SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 77
Understanding the new breed of digital donors and how to maximise your fundraising  through their networks Bryan Miller Head of Strategy & Consumer Insight Cancer Research UK [email_address]   @millbry Jonathan Waddingham Charity Champion JustGiving [email_address]   @jon_bedford
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Understanding the new breed  of digital donors and how to maximise  your fundraising  through  their networks
Don’t worry We’re all in much the same boat! How best to capitalise on the opportunities offered by social media as part of an effective fundraising strategy is something we’re still working through
Let’s begin… with a (true) story
It all began… Jenni Ware Carolee Hazzard …  with a lost purse
Realtime community storytelling
$93 is now $22,000! And looks set to continue growing  - thanks to the multiplier effect of social network fundraising
Trader Joe’s also donated over 350lbs of groceries - nice!
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
 
http://flickr.com/photos/kaptainkobold/195999767
The moral of this story? Donors are doing it for themselves!
Donors are doing it for themselves! ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
So… what is our role in all this?
Our traditional role
Within the 4-Cs of  social network fundraising Our new role… Community Commodity Cause Impact Content
The first ‘C’ = Community Community ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],*Source Nielsen: http://bit.ly/1AJ7ni
One social network to rule them all? http://www.buzzpoint.com/
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],http://img41.yfrog.com/i/facebookwqi.jpg/
[object Object],[object Object],http://www.alexa.com/topsites
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],http://www.alexa.com/topsites
[object Object],http://www.checkfacebook.com/
One social network to rule them all? http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/23/modeling-the-real-market-value-of-social-networks/ Netherlands Hyves, MySpace,  Hi5, Facebook  Italy MySpace, Badoo,  Hi5, Facebook  Germany MySpace, Piczo,  Facebook, Hi5  France Skyroc, MySpace  Facebook Brazil Orkut, Sonico, Multiply, MySpace, Australia Facebook, MySpace, Bebo India Orkut, Facebook, Hi5, MySpace  Not quite yet…
The second ‘C’ = Commodity Commodity ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The second ‘C’ = Commodity Commodity Vs
The third ‘C’ = Content ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Content
The third ‘C’ = Content ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],http://myprojects.cancerresearchuk.org/projects/pancreatic-cancer Content
The fourth ‘C’ = Cause Impact ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Cause Impact
Getting to know the new breed
Getting to know the new breed ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Getting to know the new breed Online activities
[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
Getting to know the new breed Advocacy
[object Object]
[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
[object Object]
Getting to know the new breed ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Is this your first online donation?
Which gender is giving more?
What’s the spread of ages by gender?
How much do people donate online?
Donation share vs revenue share
Key stats 25% Percentage (in revenue) that comes from donors over 45 who donate more than £50 Percentage (in revenue) that comes from donors over 55 33% Percentage (in revenue) that comes from donors over 65 11%
Donation spread by age and gender
Donation spread by age and gender
How do you help these people? accessible targeted advertise user-friendly integrate online/offline email
What was the source of the donation ask?
Let’s look at the trends...
Is email use increasing or decreasing? http://icanhaz.com/emailstats
Do the tools used vary depending on age?
Facebook – where the new breed lives ,[object Object],Percentage of Facebook visits from Facebook home page ,[object Object],Percentage of Facebook visits from Facebook inbox
Who is using Facebook Connect?
Facebook Connect
Who is using Facebook Connect?
Community fundraising through Twitter http://twitter.com/serafinowicz/status/1321093848
Community fundraising through Twitter 14% of referrals on 13 th  March to JustGiving were from Twitter www.justgiving.com/peterserafinowicz
Fundraising through Twitter – micro donations 1,106 donations £4.86 average Current total: £5,396.07
So what does this all mean? Different segments require different channels, as well as different messages Ignore your older online donors at your peril Newsfeeds are the single most valuable real estate on Facebook for charities Test online donation prompts by age and gender (as well as RFV) Email is still the king of comms for many people online  The new breed of social media fundraisers is growing in importance
The moral of this story? Donors are doing it for themselves!
The 365 Challenge www.365challenge.co.uk & @365er
This is Colin’s story “ In 2007, I was diagnosed with a soft tissue sarcoma and underwent surgery, followed by radiotherapy. Then in 2008, my sister, Brenda Carr, died after a long battle with breast cancer. Following on from this, I knew that I wanted to raise money to support Cancer Research UK, because I felt that they were supporting important work in the fight to overcome cancer.”
Colin’s strategy
Colin’s strategy “ With a group, I found that I could engage with a target audience  who had expressed an interest in what I was doing  – what any advertiser dreams of, really!”
The ripple effect…
What would’ve helped Colin guidance on how following someone can give you access to their followers too  changing your Facebook status regularly and using these status updates and tweets to draw people in, teasing them into reading more … an explanation of what Twitter is all about tips on keeping your message out there – how regular blog updates can be tweeted about so others get to know that you’ve written something new, more guidance on how FB can be exploited
The new breed “ As I posted Tweets about hitting milestones or new blogs, these connections were Re-Tweeting them, and my message spread further and further.” “ These enthusiastic strangers... I now count as supporters and friends”
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

