SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 256
2016 STATE OF THE
COMMUNITY
DATA BOOK
Our Presenting Sponsor
Special Thanks To…
• Town of Chapel Hill
• Carolina Demography
• Orange County Board of
Health
• Chapel Hill-Orange County
Visitors Bureau
• Orange Water & Sewer
Authority (OWASA)
• Orange Chatham
Association of REALTORS
• Orange County Department
of Environment, Agriculture,
Parks and Recreation
• Orange County Tax
Administration
• Home Builders of Durham,
Orange & Chatham
Counties
• University of North Carolina
• Durham Tech
• GoTriangle
Town of Chapel Hill
Assessed Value Per Acre
Urban3
Demographics:
Who We Are
Population Growth
Jurisdiction 2010 2014 Pop Growth Growth Rate
Orange
County
133,702 140,420 +6,718 5.0% (~1.2% PY)
Hillsborough 6,087 6,388 +301 4.9% (~1.2% PY)
Carrboro 19,582 20,984 +1,402 7.2% (~1.8% PY)
Chapel Hill 57,233 59,376 +2,143 3.7% (~0.9% PY)
North
Carolina
9,535,691 9,943,964 +408,273 4.3% (~1.1% PY)
U.S. Census Bureau
U.S. Census Bureau
Population Growth
116,016
140,402
17,668 20,984
48,038
59,376
5,513 6,388
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Orange County Carrboro Chapel Hill Hillsborough
549 666
1,393
2,769
3,861
5,344
10,570
14,176
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
Total Chatham County Population Increase
by Decade
U.S. Census Bureau
Chatham County Percent Population Increase
by Decade
2.3% 2.7%
5.5%
10.3%
13.1%
16.0%
27.3%
28.7%
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
U.S. Census Bureau
Total Orange County Population Increase By
Decade
1,901
11,363
8,535
14,737
19,348
16,796
24,376
15,574
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
U.S. Census Bureau
Orange County Percent Population Increase by
Decade
9.0%
49.3%
24.8%
34.3% 33.5%
21.8%
26.0%
13.2%
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
U.S. Census Bureau
Sources of 2014’s 1,055 Population Increase in
Orange County
1269
-738
-249
770
Total: 1,055
-1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000
Est Births
Est Deaths
Est Domestic Migration
Est International Migration
Est Net Population Change
U.S. Census Bureau
Minority Races by Municipality
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
10.1% 9.7%
29.5%
12.2%
22.0%
8.2%
11.9%
1.7%
7.3%
2.5%
13.8%
6.4% 6.6%
8.2% 8.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Carrboro Chapel Hill Hillsborough Orange County North Carolina
Black Asian Hispanic or Latino
Orange County Population by Race
80.0%
70.8%
15.8% 12.2%
2.5%
2.5%1.4%
8.4%
2.5% 7.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
1990 2000 2010 2014
White African American
Two or More Races Latino/Hispanic
U.S. Census Bureau
Orange County Population by Race
U.S. Census Bureau
15.8%
12.2%
2.5% 2.5%
1.4%
8.4%
2.5%
7.7%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
1990 2000 2010 2014
African American Two or More Races Latino/Hispanic Asian
High School Degree or Higher
50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
90.7%
94.7%
84.9%
91.0%
84.9%
86.0%
United States North Carolina Orange County
Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
Bachelors Degree or Higher
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
65.1%
73.9%
36.5%
55.8%
27.3%
28.8%
United States North Carolina Orange County
Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
Orange County Population Projections
77,055
93,851
115,531
133,801
160,306
192,243
230,770
277,307
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1980
Census
1990
Census
2000
Census
2010
Census
2020
Projected
2030
Projected
2040
Projected
2050
Projected
2014 Estimate: 140,420
Orange County State of the Environment (U.S. Census
Bureau and Orange County Planning)
Municipal Population Projections
19,582
51,749
54,397
113,930
6,087
12,538
1,793
42,308
51,942
56,782
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1980
Census
1990
Census
2000
Census
2010
Census
2020
Projected
2030
Projected
2040
Projected
2050
Projected
Carrboro
Chapel Hill (within Orange Co.)
Hillsborough
Mebane (within Orange County)
Unincorporated Areas
Orange County State of the Environment (U.S. Census
Bureau and Orange County Planning)
Population Density –
People Per Square Mile (2010)
336
936
357
93
1,079
213
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Orange Durham Co. Alamance Chatham Wake Johnston
U.S. Census Bureau
Municipal Population Density (pp/mi2)
3,108
2,785
1,148
141
335
4,897
3,936
1,617
175
479
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Carrboro Chapel Hill (in
Orange)
Hillsborough Unincorporated Orange County
2010 Census 2020 Projected 2030 Projected
U.S. Census Bureau and Orange County Planning
College Town
Population Density (pp/mi2) 2010
4,246
4,116
4094
3,948
3,472
3,108
3,037
2,710
3,936
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Charlottesville (VA)
Burlington (VT)
Ann Arbor (MI)
Boulder (CO)
Bloomington (IN)
Carrboro (NC)
Madison (WI)
Chapel Hill (NC)
Chapel Hill 2030
U.S. Census Bureau
Housing:
Where We Live
Hillsborough,
1%
Carrboro, 1.4%
Chapel Hill, 5%
Rest of Orange
92.6%
Urban3
Orange County Land Distribution
Location of Orange County Housing Units
9,258 (16%)
2,593 (5%)
22,254 (40%)
21,492 (39%)
Carrboro Hillsborough Chapel Hill Rest of County
U.S. Census Bureau
Number of Single and Multi Family Homes
Sold in Orange County
Triangle Multiple Listing Services
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
1,886
1,126
1,628
1,437
1,653
Orange County Average Residential
Closing Price
Triangle Multiple Listing Services
$200,000
$220,000
$240,000
$260,000
$280,000
$300,000
$320,000
$340,000
$360,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
$342,740
$317,847
$331,251
$342,172
2015 Average Residential Closing
Price per Square Foot
Triangle Multiple Listing Services
$107
$118
$138
$142
$157
$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180
Durham
Wake
Chatham
Orange
CHCCS Dist
Percent Change in Residential Closing
Price Per Square Foot 2013 to 2015
Triangle Multiple Listing Services
5.9%
6.3%
9.5%
-4.7%
2.6%
-6.0% -4.0% -2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
Durham
Wake
Chatham
Orange
CHCCS Dist
2015 Average Home Price by Location
Triangle Multiple Listing Services
$208,405
$286,590
$359,213
$342,172
$382,659
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
$450,000
Durham Wake Chatham Orange CHCCS Dist
Percent Housing Non-Owner Occupied
51.4%
62.6%
42.4%
39.7%
34.2%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%
Chapel Hill
Carrboro
Hillsborough
Orange County
North Carolina
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
Orange County Housing Units by Gross
Rent (2014)
328
794
3,529
7,085
5,419
2,277
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Less than $299
$300 to $499
$500 to $749
$750 to $999
$1,000 to $1,499
$1,500 or more
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
Percent of Orange County Housing By
Gross Rent
1.8%
6.1%
31.6%
37.2%
15.9%
7.5%
1.7%
4.1%
18.2%
36.5%
27.9%
11.7%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%
Less than $299
$300 to $499
$500 to $749
$750 to $999
$1,000 to $1,499
$1,500 or more
2010-2014 (19,432) 2005-2009 (18,966)
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
Percent of Municipal Units Affordable to Renters
Earning 80% of Municipal Median Income
73.7%
67.6%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Chapel Hill (Rent < $1252)
Carrboro (Rent < $1026)
U.S Census Bureau
Number of Units Affordable in Each Municipality to
Renters Earning 80% of Municipal Median Income
7,453
3,653
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
Chapel Hill (Rent < $1252)
Carrboro (Rent < $1026)
U.S Census Bureau
Orange Co. Gross Rent as a Percent of Household
Income (2010-14 Estimate v. 2005-09 Estimate)
U.S Census Bureau
19.34%
21.48%
12.64%
8.94%
37.60%
21.41%
25.82%
13.90%
8.69%
30.18%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Less than 20 percent
20 to 29.9 percent
30 to 39.9 percent
40.0 to 49.9 percent
50.0 percent or more
2010-2014 2005-2009
Orange County Extremely Low Income (ELI)
(Less Than 30% of Median Income)
1,839
1,766
1,022
5,891
7,062
6,026
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
2000
2005-07
2011-13
ELI Households ELI Units
< $20,300
< $18,700
< $21,400
Urban Institute
Residential Units per 100 ELI Households
31
39
31
31
25
34
25
29
17
23
18
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Wake
2011-13
2005-07
2000
Urban Institute
Percent of Households with Severe
Housing Problems
17
17
16
19
20
15
0 5 10 15 20 25
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Segregation Index (black/white)
51
41
33
41
26
42
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Transportation and
Commuting
2014 Orange County Commuting
42,696 Live outside Orange County and drive in for work
35,545 Live in Orange County and drive out of the county for work
19,611 Live in Orange County and work in Orange County
U.S. Census Bureau
U.S Census
Bureau
Orange County, NC
U.S Census Bureau
U.S. Census Bureau
2014 Chapel Hill Commute Inflow/Outflow
Chapel Hill Commute Inflow/Outflow
U.S Census Bureau
Carrboro Commute Inflow/Outflow
U.S. Census Bureau
Carrboro Commute Inflow/Outflow
U.S. Census Bureau
3,213
31,983
0 25,000 50,000
Orange & Chatham
combined to RTP
Between Orange
and Durham
U.S. Census Bureau (ACS, 2009-13), Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (2013)
Number of Daily Commuters by County
Orange County Residents’ Commuting
U.S. Census Bureau
35.6%
45.10%
64.4%
54.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
2014201320122011201020092008200720062005200420032002
Live and Work Here Live Here and Work Somewhere Else
Orange County Employee Commuting
U.S. Census Bureau
31.5%
41.70%
68.5%
58.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2014201320122011201020092008200720062005200420032002
Employed and Living in the Selection Area
Employed in the Selection Area but Living Outside
Orange Commute Change 2010 to 2014
U.S. Census Bureau
39,540
33,850
20,622
42,696
35,545
19,611
