 31% 38% 17% 2 5 5 12 67% 22% 56% 57% 4 1 2 7 Wilson 100% 0% 1 1 100% 75% 100% 100% 1 1 33% 50% 50% 100% 2 2 100% 80% 88% 67% 6 2 1 9 Zavala 0% 0% 1 1 50% 55% 55% 45% 5 3 3 11 29% 57% 43% 29% 2 2 3 7 56% 56% 61% 50% 9 6 3 18 AVG 27% 34% 31% 66 47% 53% 51% 61% 73 35% 46% 47% 48% 123 53% 53% 60% 57% 223 Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # Austin 71% 56% 56% 50% 4 4 8 17% 57% 43% 67% 4 1 1 6 25% 33% 75% 33% 1 2 3 Students w/ LEP Indicator Y Bonham 44% 25% 38% 60% 3 2 5 30% 27% 25% 25% 3 2 7 12 20% 33% 29% 14% 1 6 7 Tier 1% By Grade Lvl&Campus Bowie 59% 76% 65% 71% 12 4 1 17 56% 50% 50% 50% 8 5 3 16 56% 63% 63% 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation Crockett 57% 65% 68% 55% 12 6 4 22 47% 42% 56% 50% 15 8 7 30 69% 33% 50% 56% 5 4 9 Data pulled: Dishman 50% 75% 46% 54% 7 6 13 40% 60% 60% 33% 2 2 2 6 38% 0% 36% 25% 3 5 4 12 For Internal Use Only Houston 25% 25% 50% 20% 1 1 3 5 38% 33% 50% 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 57% 57% 71% 5 2 7 Jefferson 80% 73% 73% 71% 10 3 1 14 67% 45% 46% 67% 8 2 2 12 67% 55% 50% 53% 10 6 3 19 Lamar 39% 36% 36% 43% 18 7 17 42 36% 39% 38% 47% 15 8 9 32 44% 43% 36% 36% 8 7 7 22 Long 50% 50% 45% 45% 5 3 3 11 40% 40% 40% 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 14% 25% 13% 1 5 2 8 Means 36% 39% 42% 54% 13 7 4 24 58% 47% 50% 32% 6 8 5 19 71% 57% 46% 62% 8 2 3 13 Milam 47% 41% 16% 25% 5 7 8 20 61% 36% 47% 43% 6 4 4 14 33% 31% 40% 53% 8 2 5 15 Rodriguez 36% 58% 56% 46% 13 9 6 28 41% 52% 54% 42% 11 9 6 26 33% 33% 35% 35% 7 3 10 20 Stuart 60% 40% 70% 50% 5 3 2 10 25% 46% 54% 62% 8 1 4 13 88% 50% 78% 78% 7 2 9 Travis 40% 53% 40% 33% 5 8 2 15 75% 82% 70% 90% 9 1 10 13% 25% 13% 13% 1 3 4 8 THE 58% 67% 89% 60% 6 2 2 10 63% 67% 50% 40% 2 3 5 43% 43% 0% 50% 3 1 2 6 Wilson 56% 50% 60% 53% 8 5 2 15 50% 67% 46% 62% 8 4 1 13 83% 56% 70% 80% 8 1 1 10 Zavala 57% 52% 64% 67% 14 5 2 21 47% 29% 17% 0% 3 4 7 67% 43% 50% 80% 4 1 5 AVG 51% 52% 54% 50% 280 47% 48% 47% 47% 237 47% 39% 44% 48% 182 Istation Reading December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP Student # by Tier PK KG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
  • 3. Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 50% 2 1 1 4 56% 44% 30% 30% 3 4 3 10 25% 0% 0% 0% 2 4 6 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 100% 1 1 Bonham 33% 50% 38% 3 5 8 67% 33% 67% 58% 7 2 3 12 73% 62% 77% 71% 10 4 14 0 0 Bowie 73% 82% 64% 7 2 2 11 50% 29% 100% 100% 3 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 2 1 3 50% 50% 0 Crockett 83% 83% 83% 10 1 1 12 67% 67% 67% 73% 8 2 1 11 0% 0% 0 0 0 Dishman 0% 5 5 0% 17% 20% 50% 2 2 4 17% 0 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 Houston 63% 86% 86% 6 1 7 67% 44% 56% 78% 7 2 9 73% 67% 42% 67% 8 2 2 12 11% 50% 29% 2 2 3 7 75% 31% 75% 67% 2 1 3 Jefferson 40% 50% 0% 2 1 3 55% 82% 92% 91% 10 1 11 57% 