SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 23
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Individual decision making & problem solving seminar
Individual Decision Making & Problem Solving .
      It is not that to people can't see the solution . It is that they can't see the problem .

Theme
To understand the concept of decision making and process involved in making effective decision .
To understand the concept of problem solving and approaches adopted for it.


Contents
Concept of decision and decision making
 Type of decisions
 Decision-making process
 Effective decision


Problem solving
Approaches for problem solving
 Routine approach
 Scientific approach
 Quantitative approach
 Creative approach
Concept of Decision and Decision Making
      Before we go through the various aspects of decision making, it is essential to go through the concept of
      decision making. The word decision has been derived from the Latin word 'decidere which means 'a
      cutting away or a cutting off, or in a practical sense'. Thus, a decision involves a cut of alternatives
      between those that are desirable and those that are not desirable. The decision is a kind of choice of a
      desirable alternative. Lopez has defined a decision as follows
      "A decision represents a judgment; a final resolution of a conflict of needs, means or goals; and a
      commitment to action made in face of uncertainty, complexity, and even irrationality."
      Decision making is a process to arrive at a decision; the process by which an individual or organization
      selects one position or action from several alternatives. Shull et all have defined decision making as
      follows:
      "Decision making is a conscious human process involving both individual and social phenomenon based
      upon factual and value premises which concludes with a choice of one behavioral activity from among
      one or more alternatives with the intention of moving toward some desired state of affairs."
      Decision making, thus, is an act of projecting one's own mind upon an opinion or a course of action. In
      decision making, three aspects of human behavior are involved:

       (1) Cognition- activities of mind associated with knowledge;
      (2) Conation—the action of the mind implied by such words as willing, desire, and aversion;
      (3) Affectation—the aspect of mind associated with emotion, feeling, mood, and temperament. Based
      on the above concept of decision making,
2Felix M. Lopez, The Making of a Manager, Murnbai: Taraporevala, 1977, p. 73.
3Fremont A. Shull, Andrew L. Delbecq, and T arry L. Cummings. Organizational Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980, p. 31.
TYPES OF DECISIONS:

   Decision making is involved in every walk of life; it is relevant in organizational as well as
   non-organizational context.
   In organizational context, decisions may vary from the major ones like determination of
   organizational objectives or deciding about major projects to specific decisions about day-to-
   day operations. Therefore, there are different types of decisions which are made by
   managers in organizations and for each type of decision, decision making variables and
   conditions differ.
    There are different ways in which organizational decisions may be classified.
   One way of classifying these decisions is to group them into routine and repetitive or non-
   routine. In another way, these decisions are classified as programmed or non-programmed.
   These are further classified as strategic and tactical decisions. Strategic decisions are non-
   routine and non-programmed while tactical decisions are mostly routine and programmed.
   Therefore, understanding of programmed and non-programmed decisions and strategic and
   tactical decisions is necessary for managers to enhance their decision-making skills.
* Programmed and Non-programmed Decisions.

1. Programmed:
      Herbert Simon has grouped organizational decisions into two categories based on the decision factors
      which are taken into consideration.
       These are programmed and non-programmed decisions." 4
      Programmed Decisions. Programmed decisions are routine and repetitive and are made within the
      framework of organizational policies and rules.
      These policies and rules are established well in advance to solve recurring problems in the organization.
       For example, the problem relating to promotion of employees is solved by promoting those employees
      who meet promotion criteria.
      These criteria are established by promotion policy and the managers have just to decide which
      employees meet criteria for promotion and the decision is made accordingly.
       Programmed decisions are comparatively easy to make as these relate to the problems which are solved
      by considering internal organizational factors. Such decisions are made by personnel at lower levels in
      the organization where the environment affecting decision making is static and well structured.




4Herbert   A. Simon, The Science of Management Decision. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1977.
2. Non-programmed Decisions.


 Non-programmed decisions are relevant for solving unique/ unusual problems in which various
alternatives cannot be decided in advance.
 For such decisions, the situation is not well structured and the outcomes of various alternatives cannot
be arranged in advance.
 For example, if an organization wants to take actions for growth, it may have several alternative routes
like going for a grass-route project or taking over an existing company. In each situation, the managers
have to evaluate the likely outcomes of each alternative to arrive at a decision.
For evaluating the likely outcomes of these alternatives, the managers have to consider various factors,
many of which lie outside the organization.
A common feature of non-programmed decisions is that they are novel and non-recurring and.
therefore, readymade solutions are not available.
 Since these decisions are of high importance because of their long-term consequences, these are made
by managers at higher levels in the organization.

Table 1.1 summarizes the characteristics of programmed and non-programmed decisions.
TABLE 1.1: Characteristics of programmed and non-programmed decisions


       Characteristics       Programmed decisions         Non-programmed decisions

Level of structuring       Well structured               Semi or unstructured


Frequency                  Routine and repetitive        New and unusual


Consequences               Minor                         Major


Time for solution          Short                         Relatively long


Basics for solution        Decision rules, set procedures Judgment and creativity


Organizational level       Lower levels                  Higher levels


Information required       Readily available, mostly     To be collected from various
                           internal                      sources, mostly external
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

  When a manager makes a decision, it is in effect the organization's response to a problem. As such,
  decisions should be thought of as means rather than ends. Every decision is the outcome of a dynamic
  process which is influenced by multiple forces.
   This process is presented in Figure 1.1. However, this process should not be interpreted to mean that
  decision making is a fixed procedure.
   A process is basically a dynamic concept rather than static.
   Events and relationships are dynamic, continuous, and flexible and must be considered as a whole in
  which many forces interact; a force affecting others and being affected by others.
   Therefore, the decision-making process as presented in Figure 1.1 should be seen as sequential process
  rather than a series of steps to enable the decision maker to examine each element in the progression
  that leads to a decision.
  Moreover, the process reveals that it is more applicable to non-programmed decisions rather than to
  programmed ones.
   Problems that occur infrequently are unstructured, and are characterized by a great deal of uncertainty
  regarding their outcome, require the manager to utilize the entire process.
   For frequently occurring, structured problems, it is not necessary to consider the entire process.
   If a policy is established or a specific rule or procedure developed to handle such problems, it will not
  be necessary to develop and evaluate various alternatives each time the problem arises.
Specific
                     objective


                                     Problem
          FEEDBACK
                                   Identification




                                                Search for
Results
                                               alternatives




                                   Evaluation fro
           Action
                                    alternatives