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Driving Into Orange for
Work
Driving Out of Orange for
Work
Live and Work in Orange
2010 2014
Orange Commuting to Primary Jobs
6,151 6,969
3,151
10,445
14,337
6,275
18,949
21,390
10,185
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Drive out for work Drive in for work Live and work here
<$15,000 $15,000-$40,000 > $40,000
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
Orange Commuting to Primary Jobs
17.3% 16.3% 16.1%
29.4% 33.6% 32.0%
53.3% 50.1% 51.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
<$15,000 $15,000-$40,000 > $40,000
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
Orange County Young Worker (< 29 yo)
Commuting (2014)
U.S. Census Bureau
9,277
6,636
4,859
9,226
6,747
3,390
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Driving Into Orange for
Work
Driving Out of Orange for
Work
Live and Work in Orange
2005 2014
Percent Change in Young Workers (< 29 yo)
Commuting Between 2010 and 2014
-0.5% 1.7%
-30.2%
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
Driving Into Orange for
Work
Driving Out of Orange for
Work
Live and Work in Orange
U.S. Census Bureau
Distribution of UNC Chapel Hill’s
11,964 employees by home address
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
5,717
2,310
1,405
1,081
629
573
77
73
65
24
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Orange
Durham
Wake
Alamance
Chatham
Other
Person
Lee
Guilford
Randolph
An increase
of 68 (1.2%)
Percent Distribution of UNC Chapel Hill’s 11,964
employees by home address
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
47.8%
19.3%
11.7%
9.0%
5.3%
4.8%
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
Orange
Durham
Wake
Alamance
Chatham
Other
Person
Lee
Guilford
Randolph
Granville
Up from
47.1%
Percent of Workers Driving Alone
81
82
76
76
68
80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Percent of Workers Driving Alone on a Long
Commute (30+ Min)
31
31
44
24
30
31
0 10 20 30 40 50
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Chapel Hill Transit Ridership (millions)
Chapel Hill Transit
5.27
7.23
6.94
6.73
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
GoTriangle Ridership (Millions)
GoTriangle (formerly Triangle Transit)
0.71
1.14
1.84
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
Employment and
Income
Unemployment Over Time
NC Department of Commerce
2.9
6.6
5.0
3.2
6.6
4.5
4.7
10.9
5.7
1.0
3.0
5.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Chapel Hill Orange County North Carolina
Chapel Hill Residents Employed
NC Department of Commerce
25,928
26,432
25,829
26,187 26,143
27,028
27,337
27,800
28,488
24,000
24,500
25,000
25,500
26,000
26,500
27,000
27,500
28,000
28,500
29,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
NC Department of Commerce
65,724
66,952
65,481 65,332 65,617
67,759
68,779
69,942
71,673
62,000
63,000
64,000
65,000
66,000
67,000
68,000
69,000
70,000
71,000
72,000
73,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Orange County Residents Employed
Unemployed Individuals
NC Department of Commerce
1,836
1,506
4,617
3,358
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Chapel Hill Orange County
Per Capita Personal Income (2014)
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
#1 Orange $52,989
#2 Chatham $51,593
#3 Wake $49,695
#8 Durham $42,830
NC Average $39,171
#42 Alamance
$34,801
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Percent Change in Per Capita Income
Between 2009 to 2014
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
12.7%
11.7%
11.0%
5.3%
14.4%
12.1%
14.2%
11.8%
10.8%
20.4%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Johnston
Mecklenburg
North Carolina
Orange
Person
Randolph
Wake
Per Capita Personal Income 1969-2014
$39,646
$45,018
$52,339
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
North Carolina Durham Chapel Hill MSA Orange County
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Median vs. Per Capita Income (2013)
$33,840
$36,391
$41,376
$52,339
$53,336
$46,097
$43,043
$49,711
$51,853
$55,569
$57,091
$66,006
20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000
Alamance
Johnston
Durham
Orange
Chatham
Wake
Median Household Income Per Capita Income
U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Income Inequality Ratio (80%:20%)
4.8
4.6
4.9
4.9
6.1
4.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Indicators of
Poverty
Percent of Persons Living Below
Poverty Level
17.9%
15.5%
23.1%
17.0%
22.2%
0
5
10
15
20
25
North Carolina Orange County Chapel Hill Carrboro Hillsborough
U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2013 Four Year Estimate
Percent of People Living in Poverty
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
11.0%
13.0%
15.0%
17.0%
19.0%
21.0%
23.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake
U.S Census Bureau
Orange County Food and Nutrition Services
Active Cases (Formerly Food Stamps)
NC Division of Social Services
2,903
3,037
3,526
4,600
5,466
6,078
6,320
6,533
5,756
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
Apr-07
Sep-07
Feb-08
Jul-08
Dec-08
May-09
Oct-09
Mar-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jun-11
Nov-11
Apr-12
Sep-12
Feb-13
Jul-13
Dec-13
May-14
Oct-14
Mar-15
Aug-15
Jan-16
Orange County Food and Nutrition Services
Active Cases (Formerly Food Stamps)
NC Division of Social Services
6,525
6,309
6,199 6,087
5,756
5,200
5,400
5,600
5,800
6,000
6,200
6,400
6,600
Food Insecure People
20,900 25,450
7,750
50,380
133,460
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Wake
Feeding America
Food Insecurity Rate
18.3%
15.4%
16.7%
12.0%
18.2%
14.4%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
North
Carolina
Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Wake
Feeding America
Percent of Children in Poverty
24
24
21
22
13
14
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
24.4%
21.0%
22.2%
13.1%
14.3%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake
Percent of Children in Poverty
U.S Census Bureau
Orange County Children in Poverty
U.S Census Bureau
2,897
3,879
4,822 4,627
4,258
3,820
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Percent of Students Eligible for Free
and Reduced Lunch
47
48
42
55
27
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Percent of K-12 Students Enrolled in
Free and Reduced Lunch
NC Dept of Public Instruction
46.0%
59.7%
44.0%
53.5%50.6%
66.3%
32.6%
43.3%
21.7%
28.2%
33.7%
37.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Alamance Chatham Durham Orange: OCS Orange: CHCCS Wake
Percent of CHCCS Elementary Students
Receiving Free and Reduced Lunch
N.C Dept of Public Instruction
43%
41%
26%
31%
29%
51%
29%
33%
29%
26%
32%
10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55%
Northside Elementary
Carrboro Elementary
Elizabeth Seawell Elem
Ephesus Road Elementary
Estes Hills Elementary
Frank P Graham Elementary
Glenwood Elementary
C and L McDougle Elem
Mary Scroggs Elementary
Morris Grove Elementary
Mel and Zora Rashkis Elem
2012-13 2013-14
N.C Dept of Public Instruction
Percent of Orange County Schools Elem
Students Receiving Free and Reduced Lunch
37%
83%
65%
42%
17%
59%
49%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Cameron Park Elementary
Central Elementary
Efland Cheeks Elementary
Grady Brown Elementary
Hillsborough Elementary
New Hope Elementary
Pathways Elementary
2012-13 2013-14
Percent of K-12 School Children Receiving
Free and Reduced Lunch
32.6%
43.3%
21.7%
28.2%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Orange County CHCCS
NC Department of Public Instruction
The Nonprofit
Employment Sector and
Charitable Giving
Number of 501 (c)3 Nonprofits Filing 990s
83
485
107
303
1,370
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Chatham Durham Johnston Orange Wake
NC Center for Nonprofits
Average Annual Wages for Nonprofit Employees
$50,666
$28,869
$56,585
$28,082
$58,850
$42,470
$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000
Triangle Area *
Chatham
Durham
Johnston
Orange
Wake
Orange Average Wage $53,445
NC Center for Nonprofits
Total Nonprofit Employment
1,681
42,373
1,537
29,808
34,766
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Chatham Durham Johnston Orange Wake
NC Center for Nonprofits
Nonprofit Employment as
% of Total Employment
13.27%
11.72%
22.96%
3.63%
46.59%
7.38%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Triangle Area *
Chatham
Durham
Johnston
Orange
Wake
NC Center for Nonprofits
Orange County Nonprofits
Orange County Registered
Nonprofits
735
Orange County 501(c)3 Orgs
Filing 990s
333
Annual Revenue of Orange
County 501(c)3s
$5.2 billion
Assets of Orange county
501(c)3s
$933 million
Urban Institute
2013 Individual Adjusted Gross Income
Reported ($1000s)
$5,783,274
$34,667,417
$7,461,236
$1,137,747
$3,299,617
0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000
Orange County, NC
Wake County, NC
Durham County, NC
Chatham County, NC
Alamance County, NC
National Center for Charitable Statistics
2013 Itemized Contributions Reported
($1000s)
$133,287
$785,501
$187,549
$25,288
$75,621
0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000
Orange County, NC
Wake County, NC
Durham County, NC
Chatham County, NC
Alamance County, NC
National Center for Charitable Statistics
2013 Dollars Donated per Tax Return Filed
($1000s)
$2,193
$1,666
$1,426
$1,218
$1,086
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Orange County, NC
Wake County, NC
Durham County, NC
Chatham County, NC
Alamance County, NC
National Center for Charitable Statistics
The Economy
Nominal 2014 County GDP (Billions)
National Association of Counties
$5.0
$25.7
$1.4
$54.8
$5.4
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60
Alamance
Durham
Chatham
Wake
Orange
Chatham County Economic Output
National Association of Counties
Durham County Economic Output
National Association of Counties
Orange County Economic Output
National Association of Counties
Orange County Major Employers
1. UNC Chapel Hill
2. UNC Health Care System
3. Chapel Hill-Carrboro City
Schools
4. Orange County Schools
