Interpolation 2013

Atiqa Khan
Atiqa Khanstudent
In context of Arc
GIS
INTERPOLATION
TECHNIQUES
Our aim is to apply interpolation
techniques, mostly in the context of GIS.
We have discussed few of the methods
such as: Nearest
neighbor, IDW, Spline, Radial Basis
Function, and Kriging.
But we have done analysis on:
IDW, Spline (tension and registration)
and Kriging (ordinary and universal).
Introduction
The study area includes different
states of USA :
 Nevada
 Idaho – Rocky Mountains (side of Montana)
 Oregon
 Wyoming
 Utah
 Washington DC
Study Area
Google Earth
View
The data we use to achieve our goal is
of the different weather stations in
different states of the USA.
The information it includes is:
 Station Names (in text format)
 Lat/long (in degress)
 Elevation Values (in meters)
 Rain Percentage (in %)
Given Data
Map Layout
Map Layout
 The method which we adopt here is the
technique of Interpolation data from
sample points.
 As defined earlier, the software that
aid us is the Arc GIS and Arc Scene
(version 9.3) .
 Different types of interpolation
techniques gives us separate results.
 As we display the sample points on Arc
GIS, and also label them.
 We interpolate data using the
Methodology
Literature
Review
Interpolating A Surface from
Sample Point Data
Interpolation
Estimating the attribute values of
locations that are within the range
of available data using known data
values.
Extrapolation
Estimating the attribute values of
locations outside the range of
available data using known data
Interpolation
Extrapolation
Linear Interpolation
Elevation
profile
Sample
elevatio
n data
A
B
If
A = 8 feet
and
B = 4 feet
then
C = (8 + 4) / 2 =
6 feet
C
Non-linear Interpolation
Elevation
profile
Sample
elevatio
n data A
B
C
• Often
results in a
more
realistic
interpolatio
n but
estimating
missing data
values is
more complex
Sampling
Strategy
Random
Regular
Sampling
Strategies
Guarantees a good spread of
points.
Regular
Strategy
 It produces a pattern with
clustering some areas.
Random
Strategy
Spatial Interpolation
Methods
SpatialInterpolation
Methods
Global
Deterministic
Exact
Inexact
Geo-Statistical
Exact
Inexact
Local
Deterministic
Exact
Inexact
Geo-Statistical
Exact
Inexact
Global
Interpolation
Sample
data
 Uses all Known Points to estimate
a value at unsampled locations.
 More generalize estimation.
 Useful for the terrains that do
not show abrupt change.
Local Interpolation
Sample
data
• Uses a local
neighborhood to
estimate value, i.e.
closest n number of
 Uses a neighborhood of sample
points to estimate the a value at
unsampled location.
 Produce local estimation.
 Useful for abrupt changes.
Grouping of
Interpolation
Grouping
Deterministic
Geo-
Statistical
 Deterministic interpolation
techniques create surfaces from
measured points.
 A deterministic interpolation can
either force the resulting
surface to pass through the data
values or not.
Deterministic
Technique
 Geo-statistical techniques
quantify the spatial
autocorrelation among measured
points and account for the
spatial configuration of the
sample points around the
prediction location.
 Because geo-statistics is based on
statistics, these techniques
Geo-statistical
Technique
Exact Interpolation: predicts a
value that is identical to the
measured value at a sampled
location.
Inexact interpolator: predicts a
value that is different from the
measured value
Examples
Nearest
Neighbor(NN)
Predicts the value on the basis of the
perpendicular bisector between
sampled points forming Thiession
Polygons.
Produces 1 polygon per sample point,
With sample point at the center.
It weights as per the area or the
volume.
They are further divided into two more
categories.
 It is Local, Deterministic, and Exact.
Inverse Distance
Weighted (IDW)
It is advanced of Nearest Neighbor.
Here the driving force is Distance.
It includes ore observation other
than the nearest points.
It is Local, Deterministic, and Exact.
With the high power, the surface get
soother and smoother
Result
IDW with
8
IDW with power 2
IDW with power 4
IDW with power 8
Spline
Those points that are extended to the
height of their magnitude
Act as bending of a rubber sheet while
minimizing the curvature.
Can be used for the smoothing of the
surface.
Surface passes from all points.
They can be 1st , 2nd , and 3rd order:
 Regular (1st, 2nd , & 3rd )
 Tension (1st , & 2nd )
They can 2D (smoothing a contour) or 3D
(modeling a surface).
 Regularized Spline: the higher the
weight, the smoother the surface.
 Typical values are: 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.5
etc
 Suitable values are: 0-5.
 Tension Spline: the higher the weight,
the coarser the surface.
 Must be greater than equal to zero
 Typical values are: 0, 1, 5, 10.
Result
Regular
Spline
Tension Spline
 The number of point are set by default
in most of the software.
 The number of points one define, all
the number are used in the calculation
 Maximum the number, smoother the
surface.
 Lesser the stiffness.
Radial Basis
Function (RBS)
Is a function that changes its
location with distance.
It can predicts a value above the
maximum and below the minimum
Basically, it is the series of exact
interpolation techniques:
 Thin-plate Spline
 Spline with Tension
 Regularized Spline
 Multi-Quadratic Function
 Inverse Multi-quadratic Spline
Trend Surface
 Produces surface that represents
gradual trend over area of interest.
 It is Local, Estimated, and Geo-
statistical.
 Examining or removing the long range
trends.
 1st Order
 2nd Order
Kirging
 It says that the distance and
direction between sample points
shows the spatial correlation that
can be used to predict the surface
 Merits: it is fast and flexible method.
 Demerit: requires a lot of decision
making
 In Kriging, the weight not only depends
upon the distance of the measured and
prediction points, but also on the
spatial arrangement of them.
 It uses data twice:
 To estimate the spatial correlation, and
 To make the predictions
 Ordinary Kriging: Suitable for the
data having trend. (e.g. mountains
along with valleys)
 Computed with constant mean “µ”
 Universal Kriging: The results are
similar to the one get from regression.
 Sample points arrange themselves
above and below the mean.
 More like a 2nd order polynomial.
Result
Ordinary
Kriging
Universal Kriging
 It quantifies the assumption that
nearby things tend to be more similar
than that are further apart.
 It measures the statistical
correlation.
 It shows that greater the distance
between two points, lesser the
similarity between them.
Semi-variogram
It can be:
 Spherical
 Circular
 Exponential
 Gaussian
Kriging Spherical
Result
Kriging
Kriging
Kriging
Summary
Serial No. Techniques Observatio
ns
01. IDW
02. Regularize
d Spline
03. Tension
Spline
04. Krging
Universe
with
05. Krging
Serial No. Techniques Observatio
ns
06. Krging
Gussain
07. Kriging
Exponentia
l
08. Kriging
Circular
09. Kriging
Spherical
 The final outcome of our
experimentation is :
Conclusion
1 de 52