                     Choice for
                     alternative
FIGURE 1.1: Decision-making
                                             process Specific Objective
    The need for decision making arises in order to achieve certain specific objectives.
    Every action of human being is goal directed. This is true for decision making also which is an action.
    Therefore, the starting point in any analysis of decision making involves the determination of whether a
    decision needs to be made.
    In fact, setting of specific objective itself is an outcome of an earlier decision. However, since the
    objective setting is an outcome of earlier decision, this may not be considered truly as the first step of
    decision process but provides framework for further decisions.
Problem Identification
Since a particular decision is made in the context of certain given objectives, identification of problem is the real beginning
     of decision-making process.
      A problem is a felt need, a question thrown forward for solution.
      It is the gap between present and desired state of affairs on the subject-matter of decision.
     It is just like the diagnosis of patient by the doctor.
     When a doctor makes a diagnosis, he has a normal, healthy person in his mind and he also has a fairly clear concept of
     what a healthy person is.
     With this model as the desired result, he looks for disparities in the patient's actual state of health or factors which
     indicate that his future health will fall short of normal.
      In the case of management decision, however, a manager cannot rely on a commonly accepted norm such as a healthy
     person. The objectives, if set precisely and specifically on the subject-matter of decision, will provide clue in identifying
     the problem and its possible solution.
      Further, in management, a problem exists whenever one faces a question whose answer involves doubt and
     uncertainty.
     If there is no solution to the problem, it cannot be treated as problem from decision point of view, though the
     consequences of not solving this problem may be terrible.
     A problem can be identified much clearly, if managers go through diagnosis and analysis of the problem.
Search for Alternatives
A thorough diagnosis defines both a specific problem and the situation in which the problem exists. With this definition in
     mind, a decision maker seeks possible solutions. A problem can be solved in several ways, however, all the ways cannot
     be equally satisfying.
     Further, if there is only one way of solving a problem, no question of decision arises.
     Therefore, the decision maker must try to find out the various alternatives available In order to get the most
     satisfactory result of a decision. Identification of various alternatives not only serves the purpose of selecting the most
     satisfactory one, but it also avoids bottlenecks in operation as alternatives are available if a particular decision goes
     wrong.
      However, it should be borne in mind that it may not be possible to consider all alternatives either because some of the
     alternatives cannot be considered for selection because of obvious limitations of the decision maker or information
     about all alternatives may not be available.
     Therefore, while generating alternatives, the concept of limiting factor should be applied.
      A limiting factor is one which stands in the way of accomplishing a desired objective. If these factors arc identified,
     managers will confine their search for alternatives to those which will overcome the limiting factors.
     For example, if an organization has limitation in raising sizable finances, it cannot consider projects involving high
     investment.
     A decision maker can use several sources for identifying alternatives: his own past experience, practices followed by
     others, and using creative techniques.
      Past experience, applied in most cases of decision making, takes into account the actions taken by the decision maker
     in the past with obvious differences between the former challenges and the present one.
     The successful action of the past may become an alternative for the future.
    This is a very simple approach but has obvious limitations because there may be so much changes in the decision context that old action
    becomes totally irrelevant. Copying from the experience of others is another way of generating alternatives.
     Thus, alternatives used by successful decision makers can be thought of as alternatives of decision making. This is also
    practiced by many organizations after making suitable amendments in the light of changed decision context. Importing of
    technology from foreign countries with suitable changes is good example of this type of alternatives.
     The third method of generating alternatives is through creative process where various exercises are taken to generate
    entirely new ideas.
Evaluation of Alternatives
After the various alternatives are identified, the next step is to evaluate them and select the one that will meet the choice
     criteria.
      However, all alternatives available for decision making will not be taken for detailed evaluation because of the obvious
     limitations of managers in evaluating all alternatives. The energy of managers is limited and psychologically most of
     them prefer to work on plans that have good prospect of being carried out.
     In narrowing down the number of alternatives, two approaches can be followed: constraint on alternatives and
     grouping of alternatives of similar nature. The decision maker develops a list of limits that must be met by a
     satisfactory solution. He may treat these limits as constraints, that is.
     he may check proposed alternatives against limits, and if an alternative does not meet them, he can discard it.
      In the second approach, various alternatives can be grouped into classes on some specific criteria important to
     decision making. A representative alternative from one group may be selected for future analysis.
     Then, having found the group that shows up the best, decision maker can concentrate on alternatives within this
     group. This method is very helpful in decision making regarding the location of plant, warehouse, etc.
     Having narrowed down the alternatives which require serious consideration, the decision maker will go for evaluating
     how each alternative may contribute towards the solution of the problem or objectives supposed to be achieved by
     implementing the decision. Evaluation of various alternatives dissects an alternative into various tangible and
     intangible factors.
      Tangible factors are those which can be quantified because they are quite obvious like the cost per unit, investment
     required, output to be received, etc. Such factors can be measured easily, though their happening may not be
     measured with certainty; for example, demand projection at a given price in a particular alternative.
      As against these, intangible factors are mostly qualitative and cannot be measured in terms of quantity.
     Therefore, some definitions can be used for such factors. For example, in a plant location, various non-economic factors
     like psychological problem arising out of displacement of persons from the plant site, ecological balance, etc., have to
     be taken into account which cannot be quantified.
      In evaluating an alternative, both these factors have to be taken into account. For determining the impact of a factor,
     various quantitative techniques have been developed.
Choice of Alternative
The evaluation of various alternatives presents a clear picture as to how each one of them contributes to the objectives
    under question. A comparison is made among the likely outcomes of various alternatives and the best one is chosen.
    Choice aspect of decision making is related to deciding the most acceptable alternative which fits with the
    organizational objectives.
     It may be seen that the chosen alternative should be acceptable in the light of the organizational objectives.
     Thus, it is not necessary that the chosen alternative is the best one. This concept is based on the satisfying approach
    rather than the maximizing approach of decision making,
    . In choosing an alternative, the decision maker can go through three approaches: experience, experimentation, and
    research and analysis.
1.Experience. Managers can choose an alternative based on their past experience if they have solved similar problems
    earlier.
     Reliance on past experience plays a larger part than it deserves in decision making. Managers rely more on experience
    than alternative methods of choice. Past experience has some benefits but it has certain limitation that it blocks
    making correct choice specially when the environmental factors are more flexible.
2.Experimentation. Experimentation which is generally used in scientific enquiry involves that a particular alternative is
    put in practice, result is observed, and the alternative giving the best result is selected. For example, many
    organizations go for test marketing of their products before the products are really introduced in the market.
    During test marketing, the actions can be taken to change product features which are not acceptable. Experimentation
    as a method for choice of an alternative can be used on a limited scale because of cost and time factor.
3.Research and Analysis. Research and analysis is the most certain method of selecting an alternative, especially when
    major decisions are involved. This approach entails solving a problem first by comprehending it.
    This involves a search for relationships between the more critical variables, constraints, and planning premises that
    bear the objective sought. In the second stage, the alternative is broken into various components.
Action
Once the alternative is selected, it is put into action. Truly speaking, the actual process of decision making ends with the
    choice of an alternative through which the objectives can be achieved.
     However, decision making, being a continuous and on-going process, must ensure that the problem has been solved
    and the objectives have been achieved by the chosen alternative.
     Unless this is done, managers will never know what way their choice has contributed. Therefore, the implementation
    of decision may be seen as an integral aspect of decision.
    Once the creative and analytical aspects of decision making through which an alternative has been chosen are over, the
    managerial priority is one of converting the decision into something operationally effective.
     This is the important aspect of decision making. The basic difference between decision making as an analytical process
    and action is that the former requires the use of conceptual skills since it translates the abstract ideas into reality.
     For example, suppose that there is a change in consumers' tastes.
    This change is very abstract and cannot be seen unless some specific techniques and measurements are applied.
    How this change can provide opportunity to the organization is mostly a conceptual exercise requiring managers to
    interpret what changes are taking place and what products or services will be preferred in the changed situation.
     Action, on the other hand, relates to putting a decision into practice so that objectives of decision are achieved.
    This practice will provide further feedback for evaluating the soundness of the decision and, if need be, a change in the
    decision.
    Implementation of a decision requires the communication to subordinates, getting their acceptance over the matters
    involved in the decision, and getting their support for putting their decision into action.
    The decision should be effected at appropriate time and in proper way to make the action more effective.
    The effectiveness of action is important because it is only effective action through which organizational objectives can
    be achieved and right decisions help in effective action.
Results
When the decision is put into action, it brings certain results.
   These results must correspond with objectives, the starting point of decision process, if good decision has been made
   and implemented properly.
   Thus, results provide indication whether decision and its imple-mentation is proper.
    Therefore, managers should take up a follow-up action in the light of
   feedback received from the results.
   If there is any deviation between objectives and results, this should be analyzed and factors responsible for this
   deviation should be located.
    The feedback may also help in reviewing the decision when conditions change which may require changes in decision.
   Therefore, a successful manager is one who keeps a close look at the objectives and results of the decision and
   modifies his decision according to the changes in the circumstances.
EFFECTIVE DECISION
The decision-making process goes through the various stages and the basic objectives of all these stages are to solve
    problem through the decision. The solution of the problem depends on how effectively the decision is made and
    implemented.
    Thus, an effective decision is one which is action-oriented, goal-directed, and provides efficiency in implementation.
    These three aspects of effective decision are presented below.
1.Action Orientation. Decisions are action-oriented and are directed towards relevant and controllable aspects of the
    environment.
    Decisions are totally pragmatic in nature and their value is dependent on the success of the actions that follow.
    Decisions may be treated as an intervening variable which may ultimately lead to the end-result variables.
    From this point of view, decisions should ultimately find their utility in implementation. Therefore, the decisions to be
    effective must specify the various actions which are to be taken to achieve the objective necessitating decision making.
2.Goal Direction. Organizations are goal-directed units and, therefore, any organizational process, including decision
    making, should be goal-directed to enable the organization to meet its objectives.
Naturally, the value of a decision and the associated action is related to the dispatch with which the goal is
   achieved. While the value of a decision is dependent on the attainment of a given goal or set of goals,
   such attainment is a function of both the accuracy of the decision and its implementation.
    In evaluating a decision, then, a distinction should be made between the effects of goal attainment
   brought about by the better decision and those attainments arising out of execution.