5. Orange County
6. Town of Chapel Hill
7. Eurosport
8. UNC Physicians Network
9. Wal-Mart
10. General Electric
11. AKG of America
12. Harris Teeter
13. Food Lion
13. Chapel Hill Residential
14. Performance AutoMall
15. PHE Inc.
16. Southern Season
17. Whole Foods
18. Weaver Street Market
19. Residential Services
20. Aramark
21. Carolina Inn
22. The Arc of the Triangle
23. Town of Carrboro
24. Strata Solar
Incubation and Start Up
Opened Facility Size (sq/ft)
Enterprises served in
2015
Mid Way Business
Center
2001 5,000 13
Piedmont Food & Ag
Processing Center
2011 10,400 30
The Cube
(UNC- Campus Y)
2012 1,500 10
LaUNCh Chapel Hill 2013 3,400 18
1789 2013 3,500 50
TOTALS 23,800 sq/ft
121
enterprises
Personal Interviews
Taxes and Revenue
2014 Total Assessed Property Value
(Billions)
$1.92
$6.37
$0.68
$6.64 Carrboro
Chapel Hill
Hillsborough
Rest of Orange
County
TOTAL $15.6 Billion
Orange County Tax Administration
2014 Commercial vs Residential Tax
Base
12.8% 18.5% 15.8%
40.5%
2.9%
4.3% 7.6%
1.2%
84.3%
77.3% 76.6%
58.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Orange County Chapel Hill Carrboro Hillsborough
Commerical Apartments Residential
Orange County Tax Administration
2014 Orange County Commercial
Assessed Value (Millions)
$303.4
$1,176.0
$273.7
$238.4
Carrboro
Chapel Hill
Hillsborough
Rest of Orange
County
Orange County Tax Administration
Orange County Assessed Value
TOTAL $15.6 Billion
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
Commercial Residential Apartment
Rest of Orange County
Hillsborough
Chapel Hill
Carrboro
$1.99 Billion
$451.7 Million
$13.16 Billion
Orange County Tax Administration
Orange County Taxable Sales (Millions)
NC Department of Revenue
$907
$1,422$1,477
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
Orange Co. Gross Sales Tax Collection
(Millions)
NC Department of Revenue
$40.82
$67.84 $70.47
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
Percent Share of Orange County Sales Tax
Revenue Distribution
62%
9%
25%
0%
3% 1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Orange
County
Carrboro Chapel Hill Durham Hillsborough Mebane
NC Department of Revenue
Retail Demand: How It Works
• The average Orange County household spends
$34,229 on retail purchases including food.
• Total Retail Demand is the product of 53,141
households multiplied by the $34,229 in retail
purchase power equaling ~$1.82 billion
• The Retail Gap is delta between demand and
annual retail sales in each county.
2014 Average Local Household Retail
Demand (with Food and Drink)
$23,560
$31,342
$28,247
$25,745
$34,229
$36,238
Alamance County (NC)
Chatham County (NC)
Durham County (NC)
Johnston County (NC)
Orange County (NC)
Wake County (NC)
NC Department of Commerce
2014 Retail Demand vs Retail Sales (Billions)
NC Department of Commerce
$1.8
$0.9
$3.3
$1.5
$1.7
$0.9
$0.8
$3.4
$1.8 $1.9
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
Orange Chatham Durham Alamance Johnston
2014 Total Retail Demand 2014 Retail Sales
Total Retail Gap (Millions)
(with Food and Drink)
NC Department of Commerce
$727.9
$235.8
$375.8
($153.8) $59.9
$866.5
$133.6
($104.7)
($338.9)
($195.6)
($400,000,000)
($200,000,000)
$0
$200,000,000
$400,000,000
$600,000,000
$800,000,000
$1,000,000,000
Orange
County
Chatham Durham Alamance Johnston
2012 Retail Gap 2014 Retail Gap
Retail Gap Change from 2012 to 2014
(Millions)
$138.6
($102.2)
($480.6)
($185.1)
($255.5)
($600,000,000) ($400,000,000) ($200,000,000) $0 $200,000,000
Orange
Chatham
Durham
Alamance
Johnston
NC Department of Commerce
Orange Retail Gap (Millions)
NC Department of Commerce
$233
$205
$82
$82
$77
$41
$30
$30
$20
($7)
($50) $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250
General Merchandise Stores
Motor Vehicles Parts and Dealers
Food and Beverage Stores
Health and Personal Care Stores
Clothing/Accessories Stores
Electronics and Appliance Stores
2014 Retail Gap: Furniture/Home…
Gasoline Stations
Sports/Hobby/Book/Music Stores
Food Services & Drinking Places
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
Sales Tax Revenue Per Capita
2012 and 2013
NC Department of Revenue
$109
$135
$129
$192
$153
$126
$148
$135
$128
$210
$152
$129
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Johnston Wake
Sales Tax Revenue Per Capita
John Locke Foundation
$117.56
$147.95
$116.37
$135.04
$133.74
$127.95
$162.23
$210.19
$129.31
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
2010 2011 2012 2013
Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Wake
Sales Tax Per Capita Rankings
John Locke Foundation
42
55
53
19
61
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2010 2011 2012 2013
Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Wake
2013 Per Capita Income Rank vs
Per Capita Retail Sales Rank
John Locke Foundation
12
2
19
42
051015202530354045
Durham
Orange
Per Capita Income
Rank
Percapital Retail
Sales Rank
Cost of Living
Cost of Living - Composite Index
(100=US Average)
Chapel Hill, 103.6
Durham, 88.7
Raleigh, 90.5
Madison, 104.5
Ann Arbor, 95.3
Boulder , 109.6
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Council for Community and Economic Research
Chapel Hill, 114.1
Durham, 70.8 Raleigh, 72.4
Madison, 111.2
Ann Arbor, 90.8
Asheville, 97.2
Boulder , 130.2
65
75
85
95
105
115
125
135
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Council for Community and Economic Research
Cost of Living – Housing
(100=US Average)
2013 City and Town Tax Rates
0.33
0.3826
0.494
0.5675
0.675
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Huntersville
Cary
Raleigh
Apex
Asheville
Charlotte
Wilmington
Fayetteville
Concord
Winston-Salem
Chapel Hill
Hickory
Wilson
Greenville
Gastonia
Jacksonville
Monroe
Kannapolis
Durham
Burlington
Rocky Mount
Greensboro
Salisbury
Goldsboro
High Point
NC Department of Revenue
2013 Total of All Jurisdictions Property Tax Rate
0.864
0.9166
1.3119
1.4554
1.5404
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Cary
Raleigh
Apex
Wilmington
Hickory
Huntersville
Asheville
Burlington
Jacksonville
Winston-Salem
Concord
Fayetteville
Greenville
Monroe
Charlotte
Wilson
Rocky Mount
Salisbury
Kannapolis
Durham
Goldsboro
Gastonia
Greensboro
High Point
Chapel Hill
NC Department of Revenue
2013 Property Tax Rates Assessed on Median
House Price
$1,100.00
$1,604.05
$1,819.25
$2,164.64
$2,224.80 $4,898.47
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000
Burlington
Kannapolis
Salisbury
Rocky Mount
Hickory
Winston-Salem
Fayetteville
Monroe
Goldsboro
Wilson
Greenville
Gastonia
Jacksonville
Raleigh
Wilmington
Greensboro
High Point
Charlotte
Asheville
Concord
Durham
Apex
Cary
Huntersville
Chapel Hill
NC Department of Revenue and RealEstate.com
Quality of Life
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
Totally and Partially Protected Lands (Acres)
1,229
4,088
7,784
10,804
12,722 14,473
3,151
5,230
8,613
9,609
10,185
10,174
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Pre-1981 1981-90 1991-2000 2001-04 2005-08 2009-13
Totally Protected Lands Partially Protected Lands
8,250 acre (50%) increase since 2000
#1 Duke University
(5,092 acres)
2014 Orange County State of the Environment
Greenway Trails (miles)
100
26.6
71.3
40
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Raleigh
Durham
Cary
Chapel Hill
Wake County Economic Development
Greenway Trail Miles per 1000 people
0.23
0.09
0.46
0.67
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80
Raleigh
Durham*
Cary**
Chapel Hill
Wake County Economic Development
Park Acreage per 1,000 people
21.55
6.17
11.60
5.37
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
Raleigh
Durham*
Cary
Chapel Hill
Wake County Economic Development
* Durham acreage includes lakes and undeveloped parks.
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
Environment
Air Quality:
Orange County Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector
2009 Orange County State of the Environment Report
Transportation,
49%
Residential, 19%
Commercial/
Institutional, 29%
Solid Waste, 1% Industrial , 2%
Annual Ozone Exceedances
Orange County State of the Environment
Air Pollution and Volatile Organic Compounds
Orange County State of the Environment
Air Pollutants by Source Over Time
Orange County State of the Environment
Water Sales and Accounts
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
CustomerAccounts
WaterSales(MillionGallonsPerDayAverage)
Actual Water Sales Customer Accounts
Reclaimed Water to
UNC begins 2009
OWASA
Monthly Water & Sewer Bills
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
RateIncrease
AverageMonthlyBillBasedon4,000gallons
permonthresidentialcustomer
Average Bill Projected Average Bill Rate Increase Projected Rate Increase
0%
2%
0% 0% 0%
3% 3% 3%
OWASA
Orange County Water Users (MGD)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1997 2002 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012
Mebane MGD Orange-Alamance MGD Hillsborough MGD OWASA MGD
2014 Orange County State of the Environment
Health Behaviors and
Outcomes
2016 Health Indicators
Health Indicator
Orange
County
Chatham
County
Who is #1
Length of Life #1 #7 Orange
Quality of Life #7 #15 Currituck
Health Behaviors #3 #6 Polk
Clinical Care #1 #12 Orange
Social and Economic
Factors
#1 #8 Orange
Physical
Environment
#4 #53 Hyde
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Number of Uninsured
22,338
8,704
39,718
15,650
110,159
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Percent of Adults Smoking
18
19
16
17
17
15
0 5 10 15 20
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Percent of Adults Obese
29
34
27
28
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Percent of of People with Insufficient
Sleep
33
33
29
33
30
30
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Orange County Diagnosis of Asthma
(All Ages) in Hospital Discharges per 100,000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
48
72.7
62.8
45.6
NC State Center on Health Statistics
Orange County Pregnancy Rate
Girls Age 15-17 (per 1000)
NC State Center for Health Statistics
26.1
9.1