More Related Content

What's hot

Social networking ... Boon or a Bane
Social networking ... Boon or a Bane Social networking ... Boon or a Bane
Social networking ... Boon or a Bane Nivesh Yadav
 
So-Sial Networking
So-Sial NetworkingSo-Sial Networking
So-Sial NetworkingAlanGun Alan
 
Cybersecurity
CybersecurityCybersecurity
CybersecurityBen Liu
 
Social networks
Social networksSocial networks
Social networksvivek5110
 
Facebook Analysis and Study
Facebook Analysis and StudyFacebook Analysis and Study
Facebook Analysis and StudyOuriel Ohayon
 
Did facebook kill privacy
Did facebook kill privacyDid facebook kill privacy
Did facebook kill privacyJason Fernandes
 
A Brief History Of Social Media
A Brief History Of Social MediaA Brief History Of Social Media
A Brief History Of Social MediaConnie Piggott
 
Fundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donations
Fundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donationsFundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donations
Fundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donationsDarren Fower - Shine Charity
 
Was think forward_2020
Was think forward_2020Was think forward_2020
Was think forward_2020Huyen Nguyen
 
101006 Communicating Your Impact
101006 Communicating Your Impact101006 Communicating Your Impact
101006 Communicating Your ImpactMark Walker
 
How Creators are Thriving Digitally
How Creators are Thriving DigitallyHow Creators are Thriving Digitally
How Creators are Thriving DigitallyLeah Wells
 
SEO is broken – giving way to social search
SEO is broken – giving way to social searchSEO is broken – giving way to social search
SEO is broken – giving way to social searchStephen Waddington
 
2018 tech-report-english
2018 tech-report-english2018 tech-report-english
2018 tech-report-englishjugaldejr
 
Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014
Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014
Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014Stephen Waddington
 

What's hot (17)

Social networking ... Boon or a Bane
Social networking ... Boon or a Bane Social networking ... Boon or a Bane
Social networking ... Boon or a Bane
 
So-Sial Networking
So-Sial NetworkingSo-Sial Networking
So-Sial Networking
 
Cybersecurity
CybersecurityCybersecurity
Cybersecurity
 
Social networks
Social networksSocial networks
Social networks
 
Facebook
FacebookFacebook
Facebook
 
Facebook Analysis and Study
Facebook Analysis and StudyFacebook Analysis and Study
Facebook Analysis and Study
 
Did facebook kill privacy
Did facebook kill privacyDid facebook kill privacy
Did facebook kill privacy
 
A Brief History Of Social Media
A Brief History Of Social MediaA Brief History Of Social Media
A Brief History Of Social Media
 
Fundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donations
Fundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donationsFundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donations
Fundraising 3.0: Turning social data into repeat donations
 
Was think forward_2020
Was think forward_2020Was think forward_2020
Was think forward_2020
 
101006 Communicating Your Impact
101006 Communicating Your Impact101006 Communicating Your Impact
101006 Communicating Your Impact
 
proposal
proposalproposal
proposal
 
How Creators are Thriving Digitally
How Creators are Thriving DigitallyHow Creators are Thriving Digitally
How Creators are Thriving Digitally
 