3.Efficiency in Implementation. An effective decision should provide the way in which it can be
    implemented. Therefore, decision making should take into account all the possible factors not only in
    terms of external context but also in internal context so that a decision can be implemented properly.
    Often, the results are obtained by proper implementation of proper decision. Therefore, a brilliant
    decision may fail if it is not suitable for implementation by the organization.
    From this point of view, three characteristics of an effective decision have been identified: (a) the
    viability of the decision; (b) the degree of congruency between prediction and the reality or viability of
    the solution as it occurs; and (c) the enthusiasm and skill with which the proposal is pursued-the
    attractiveness of the venture.
    Shull et al, op.cit.,p.15
Problem Solving
A manager is confronted daily with a host of problems/opportunities, regardless of the size and type of his organization.
    Though there may be numerous such problems, some of the relevant areas where problem solving is required are
    costs, competitive position, product pricing, production planning, product quality, employee training, employee
    morale, employee grievances, better use of organizational resources, and so on.
     Problem solving is a form of decision making in which the issue is unique and alternatives must be developed and
    evaluated without the aid of set decision rules.

    As we shall see later, there are various approaches for problem solving. However, before adopting a particular
    approach or a combination of various approaches, the problem solver must recognize the problem to be solved.
    In decision-making process, we have seen that a problem can be identified by undergoing through diagnosis and
    analysis for which information of different types is required.
    Usually, such an information is collected from historical data, planning data (comparing results with objectives),
    unfavorable comparisons with competitors, criticisms by outsiders, etc.

     Based on this information, problem solvers usually categories problems in one of two ways:
    1.Forward working, which is to project the likely results if the problem is overlooked and becomes a basis for decision
    making.
    2.Means-end factoring, which involves dissecting the problem into several smaller problems and solving each one
    separately.
Problem Solving
Approaches for Problem Solving
There may be several approaches for problem solving as each manager, as a problem solver, acts in his own ways. However,
    these approaches can broadly be classified into four broad categories:
1. Routine approach.
2. Scientific approach.
3. Quantitative approach.
4. Creative approach.
ROUTINE APPROACH
Routine approach of problem solving involves solving a problem using traditional means, or doing what has always been
    done when the problem of this type arose. In this approach, reference is simply made to history or precedent and the
    same answer used before is used now.
    Some organizations, particularly large ones and those which put emphasis on formalization, develop standard
    operating procedures (SOPs) to solve problems of recurring nature.
     Standard operating procedures are formal rules for accomplishing tasks. These rules are developed over the period of
    time and guide the organizational members in a variety of procedures.
     Most procedures are formalized and written down, but many others are in the form of informal work practices.
    With the changing situations, these SOPs get on changing with the deletion of old procedures and addition of new
    ones.
     Another means under the routine approach is to solve problems by a superior order. Here, the problem solver has no
    choice at all but follows the edict of his superior.
    Though routine approach of problem solving is the most common with many organizations because it facilitates to
    follow similar practices throughout the organization, it has some serious limitations.
    Noted industrial psychologist, Norman Maier, has suggested that managers should consider each problem with respect
    to its effect on the organization's betterment as well as its employees, which he called quality and acceptance
    respectively.
    " In routine approach, both these elements are often missing.
    7Norman R.F. Malre. Problem Solving Discussions and Conferences: Leadership Methods and Skills. New
    York: McGraw-Hill. 1983.
SCIENTIFIC APPROACH
Kepner and Tregoe have suggested scientific approach to managerial problem solving and decision making.
They contend that "what a manager needs for effective problem analysis is an orderly system for processing information, a
    system in which certain steps follow others in a fixed order

Generally, scientific approach of problem solving follows the following steps in sequence:
1. Identification of the proposition.
2. Acquiring preliminary observations about the proposition.
3. Stating tentative solutions to the proposition.
4. Investigating proposition thoroughly, using both current knowledge and controlled experiments.
5. Classification of relevant data obtained.
6. Stating tentative answer to the proposition.
7. Adjusting and stating answer to the problem.




