Click here for the presentation "Mobility: No Turning Back" by David Meckley, IIDA, CIA, LEED AP, Principal/Lead Designer at Huntsman Architectural Group. This presentation was given at our "Hoteling, Real Estate & the Evolution of Facilities" Monthly Program

1. Mobility: No Turning Back
Hoteling, Real Estate & the Evolution of Facilities
Nancy Kay Ludlow CID: PG & E Corporate Real Estate
David Meckley IIDA CID LEEP AP: Huntsman Architectural Group
IFMA-SF OCTOBER 2011

2. It’s no longer Hoteling
but MOBILITY
drop-in, touchdown,
is the norm

3. Why
Internet access easily accessible available via
hardware
Social acceptability
Smart phone, Tablet and Laptop and Cloud computing
has made collaboration easier
Software - easily available to consumer
smart phone apps, Skype
Reservation system costly, speed to use by adoption
and ad-hoc agreements
Some corporate culture hoteling has a negative
connotation
• Mobility the norm

4. Case Study 1
Pharma Company
Change all directed from global offices
Lack of space-Aging portfolio, based on
private offices, the economic downturn
restricted portfolio growth, any space
directed to the GMP
The demand for real time collaboration -
between Scientist, Process engineers and
increase speed to market for drug
Flex space required in the R&D
High occupancy, need for collaboration
Too noisy at facility to focus on heads-
down work
Gen X demographics
Not hoteling drop in- first come first serve
Mobility Scenarios
• 3 Case Studies

5. Case Study 2
IT Company
Demo product, increase collaboration
reduce costs
Showcase the product in the workplace
demonstrating the family of products and
how that would impact how people work
Increase collaboration
Minimize expansion
Minimize managing space reduce operations
services
Sets new industry standards leveraging
field offices success implementing into large
sites
Mobility Scenarios
• 3 Case Studies

6. Case Study 3
Utility company
Adopt by work group management style
Aging real estate portfolio
Minimal investment of technology
Limited dollars for investment in reconfigurations
Poor commutes because of the urban and suburban
sprawl
Must change culture to survive and serve
Adhoc- no investment in metrics
Mobility Scenarios
• 3 Case Studies

7. Mobility is what we do now
Permission and expectations need to be
established
Transition of manage space what we have
now and what it will ultimately look like
Speed to use occurs faster than funding
• Summary

8. Corporate Reaction
to
Mobile Staff

9. • No Official Policy
In de”Nile”
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff

10. o No Official Policy
• Loss of Control
• Security Risk
• Cultural Divide
• Staff Attraction & Retention
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff

11. o Alternative Spaces
• Satellites
• Rented Amenities
• Hot Spots
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff

12. Rented Amenities
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Alternative Locations

13. Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Alternative Locations

14. Hot Spots
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Alternative Locations

15. o Touchdown Zones
• Beyond Hoteling Spots
• Places to be seen, relax, eat –
impromptu meetings
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff

16. Kaiser Permanente
Oakland, California
71% of workplace knowledge is shared casually
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Touchdown Zones

17. Kaiser Permanente
Oakland, California
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Touchdown Zones

18. o Home Base
• Small Assigned Personal Spaces
• Hive & Pollinate
• Emphasis on Shared Environments
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff

19. Google
Zurich, Switzerland
47% of Google facilities are devoted to shared
spaces compared to 21% in traditional offices
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Home Bases

20. Google
Zurich, Switzerland
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Home Bases

21. Google
Zurich, Switzerland
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Home Bases

22. Google
Zurich, Switzerland
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Home Bases

23. o Free Addressing
• Advanced Mobile Technology
• Entrepreneurial Culture
• Managerial Training
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff

24. Macquarie Bank
Sydney, Australia
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Free Addressing

25. Macquarie Bank
Sydney, Australia
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Free Addressing

26. Macquarie Bank
Sydney, Australia
Corporate Reaction to Mobile Staff
• Free Addressing

27. Implications
for
Facilities

28. o More Open
• Panel – What Panel?
• Access to natural light
• See and be seen -
Implications for Facilities

29. Steelcase Knoll
Allsteel
Panel – What Panel ?!?!
Implications for Facilities
• More Open

30. o Smaller Footprints
• Offices typically 10’ x 12’
• Workstations typically 6’ x 8’
• Shallower worksurfaces
• Layered Storage
• Reduced Storage
• Elimination of Guest Chair
Implications for Facilities

31. 150 SF 110 SF
Thomas Wiesel Partners
Contango KPMG Kimball
Implications for Facilities
• Smaller Footprint

32. Contango
Service Source
64 SF 48 SF
Allsteel
Implications for Facilities
• Smaller Footprint

33. o Increased Flexibility
• Adjustable
Sit to Stand
User configurable
• Adaptable
Variable Width
Shared Spaces
Implications for Facilities

34. Steelcase Steelcase
Steelcase
Steelcase Kristalia
Implications for Facilities
• Adaptable

35. Steelcase
Steelcase Resource & Design
Implications for Facilities
• Adaptable

36. Allsteel
2011 Guest Seating !
Steelcase
Implications for Facilities
• Adaptable

37. o Work/Home Lines Blur
• Comfort of home at office
• Change with fashion
• Cost vs. Quality
Implications for Facilities

38. West Elm
Steelcase
Buzzispace
Anthropologie Anthropologie Steelcase
Implications for Facilities
• Blurring of the Lines

39. Dolby Laboratories
Implications for Facilities
• Blurring of the Lines

40. Discussion
Topics

41. • Ergonomics
• Security
• Loyalty & Culture
• Economics
• Discussion Topic