SEO is broken – giving way to social search
SEO is broken – giving way to social searchSEO is broken – giving way to social search
SEO is broken – giving way to social search
 
2018 tech-report-english
2018 tech-report-english2018 tech-report-english
2018 tech-report-english
 
GravitySummit 2010 Beverly Macy
GravitySummit 2010 Beverly MacyGravitySummit 2010 Beverly Macy
GravitySummit 2010 Beverly Macy
 
Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014
Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014
Preview of session at the World PR Forum, Madrid, September 2014
 

Viewers also liked

Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010
Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010
Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010FirstGiving
 
Philanthropic donations small businesses
Philanthropic donations  small businessesPhilanthropic donations  small businesses
Philanthropic donations small businessesCPA Australia
 
Oxfam Foundation
Oxfam FoundationOxfam Foundation
Oxfam FoundationJalanah
 
Trends in the Nonprofit Industry
Trends in the Nonprofit IndustryTrends in the Nonprofit Industry
Trends in the Nonprofit IndustrySteve MacLaughlin
 
Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...
Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...
Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...Capital Region Digital Enterprise
 
Fintech Vietnam Report 2015
Fintech Vietnam Report 2015Fintech Vietnam Report 2015
Fintech Vietnam Report 2015Patrick Mehrhoff
 
Assignment 1 unit 1
Assignment 1 unit 1Assignment 1 unit 1
Assignment 1 unit 1dorcasviela
 
Entering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentation
Entering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentationEntering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentation
Entering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentationAaron Fisher
 
Fintech Vietnam Startups Report
Fintech Vietnam Startups ReportFintech Vietnam Startups Report
Fintech Vietnam Startups ReportChristian König
 

Viewers also liked (10)

Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010
Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010
Understanding Donor Behavior: Insights from FirstGiving 2007 - 2010
 
Philanthropic donations small businesses
Philanthropic donations  small businessesPhilanthropic donations  small businesses
Philanthropic donations small businesses
 
Order ReachOut.com Merchandise
Order ReachOut.com MerchandiseOrder ReachOut.com Merchandise
Order ReachOut.com Merchandise
 
Oxfam Foundation
Oxfam FoundationOxfam Foundation
Oxfam Foundation
 
Trends in the Nonprofit Industry
Trends in the Nonprofit IndustryTrends in the Nonprofit Industry
Trends in the Nonprofit Industry
 
Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...
Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...
Social Media and Online Fundraising for Community and Not-for-Profit Organisa...
 
Fintech Vietnam Report 2015
Fintech Vietnam Report 2015Fintech Vietnam Report 2015
Fintech Vietnam Report 2015
 
Assignment 1 unit 1
Assignment 1 unit 1Assignment 1 unit 1
Assignment 1 unit 1
 
Entering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentation
Entering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentationEntering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentation
Entering a New Market - Example PowerPoint presentation
 
Fintech Vietnam Startups Report
Fintech Vietnam Startups ReportFintech Vietnam Startups Report
Fintech Vietnam Startups Report
 

Similar to Understanding the new breed of digital donors and how to maximise your fundraising through their networks

Understanding the New Breed of Digital Donors
Understanding the New Breed of Digital DonorsUnderstanding the New Breed of Digital Donors
Understanding the New Breed of Digital DonorsJonathan Waddingham
 
Minnesota Planned Giving Council
Minnesota Planned Giving CouncilMinnesota Planned Giving Council
Minnesota Planned Giving Counciljmstremcha
 
Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]
Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]
Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]rlcwm
 
Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011
Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011
Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011Abila
 
Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007
Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007
Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007staciemann
 
Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...
Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...
Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...hjc
 
How charities can engage younger generations
How charities can engage younger generationsHow charities can engage younger generations
How charities can engage younger generationsiConnectXSolutions
 
Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09
Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09
Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09Jocelyn Harmon
 
Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...
Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...
Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...Aspire Knowledge
 
How small charities can apply the techniques of big campaigns
How small charities can apply the techniques of big campaignsHow small charities can apply the techniques of big campaigns
How small charities can apply the techniques of big campaignsKnowHowNonProfit
 
Fundraising Day NY: Online research
Fundraising Day NY: Online researchFundraising Day NY: Online research
Fundraising Day NY: Online researchKatya Andresen
 
