2. Introduction to Oilseed Trade Negotiations
Soybean trade negotiations between U.S. and EU marked a
turn in the two countries’ trade practices
This dispute was brought twice to GATT
GATT recommended EU to Update Trade Policy in
terms of duty-free trade
200% tariff on $300 million worth of EU (mainly
French and German) products, mainly
white wine,
sausage,
Liquors
Given these fact; the objective of this case study is to
answer the following questions:
3. If the EU had decided to counter the U.S. threats with further retaliation against U.S.
products, what might it have picked for maximum effectiveness?
Having the world’s largest bilateral traders involved in a trade
No. 1 dispute, is a true clash of titans.
No. 2 Millions of customers affected by disputes of such trade war, erosion in
annual inflation
No. 3 If EU had decided to counter U.S. threats, a careful review of its export
portfolio was necessary.
No. 4 Solution: export quota for:
Medicinal,
Dental and
No. 5 Pharmaceutical preparations.
4. If the EU had decided to counter the U.S. threats with further retaliation against U.S.
products, what might it have picked for maximum effectiveness?
Tariff Barriers
No. 1 Retaliatory tariff (for oilseed imports from U.S.)
Add/increase environmental ad valorem tariff for U.S. produced/imported
SUV’s
Prohibitive tariff for genetically modified food.
No. 2
Nontariff Barriers
Export quota control for Medicinal, dental and pharmaceutical
No. 3 preparations
Set special regulation standards for labeling, packaging and testing for
American Food Chains in EU
Introduce licensing arrangements for their food programs
No. 4 Launch an EU-wide campaign for promoting EU food products (buy local)
Subsidize companies promote oilseed export to China, Japan and
Taiwan.
No. 5 Reciprocal requirements (EU supplies with medicinal and pharmaceutical
substances after U.S. drops the 200% tariff).
5. The United States Subsidies its agricultural production and exports in various ways. Is there an
ethical dilemma involved in trying to get other countries to dismantle their subsidy programs?
The Austrian School of Economics and other free-marketers hold the
No. 1 view that subsidies generally do more harm than good by distorting
economic signals (Wikipedia®, n.d.).
Oxfam prove that subsidies are translated into millions against
No. 2
already poor countries from the third world. Their example illustrates
how EU spends €3.30 in subsidies to export sugar worth €1
(Oxfam International. 2004).
No. 3
Export subsidy: a mean of compensation or protection, provided by a
foreign state to its native producers.
No. 4
Government influence in pricing; therefore dumping
No. 5 Should be treated in country-by-country and product-by-product
cases, in order to determine and settle dilemmas
6. At the time of the oilseed trade negotiations, France had an unemployment rate of about
10% and mounting racial tensions in working-class neighborhoods. What constraints did
these conditions put on French politicians negotiating an agreement?
No. 1 US request to cut the oilseed production for 7.5-8 million metric tons
a year, being 40% less of their current output
No. 2
Low possibilities for market for both Asia, as well as EU
No capacity utilization
No. 3 Layoff
Through trade, Europe is connected with the rest of the world
No. 4
Limit this involvement or inflate
Endanger influence,
Political hegemony.
No. 5
7. If the United States were to threaten Japan, what product(s) would be (a) likely candidates(s)? Would
the possibility of reaching an agreement with Japan be as high as with the EU?
The export portfolio of Japan towards the U.S. is rather concentrated
No. 1 in manufactured goods (cars, computer accessories etc.) (Daniel
Workman. 1993).
Efficient Product: Steel
No. 2 What way: Import tariff of ~40%
Why efficient:
Limit Japan’s market share
No. 3 Stimulate domestic producers
competitive advantage
increase their production capacities, while on the other side;
Japan unable to sell due to higher price dictated by import tariffs
No. 4
Is it easier than with EU? Yes. Single - single governmental body offers a rather
less complex legal and business framework.
Japan’s accounts as one of world’s largest economies, and the second largest
No. 5 investor in the United States.
8. What risks were apparent in the U.S. announcement to limit EU imports?
No. 1 If the Oilseed agreement was to be set on a status quo, or even worse
fail, the world would face a turn in the socio-economical aspect, with
time deteriorating things increasingly.
No. 2 Turmoil:
Unemployment rate rolling upwards
Instability
Disturbing social welfare
No. 3 Political weakness
Negative signal for developing countries – retreat
GATT – WTO??
No. 4
In figures: G7 countries:
each extra $1 billion in exports
No. 5 Est. 19,000 new jobs (Peter Sutherland. 1993. p.p. 5).
9. Works Cited
EUROSTAT (Comext, Statistical regime 4). 22 9 2009. Retrieved 6 5 2010, from Europa.eu:
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113465.pdf, p.p. 5
EUROSTAT (Comext, Statistical regime 4). 22 9 2009. Retrieved 6 5 2010, from Europa.eu:
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113465.pdf, p.p. 6
EUROSTAT (Comext, Statistical regime 4). 22 9 2009. Retrieved 6 5 2010, from Europa.eu:
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113465.pdf, p.p. 7
Wikipedia®. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 11, 2010, from Wikipedia.org:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidy
Oxfam International. Oxford, UK (2004). "A Sweeter Future? The potential for EU sugar
reform to contribute to poverty reduction in southern Africa." Oxfam Briefing Paper No. 70.
November 2004. pp. 39-40.
Peter Sutherland. (1993). Countdown to the Uruguay Round. Retrieved 6 5 2010, from World
Trade Organization: http://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/91730177.pdf
Daniel Workman. (1993). Japan's Top Exports & Imports. 2 7 2007. Retrieved 6 5 2010, from
Suite101: http://internationaltrade.suite101.com/article.cfm/japans_top_exports_imports