8 "Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe, The Rational Manager, New York: McGraw Hill. 1985.
QUANTITATIVE APPROACH
With the introduction of computers in business problem solving, quantitative approach has been developed.
     The emphasis in the quantitative approach is on mathematical modeling of systems.
     Comparisons of various feasible actions such as cost minimization, profit maximization, return on investment, etc. are
    expressed by measurable values. The relationship of the factors for any given action is stated in mathematical form-by
    formula or action.
     By substituting different mathematical values for the variables of the equation, different results are obtained and
    evaluated in keeping with the requirements of the stated problem.
    Thus, quantitative approach of problem solving proceeds in the following manner:
1. Formulation of the problem.
2. Building a mathematical model to represent the system under study.
3. Deriving the answer from the model.
4. Testing the model and answer derived to ensure its practicability.
5. Placing needed constraints over use of model and answer.
6. Selecting the final answer.
    There are various quantitative techniques for problem solving and decision making. These techniques are the subject
    matters of a distinct field of study, known as Operations Research.
CREATIVE APPROACH
Some managers feel that problem solving and decision making should not be viewed as a logical action, that is, the problem
   need not be defined and strictly rational steps need not be taken to decide what to do.
   They point out that stated objectives are not needed. The decision maker studies the information, people, and facilities
   involved and concentrates on the interactions and the possible outputs from these resources.
   This is done through creative approach.
   In today's dynamic environment, creativity is vital in decision making. There are various terms which are used as
   synonyms to creativity such as 'discover', 'invention', 'extending the boundary', etc. Examples of creativity in decision
   making may be creation of new product, creation of new method, creation of new market, and so on.
   In general usage, creativity means a talent for unique combination or unusual association of ideas.
    But since our approach to creativity is on concentrating on decision making, such a definition is too broad.
   From a managerial perspective, creativity is the conceiving of original and unique alternatives to the solution of
   existing problems.
    Some writers have attempted to differentiate between different types of creativity; for example, viewing 'innovation'
   as something new, 'synthesis' as combining unrelated data into something new, 'extension' as expanding boundaries on
   innovation, and 'duplication' as copying others.
   However, nothing is ever really new.




9   John F. Mee, "The Creative Thinking Process." Harvard Business Review, January-February, 1956.
Individual decision making & problem solving seminar

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Decision making
Decision making Decision making
Decision making fn231
 
Fundamentals of Decision Making
Fundamentals of Decision Making Fundamentals of Decision Making
Fundamentals of Decision Making Andrew Hirst
 
Conflict management presentation
Conflict management presentationConflict management presentation
Conflict management presentationMal Cocklin
 
Negotiation attitudes behaviours decide failure to success
Negotiation attitudes  behaviours decide failure to successNegotiation attitudes  behaviours decide failure to success
Negotiation attitudes behaviours decide failure to successCol Mukteshwar Prasad
 
Introduction to Decision Making
Introduction to Decision MakingIntroduction to Decision Making
Introduction to Decision MakingAnirudh Bapna
 
Decision making process
Decision making process Decision making process
Decision making process talhamansab
 
Decision making process
Decision making processDecision making process
Decision making processAnjana Mathew
 
Decision making process
Decision making processDecision making process
Decision making processVikash K Giri
 
Decision Making for Leaders
Decision Making for LeadersDecision Making for Leaders
Decision Making for LeadersWong Yew Yip
 
Decision making PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEM
Decision making  PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEMDecision making  PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEM
Decision making PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEMBabasab Patil
 
Problem solving and decision making
Problem solving and decision making  Problem solving and decision making
Problem solving and decision making khushboo choudhary
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Decision making
Decision making Decision making
Decision making
 
Decision making process
Decision making processDecision making process
Decision making process
 
Managerial Decision Making by Dr. B. J. Mohite
Managerial Decision Making by Dr. B. J. MohiteManagerial Decision Making by Dr. B. J. Mohite
Managerial Decision Making by Dr. B. J. Mohite
 
Fundamentals of Decision Making
Fundamentals of Decision Making Fundamentals of Decision Making
Fundamentals of Decision Making
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Conflict management presentation
Conflict management presentationConflict management presentation
Conflict management presentation
 
Decision Making 2
Decision Making 2Decision Making 2
Decision Making 2
 
Negotiation attitudes behaviours decide failure to success
Negotiation attitudes  behaviours decide failure to successNegotiation attitudes  behaviours decide failure to success
Negotiation attitudes behaviours decide failure to success
 
Problem solving case study
Problem solving case studyProblem solving case study
Problem solving case study
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Introduction to Decision Making
Introduction to Decision MakingIntroduction to Decision Making
Introduction to Decision Making
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Decision Making
Decision MakingDecision Making
Decision Making
 
Decision making process
Decision making process Decision making process
Decision making process
 
Decision making process
Decision making processDecision making process
Decision making process
 
Decision making process
Decision making processDecision making process
Decision making process
 
Decision Making for Leaders
Decision Making for LeadersDecision Making for Leaders
Decision Making for Leaders
 
Decision making PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEM
Decision making  PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEMDecision making  PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEM
Decision making PPT ON MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOURAL PROCESS MBA 4 SEM
 
Problem solving and decision making
Problem solving and decision making  Problem solving and decision making
Problem solving and decision making
 

Destacado

Higher education act of 1994
Higher education act of 1994Higher education act of 1994
Higher education act of 1994Kylie Sarmiento
 
Republic act no.7796 tesda law
Republic act no.7796   tesda lawRepublic act no.7796   tesda law
Republic act no.7796 tesda lawJared Ram Juezan
 
Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryan
 Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryan Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryan
Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryanryan bermundo
 
Executive order no. 356 s. 2004 renaming nfe to als
Executive order no. 356 s. 2004   renaming nfe to alsExecutive order no. 356 s. 2004   renaming nfe to als
Executive order no. 356 s. 2004 renaming nfe to alsJared Ram Juezan
 
What Does A 21 St Century School Administrator
What Does A 21 St Century School AdministratorWhat Does A 21 St Century School Administrator
What Does A 21 St Century School AdministratorTMSIMPACT
 
21st century managerial and leadership skills
21st century managerial and leadership skills21st century managerial and leadership skills
21st century managerial and leadership skillstitserchriz Gaid
 
21st Century School Leadership
21st Century School Leadership21st Century School Leadership
21st Century School Leadershipsdwjsw5
 
Effective School leadership
Effective School leadershipEffective School leadership
Effective School leadershipace boado
 

Destacado (17)

Higher education act of 1994
Higher education act of 1994Higher education act of 1994
Higher education act of 1994
 
Republic act no.7796 tesda law
Republic act no.7796   tesda lawRepublic act no.7796   tesda law
Republic act no.7796 tesda law
 
Republic act no. 7796
Republic act no. 7796Republic act no. 7796
Republic act no. 7796
 
Eo 356
Eo 356Eo 356
Eo 356
 
Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryan
 Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryan Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryan
Executive order no 356 prepared by Bermundo.Ryan
 