Recomendados

InterpolationInterpolation
Interpolationseidmmd
990 vistas4 diapositivas
Inverse distance weightingInverse distance weighting
Inverse distance weightingPenchala Vineeth
15.3K vistas22 diapositivas
Interpolation 2013Interpolation 2013
Interpolation 2013Atiqa khan
867 vistas52 diapositivas

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Spatial data analysis 2Spatial data analysis 2
Spatial data analysis 2Johan Blomme
3K vistas63 diapositivas
3D Analyst3D Analyst
3D AnalystHartanto Sanjaya
589 vistas22 diapositivas
spatial interoplation in GISspatial interoplation in GIS
spatial interoplation in GISGopalKharka
123 vistas9 diapositivas

La actualidad más candente(20)

Spatial data analysis 2Spatial data analysis 2
Spatial data analysis 2
Johan Blomme3K vistas
GIS Spatially Weighted AveragesGIS Spatially Weighted Averages
GIS Spatially Weighted Averages
Joseph Luchette1.3K vistas
Validation of digital soil mapsValidation of digital soil maps
Validation of digital soil maps
ExternalEvents601 vistas
3D Analyst3D Analyst
3D Analyst
Hartanto Sanjaya589 vistas
spatial interoplation in GISspatial interoplation in GIS
spatial interoplation in GIS
GopalKharka123 vistas
Best guess for calc paper higherBest guess for calc paper higher
Best guess for calc paper higher
claire meadows-smith286 vistas
Mutual informationMutual information
Mutual information
Michael Munroe58 vistas
Remote Sensing: Overlay AnalysisRemote Sensing: Overlay Analysis
Remote Sensing: Overlay Analysis
Kamlesh Kumar593 vistas
Statistics and optimization (1)Statistics and optimization (1)
Statistics and optimization (1)
Tl-mohammed Altaey418 vistas
Question 1Question 1
Question 1
Dineshi Gelanigama153 vistas
testtest
test
mrviml155 vistas
KrystianPaczkowski_iFEMKrystianPaczkowski_iFEM
KrystianPaczkowski_iFEM
Krystian Paczkowski256 vistas
AgspaperAgspaper
Agspaper
GeoBlogs261 vistas
Spatial Data Mining : SeminarSpatial Data Mining : Seminar
Spatial Data Mining : Seminar
Ipsit Dash2K vistas
3-IGARSS-JiongCHEN.ppt3-IGARSS-JiongCHEN.ppt
3-IGARSS-JiongCHEN.ppt
grssieee236 vistas