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
White Minority Total
Total Orange County Teen Pregnancies (Girls 15-17)
NC State Center for Health Statistics
23
22
26
27
36
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Percent of Births with
Low Birth Weight
9
9
8
9
8
8
7.4 7.6 7.8 8 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.8 9 9.2
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Orange County Infant Mortality Rate
(per 1000 live births)
NC State Center for Health Statistics
12.0
3.4
8.8
7.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Orange County State
Percent of Adults Diabetic
11
11
12
10
8
8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
HIV Prevalence Rate (per 100,000)
327
271
174
656
257
375
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Child Mortality Rate
58
58
40
68
35
48
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Motor Vehicle Mortality Rate
15
12
16
9
9
8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
# Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
23
11
39
19
132
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Percent of Children in Single Parent
Households
36
40
31
42
26
28
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
NC
Alamance
Chatham
Durham
Orange
Wake
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Crime and Safety
Chatham County Crime Index
100 = U.S. Average
94
50
45
49
81
122
72
49
40 60 80 100 120 140
Murder Index
Rape Index
Robbery Index
Assault Index
Property Crime Index
Burglary Index
Larceny Index
Motor Vehicle Theft Index
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Orange County Crime Index
100 = U.S. Average
105
56
51
62
64
51
112
131
111
61
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Total Crime Index
Personal Crime Index
Murder Index
Rape Index
Robbery Index
Assault Index
Property Crime Index
Burglary Index
Larceny Index
Motor Vehicle Theft Index
2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
Property Crime Rate (per 100,000)
State Bureau of Investigation
6,112
3,200
7,427
3,026
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
Chapel Hill Carrboro
Violent Crime Rate (per 100,000)
State Bureau of Investigation
186.5
315.3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Chapel Hill Carrboro
County Property Crime Rates (Per 100,000)
State Bureau of Investigation
4,146
2,854
2,229
1,875
5,918
4,436
3,591
2,140
2,983
2,195
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake
County Violent Crime Rates (Per 100,000)
State Bureau of Investigation
381.2
182.9
675.5
151.1
240.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake
Education
School Size Over Time
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
Total Per Pupil Expense Over Time
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
179
NC Department of Public Instruction
2014 Per Pupil Funding by School District
$5,176
$5,358
$5,411
$5,370
$4,883
$5,027
$5,390
$1,846
$3,195
$3,461
$3,521
$5,514
$2,219
$2,095
0 5,000 10,000 15,000
Alamance-Burlington Schools
Chatham County Schools
Durham County Schools
Orange County Schools
Chapel-Hill/Carrboro City Schools
Wake County Schools
NC Average
PupilState PupilFederal PupilLocal
Total Per Pupil Funding All Sources
$8,029
$9,439
$9,989
$9,602
$10,872
$7,880
$8,477
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
Alamance-Burlington Schools
Chatham County Schools
Durham County Schools
Orange County Schools
Chapel-Hill/Carrboro City Schools
Wake County Schools
NC Average
NC Department of Public Instruction
CHCCS, Orange and NC
4 and 5-Year Graduation Rates (by freshman year)
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
91.0%
94.8%
88.0%87.9%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
CHCCS 4-year CHCCS 5-year OCS 4-year
OCS 5-year NC 4-year NC 5-year
Chatham 4 and 5-Year Graduation Rates
(by Freshman Year)
87.3%
83.5%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
CCS 4-year CCS 5-year NC 4-year NC 5-year
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
School District Dropout Rates
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
2.04%
0.67%
2.39%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
OCS Rate CHCCS Rate NC Rate
Percent of All Students “College
and Career Ready” by School
District Compared to State Average
“College and Career Ready” means to
score Level 4 or above on a 1-5 scale on
End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course
(EOC) test
2015 Percent of All Students "College and
Career Ready" All EOG/EOC Subjects
70.8
50.7
35
47.6
40.2
46.9
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
2015 Percent of All Students "College and
Career Ready" EOG Reading Grade 3
69.2
53.4
35.1
43.5
42.4
46.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
2015 Percent of All Students "College and
Career Ready" EOG Math 8
68.3
41.2
29.1
43.1
27.6
35.8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Students “College and
Career Ready” by Race and
Economic Status Within District
“College and Career Ready” means to
score Level 4 or above on a 1-5 scale on
End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course
(EOC) test
2015 CHCCS Percent “College and Career
Ready” On All EOC/EOG Subjects
77.9
31.7
38
85.4
29.5
0 20 40 60 80 100
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Economically Disadvantaged
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
2015 CHCCS Percent “College and Career
Ready” (4+) on EOG Reading Grade 3
NC Department of Public Instruction
69.2
39
35
85.4
30.9
0 20 40 60 80 100
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Economically Disadvantaged
2015 CHCCS Percent “College and
Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8
78.2
24.3
40.5
80.8
25.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Economically Disadvantaged
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
Percent of CHCCS Middle/High Students
Proficient on End of Course Test
44.3
55.1
93.1
43.0
34.7
0 20 40 60 80 100
Black Students
Hispanic Students
White Students
Economically Disadvantaged
Students with Disabilities
NC Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Students “Proficient” by
Race, Disability and Economic
Status Compared with Surrounding
School Districts and State Average
“Proficient” means to score Level 3 or
above on a 1-5 scale on End of Grade
(EOG) or End of Course (EOC) test
Percent of CHCCS Students “Proficient” on
Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-15)
41.9
47.4
90.2
39.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Black Students Hispanic Students White Students Economically
Disadvantaged
NC Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Chatham Students “Proficient” on
Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015)
34.3 38.1
72.2
38.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Black Students Hispanic Students White Students Economically
DisadvantagedNC Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Economically Disadvantaged Students
“Proficient” on Combined EOG and EOC Scores
(2014-2015)
39.1 38.3
30.9
38.5
41.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina
NC Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Students with Disabilities “Proficient”
on Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015)
32.4
18.2
15.5
19.8 20.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina
NC Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Hispanic Students “Proficient” on
Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015)
47.4
38.1
36.1
42.5
45.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina
NC Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Black Students “Proficient” on
Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015)
41.9
34.3 34.2 34.7
37.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina
NC Department of Public Instruction
Percent of CHCCS Middle/High Students
“Proficient” on End of Course Test
44.3
55.1
93.1
43.0
34.7
39.6
44.6
76.0
43.1
17.7
Black Students
Hispanic Students
White Students
Economically Disadvantaged
Students with Disabilities
Chatham CHCCS
NC Department of Public Instruction
Improvement/Decline of Students
“College and Career Ready” by Race
and Economic Status Between
2013-14 and 2014-15 School Years
“College and Career Ready” means to
score Level 4 or above on a 1-5 scale on
End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course
(EOC) test
Percent of Hispanic Students “College and
Career Ready” on EOG Reading Grade 3
NC Department of Public Instruction
20 25 30 35 40
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
Percent of Hispanic Students “College and
Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8
NC Department of Public Instruction
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
Percent of Black Students “College and
Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8
NC Department of Public Instruction
5 10 15 20 25 30
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
Percent of Black Students “College and Career
Ready” EOG Reading Grade 3
NC Department of Public Instruction
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
2015 CHCCS Percent of White Students “College
and Career Ready” EOG Reading Grade 3
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
2015 CHCCS Percent of White Students “College
and Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
Percent of Economically Disadvantaged
Students “College and Career Ready”
EOG Reading Grade 3
NC Department of Public Instruction
15 20 25 30 35 40
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
Percent of Economically Disadvantaged Students
“College and Career Ready”
EOG Math Grade 8
NC Department of Public Instruction
5 10 15 20 25 30
CHCCS
Orange
Durham
Chatham
Alamance
North Carolina
2014
2015
Percent of Students Meeting UNC’s
Minimum ACT Score Requirements
Percent of Students Who Met the UNC
Minimum ACT Requirements
49.4
62.9
95
48.0 44.948.2 45.4
81.9
53.1
30.0
35.6
40.6
70.9
35.6
18.1
Black Students Hispanic
Students
White Students Economically