Future of Online Organizing training
Future of Online Organizing training  Future of Online Organizing training
Future of Online Organizing training Cheryl Contee
 
3 Ways to Use Social Media for Fundraising
3 Ways to Use Social Media for Fundraising3 Ways to Use Social Media for Fundraising
3 Ways to Use Social Media for FundraisingSee3 Communications
 
Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011
Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011
Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011Bridget Brandt
 

Similar to Understanding the new breed of digital donors and how to maximise your fundraising through their networks (20)

Understanding the New Breed of Digital Donors
Understanding the New Breed of Digital DonorsUnderstanding the New Breed of Digital Donors
Understanding the New Breed of Digital Donors
 
Minnesota Planned Giving Council
Minnesota Planned Giving CouncilMinnesota Planned Giving Council
Minnesota Planned Giving Council
 
Fundraising 2.0
Fundraising 2.0Fundraising 2.0
Fundraising 2.0
 
MKT Final Report
MKT Final ReportMKT Final Report
MKT Final Report
 
Cne online 10.28.09
Cne online 10.28.09Cne online 10.28.09
Cne online 10.28.09
 
Show Me the Money: Reaching Donors Across Generations
Show Me the Money: Reaching Donors Across GenerationsShow Me the Money: Reaching Donors Across Generations
Show Me the Money: Reaching Donors Across Generations
 
Show Me The Money: Reaching Donors Across Generations
Show Me The Money: Reaching Donors Across GenerationsShow Me The Money: Reaching Donors Across Generations
Show Me The Money: Reaching Donors Across Generations
 
Social Media, Social Good
Social Media, Social GoodSocial Media, Social Good
Social Media, Social Good
 
Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]
Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]
Engagingdonorsinanonlineagept 110714145355-phpapp01[1]
 
Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011
Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011
Engaging Donors In An Online Age Sage Summit 2011
 
Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007
Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007
Web 2.0 Man Ynet 1007
 
Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...
Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...
Everything you wanted to know about Integrated Fundraising for the 21st centu...
 
How charities can engage younger generations
How charities can engage younger generationsHow charities can engage younger generations
How charities can engage younger generations
 
Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09
Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09
Arthritis Foundation 11.14.09
 
Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...
Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...
Optimum Scale: how to apply the techniques of big campaigns to small organisa...
 
How small charities can apply the techniques of big campaigns
How small charities can apply the techniques of big campaignsHow small charities can apply the techniques of big campaigns
How small charities can apply the techniques of big campaigns
 
Fundraising Day NY: Online research
Fundraising Day NY: Online researchFundraising Day NY: Online research
Fundraising Day NY: Online research
 
Future of Online Organizing training
Future of Online Organizing training  Future of Online Organizing training
Future of Online Organizing training
 
3 Ways to Use Social Media for Fundraising
3 Ways to Use Social Media for Fundraising3 Ways to Use Social Media for Fundraising
3 Ways to Use Social Media for Fundraising
 
Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011
Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011
Engaging Donors in an Online Age-2011
 

Recently uploaded

2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis UsageNeil Kimberley
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...
Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...
Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...ShrutiBose4
 
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionFuture Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionMintel Group
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportMintel Group
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...ssuserf63bd7
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Pereraictsugar
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyotictsugar
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
Islamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in Islamabad
Islamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in IslamabadIslamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in Islamabad
Islamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in IslamabadAyesha Khan
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Riya Pathan
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 
Kenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby Africa
Kenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby AfricaKenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby Africa
Kenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby Africaictsugar
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMVoces Mineras
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfKhaled Al Awadi
 

Recently uploaded (20)

2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
 
Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...
Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...
Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...
 