Executive order no. 356 s. 2004 renaming nfe to als
Executive order no. 356 s. 2004   renaming nfe to alsExecutive order no. 356 s. 2004   renaming nfe to als
Executive order no. 356 s. 2004 renaming nfe to als
 
What Does A 21 St Century School Administrator
What Does A 21 St Century School AdministratorWhat Does A 21 St Century School Administrator
What Does A 21 St Century School Administrator
 
Shared governance
Shared governanceShared governance
Shared governance
 
Shared Governance
Shared GovernanceShared Governance
Shared Governance
 
Tesda's goals
Tesda's goalsTesda's goals
Tesda's goals
 
republic act no. 7796
republic act no. 7796republic act no. 7796
republic act no. 7796
 
Institutional accreditation
Institutional accreditationInstitutional accreditation
Institutional accreditation
 
Educational Leadership
Educational LeadershipEducational Leadership
Educational Leadership
 
Republic Act 9155
Republic Act 9155Republic Act 9155
Republic Act 9155
 
21st century managerial and leadership skills
21st century managerial and leadership skills21st century managerial and leadership skills
21st century managerial and leadership skills
 
21st Century School Leadership
21st Century School Leadership21st Century School Leadership
21st Century School Leadership
 
Effective School leadership
Effective School leadershipEffective School leadership
Effective School leadership
 

Similar a Individual decision making & problem solving seminar

Decision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principles
Decision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principlesDecision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principles
Decision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principlesRupali sharma
 
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKINGDECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKINGManah Chhabra
 
Decision Making in Management
Decision Making in ManagementDecision Making in Management
Decision Making in ManagementSumit Verma
 
DECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKINGDECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKINGDrneetu2
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision makingLavan Yaa
 
The decision making and problem solving models
The decision making and problem solving modelsThe decision making and problem solving models
The decision making and problem solving modelsKaren S.
 
2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx
2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx
2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx177VivekKumar
 
Decision making (Principles of Management)
Decision making (Principles of Management)Decision making (Principles of Management)
Decision making (Principles of Management)Denni Domingo
 
Session 7 groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...
Session 7  groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...Session 7  groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...
Session 7 groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...Diego Thomas
 
Sch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptx
Sch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptxSch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptx
Sch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptxReubenMawukoDordunu
 
Decision making and decentralization
Decision making and decentralizationDecision making and decentralization
Decision making and decentralizationNursing Path
 

Similar a Individual decision making & problem solving seminar (20)

Decision making.docx
Decision making.docxDecision making.docx
Decision making.docx
 
Decision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principles
Decision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principlesDecision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principles
Decision making- concept,types,process,techniques and principles
 
problem solving
problem solvingproblem solving
problem solving
 
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKINGDECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKING
 
Essay On Decision Making
Essay On Decision MakingEssay On Decision Making
Essay On Decision Making
 
Decision Making in Management
Decision Making in ManagementDecision Making in Management
Decision Making in Management
 
A group decision making - copy
A group   decision making - copyA group   decision making - copy
A group decision making - copy
 
DECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKINGDECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKING
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Dm2
Dm2Dm2
Dm2
 
The decision making and problem solving models
The decision making and problem solving modelsThe decision making and problem solving models
The decision making and problem solving models
 
2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx
2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx
2. SKM_Decision Making.pptx
 
Decision making (Principles of Management)
Decision making (Principles of Management)Decision making (Principles of Management)
Decision making (Principles of Management)
 
Decision Making
Decision MakingDecision Making
Decision Making
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
mpob 6 dec.pptx
mpob 6 dec.pptxmpob 6 dec.pptx
mpob 6 dec.pptx
 
Session 7 groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...
Session 7  groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...Session 7  groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...
Session 7 groups bba g-i - introduction to management - decision making and ...
 
Sch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptx
Sch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptxSch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptx
Sch Organistion - Lect 5 Decision making in edu.pptx
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Decision making and decentralization
Decision making and decentralizationDecision making and decentralization
Decision making and decentralization
 

Más de University of Duhok

Marketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok city
Marketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok cityMarketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok city
Marketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok cityUniversity of Duhok
 
An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...
An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...
An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...University of Duhok
 
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT University of Duhok
 

Más de University of Duhok (9)

Marketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok city
Marketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok cityMarketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok city
Marketing mix (4 p's) strategy applied to increase oak sales in duhok city
 
An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...
An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...
An Analysis Study of Improving Brand Awareness and Its Impact on Consumer Beh...
 
Caterpillar 'CASE STUDY'
Caterpillar 'CASE STUDY'Caterpillar 'CASE STUDY'
Caterpillar 'CASE STUDY'
 
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT
 
Presentation on Peter Drucker
Presentation on Peter Drucker Presentation on Peter Drucker
Presentation on Peter Drucker
 
Report on lenovo pc
Report on lenovo pcReport on lenovo pc
Report on lenovo pc
 
Strategic HRM
Strategic HRMStrategic HRM
Strategic HRM
 
Administration
AdministrationAdministration
Administration
 
The role of information system
The role of information system The role of information system
The role of information system
 

Último

Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examplesamberjiles31
 
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfAMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfJohnCarloValencia4
 
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)Lviv Startup Club
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHelene Heckrotte
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.ukaroemirsr
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView
 
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyAnyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyHanna Klim
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..dlewis191
 
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptxIntroduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptxJemalSeid25
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZKanakChauhan5
 
BCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John Meulemans
BCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John MeulemansBCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John Meulemans
BCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John MeulemansBBPMedia1
 
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003believeminhh
 
Project Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture ReportProject Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture Reportamberjiles31
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGlokeshwarmaha
 
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsUpgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsIntellect Design Arena Ltd
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfAnhNguyen97152
 
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinSlicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinAnton Skornyakov
 

Último (20)

Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
 
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfAMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
 
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
 
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
 
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyAnyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
 
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptxIntroduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
 
BCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John Meulemans
BCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John MeulemansBCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John Meulemans
BCE24 | Virtual Brand Ambassadors: Making Brands Personal - John Meulemans
 
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
 
Project Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture ReportProject Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture Report
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
 
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsUpgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
 
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinSlicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
 