Disadvantaged
Students with
Disabilities
CHCCS Chatham Orange
NC Department of Public Instruction
Higher Education
UNC Chapel Hill’s 29,278 Students
Undergraduate,
18,503
Graduate, 8,262
Professional,
2,513
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Fall 2015
UNC Chapel Hill Student Housing
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Resident
Student
Housing, 8,113
Married Student
Housing, 374
Off-Campus,
18,541
Fraternity &
Sorority, 841
Other
University
Affiliated
Housing
(Granville
Towers),
1,215
UNC Student Information - Fall 2015
N %
Headcount 29,084
Full-Time 24,070 82.8%
Part-Time 5,014 17.2%
FTE 26,878
Men 12,514 43.0%
Women 16,570 57.0%
White 18,252 62.8%
African-American 2,353 8.1%
Other* 8,479 29.2%
Undergraduate 18,415 63.3%
Graduate 8,109 27.9%
Professional 2,560 8.8%
In-State 21,153 72.7%
Out-of-State 7,931 27.3%
Number of First-Year Undergraduate 3,946 13.6%
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
UNC Student Enrollment
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
1980,
21,465
1990,
23,852
2000,
24,872
2015,
29,084
15,000
17,000
19,000
21,000
23,000
25,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
Percent Growth of UNC Enrollment
(1.06% Annual Average)
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
0.96
2.50
2.21
1.27
1.97
1.48
1.62
1.51
1.53
1.22
1.64
-0.86
0.48
-0.52
0.03
-0.18%
-1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
UNC’s 12,187 Permanent Employees
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
SPA
6,338
52%
EPA Non-Faculty
2,071
17%
Faculty
3,778
31%
UNC, Chapel Hill Revenues
UNC Chapel Hill Operating Revenues
Student Tuition & Fees, net $395,005,215 13.2%
Patient Services, net $323,700,133 10.8%
Federal Grants & Contracts $716,563,873 24.0%
State & Local Grants & Contracts $17,226,880 0.6%
Nongovernmental Grants & Contracts $106,761,998 3.6%
Sales & Services, net $461,579,399 15.4%
Interest Earnings on Loans $1,167,156 0.0%
Other Operating Revenues $9,280,125 0.3%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES $2,031,284,779 68.0%
UNC Chapel Hill Non-operating Revenues
State Appropriations $479,186,534 16.0%
Non-capital grants – federal student financial
aid
$36,232,220 1.2%
Other non-capital grants $88,596,395 3.0%
Non-capital Gifts, net $155,065,095 5.2%
Net Investment income $195,406,736 6.5%
Federal interest subsidy on debt $2,107,038 0.1%
NET NON-OPERATING REVENUES $956,594,018 32.0%
UNC Chapel Hill TOTAL REVENUES $2,987,878,797
100.0
%
UNC Chapel Hill OIRA
UNC, Chapel Hill Expenses
UNC Chapel Hill Operating Expenses by Function
Instruction $683,793,069 22.9%
Research $714,092,851 23.9%
Public Service $152,660,508 5.1%
Academic Support $110,417,006 3.7%
Student Services $35,845,376 1.2%
Institutional Support $130,905,011 4.4%
Operations & Maintenance $162,016,441 5.4%
Student Financial Aid $119,452,838 4.0%
Auxiliary Enterprises $662,094,175 22.1%
Depreciation $136,492,665 4.6%
GASB 68 Pension Standard
Implementation
$16,913,662 0.6%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES $2,924,683,602 97.7%
Non-Operating Expenses
Interest & Fees on Debt $67,458,622 2.3%
NET NON-OPERATING REVENUES $67,458,622 2.3%
TOTAL REVENUES $2,992,142,224 100.0%
UNC Chapel Hill OIRA
Total UNC Revenues
$2,987,878,797
(FY2015)
$479,186,534
(FY2015)
$0
$500,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$1,500,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$2,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$3,500,000,000
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Total
Revenues
State
Appropriations
$1 Billion
1997
$2 Billion
2006
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
State Appropriations
(FY 2015 UNC Chapel Hill)
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
$479,186,534
$0
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
UNC Chapel Hill Licensed Rev (millions)
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
$3.0 $2.8
$1.5
$2.4
$3.8
$7.9
$3.0
$0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
$8.0
$9.0
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
UNC Campus Gross Square Feet (1000s)
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
7,847
9,639
12,312
18,394
19,536
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
N
University Master Plan – Land Holdings
UNC Chapel Hill Annual Research Funding
(2000-2014)
UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
$792,729,006
$0
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
$700,000,000
$800,000,000
$900,000,000
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
U.S. Patent Applications
(1,946 Since FY2000)
110 115
107
86
105
119
113 109
121
111
132
124 127
153
142
172
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
UNC Office of Technology Development
UNC Chapel Hill Number of U.S. Patents Issues
(549 since FY2000)
UNC Office of Technology Development
57
52
37
34 35
29
32 32
21 22
27
33
31
25
34
48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
UNC Chapel Hill’s 95 Start-Up Companies
UNC Office of Technology Development
5
11
3 3 3
1
6
1
7
1
5
7
9
14
10
9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
Durham Tech
Durham Tech
Durham Tech
Durham Tech
Visitors
2014 Visitor Spending Up in
Orange County, Tourism Impact Highlights
• The travel and tourism industry directly employs nearly 1800 in Orange County.
• Total payroll generated by the tourism industry in Orange County was $33.55
million.
• State and local tax revenues from travel to Orange County amounted to $13.34
million, representing a $95.33 tax saving to each county resident.
• Domestic Visitors spending in Orange County in 2014 was $181.65 million. This
is a $7.75% increase over 2013, which was the largest in North Carolina.
• The Visitors Bureau budget is designed to grow the economy through the tourism
sector.
• Approximately $1 million annually is spent on sales, marketing, publications, a
walk-in Visitors Center, on-line marketing and national travel promotions
designed to turn the spotlight on Orange County.
Source: “2014 Economic Impact of Travel on North Carolina Counties”. Prepared for VisitNC by the U.S. Travel Association.
Chapel Hill/Orange Co. Hotel Occupancy
58.9% 59.6%
64.1%
65.1% 65.4%
69.9% 69.7%
52%
54%
56%
58%
60%
62%
64%
66%
68%
70%
72%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
$107.35
$102.12 $101.61
$104.38
$106.49
69.9%
69.7%
$90.00
$95.00
$100.00
$105.00
$110.00
$115.00
$120.00
$125.00
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Chapel Hill/Orange County Average
Daily Rate
Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
Chapel Hill/Orange Co. Room Revenue
$63.3 $60.9
$65.2
$68.0 $69.6
$79.5
$83.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
RevPAR, or revenue per available room, is a performance metric calculated by
multiplying a hotel's average daily room rate (ADR) by its occupancy rate.
Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
2014 Taxes Generated by Tourists
(in Millions)
$3.88
$9.46
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Local State
2014
• In 2014, visitors to
Orange County
generated $13.34
million in State and
Local Taxes (including
sales, lodging, food &
beverage, gas and
other)
Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
Tourism Spending in Orange County
(In Millions)
$136.30
$144.07
$156.82
$161.60
$168.59
$181.65
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
2015 Town of Chapel
Hill Community Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for singles
and foodies!
• Carrboro was ranked at the top of Livability’s
list of “10 Best Cities for Singles”
• Durham-Chapel Hill is No. 1 'vegetarian city'
in the U.S. according to the Huffington Post
• Chapel Hill named #8 Best College Town in
America for Food & Drink by Thrillist
Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for sports
fans!
• Chapel Hill named one of Four Slam Dunk College
Towns by National Geographic
• Chapel Hill among Best Cities for Baseball Fans by
WalletHub
• Chapel Hill among Best Cities for Soccer Fans by
WalletHub
• Chapel Hill among Best Cities for Sports Fans by
WalletHub
Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for
students!
• Orange County has 9th-best schools in the U.S.
• Multiple UNC-Chapel Hill graduate programs ranked by U.S. News &
World Report
• For the 15th time, UNC-Chapel Hill is ranked #1 best value in public
schools across the country and also #1 for best out-of-state value, a new
category added this year by Kiplinger’s Personal Finance
• Durham-Chapel Hill No. 2 among best U.S. metros for college students
• UNC-Chapel Hill’s campus tops a list of the “21 of the Most Beautiful
College Campuses in America”
Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for
anyone!
• Carrboro ranked one of the top 10 Best Suburbs to Buy a House in
North Carolina
• Carrboro among the Top 100 Best Small Towns in the U.S.
• Chapel Hill is No. 11 on a list of “America's Most Affordable
Places,” published by NerdWallet
• Chapel Hill among the “Most Educated Places in America”
• Chapel Hill’s ranking among Top 100 Best Places to Live
continues to improve
Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for
anyone!
• Chapel Hill is the best North Carolina city for public transportation
and ranks 107th in the nation, according to real estate news site
Redfin
• Chapel Hill rated #1 in Top 10 College Towns You’ll Never Want to
Leave by College Magazine
• Chapel Hill tops the list of the “10 most fun cities in North
Carolina,” according to lifestyle and travel site The Retired Blog
• Orange County is the third-best place in the U.S. to retire,
according to a report by real estate research site FIndTheHome
slideshare.net/carolinachamber
Check the Chamber’s SlideShare
account for the entire presentation.
Connect With Us
Facebook.com/ChapelHillCarrboroChamber
Twitter: @CarolinaChamber
Instagram: @carolinachamber
flickr.com/photos/carolinachamber
LinkedIn: Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber group
carolinachamber.org