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionFuture Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information TechnologyCorporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
 
Islamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in Islamabad
Islamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in IslamabadIslamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in Islamabad
Islamabad Escorts | Call 03070433345 | Escort Service in Islamabad
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 
Kenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby Africa
Kenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby AfricaKenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby Africa
Kenya’s Coconut Value Chain by Gatsby Africa
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
 
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North GoaCall Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
 

Understanding the new breed of digital donors and how to maximise your fundraising through their networks

  • 1. Understanding the new breed of digital donors and how to maximise your fundraising through their networks Bryan Miller Head of Strategy & Consumer Insight Cancer Research UK [email_address] @millbry Jonathan Waddingham Charity Champion JustGiving [email_address] @jon_bedford
  • 2.
  • 3. Understanding the new breed of digital donors and how to maximise your fundraising through their networks
  • 4. Don’t worry We’re all in much the same boat! How best to capitalise on the opportunities offered by social media as part of an effective fundraising strategy is something we’re still working through
  • 5. Let’s begin… with a (true) story
  • 6. It all began… Jenni Ware Carolee Hazzard … with a lost purse
  • 8. $93 is now $22,000! And looks set to continue growing - thanks to the multiplier effect of social network fundraising
  • 9. Trader Joe’s also donated over 350lbs of groceries - nice!
  • 10.
  • 11.  
  • 13. The moral of this story? Donors are doing it for themselves!
  • 14.
  • 15. So… what is our role in all this?
  • 17. Within the 4-Cs of social network fundraising Our new role… Community Commodity Cause Impact Content
  • 18.
  • 19. One social network to rule them all? http://www.buzzpoint.com/
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24. One social network to rule them all? http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/23/modeling-the-real-market-value-of-social-networks/ Netherlands Hyves, MySpace, Hi5, Facebook Italy MySpace, Badoo, Hi5, Facebook Germany MySpace, Piczo, Facebook, Hi5 France Skyroc, MySpace Facebook Brazil Orkut, Sonico, Multiply, MySpace, Australia Facebook, MySpace, Bebo India Orkut, Facebook, Hi5, MySpace Not quite yet…
  • 25.
  • 26. The second ‘C’ = Commodity Commodity Vs
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30. Getting to know the new breed
  • 31.
  • 32. Getting to know the new breed Online activities
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41. Getting to know the new breed Advocacy
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48. Is this your first online donation?
  • 49. Which gender is giving more?
  • 50. What’s the spread of ages by gender?
  • 51. How much do people donate online?
  • 52. Donation share vs revenue share
  • 53. Key stats 25% Percentage (in revenue) that comes from donors over 45 who donate more than £50 Percentage (in revenue) that comes from donors over 55 33% Percentage (in revenue) that comes from donors over 65 11%
  • 54. Donation spread by age and gender
  • 55. Donation spread by age and gender
  • 56. How do you help these people? accessible targeted advertise user-friendly integrate online/offline email
  • 57. What was the source of the donation ask?
  • 58. Let’s look at the trends...
  • 59. Is email use increasing or decreasing? http://icanhaz.com/emailstats
  • 60. Do the tools used vary depending on age?
  • 61.
  • 62. Who is using Facebook Connect?
  • 64. Who is using Facebook Connect?
  • 65. Community fundraising through Twitter http://twitter.com/serafinowicz/status/1321093848
  • 66. Community fundraising through Twitter 14% of referrals on 13 th March to JustGiving were from Twitter www.justgiving.com/peterserafinowicz
  • 67. Fundraising through Twitter – micro donations 1,106 donations £4.86 average Current total: £5,396.07
  • 68. So what does this all mean? Different segments require different channels, as well as different messages Ignore your older online donors at your peril Newsfeeds are the single most valuable real estate on Facebook for charities Test online donation prompts by age and gender (as well as RFV) Email is still the king of comms for many people online The new breed of social media fundraisers is growing in importance
  • 69. The moral of this story? Donors are doing it for themselves!
  • 70. The 365 Challenge www.365challenge.co.uk & @365er
  • 71. This is Colin’s story “ In 2007, I was diagnosed with a soft tissue sarcoma and underwent surgery, followed by radiotherapy. Then in 2008, my sister, Brenda Carr, died after a long battle with breast cancer. Following on from this, I knew that I wanted to raise money to support Cancer Research UK, because I felt that they were supporting important work in the fight to overcome cancer.”
  • 73. Colin’s strategy “ With a group, I found that I could engage with a target audience who had expressed an interest in what I was doing – what any advertiser dreams of, really!”
  • 75. What would’ve helped Colin guidance on how following someone can give you access to their followers too changing your Facebook status regularly and using these status updates and tweets to draw people in, teasing them into reading more … an explanation of what Twitter is all about tips on keeping your message out there – how regular blog updates can be tweeted about so others get to know that you’ve written something new, more guidance on how FB can be exploited
  • 76. The new breed “ As I posted Tweets about hitting milestones or new blogs, these connections were Re-Tweeting them, and my message spread further and further.” “ These enthusiastic strangers... I now count as supporters and friends”
  • 77.