Individual decision making & problem solving seminar

  • 2. Individual Decision Making & Problem Solving . It is not that to people can't see the solution . It is that they can't see the problem . Theme To understand the concept of decision making and process involved in making effective decision . To understand the concept of problem solving and approaches adopted for it. Contents Concept of decision and decision making  Type of decisions  Decision-making process  Effective decision Problem solving Approaches for problem solving  Routine approach  Scientific approach  Quantitative approach  Creative approach
  • 3. Concept of Decision and Decision Making Before we go through the various aspects of decision making, it is essential to go through the concept of decision making. The word decision has been derived from the Latin word 'decidere which means 'a cutting away or a cutting off, or in a practical sense'. Thus, a decision involves a cut of alternatives between those that are desirable and those that are not desirable. The decision is a kind of choice of a desirable alternative. Lopez has defined a decision as follows "A decision represents a judgment; a final resolution of a conflict of needs, means or goals; and a commitment to action made in face of uncertainty, complexity, and even irrationality." Decision making is a process to arrive at a decision; the process by which an individual or organization selects one position or action from several alternatives. Shull et all have defined decision making as follows: "Decision making is a conscious human process involving both individual and social phenomenon based upon factual and value premises which concludes with a choice of one behavioral activity from among one or more alternatives with the intention of moving toward some desired state of affairs." Decision making, thus, is an act of projecting one's own mind upon an opinion or a course of action. In decision making, three aspects of human behavior are involved: (1) Cognition- activities of mind associated with knowledge; (2) Conation—the action of the mind implied by such words as willing, desire, and aversion; (3) Affectation—the aspect of mind associated with emotion, feeling, mood, and temperament. Based on the above concept of decision making, 2Felix M. Lopez, The Making of a Manager, Murnbai: Taraporevala, 1977, p. 73. 3Fremont A. Shull, Andrew L. Delbecq, and T arry L. Cummings. Organizational Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980, p. 31.
  • 4. TYPES OF DECISIONS: Decision making is involved in every walk of life; it is relevant in organizational as well as non-organizational context. In organizational context, decisions may vary from the major ones like determination of organizational objectives or deciding about major projects to specific decisions about day-to- day operations. Therefore, there are different types of decisions which are made by managers in organizations and for each type of decision, decision making variables and conditions differ. There are different ways in which organizational decisions may be classified. One way of classifying these decisions is to group them into routine and repetitive or non- routine. In another way, these decisions are classified as programmed or non-programmed. These are further classified as strategic and tactical decisions. Strategic decisions are non- routine and non-programmed while tactical decisions are mostly routine and programmed. Therefore, understanding of programmed and non-programmed decisions and strategic and tactical decisions is necessary for managers to enhance their decision-making skills.
  • 5. * Programmed and Non-programmed Decisions. 1. Programmed: Herbert Simon has grouped organizational decisions into two categories based on the decision factors which are taken into consideration. These are programmed and non-programmed decisions." 4 Programmed Decisions. Programmed decisions are routine and repetitive and are made within the framework of organizational policies and rules. These policies and rules are established well in advance to solve recurring problems in the organization. For example, the problem relating to promotion of employees is solved by promoting those employees who meet promotion criteria. These criteria are established by promotion policy and the managers have just to decide which employees meet criteria for promotion and the decision is made accordingly. Programmed decisions are comparatively easy to make as these relate to the problems which are solved by considering internal organizational factors. Such decisions are made by personnel at lower levels in the organization where the environment affecting decision making is static and well structured. 4Herbert A. Simon, The Science of Management Decision. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1977.
  • 6. 2. Non-programmed Decisions. Non-programmed decisions are relevant for solving unique/ unusual problems in which various alternatives cannot be decided in advance. For such decisions, the situation is not well structured and the outcomes of various alternatives cannot be arranged in advance. For example, if an organization wants to take actions for growth, it may have several alternative routes like going for a grass-route project or taking over an existing company. In each situation, the managers have to evaluate the likely outcomes of each alternative to arrive at a decision. For evaluating the likely outcomes of these alternatives, the managers have to consider various factors, many of which lie outside the organization. A common feature of non-programmed decisions is that they are novel and non-recurring and. therefore, readymade solutions are not available. Since these decisions are of high importance because of their long-term consequences, these are made by managers at higher levels in the organization. Table 1.1 summarizes the characteristics of programmed and non-programmed decisions.
  • 7. TABLE 1.1: Characteristics of programmed and non-programmed decisions Characteristics Programmed decisions Non-programmed decisions Level of structuring Well structured Semi or unstructured Frequency Routine and repetitive New and unusual Consequences Minor Major Time for solution Short Relatively long Basics for solution Decision rules, set procedures Judgment and creativity Organizational level Lower levels Higher levels Information required Readily available, mostly To be collected from various internal sources, mostly external
  • 8. DECISION-MAKING PROCESS When a manager makes a decision, it is in effect the organization's response to a problem. As such, decisions should be thought of as means rather than ends. Every decision is the outcome of a dynamic process which is influenced by multiple forces. This process is presented in Figure 1.1. However, this process should not be interpreted to mean that decision making is a fixed procedure. A process is basically a dynamic concept rather than static. Events and relationships are dynamic, continuous, and flexible and must be considered as a whole in which many forces interact; a force affecting others and being affected by others. Therefore, the decision-making process as presented in Figure 1.1 should be seen as sequential process rather than a series of steps to enable the decision maker to examine each element in the progression that leads to a decision. Moreover, the process reveals that it is more applicable to non-programmed decisions rather than to programmed ones. Problems that occur infrequently are unstructured, and are characterized by a great deal of uncertainty regarding their outcome, require the manager to utilize the entire process. For frequently occurring, structured problems, it is not necessary to consider the entire process. If a policy is established or a specific rule or procedure developed to handle such problems, it will not be necessary to develop and evaluate various alternatives each time the problem arises.
  • 9. Specific objective Problem FEEDBACK Identification Search for Results alternatives Evaluation fro Action alternatives Choice for alternative
  • 10. FIGURE 1.1: Decision-making process Specific Objective The need for decision making arises in order to achieve certain specific objectives. Every action of human being is goal directed. This is true for decision making also which is an action. Therefore, the starting point in any analysis of decision making involves the determination of whether a decision needs to be made. In fact, setting of specific objective itself is an outcome of an earlier decision. However, since the objective setting is an outcome of earlier decision, this may not be considered truly as the first step of decision process but provides framework for further decisions. Problem Identification Since a particular decision is made in the context of certain given objectives, identification of problem is the real beginning of decision-making process. A problem is a felt need, a question thrown forward for solution. It is the gap between present and desired state of affairs on the subject-matter of decision. It is just like the diagnosis of patient by the doctor. When a doctor makes a diagnosis, he has a normal, healthy person in his mind and he also has a fairly clear concept of what a healthy person is. With this model as the desired result, he looks for disparities in the patient's actual state of health or factors which indicate that his future health will fall short of normal. In the case of management decision, however, a manager cannot rely on a commonly accepted norm such as a healthy person. The objectives, if set precisely and specifically on the subject-matter of decision, will provide clue in identifying the problem and its possible solution. Further, in management, a problem exists whenever one faces a question whose answer involves doubt and uncertainty. If there is no solution to the problem, it cannot be treated as problem from decision point of view, though the consequences of not solving this problem may be terrible. A problem can be identified much clearly, if managers go through diagnosis and analysis of the problem.