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"
A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"
A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"ARCResearch
 
Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...
Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...
Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...West Cork Development Partnership
 
A look at housing in south africa.2018
A look at housing in south africa.2018A look at housing in south africa.2018
A look at housing in south africa.201871point4
 

La actualidad más candente (6)

A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"
A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"
A First Look at Atlanta's 2020 Census Results: Counties and "Up"
 
Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...
Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...
Justin Doran & Lisa Noonan - Census 2011, Interpretation of Data and Trends f...
 
Monthly Employment Summary March 2016
Monthly Employment Summary March 2016Monthly Employment Summary March 2016
Monthly Employment Summary March 2016
 
Domestic tourism survey (DTS), 2015
Domestic tourism survey (DTS), 2015Domestic tourism survey (DTS), 2015
Domestic tourism survey (DTS), 2015
 
2021 Critical Issues Series: Regional Economic Development Forum
2021 Critical Issues Series: Regional Economic Development Forum2021 Critical Issues Series: Regional Economic Development Forum
2021 Critical Issues Series: Regional Economic Development Forum
 
A look at housing in south africa.2018
A look at housing in south africa.2018A look at housing in south africa.2018
A look at housing in south africa.2018
 

Similar a 2016 State of the Community Report Data Book

Williamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of Growth
Williamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of GrowthWilliamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of Growth
Williamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of GrowthCivic Analytics LLC
 
2017 Saratoga County State of the Economy
2017 Saratoga County State of the Economy2017 Saratoga County State of the Economy
2017 Saratoga County State of the EconomyJenniferKelley47
 
Changing Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and Marketing
Changing Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and MarketingChanging Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and Marketing
Changing Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and MarketingAAF Northern Illinois
 
Oregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullen
Oregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullenOregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullen
Oregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullenNeighborhoodPartnerships
 
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16Michael Brazill
 

Similar a 2016 State of the Community Report Data Book (20)

2013 State of the Community Report
2013 State of the Community Report2013 State of the Community Report
2013 State of the Community Report
 
2010 State of the Community
2010 State of the Community2010 State of the Community
2010 State of the Community
 
2018 community data book part 1
2018 community data book part 12018 community data book part 1
2018 community data book part 1
 
Aaron Nelson's 101 Presentation to Leadership on Economic Development & the E...
Aaron Nelson's 101 Presentation to Leadership on Economic Development & the E...Aaron Nelson's 101 Presentation to Leadership on Economic Development & the E...
Aaron Nelson's 101 Presentation to Leadership on Economic Development & the E...
 
2012 State of the Community
2012 State of the Community2012 State of the Community
2012 State of the Community
 
2021 State of the Community Report Presentation
2021 State of the Community Report Presentation2021 State of the Community Report Presentation
2021 State of the Community Report Presentation
 
State of the Community for Chapel Hill 2020
State of the Community for Chapel Hill 2020State of the Community for Chapel Hill 2020
State of the Community for Chapel Hill 2020
 
Leadership 2019 Session #3 "History and Governance" with Chamber President an...
Leadership 2019 Session #3 "History and Governance" with Chamber President an...Leadership 2019 Session #3 "History and Governance" with Chamber President an...
Leadership 2019 Session #3 "History and Governance" with Chamber President an...
 
Leadership 2022, Session 3 - History, Geography, and Governance
Leadership 2022, Session 3 - History, Geography, and GovernanceLeadership 2022, Session 3 - History, Geography, and Governance
Leadership 2022, Session 3 - History, Geography, and Governance
 
Orange County's Housing Crisis
Orange County's Housing CrisisOrange County's Housing Crisis
Orange County's Housing Crisis
 
Williamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of Growth
Williamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of GrowthWilliamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of Growth
Williamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of Growth
 
Leadership 2023, Session 3 - History, Geography, and Governance
Leadership 2023, Session 3 - History, Geography, and GovernanceLeadership 2023, Session 3 - History, Geography, and Governance
Leadership 2023, Session 3 - History, Geography, and Governance
 
2017 State of the Community Report
2017 State of the Community Report2017 State of the Community Report
2017 State of the Community Report
 
2017 Saratoga County State of the Economy
2017 Saratoga County State of the Economy2017 Saratoga County State of the Economy
2017 Saratoga County State of the Economy
 
Leadership 2022, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human Services
Leadership 2022, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human ServicesLeadership 2022, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human Services
Leadership 2022, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human Services
 
Leadership 2019 Session #5 - 101 with Aaron on HHS
Leadership 2019 Session #5 - 101 with Aaron on HHSLeadership 2019 Session #5 - 101 with Aaron on HHS
Leadership 2019 Session #5 - 101 with Aaron on HHS
 
2020 State of the Community Report
2020 State of the Community Report2020 State of the Community Report
2020 State of the Community Report
 
Changing Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and Marketing
Changing Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and MarketingChanging Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and Marketing
Changing Rockford Demographics 2011: The Meaning for Advertising and Marketing
 
Oregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullen
Oregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullenOregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullen
Oregon Economic and Housing Update - Mark McMullen
 
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
 

Más de The Chamber For a Greater Chapel Hill-Carrboro

Más de The Chamber For a Greater Chapel Hill-Carrboro (20)

2024 Economic Forecast Forum Presentation
2024 Economic Forecast Forum Presentation2024 Economic Forecast Forum Presentation
2024 Economic Forecast Forum Presentation
 
Leadership 2023, Session 4, Parliamentary Procedures and Roberts Rules
Leadership 2023, Session 4, Parliamentary Procedures and Roberts RulesLeadership 2023, Session 4, Parliamentary Procedures and Roberts Rules
Leadership 2023, Session 4, Parliamentary Procedures and Roberts Rules
 
Leadership 2023, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human Services
Leadership 2023, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human ServicesLeadership 2023, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human Services
Leadership 2023, Session 4, 101 on Community Health and Human Services
 
Leadership 2023, Session 4 - Homeroom
Leadership 2023, Session 4 - HomeroomLeadership 2023, Session 4 - Homeroom
Leadership 2023, Session 4 - Homeroom
 
2023 Critical Issues Series: Economic Development Forum
2023 Critical Issues Series: Economic Development Forum2023 Critical Issues Series: Economic Development Forum
2023 Critical Issues Series: Economic Development Forum
 
Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro Virtual Information Session
Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro Virtual Information SessionLeadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro Virtual Information Session
Leadership Chapel Hill-Carrboro Virtual Information Session
 
2023 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Outlook Forum
2023 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Outlook Forum2023 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Outlook Forum
2023 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Outlook Forum
 
Summer Careers Academy Employer Information Session (2nd of 2)
Summer Careers Academy Employer Information Session (2nd of 2)Summer Careers Academy Employer Information Session (2nd of 2)
Summer Careers Academy Employer Information Session (2nd of 2)
 
Presentation for Employer Information Session
Presentation for Employer Information SessionPresentation for Employer Information Session
Presentation for Employer Information Session
 
Critical Issues Series: Legislative Forum
Critical Issues Series: Legislative ForumCritical Issues Series: Legislative Forum
Critical Issues Series: Legislative Forum
 
ICV 2022 Delegation Orientation
ICV 2022 Delegation OrientationICV 2022 Delegation Orientation
ICV 2022 Delegation Orientation
 
2022 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Development Forum Presentations
2022 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Development Forum Presentations2022 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Development Forum Presentations
2022 Critical Issues Series: The Economic Development Forum Presentations
 
Inter-City Visit 2022 Virtual Information Session
Inter-City Visit 2022 Virtual Information SessionInter-City Visit 2022 Virtual Information Session
Inter-City Visit 2022 Virtual Information Session
 
Article 46
Article 46Article 46
Article 46
 
Leadership 2022, Session 9, Homeroom
Leadership 2022, Session 9, HomeroomLeadership 2022, Session 9, Homeroom
Leadership 2022, Session 9, Homeroom
 
Leadership 2022 101 on Safety and Equity
Leadership 2022 101 on Safety and EquityLeadership 2022 101 on Safety and Equity
Leadership 2022 101 on Safety and Equity
 
Presentation for Leadership 2022 by Dispute Settlement Center
Presentation for Leadership 2022 by Dispute Settlement CenterPresentation for Leadership 2022 by Dispute Settlement Center
Presentation for Leadership 2022 by Dispute Settlement Center
 
Leadership 2022, Session 8, 101 on Economic and Community Development
Leadership 2022, Session 8, 101 on Economic and Community DevelopmentLeadership 2022, Session 8, 101 on Economic and Community Development
Leadership 2022, Session 8, 101 on Economic and Community Development
 
Leadership 2022 Session 6 - Homeroom
Leadership 2022 Session 6 - HomeroomLeadership 2022 Session 6 - Homeroom
Leadership 2022 Session 6 - Homeroom
 
Leadership 2022 Session 6 on Education and Workforce Development
Leadership 2022 Session 6 on Education and Workforce DevelopmentLeadership 2022 Session 6 on Education and Workforce Development
Leadership 2022 Session 6 on Education and Workforce Development
 

Último

2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis UsageNeil Kimberley
 
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In.../:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...lizamodels9
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03DallasHaselhorst
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Pereraictsugar
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailAriel592675
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptxContemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptxMarkAnthonyAurellano
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfKhaled Al Awadi
 
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfDigital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfJos Voskuil
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024christinemoorman
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaoncallgirls2057
 
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...lizamodels9
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 

Último (20)

2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
 
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In.../:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
 
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information TechnologyCorporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
 
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
 
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptxContemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
 
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfDigital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
 
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
The CMO Survey - Highlights and Insights Report - Spring 2024
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
 