43% 50% 64% 9 3 2 14 0 0 Lamar 60% 63% 48% 11 6 6 23 37% 53% 71% 79% 11 3 14 58% 58% 55% 58% 18 5 8 31 73% 69% 85% 92% 12 1 13 36% 44% 42% 45% 15 3 15 33 Long 38% 40% 2 1 2 5 ~~ 25% 57% 4 1 2 7 ~~ 20% 20% 1 1 3 5 ~~ 0% 1 1 ~~ 0 Means 38% 56% 57% 8 3 3 14 36% 43% 47% 67% 10 2 3 15 72% 72% 66% 57% 16 11 1 28 73% 52% 75% 77% 23 6 1 30 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 Milam 36% 40% 6 4 5 15 29% 48% 55% 65% 13 5 2 20 39% 42% 36% 39% 14 11 11 36 30% 30% 34% 26% 7 9 11 27 26% 28% 26% 24% 8 6 20 34 Rodriguez 67% 91% 55% 6 3 2 11 38% 69% 85% 100% 14 14 33% 36% 38% 62% 8 3 2 13 0 33% 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3 Stuart 55% 80% 40% 2 1 2 5 36% 36% 63% 50% 4 1 3 8 44% 41% 47% 8 2 7 17 0 0% 100% 100% 0 Travis 57% 25% 33% 3 3 3 9 38% 29% 40% 50% 7 3 4 14 50% 31% 25% 38% 6 3 7 16 33% 33% 50% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 Treasure Hills 67% 33% 20% 1 4 5 40% 50% 50% 67% 2 1 3 33% 0% 0% 33% 1 2 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 33% 33% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 Wilson 44% 67% 50% 3 2 1 6 54% 57% 38% 62% 8 3 2 13 80% 50% 60% 89% 8 1 9 100% 100% 100% 3 3 80% 75% 100% 0 Zavala 40% 43% 38% 3 4 1 8 8% 55% 36% 80% 8 2 10 14% 29% 2 2 3 7 67% 100% 100% 100% 2 2 0 AVG 57% 63% 44% 151 42% 46% 57% 68% 178 49% 34% 34% 45% 212 54% 50% 59% 52% 90 44% 44% 51% 45% 80 All Students assessed in Español Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Source: Istation Data pulled: 12/15/2017 ~~ No students assessed in Español For Internal Use Only *1stAssessmentinOctober Istation Reading Español December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage PK Student # by Tier3RDKG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier
  • 4. Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 100% 100% 1 1 25% 50% 0 25% 25% 20% 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 0% 14% 14% 1 2 4 7 Bonham 50% 75% 25% 1 3 4 100% 50% 20% 0% 2 2 0 33% 33% 29% 33% 2 2 2 6 Bowie 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 2 Crockett 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 4 7 Dishman 50% 50% 50% 1 1 2 50% 50% 100% 100% 2 2 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 33% 20% 20% 20% 1 1 3 5 Houston 0 0% 0% 50% 50% 1 1 2 25% 25% 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 0% 0% 25% 1 1 2 4 Jefferson 20% 40% 33% 2 3 1 6 0% 0% 0% 5 5 0% 50% 33% 0% 1 1 2 40% 40% 40% 40% 2 3 5 Lamar 0% 0% 0% 1 1 2 0% 0% 1 1 25% 0% 17% 0% 2 5 7 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 5 7 Long 100% 100% 1 1 33% 25% 67% 67% 2 1 3 17% 33% 20% 20% 1 3 1 5 17% 15% 14% 17% 2 2 8 12 Means 100% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 2 2 4 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 67% 67% 57% 67% 4 2 6 Milam 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1 2 50% 50% 33% 