  • 11. Search for Alternatives A thorough diagnosis defines both a specific problem and the situation in which the problem exists. With this definition in mind, a decision maker seeks possible solutions. A problem can be solved in several ways, however, all the ways cannot be equally satisfying. Further, if there is only one way of solving a problem, no question of decision arises. Therefore, the decision maker must try to find out the various alternatives available In order to get the most satisfactory result of a decision. Identification of various alternatives not only serves the purpose of selecting the most satisfactory one, but it also avoids bottlenecks in operation as alternatives are available if a particular decision goes wrong. However, it should be borne in mind that it may not be possible to consider all alternatives either because some of the alternatives cannot be considered for selection because of obvious limitations of the decision maker or information about all alternatives may not be available. Therefore, while generating alternatives, the concept of limiting factor should be applied. A limiting factor is one which stands in the way of accomplishing a desired objective. If these factors arc identified, managers will confine their search for alternatives to those which will overcome the limiting factors. For example, if an organization has limitation in raising sizable finances, it cannot consider projects involving high investment. A decision maker can use several sources for identifying alternatives: his own past experience, practices followed by others, and using creative techniques. Past experience, applied in most cases of decision making, takes into account the actions taken by the decision maker in the past with obvious differences between the former challenges and the present one. The successful action of the past may become an alternative for the future. This is a very simple approach but has obvious limitations because there may be so much changes in the decision context that old action becomes totally irrelevant. Copying from the experience of others is another way of generating alternatives. Thus, alternatives used by successful decision makers can be thought of as alternatives of decision making. This is also practiced by many organizations after making suitable amendments in the light of changed decision context. Importing of technology from foreign countries with suitable changes is good example of this type of alternatives. The third method of generating alternatives is through creative process where various exercises are taken to generate entirely new ideas.
  • 12. Evaluation of Alternatives After the various alternatives are identified, the next step is to evaluate them and select the one that will meet the choice criteria. However, all alternatives available for decision making will not be taken for detailed evaluation because of the obvious limitations of managers in evaluating all alternatives. The energy of managers is limited and psychologically most of them prefer to work on plans that have good prospect of being carried out. In narrowing down the number of alternatives, two approaches can be followed: constraint on alternatives and grouping of alternatives of similar nature. The decision maker develops a list of limits that must be met by a satisfactory solution. He may treat these limits as constraints, that is. he may check proposed alternatives against limits, and if an alternative does not meet them, he can discard it. In the second approach, various alternatives can be grouped into classes on some specific criteria important to decision making. A representative alternative from one group may be selected for future analysis. Then, having found the group that shows up the best, decision maker can concentrate on alternatives within this group. This method is very helpful in decision making regarding the location of plant, warehouse, etc. Having narrowed down the alternatives which require serious consideration, the decision maker will go for evaluating how each alternative may contribute towards the solution of the problem or objectives supposed to be achieved by implementing the decision. Evaluation of various alternatives dissects an alternative into various tangible and intangible factors. Tangible factors are those which can be quantified because they are quite obvious like the cost per unit, investment required, output to be received, etc. Such factors can be measured easily, though their happening may not be measured with certainty; for example, demand projection at a given price in a particular alternative. As against these, intangible factors are mostly qualitative and cannot be measured in terms of quantity. Therefore, some definitions can be used for such factors. For example, in a plant location, various non-economic factors like psychological problem arising out of displacement of persons from the plant site, ecological balance, etc., have to be taken into account which cannot be quantified. In evaluating an alternative, both these factors have to be taken into account. For determining the impact of a factor, various quantitative techniques have been developed.
  • 13. Choice of Alternative The evaluation of various alternatives presents a clear picture as to how each one of them contributes to the objectives under question. A comparison is made among the likely outcomes of various alternatives and the best one is chosen. Choice aspect of decision making is related to deciding the most acceptable alternative which fits with the organizational objectives. It may be seen that the chosen alternative should be acceptable in the light of the organizational objectives. Thus, it is not necessary that the chosen alternative is the best one. This concept is based on the satisfying approach rather than the maximizing approach of decision making, . In choosing an alternative, the decision maker can go through three approaches: experience, experimentation, and research and analysis. 1.Experience. Managers can choose an alternative based on their past experience if they have solved similar problems earlier. Reliance on past experience plays a larger part than it deserves in decision making. Managers rely more on experience than alternative methods of choice. Past experience has some benefits but it has certain limitation that it blocks making correct choice specially when the environmental factors are more flexible. 2.Experimentation. Experimentation which is generally used in scientific enquiry involves that a particular alternative is put in practice, result is observed, and the alternative giving the best result is selected. For example, many organizations go for test marketing of their products before the products are really introduced in the market. During test marketing, the actions can be taken to change product features which are not acceptable. Experimentation as a method for choice of an alternative can be used on a limited scale because of cost and time factor. 3.Research and Analysis. Research and analysis is the most certain method of selecting an alternative, especially when major decisions are involved. This approach entails solving a problem first by comprehending it. This involves a search for relationships between the more critical variables, constraints, and planning premises that bear the objective sought. In the second stage, the alternative is broken into various components.
  • 14. Action Once the alternative is selected, it is put into action. Truly speaking, the actual process of decision making ends with the choice of an alternative through which the objectives can be achieved. However, decision making, being a continuous and on-going process, must ensure that the problem has been solved and the objectives have been achieved by the chosen alternative. Unless this is done, managers will never know what way their choice has contributed. Therefore, the implementation of decision may be seen as an integral aspect of decision. Once the creative and analytical aspects of decision making through which an alternative has been chosen are over, the managerial priority is one of converting the decision into something operationally effective. This is the important aspect of decision making. The basic difference between decision making as an analytical process and action is that the former requires the use of conceptual skills since it translates the abstract ideas into reality. For example, suppose that there is a change in consumers' tastes. This change is very abstract and cannot be seen unless some specific techniques and measurements are applied. How this change can provide opportunity to the organization is mostly a conceptual exercise requiring managers to interpret what changes are taking place and what products or services will be preferred in the changed situation. Action, on the other hand, relates to putting a decision into practice so that objectives of decision are achieved. This practice will provide further feedback for evaluating the soundness of the decision and, if need be, a change in the decision. Implementation of a decision requires the communication to subordinates, getting their acceptance over the matters involved in the decision, and getting their support for putting their decision into action. The decision should be effected at appropriate time and in proper way to make the action more effective. The effectiveness of action is important because it is only effective action through which organizational objectives can be achieved and right decisions help in effective action.