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
 

2016 State of the Community Report Data Book

  • 1. 2016 STATE OF THE COMMUNITY DATA BOOK
  • 3. Special Thanks To… • Town of Chapel Hill • Carolina Demography • Orange County Board of Health • Chapel Hill-Orange County Visitors Bureau • Orange Water & Sewer Authority (OWASA) • Orange Chatham Association of REALTORS • Orange County Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation • Orange County Tax Administration • Home Builders of Durham, Orange & Chatham Counties • University of North Carolina • Durham Tech • GoTriangle
  • 4.
  • 6. Assessed Value Per Acre Urban3
  • 8. Population Growth Jurisdiction 2010 2014 Pop Growth Growth Rate Orange County 133,702 140,420 +6,718 5.0% (~1.2% PY) Hillsborough 6,087 6,388 +301 4.9% (~1.2% PY) Carrboro 19,582 20,984 +1,402 7.2% (~1.8% PY) Chapel Hill 57,233 59,376 +2,143 3.7% (~0.9% PY) North Carolina 9,535,691 9,943,964 +408,273 4.3% (~1.1% PY) U.S. Census Bureau
  • 9. U.S. Census Bureau Population Growth 116,016 140,402 17,668 20,984 48,038 59,376 5,513 6,388 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Orange County Carrboro Chapel Hill Hillsborough
  • 10. 549 666 1,393 2,769 3,861 5,344 10,570 14,176 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Total Chatham County Population Increase by Decade U.S. Census Bureau
  • 11. Chatham County Percent Population Increase by Decade 2.3% 2.7% 5.5% 10.3% 13.1% 16.0% 27.3% 28.7% 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s U.S. Census Bureau
  • 12. Total Orange County Population Increase By Decade 1,901 11,363 8,535 14,737 19,348 16,796 24,376 15,574 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s U.S. Census Bureau
  • 13. Orange County Percent Population Increase by Decade 9.0% 49.3% 24.8% 34.3% 33.5% 21.8% 26.0% 13.2% 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s U.S. Census Bureau
  • 14. Sources of 2014’s 1,055 Population Increase in Orange County 1269 -738 -249 770 Total: 1,055 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Est Births Est Deaths Est Domestic Migration Est International Migration Est Net Population Change U.S. Census Bureau
  • 15. Minority Races by Municipality U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate 10.1% 9.7% 29.5% 12.2% 22.0% 8.2% 11.9% 1.7% 7.3% 2.5% 13.8% 6.4% 6.6% 8.2% 8.7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Carrboro Chapel Hill Hillsborough Orange County North Carolina Black Asian Hispanic or Latino
  • 16. Orange County Population by Race 80.0% 70.8% 15.8% 12.2% 2.5% 2.5%1.4% 8.4% 2.5% 7.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 1990 2000 2010 2014 White African American Two or More Races Latino/Hispanic U.S. Census Bureau
  • 17. Orange County Population by Race U.S. Census Bureau 15.8% 12.2% 2.5% 2.5% 1.4% 8.4% 2.5% 7.7% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% 1990 2000 2010 2014 African American Two or More Races Latino/Hispanic Asian
  • 18. High School Degree or Higher 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 90.7% 94.7% 84.9% 91.0% 84.9% 86.0% United States North Carolina Orange County Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
  • 19. Bachelors Degree or Higher 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 65.1% 73.9% 36.5% 55.8% 27.3% 28.8% United States North Carolina Orange County Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
  • 20. Orange County Population Projections 77,055 93,851 115,531 133,801 160,306 192,243 230,770 277,307 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 1980 Census 1990 Census 2000 Census 2010 Census 2020 Projected 2030 Projected 2040 Projected 2050 Projected 2014 Estimate: 140,420 Orange County State of the Environment (U.S. Census Bureau and Orange County Planning)
  • 22. Population Density – People Per Square Mile (2010) 336 936 357 93 1,079 213 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Orange Durham Co. Alamance Chatham Wake Johnston U.S. Census Bureau
  • 23. Municipal Population Density (pp/mi2) 3,108 2,785 1,148 141 335 4,897 3,936 1,617 175 479 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 Carrboro Chapel Hill (in Orange) Hillsborough Unincorporated Orange County 2010 Census 2020 Projected 2030 Projected U.S. Census Bureau and Orange County Planning
  • 24. College Town Population Density (pp/mi2) 2010 4,246 4,116 4094 3,948 3,472 3,108 3,037 2,710 3,936 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Charlottesville (VA) Burlington (VT) Ann Arbor (MI) Boulder (CO) Bloomington (IN) Carrboro (NC) Madison (WI) Chapel Hill (NC) Chapel Hill 2030 U.S. Census Bureau
  • 26. Hillsborough, 1% Carrboro, 1.4% Chapel Hill, 5% Rest of Orange 92.6% Urban3 Orange County Land Distribution
  • 27. Location of Orange County Housing Units 9,258 (16%) 2,593 (5%) 22,254 (40%) 21,492 (39%) Carrboro Hillsborough Chapel Hill Rest of County U.S. Census Bureau
  • 28. Number of Single and Multi Family Homes Sold in Orange County Triangle Multiple Listing Services 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1,886 1,126 1,628 1,437 1,653
  • 29. Orange County Average Residential Closing Price Triangle Multiple Listing Services $200,000 $220,000 $240,000 $260,000 $280,000 $300,000 $320,000 $340,000 $360,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $342,740 $317,847 $331,251 $342,172
  • 30. 2015 Average Residential Closing Price per Square Foot Triangle Multiple Listing Services $107 $118 $138 $142 $157 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 Durham Wake Chatham Orange CHCCS Dist
  • 31. Percent Change in Residential Closing Price Per Square Foot 2013 to 2015 Triangle Multiple Listing Services 5.9% 6.3% 9.5% -4.7% 2.6% -6.0% -4.0% -2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% Durham Wake Chatham Orange CHCCS Dist
  • 32. 2015 Average Home Price by Location Triangle Multiple Listing Services $208,405 $286,590 $359,213 $342,172 $382,659 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 Durham Wake Chatham Orange CHCCS Dist
  • 33. Percent Housing Non-Owner Occupied 51.4% 62.6% 42.4% 39.7% 34.2% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Chapel Hill Carrboro Hillsborough Orange County North Carolina U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
  • 34. Orange County Housing Units by Gross Rent (2014) 328 794 3,529 7,085 5,419 2,277 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Less than $299 $300 to $499 $500 to $749 $750 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 or more U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
  • 35. Percent of Orange County Housing By Gross Rent 1.8% 6.1% 31.6% 37.2% 15.9% 7.5% 1.7% 4.1% 18.2% 36.5% 27.9% 11.7% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% Less than $299 $300 to $499 $500 to $749 $750 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 or more 2010-2014 (19,432) 2005-2009 (18,966) U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
  • 36. Percent of Municipal Units Affordable to Renters Earning 80% of Municipal Median Income 73.7% 67.6% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Chapel Hill (Rent < $1252) Carrboro (Rent < $1026) U.S Census Bureau
  • 37. Number of Units Affordable in Each Municipality to Renters Earning 80% of Municipal Median Income 7,453 3,653 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Chapel Hill (Rent < $1252) Carrboro (Rent < $1026) U.S Census Bureau
  • 38. Orange Co. Gross Rent as a Percent of Household Income (2010-14 Estimate v. 2005-09 Estimate) U.S Census Bureau 19.34% 21.48% 12.64% 8.94% 37.60% 21.41% 25.82% 13.90% 8.69% 30.18% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Less than 20 percent 20 to 29.9 percent 30 to 39.9 percent 40.0 to 49.9 percent 50.0 percent or more 2010-2014 2005-2009
  • 39. Orange County Extremely Low Income (ELI) (Less Than 30% of Median Income) 1,839 1,766 1,022 5,891 7,062 6,026 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 2000 2005-07 2011-13 ELI Households ELI Units < $20,300 < $18,700 < $21,400 Urban Institute
  • 40. Residential Units per 100 ELI Households 31 39 31 31 25 34 25 29 17 23 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Orange Durham Chatham Wake 2011-13 2005-07 2000 Urban Institute
  • 41. Percent of Households with Severe Housing Problems 17 17 16 19 20 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 42. Segregation Index (black/white) 51 41 33 41 26 42 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 44. 2014 Orange County Commuting 42,696 Live outside Orange County and drive in for work 35,545 Live in Orange County and drive out of the county for work 19,611 Live in Orange County and work in Orange County U.S. Census Bureau U.S Census Bureau
  • 45. Orange County, NC U.S Census Bureau
  • 46. U.S. Census Bureau 2014 Chapel Hill Commute Inflow/Outflow
  • 47. Chapel Hill Commute Inflow/Outflow U.S Census Bureau
  • 50. 3,213 31,983 0 25,000 50,000 Orange & Chatham combined to RTP Between Orange and Durham U.S. Census Bureau (ACS, 2009-13), Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (2013) Number of Daily Commuters by County
  • 51. Orange County Residents’ Commuting U.S. Census Bureau 35.6% 45.10% 64.4% 54.90% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 2014201320122011201020092008200720062005200420032002 Live and Work Here Live Here and Work Somewhere Else
  • 52. Orange County Employee Commuting U.S. Census Bureau 31.5% 41.70% 68.5% 58.30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2014201320122011201020092008200720062005200420032002 Employed and Living in the Selection Area Employed in the Selection Area but Living Outside
  • 53. Orange Commute Change 2010 to 2014 U.S. Census Bureau 39,540 33,850 20,622 42,696 35,545 19,611 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 Driving Into Orange for Work Driving Out of Orange for Work Live and Work in Orange 2010 2014
  • 54. Orange Commuting to Primary Jobs 6,151 6,969 3,151 10,445 14,337 6,275 18,949 21,390 10,185 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 Drive out for work Drive in for work Live and work here <$15,000 $15,000-$40,000 > $40,000 U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