33% 1 2 3 Rodriguez 0% 100% 0% 1 1 33% 25% 25% 50% 2 2 4 17% 14% 14% 14% 1 1 5 7 25% 0% 14% 17% 1 5 6 Stuart 0% 100% 100% 2 2 67% 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3 20% 20% 17% 0% 3 3 6 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 Travis 0 0% 50% 50% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2 50% 0% 50% 50% 1 1 2 Treasure Hills 0% 0% 50% 1 1 2 80% 50% 80% 60% 3 1 1 5 33% 20% 40% 20% 1 1 3 5 33% 33% 20% 40% 2 2 1 5 Wilson 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 1 0% 0% 100% 100% 1 1 0% 100% 0% 1 1 Zavala 33% 67% 0% 3 3 40% 40% 57% 43% 3 2 2 7 0% 20% 0% 20% 1 1 3 5 67% 67% 67% 67% 2 1 3 AVG 28% 67% 42% 25 41% 36% 41% 39% 44 16% 19% 24% 20% 56 39% 31% 39% 37% 82 Campus SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT NOV DEC T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 20% 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 29% 17% 20% 1 3 1 5 13% 33% 25% 13% 2 1 5 8 All Students w/SPED Indicator(Y) Bonham 20% 0% 20% 13% 1 1 6 8 17% 13% 9% 9% 1 1 9 11 14% 29% 18% 18% 2 9 11 Tier 1 % By Grd Lvl & Campus Bowie 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 4 0% 20% 17% 17% 1 5 6 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 3 5 Source: Istation Crockett 42% 17% 33% 27% 3 1 7 11 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8 13% 10% 17% 0% 4 7 11 Data pulled: Dishman 0% 33% 0% 0% 2 1 3 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 4 5 25% 0% 25% 25% 1 3 4 For Internal Use Only Houston 13% 0% 17% 0% 1 5 6 11% 0% 0% 22% 2 2 5 9 50% 30% 36% 18% 2 3 6 11 Jefferson 33% 0% 0% 0% 1 4 5 0 0% 0% 0% 50% 1 1 2 Lamar 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 7 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 14 15 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 7 8 Long 7% 21% 14% 23% 3 4 6 13 0% 0% 10% 0% 1 9 10 6% 0% 6% 13% 2 6 8 16 Means 0% 0% 0% 20% 1 4 5 50% 33% 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 25% 14% 25% 33% 3 1 5 9 Milam 17% 0% 0% 25% 2 6 8 0% 0% 0% 13% 1 1 6 8 14% 14% 17% 0% 2 3 5 Rodriguez 25% 22% 20% 18% 2 9 11 25% 18% 18% 17% 2 2 8 12 7% 7% 6% 6% 1 4 12 17 Stuart 100% 100% 100% 100% 2 2 33% 33% 33% 33% 2 2 2 6 0% 50% 0% 0% 1 1 Travis 0% 25% 0% 20% 1 1 3 5 25% 0% 50% 20% 1 1 3 5 11% 11% 8% 0% 2 10 12 Treasure Hills 33% 40% 50% 50% 4 2 2 8 17% 13% 7% 21% 3 3 8 14 25% 0% 20% 0% 2 2 Wilson 9% 20% 17% 8% 1 5 6 12 10% 10% 10% 10% 1 5 4 10 36% 27% 36% 27% 3 3 5 11 Zavala 33% 33% 33% 33% 1 2 3 33% 33% 17% 0% 5 5 13% 25% 11% 11% 1 3 5 9 AVG 22% 19% 19% 21% 115 14% 13% 14% 13% 132 15% 15% 15% 13% 142 *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD Student # by TierStudent # by TierStudent # by Tier Istation Reading December 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED PK KG 1ST 2NDStudent # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier Student # by Tier