Similar a Interpolation 2013

3D Analyst Lab 13D Analyst Lab 1
3D Analyst Lab 1Hartanto Sanjaya
1K vistas20 diapositivas
Improving Dtm AccuracyImproving Dtm Accuracy
Improving Dtm AccuracyUniversity of Oradea
1.1K vistas8 diapositivas
GEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYSTGEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYST
GEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYSTPutu Santikayasa
208 vistas135 diapositivas
3D Analyst - Lab3D Analyst - Lab
3D Analyst - LabHartanto Sanjaya
344 vistas20 diapositivas

Similar a Interpolation 2013(20)

3D Analyst Lab 13D Analyst Lab 1
3D Analyst Lab 1
Hartanto Sanjaya1K vistas
Improving Dtm AccuracyImproving Dtm Accuracy
Improving Dtm Accuracy
University of Oradea1.1K vistas
GEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYSTGEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYST
GEOSTATISTICAL_ANALYST
Putu Santikayasa208 vistas
3D Analyst - Lab3D Analyst - Lab
3D Analyst - Lab
Hartanto Sanjaya344 vistas
Building maps with analysisBuilding maps with analysis
Building maps with analysis
LindaBeale1.5K vistas
Raster data analysisRaster data analysis
Raster data analysis
Abdul Raziq2.6K vistas
Exercise advanced gis_and_hydrologyExercise advanced gis_and_hydrology
Exercise advanced gis_and_hydrology
BUGINGO Annanie270 vistas
GEOMETRIC TAMPERING ESTIMATION  BY MEANS OF A SIFT-BASED FORENSIC ANALYSISGEOMETRIC TAMPERING ESTIMATION  BY MEANS OF A SIFT-BASED FORENSIC ANALYSIS
GEOMETRIC TAMPERING ESTIMATION BY MEANS OF A SIFT-BASED FORENSIC ANALYSIS
ICL - Image Communication Laboratory1.1K vistas
STATISTICAL_SURFACES.pptSTATISTICAL_SURFACES.ppt
STATISTICAL_SURFACES.ppt
AtikaParvaz113 vistas

Más de Atiqa Khan

Clouds 2011Clouds 2011
Clouds 2011Atiqa Khan
1K vistas44 diapositivas
Moons 2009Moons 2009
Moons 2009Atiqa Khan
223 vistas92 diapositivas
Clouds 2011Clouds 2011
Clouds 2011Atiqa Khan
234 vistas44 diapositivas
Pca 2012Pca 2012
Pca 2012Atiqa Khan
272 vistas15 diapositivas
Moons 2009Moons 2009
Moons 2009Atiqa Khan
199 vistas92 diapositivas
Contra vs co vector 2013Contra vs co vector 2013
Contra vs co vector 2013Atiqa Khan
190 vistas7 diapositivas

Más de Atiqa Khan(12)

Clouds 2011Clouds 2011
Clouds 2011
Atiqa Khan1K vistas
Moons 2009Moons 2009
Moons 2009
Atiqa Khan223 vistas
Clouds 2011Clouds 2011
Clouds 2011
Atiqa Khan234 vistas
Pca 2012Pca 2012
Pca 2012
Atiqa Khan272 vistas
Moons 2009Moons 2009
Moons 2009
Atiqa Khan199 vistas
Contra vs co vector 2013Contra vs co vector 2013
Contra vs co vector 2013
Atiqa Khan190 vistas
Koppen classification 2011Koppen classification 2011
Koppen classification 2011
Atiqa Khan2.7K vistas
Dbms 2011Dbms 2011
Dbms 2011
Atiqa Khan386 vistas
Rs satellites catelogue 2012Rs satellites catelogue 2012
Rs satellites catelogue 2012
Atiqa Khan1K vistas
Pca 2012Pca 2012
Pca 2012
Atiqa Khan672 vistas
Contra vs co vector 2013Contra vs co vector 2013
Contra vs co vector 2013
Atiqa Khan379 vistas
Array 2011Array 2011
Array 2011
Atiqa Khan318 vistas