Editor's Notes

  1. How
  2. How
  3. How
  4. How
  5. How
  6. How
  7. At CRUK we are incredibly fortunate to be supported by a generous and very diverse range of supporters, with some 2million+ giving us some form of financial support over the last couple of years - from traditional cash appeals, direct debits, legacy donations, etc. to 750k women taking part in our Race for Life 5k sponsored event and all manner of other activities.
  8. At CRUK we are incredibly fortunate to be supported by a generous and very diverse range of supporters, with some 2million+ giving us some form of financial support over the last couple of years - from traditional cash appeals, direct debits, legacy donations, etc. to 750k women taking part in our Race for Life 5k sponsored event and all manner of other activities.
  9. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  10. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  11. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  12. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  13. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  14. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  15. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  16. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  17. At CRUK we are incredibly fortunate to be supported by a generous and very diverse range of supporters, with some 2million+ giving us some form of financial support over the last couple of years - from traditional cash appeals, direct debits, legacy donations, etc. to 750k women taking part in our Race for Life 5k sponsored event and all manner of other activities.
  18. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  19. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  20. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  21. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  22. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ Recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising, according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries. Ninety percent or consumers surveyed noted that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70 percent trusted consumer opinions posted online. “ The explosion in Consumer Generated Media over the last couple of years means consumers’ reliance on word of mouth in the decision-making process, either from people they know or online consumers they don’t, has increased significantly,” says Jonathan Carson, President of Online, International, for the Nielsen Company.” However, in this new age of consumer control, advertisers will be encouraged by the fact that brand websites are trusted at that same 70 percent level as online consumer opinions. Carson adds, “We see that all forms of advertiser-led advertising, except ads in newspapers, have also experienced increases in levels of trust and it’s possible that the CGM revolution has forced advertisers to use a more realistic form of messaging that is grounded in the experience of consumers rather than the lofty ideals of the advertisers.” Brands Gaining Global Trust… In Some Regions More Than Others In the two years the biannual study has been conducted, brand sponsorship has seen the greatest increase in levels of trust from 49 percent of Internet consumers in April 2007 to 64 percent in April 2009. Regionally, Latin American countries lead the way with 81 percent of both Colombian and Venezuelan Internet consumers and 79 percent of Brazilians trusting brand sponsorships. In contrast, sponsorships hold the least sway amongst Swedish (33 percent), Latvian (36 percent) and Finnish online consumers (38 percent). In comparison, 72 percent of United States Internet consumers trust brand sponsorships, placing the United States 12th out of the 50 countries represented in the survey. Brand websites, globally the most trusted form of advertiser-led advertising, hold the greatest sway in China (82 percent). Following China are Pakistan (81 percent) and Vietnam (80 percent). However, brand websites tend to be trusted least amongst Swedish (40 percent) and Israeli (45 percent) Internet consumers. In the US, 62 percent of Internet consumers said they trusted brand sponsorships, placing the United States 21st out of the 50 countries surveyed. “ The regional differences provide a clear guide to advertisers as to how they should focus their ad strategy in different countries. It also shows that, despite the authority of word of mouth when it comes to consumer decision-making, advertisers still have a major say in the process. This is backed up by past Nielsen studies which showed that the majority of people posting comments online went to the advertiser website or emailed feedback to the company before they posted. The website, and monitoring feedback through it, is a golden opportunity for advertisers to shape the tone and content of consumer opinion before it reaches the digital masses,” said Carson.