  • 15. Results When the decision is put into action, it brings certain results. These results must correspond with objectives, the starting point of decision process, if good decision has been made and implemented properly. Thus, results provide indication whether decision and its imple-mentation is proper. Therefore, managers should take up a follow-up action in the light of feedback received from the results. If there is any deviation between objectives and results, this should be analyzed and factors responsible for this deviation should be located. The feedback may also help in reviewing the decision when conditions change which may require changes in decision. Therefore, a successful manager is one who keeps a close look at the objectives and results of the decision and modifies his decision according to the changes in the circumstances. EFFECTIVE DECISION The decision-making process goes through the various stages and the basic objectives of all these stages are to solve problem through the decision. The solution of the problem depends on how effectively the decision is made and implemented. Thus, an effective decision is one which is action-oriented, goal-directed, and provides efficiency in implementation. These three aspects of effective decision are presented below. 1.Action Orientation. Decisions are action-oriented and are directed towards relevant and controllable aspects of the environment. Decisions are totally pragmatic in nature and their value is dependent on the success of the actions that follow. Decisions may be treated as an intervening variable which may ultimately lead to the end-result variables. From this point of view, decisions should ultimately find their utility in implementation. Therefore, the decisions to be effective must specify the various actions which are to be taken to achieve the objective necessitating decision making. 2.Goal Direction. Organizations are goal-directed units and, therefore, any organizational process, including decision making, should be goal-directed to enable the organization to meet its objectives.
  • 16. Naturally, the value of a decision and the associated action is related to the dispatch with which the goal is achieved. While the value of a decision is dependent on the attainment of a given goal or set of goals, such attainment is a function of both the accuracy of the decision and its implementation. In evaluating a decision, then, a distinction should be made between the effects of goal attainment brought about by the better decision and those attainments arising out of execution. 3.Efficiency in Implementation. An effective decision should provide the way in which it can be implemented. Therefore, decision making should take into account all the possible factors not only in terms of external context but also in internal context so that a decision can be implemented properly. Often, the results are obtained by proper implementation of proper decision. Therefore, a brilliant decision may fail if it is not suitable for implementation by the organization. From this point of view, three characteristics of an effective decision have been identified: (a) the viability of the decision; (b) the degree of congruency between prediction and the reality or viability of the solution as it occurs; and (c) the enthusiasm and skill with which the proposal is pursued-the attractiveness of the venture. Shull et al, op.cit.,p.15
  • 17. Problem Solving A manager is confronted daily with a host of problems/opportunities, regardless of the size and type of his organization. Though there may be numerous such problems, some of the relevant areas where problem solving is required are costs, competitive position, product pricing, production planning, product quality, employee training, employee morale, employee grievances, better use of organizational resources, and so on. Problem solving is a form of decision making in which the issue is unique and alternatives must be developed and evaluated without the aid of set decision rules. As we shall see later, there are various approaches for problem solving. However, before adopting a particular approach or a combination of various approaches, the problem solver must recognize the problem to be solved. In decision-making process, we have seen that a problem can be identified by undergoing through diagnosis and analysis for which information of different types is required. Usually, such an information is collected from historical data, planning data (comparing results with objectives), unfavorable comparisons with competitors, criticisms by outsiders, etc. Based on this information, problem solvers usually categories problems in one of two ways: 1.Forward working, which is to project the likely results if the problem is overlooked and becomes a basis for decision making. 2.Means-end factoring, which involves dissecting the problem into several smaller problems and solving each one separately.
  • 19. Approaches for Problem Solving There may be several approaches for problem solving as each manager, as a problem solver, acts in his own ways. However, these approaches can broadly be classified into four broad categories: 1. Routine approach. 2. Scientific approach. 3. Quantitative approach. 4. Creative approach. ROUTINE APPROACH Routine approach of problem solving involves solving a problem using traditional means, or doing what has always been done when the problem of this type arose. In this approach, reference is simply made to history or precedent and the same answer used before is used now. Some organizations, particularly large ones and those which put emphasis on formalization, develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) to solve problems of recurring nature. Standard operating procedures are formal rules for accomplishing tasks. These rules are developed over the period of time and guide the organizational members in a variety of procedures. Most procedures are formalized and written down, but many others are in the form of informal work practices. With the changing situations, these SOPs get on changing with the deletion of old procedures and addition of new ones. Another means under the routine approach is to solve problems by a superior order. Here, the problem solver has no choice at all but follows the edict of his superior. Though routine approach of problem solving is the most common with many organizations because it facilitates to follow similar practices throughout the organization, it has some serious limitations. Noted industrial psychologist, Norman Maier, has suggested that managers should consider each problem with respect to its effect on the organization's betterment as well as its employees, which he called quality and acceptance respectively. " In routine approach, both these elements are often missing. 7Norman R.F. Malre. Problem Solving Discussions and Conferences: Leadership Methods and Skills. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1983.
  • 20. SCIENTIFIC APPROACH Kepner and Tregoe have suggested scientific approach to managerial problem solving and decision making. They contend that "what a manager needs for effective problem analysis is an orderly system for processing information, a system in which certain steps follow others in a fixed order Generally, scientific approach of problem solving follows the following steps in sequence: 1. Identification of the proposition. 2. Acquiring preliminary observations about the proposition. 3. Stating tentative solutions to the proposition. 4. Investigating proposition thoroughly, using both current knowledge and controlled experiments. 5. Classification of relevant data obtained. 6. Stating tentative answer to the proposition. 7. Adjusting and stating answer to the problem. 8 "Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe, The Rational Manager, New York: McGraw Hill. 1985.
  • 21. QUANTITATIVE APPROACH With the introduction of computers in business problem solving, quantitative approach has been developed. The emphasis in the quantitative approach is on mathematical modeling of systems. Comparisons of various feasible actions such as cost minimization, profit maximization, return on investment, etc. are expressed by measurable values. The relationship of the factors for any given action is stated in mathematical form-by formula or action. By substituting different mathematical values for the variables of the equation, different results are obtained and evaluated in keeping with the requirements of the stated problem. Thus, quantitative approach of problem solving proceeds in the following manner: 1. Formulation of the problem. 2. Building a mathematical model to represent the system under study. 3. Deriving the answer from the model. 4. Testing the model and answer derived to ensure its practicability. 5. Placing needed constraints over use of model and answer. 6. Selecting the final answer. There are various quantitative techniques for problem solving and decision making. These techniques are the subject matters of a distinct field of study, known as Operations Research.
  • 22. CREATIVE APPROACH Some managers feel that problem solving and decision making should not be viewed as a logical action, that is, the problem need not be defined and strictly rational steps need not be taken to decide what to do. They point out that stated objectives are not needed. The decision maker studies the information, people, and facilities involved and concentrates on the interactions and the possible outputs from these resources. This is done through creative approach. In today's dynamic environment, creativity is vital in decision making. There are various terms which are used as synonyms to creativity such as 'discover', 'invention', 'extending the boundary', etc. Examples of creativity in decision making may be creation of new product, creation of new method, creation of new market, and so on. In general usage, creativity means a talent for unique combination or unusual association of ideas. But since our approach to creativity is on concentrating on decision making, such a definition is too broad. From a managerial perspective, creativity is the conceiving of original and unique alternatives to the solution of existing problems. Some writers have attempted to differentiate between different types of creativity; for example, viewing 'innovation' as something new, 'synthesis' as combining unrelated data into something new, 'extension' as expanding boundaries on innovation, and 'duplication' as copying others. However, nothing is ever really new. 9 John F. Mee, "The Creative Thinking Process." Harvard Business Review, January-February, 1956.