Interpolation 2013

  • 1. In context of Arc GIS INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES
  • 2. Our aim is to apply interpolation techniques, mostly in the context of GIS. We have discussed few of the methods such as: Nearest neighbor, IDW, Spline, Radial Basis Function, and Kriging. But we have done analysis on: IDW, Spline (tension and registration) and Kriging (ordinary and universal). Introduction
  • 3. The study area includes different states of USA :  Nevada  Idaho – Rocky Mountains (side of Montana)  Oregon  Wyoming  Utah  Washington DC Study Area
  • 5. The data we use to achieve our goal is of the different weather stations in different states of the USA. The information it includes is:  Station Names (in text format)  Lat/long (in degress)  Elevation Values (in meters)  Rain Percentage (in %) Given Data
  • 8.  The method which we adopt here is the technique of Interpolation data from sample points.  As defined earlier, the software that aid us is the Arc GIS and Arc Scene (version 9.3) .  Different types of interpolation techniques gives us separate results.  As we display the sample points on Arc GIS, and also label them.  We interpolate data using the Methodology
  • 10. Interpolating A Surface from Sample Point Data Interpolation Estimating the attribute values of locations that are within the range of available data using known data values. Extrapolation Estimating the attribute values of locations outside the range of available data using known data
  • 13. Linear Interpolation Elevation profile Sample elevatio n data A B If A = 8 feet and B = 4 feet then C = (8 + 4) / 2 = 6 feet C
  • 14. Non-linear Interpolation Elevation profile Sample elevatio n data A B C • Often results in a more realistic interpolatio n but estimating missing data values is more complex
  • 16. Guarantees a good spread of points. Regular Strategy
  • 17.  It produces a pattern with clustering some areas. Random Strategy
  • 19. Global Interpolation Sample data  Uses all Known Points to estimate a value at unsampled locations.  More generalize estimation.  Useful for the terrains that do not show abrupt change.
  • 20. Local Interpolation Sample data • Uses a local neighborhood to estimate value, i.e. closest n number of  Uses a neighborhood of sample points to estimate the a value at unsampled location.  Produce local estimation.  Useful for abrupt changes.
  • 22.  Deterministic interpolation techniques create surfaces from measured points.  A deterministic interpolation can either force the resulting surface to pass through the data values or not. Deterministic Technique
  • 23.  Geo-statistical techniques quantify the spatial autocorrelation among measured points and account for the spatial configuration of the sample points around the prediction location.  Because geo-statistics is based on statistics, these techniques Geo-statistical Technique
  • 24. Exact Interpolation: predicts a value that is identical to the measured value at a sampled location.
  • 25. Inexact interpolator: predicts a value that is different from the measured value
  • 27. Nearest Neighbor(NN) Predicts the value on the basis of the perpendicular bisector between sampled points forming Thiession Polygons. Produces 1 polygon per sample point, With sample point at the center. It weights as per the area or the volume. They are further divided into two more categories.  It is Local, Deterministic, and Exact.
  • 28. Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) It is advanced of Nearest Neighbor. Here the driving force is Distance. It includes ore observation other than the nearest points. It is Local, Deterministic, and Exact. With the high power, the surface get soother and smoother
  • 32. Spline Those points that are extended to the height of their magnitude Act as bending of a rubber sheet while minimizing the curvature. Can be used for the smoothing of the surface. Surface passes from all points. They can be 1st , 2nd , and 3rd order:  Regular (1st, 2nd , & 3rd )  Tension (1st , & 2nd ) They can 2D (smoothing a contour) or 3D (modeling a surface).
  • 33.  Regularized Spline: the higher the weight, the smoother the surface.  Typical values are: 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.5 etc  Suitable values are: 0-5.  Tension Spline: the higher the weight, the coarser the surface.  Must be greater than equal to zero  Typical values are: 0, 1, 5, 10.
  • 36.  The number of point are set by default in most of the software.  The number of points one define, all the number are used in the calculation  Maximum the number, smoother the surface.  Lesser the stiffness.
  • 37. Radial Basis Function (RBS) Is a function that changes its location with distance. It can predicts a value above the maximum and below the minimum Basically, it is the series of exact interpolation techniques:  Thin-plate Spline  Spline with Tension  Regularized Spline  Multi-Quadratic Function  Inverse Multi-quadratic Spline
  • 38. Trend Surface  Produces surface that represents gradual trend over area of interest.  It is Local, Estimated, and Geo- statistical.  Examining or removing the long range trends.  1st Order  2nd Order
  • 39. Kirging  It says that the distance and direction between sample points shows the spatial correlation that can be used to predict the surface  Merits: it is fast and flexible method.  Demerit: requires a lot of decision making
  • 40.  In Kriging, the weight not only depends upon the distance of the measured and prediction points, but also on the spatial arrangement of them.  It uses data twice:  To estimate the spatial correlation, and  To make the predictions
  • 41.  Ordinary Kriging: Suitable for the data having trend. (e.g. mountains along with valleys)  Computed with constant mean “µ”  Universal Kriging: The results are similar to the one get from regression.  Sample points arrange themselves above and below the mean.  More like a 2nd order polynomial.
  • 44.  It quantifies the assumption that nearby things tend to be more similar than that are further apart.  It measures the statistical correlation.  It shows that greater the distance between two points, lesser the similarity between them. Semi-variogram
  • 45. It can be:  Spherical  Circular  Exponential  Gaussian
  • 50. Summary Serial No. Techniques Observatio ns 01. IDW 02. Regularize d Spline 03. Tension Spline 04. Krging Universe with 05. Krging
  • 51. Serial No. Techniques Observatio ns 06. Krging Gussain 07. Kriging Exponentia l 08. Kriging Circular 09. Kriging Spherical
  • 52.  The final outcome of our experimentation is : Conclusion