  23. At CRUK we are incredibly fortunate to be supported by a generous and very diverse range of supporters, with some 2million+ giving us some form of financial support over the last couple of years - from traditional cash appeals, direct debits, legacy donations, etc. to 750k women taking part in our Race for Life 5k sponsored event and all manner of other activities. Who we are What we did Why we did it We’re fascinated about data, and the small things that make a big difference. Be that user experience to research. Are there certain profiles who respond better and more positively who respond to different methods? We wanted to find that out. We surveyed a sample of 2,702 of people who gave online, across all different types of charities It’s the biggest online collection of people and causes in the world, we have 10 million users, 1 in 5 of UK internet users, so it’s a unique snapshot of online giving habits. Bryan and I thought – great opportunity to generate some insight into the state of online giving, and who the people are who give This is the start – online donors, and we want to find out more about online fundraisers
  24. We asked donors – is this your first online donation? Like the CR-UK data, the middle age ranges are comfortable and have done this before. BUT – 55-64 range is the second most comfortable There are a lot of people comfortable in giving and transacting online – are you meeting their needs? If you don’t ask them to give online – I’m sure you’ve read about *silver surfers* but are you doing anything about it? Benchmark your own online donors against this. Why are your own groups not as well represented? Would’ve said 25-34 was the biggest repeat donors – but it’s not – by a long way. Hide graph, then show.
  25. What do people in the room think? What’s the traditional model...? Add in blank slide! Not getting into a debate over the battle of the sexes (who earns more), but in terms of profiling and segmentation, have you considered segmenting your ask by gender online?
  26. Basic demographic data for the survey. >64 is the only range with more males – why do you think?
  27. Just say this – key donation stat – avg is £30
  28. What is your donor care strategy – do you differentiate based on age? As people get older, they give more What is the language you use and the channels – offline/online. I don’t think we have the same donor care for online donors as we do for offline – yet Will a clever charity segment a donor care strategy by age. Don’t they have different needs to the younger people? Has anyone done it?
  29. While donors over 45 are under-represented in terms of numbers, they are over-represented in terms of value of donation. Put that another way, there are less of them, but each of them is giving more. 45-80 is a big span, tend to give more. But it’s the over 60s who are giving the highest??? 35-54 is worth 45% 25-54 = 62% revenue So what – how does your website work with older people? Are they targeted? Do you advertise on the sites they use? Is your own site older-people friendly. Is your marcomms strategy integrating online and offline.
  30. Question – how to make this look ok!?! Older people are significantly more likely to donate more. Men have more of a peak in the >50.
  31. Question – how to make this look ok!?! Older people are significantly more likely to donate more. Men have more of a peak in the >50.
  32. So what – how does your website work with older people? Are they targeted? Do you advertise on the sites they use? Is your own site older-people friendly. Is your marcomms strategy integrating online and offline.
  33. Overwhelming majority of people still respond to emails for online donations. To give you some context – here’s JG’s figures. Most comes from email – looking at the last four weeks, 16% comes from FB. 40% of referrals are direct – email. So you need to think of your audience and the tools they use. There’s been a shift from email to FB, but email still rules as a communication method. 2 years ago, FB was significantly less. Anyone replacing email with FB?
  34. Get the most recent charts
  35. Last month suggests the opposite - symbiotic relationship between social media and email. September this year – less than one month ago. Think about it – how do you know you’ve got a FB message, or new comment – or a new follower on twitter – it’s by email!
  36. When you drill into the ages, the clearer patterns emerge. None of them are that much of a surprise – but do you plan your comms or segment by this data. If you’re not using FB – are you missing out on a huge opportunity. We’re fascinated by FB, so I wanted to show you some facts that would be of interest. List the top sources to the JG site – Direct 40% (email), FB 16%, Google 15%
  37. Sources from Facebook to JG. Percentage of referrals from FB home page – 60%. Not interrupting you – it’s in your news feed – what you are interested in Profile is 12% Group is 4% Search is 3% Inbox just 2% If you’re not set up for this, you need to be – it isn’t going away. If you want to engage people online, and you’re not on FB, you’re missing a trick. If you are, and you’re not sending messages, posting to your wall, then you may as well not be on there. 1. /home.php 303,103 59.88% 2. /profile.php 62,070 12.26% 3. /group.php 21,949 4.34% 4. /search/ 19,085 3.77% 5. /inbox/ 12,143 2.40% 6. /photo.php 9,080 1.79% 7. /posted.php 8,015 1.58% 8. /event.php 6,374 1.26% /album.php 5,191 1.03% /inbox/readmessage.php 4,852 0.96%
  38. Who’s using FB connect – who knows what it is?
  39. Find a charity example too. Not just fundraising – campaigning, can be action, participation, engagement.
  40. Who’s using FB connect – who knows what it is?
  41. Average time on page…
  42. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/is-social-media-impacting-how-much-we-email John Smith aged 60 gets the same message, the same ask, the same channel as John Smith aged 30
  43. Introduce the case study and how it links – Colin as an example of a new breed of fundraiser, using socmed tolls and networked fundraising/supporter recruitment theory in practice to reach new supporters. Imagine spending 365 days – a full year – undertaking as many challenges as you can to test yourself to the limit. Maybe not everyone's idea of fun ... but then imagine that across that year, you use those challenges to raise as much money as you can for a very, very good cause. Does that sound better? Add to the mix that you do it in memory of a loved family member, and there aren't many better reasons, are there?
  44. When I launched the 365challenge in August 2008, while I was aware of Facebook, I had rarely used it, and I hadn’t really heard of Twitter. I wanted to use email and the internet as much as possible as I saw this as the way to spread my message. I think somewhere along the way I read, on either/both the CRUK and the JG sites, some tips on using Facebook, so I started to explore this Not having a large group of friends on FB, I saw that I needed to make connections, so started joining groups and sharing thoughts with others who had references things like cancer and CRUK in their writings, and I was able to spread the message slowly this way.
  45. When I launched the 365challenge in August 2008, while I was aware of Facebook, I had rarely used it, and I hadn’t really heard of Twitter. I wanted to use email and the internet as much as possible as I saw this as the way to spread my message. I think somewhere along the way I read, on either/both the CRUK and the JG sites, some tips on using Facebook, so I started to explore this Not having a large group of friends on FB, I saw that I needed to make connections, so started joining groups and sharing thoughts with others who had references things like cancer and CRUK in their writings, and I was able to spread the message slowly this way.
  46. I’ll not claim that this lead to huge donations or a load of people taking the 365challenge (yet), but it allowed me to spread the word and invite people to engage with me online and to pass on the links to their groups of friends on FB too. Ripples spreading outwards, occasionally touching someone whom I’d never have encountered, but who could now share my message or even come on board and want to join me in raising funds for CRUK by taking their own 365challenges … a number of my 365ers fit this profile. And as they have come on board, they’ve created their own FB groups, and so the ripples continue to spread … Twitter was a different matter. Once I did start playing with it, however, firstly following a few celebrities, then searching for key words like cancer or CRUK, I began to see just what a powerful tool this was … http://www.flickr.com/photos/twenty_questions/2808819998
  47. Colin is one in a million – give even the people who wouldn’t think about these things the tools, advice and support they need. Finally, what would have helped me (or maybe got me further along this process sooner than my own efforts did) … maybe more guidance on how FB can be exploited, an explanation of what Twitter is all about and how to use this to connect with like-minded people, guidance on how following someone can give you access to their followers too (okay, they need to follow you back now, but that’ll happen), tips on keeping your message out there – how regular blog updates can be tweeted about so others get to know that you’ve written something new, changing your FB status regularly and using these status updates and tweets to draw people in, teasing them into reading more …
  48. Colin is having a brilliant time. This is user delight – people find running a marathon easy compared to raising money. This is a *good* experience – the kind of thing all websites dream of offering, and you can put people like Colin at the heart of your online strategy and focus on providing the best experiences. I began to follow more people, and as a number of them followed me back, here again I was making connections with like-minded folk, who could spread the word for me on the 365challenge. Looking at who people I was following were following opened more doorways and more connections were made. Twitter was a different matter. Once I did start playing with it, however, firstly following a few celebrities, then searching for key words like cancer or CRUK, I began to see just what a powerful tool this was … Twitter connected me with people who have sponsored me, who have taken the 365challenge on themselves and/or who have promoted the 365challenge on my behalf. These are people who I would NEVER have encountered otherwise, and the connections made will be invaluable both to me and the 365challenge and to CRUK, as this concept is going to grow, partly helped by these enthusiastic strangers, many of whom I now count as supporters and friends, some of whom have gone out of their way to join me in some of my adventures.