  • 55. Orange Commuting to Primary Jobs 17.3% 16.3% 16.1% 29.4% 33.6% 32.0% 53.3% 50.1% 51.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% <$15,000 $15,000-$40,000 > $40,000 U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2014 Five Year Estimate
  • 56. Orange County Young Worker (< 29 yo) Commuting (2014) U.S. Census Bureau 9,277 6,636 4,859 9,226 6,747 3,390 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 Driving Into Orange for Work Driving Out of Orange for Work Live and Work in Orange 2005 2014
  • 57. Percent Change in Young Workers (< 29 yo) Commuting Between 2010 and 2014 -0.5% 1.7% -30.2% -35% -30% -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% Driving Into Orange for Work Driving Out of Orange for Work Live and Work in Orange U.S. Census Bureau
  • 58. Distribution of UNC Chapel Hill’s 11,964 employees by home address UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 5,717 2,310 1,405 1,081 629 573 77 73 65 24 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Orange Durham Wake Alamance Chatham Other Person Lee Guilford Randolph An increase of 68 (1.2%)
  • 59. Percent Distribution of UNC Chapel Hill’s 11,964 employees by home address UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 47.8% 19.3% 11.7% 9.0% 5.3% 4.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Orange Durham Wake Alamance Chatham Other Person Lee Guilford Randolph Granville Up from 47.1%
  • 60. Percent of Workers Driving Alone 81 82 76 76 68 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 61. Percent of Workers Driving Alone on a Long Commute (30+ Min) 31 31 44 24 30 31 0 10 20 30 40 50 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 62. Chapel Hill Transit Ridership (millions) Chapel Hill Transit 5.27 7.23 6.94 6.73 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
  • 63. GoTriangle Ridership (Millions) GoTriangle (formerly Triangle Transit) 0.71 1.14 1.84 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
  • 64. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 65. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 66. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 67. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 69. Unemployment Over Time NC Department of Commerce 2.9 6.6 5.0 3.2 6.6 4.5 4.7 10.9 5.7 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Chapel Hill Orange County North Carolina
  • 70. Chapel Hill Residents Employed NC Department of Commerce 25,928 26,432 25,829 26,187 26,143 27,028 27,337 27,800 28,488 24,000 24,500 25,000 25,500 26,000 26,500 27,000 27,500 28,000 28,500 29,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
  • 71. NC Department of Commerce 65,724 66,952 65,481 65,332 65,617 67,759 68,779 69,942 71,673 62,000 63,000 64,000 65,000 66,000 67,000 68,000 69,000 70,000 71,000 72,000 73,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Orange County Residents Employed
  • 72. Unemployed Individuals NC Department of Commerce 1,836 1,506 4,617 3,358 - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Chapel Hill Orange County
  • 73. Per Capita Personal Income (2014) U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis #1 Orange $52,989 #2 Chatham $51,593 #3 Wake $49,695 #8 Durham $42,830 NC Average $39,171 #42 Alamance $34,801 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000
  • 74. Percent Change in Per Capita Income Between 2009 to 2014 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis 12.7% 11.7% 11.0% 5.3% 14.4% 12.1% 14.2% 11.8% 10.8% 20.4% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% Alamance Chatham Durham Johnston Mecklenburg North Carolina Orange Person Randolph Wake
  • 75. Per Capita Personal Income 1969-2014 $39,646 $45,018 $52,339 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 North Carolina Durham Chapel Hill MSA Orange County U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
  • 76. Median vs. Per Capita Income (2013) $33,840 $36,391 $41,376 $52,339 $53,336 $46,097 $43,043 $49,711 $51,853 $55,569 $57,091 $66,006 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 Alamance Johnston Durham Orange Chatham Wake Median Household Income Per Capita Income U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
  • 77. Income Inequality Ratio (80%:20%) 4.8 4.6 4.9 4.9 6.1 4.3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 79. Percent of Persons Living Below Poverty Level 17.9% 15.5% 23.1% 17.0% 22.2% 0 5 10 15 20 25 North Carolina Orange County Chapel Hill Carrboro Hillsborough U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2013 Four Year Estimate
  • 80. Percent of People Living in Poverty 5.0% 7.0% 9.0% 11.0% 13.0% 15.0% 17.0% 19.0% 21.0% 23.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake U.S Census Bureau
  • 81. Orange County Food and Nutrition Services Active Cases (Formerly Food Stamps) NC Division of Social Services 2,903 3,037 3,526 4,600 5,466 6,078 6,320 6,533 5,756 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 Apr-07 Sep-07 Feb-08 Jul-08 Dec-08 May-09 Oct-09 Mar-10 Aug-10 Jan-11 Jun-11 Nov-11 Apr-12 Sep-12 Feb-13 Jul-13 Dec-13 May-14 Oct-14 Mar-15 Aug-15 Jan-16
  • 82. Orange County Food and Nutrition Services Active Cases (Formerly Food Stamps) NC Division of Social Services 6,525 6,309 6,199 6,087 5,756 5,200 5,400 5,600 5,800 6,000 6,200 6,400 6,600
  • 83. Food Insecure People 20,900 25,450 7,750 50,380 133,460 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Wake Feeding America
  • 85. Percent of Children in Poverty 24 24 21 22 13 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 86. 24.4% 21.0% 22.2% 13.1% 14.3% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake Percent of Children in Poverty U.S Census Bureau
  • 87. Orange County Children in Poverty U.S Census Bureau 2,897 3,879 4,822 4,627 4,258 3,820 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
  • 88. Percent of Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch 47 48 42 55 27 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 89. Percent of K-12 Students Enrolled in Free and Reduced Lunch NC Dept of Public Instruction 46.0% 59.7% 44.0% 53.5%50.6% 66.3% 32.6% 43.3% 21.7% 28.2% 33.7% 37.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Alamance Chatham Durham Orange: OCS Orange: CHCCS Wake
  • 90. Percent of CHCCS Elementary Students Receiving Free and Reduced Lunch N.C Dept of Public Instruction 43% 41% 26% 31% 29% 51% 29% 33% 29% 26% 32% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% Northside Elementary Carrboro Elementary Elizabeth Seawell Elem Ephesus Road Elementary Estes Hills Elementary Frank P Graham Elementary Glenwood Elementary C and L McDougle Elem Mary Scroggs Elementary Morris Grove Elementary Mel and Zora Rashkis Elem 2012-13 2013-14
  • 91. N.C Dept of Public Instruction Percent of Orange County Schools Elem Students Receiving Free and Reduced Lunch 37% 83% 65% 42% 17% 59% 49% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Cameron Park Elementary Central Elementary Efland Cheeks Elementary Grady Brown Elementary Hillsborough Elementary New Hope Elementary Pathways Elementary 2012-13 2013-14
  • 92. Percent of K-12 School Children Receiving Free and Reduced Lunch 32.6% 43.3% 21.7% 28.2% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Orange County CHCCS NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 93. The Nonprofit Employment Sector and Charitable Giving
  • 94. Number of 501 (c)3 Nonprofits Filing 990s 83 485 107 303 1,370 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 Chatham Durham Johnston Orange Wake NC Center for Nonprofits
  • 95. Average Annual Wages for Nonprofit Employees $50,666 $28,869 $56,585 $28,082 $58,850 $42,470 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 Triangle Area * Chatham Durham Johnston Orange Wake Orange Average Wage $53,445 NC Center for Nonprofits
  • 97. Nonprofit Employment as % of Total Employment 13.27% 11.72% 22.96% 3.63% 46.59% 7.38% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Triangle Area * Chatham Durham Johnston Orange Wake NC Center for Nonprofits
  • 98. Orange County Nonprofits Orange County Registered Nonprofits 735 Orange County 501(c)3 Orgs Filing 990s 333 Annual Revenue of Orange County 501(c)3s $5.2 billion Assets of Orange county 501(c)3s $933 million Urban Institute
  • 99. 2013 Individual Adjusted Gross Income Reported ($1000s) $5,783,274 $34,667,417 $7,461,236 $1,137,747 $3,299,617 0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 Orange County, NC Wake County, NC Durham County, NC Chatham County, NC Alamance County, NC National Center for Charitable Statistics
  • 100. 2013 Itemized Contributions Reported ($1000s) $133,287 $785,501 $187,549 $25,288 $75,621 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 Orange County, NC Wake County, NC Durham County, NC Chatham County, NC Alamance County, NC National Center for Charitable Statistics
  • 101. 2013 Dollars Donated per Tax Return Filed ($1000s) $2,193 $1,666 $1,426 $1,218 $1,086 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Orange County, NC Wake County, NC Durham County, NC Chatham County, NC Alamance County, NC National Center for Charitable Statistics
  • 103. Nominal 2014 County GDP (Billions) National Association of Counties $5.0 $25.7 $1.4 $54.8 $5.4 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 Alamance Durham Chatham Wake Orange
  • 104. Chatham County Economic Output National Association of Counties
  • 105. Durham County Economic Output National Association of Counties
  • 106. Orange County Economic Output National Association of Counties
  • 107. Orange County Major Employers 1. UNC Chapel Hill 2. UNC Health Care System 3. Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools 4. Orange County Schools 5. Orange County 6. Town of Chapel Hill 7. Eurosport 8. UNC Physicians Network 9. Wal-Mart 10. General Electric 11. AKG of America 12. Harris Teeter 13. Food Lion 13. Chapel Hill Residential 14. Performance AutoMall 15. PHE Inc. 16. Southern Season 17. Whole Foods 18. Weaver Street Market 19. Residential Services 20. Aramark 21. Carolina Inn 22. The Arc of the Triangle 23. Town of Carrboro 24. Strata Solar
  • 108. Incubation and Start Up Opened Facility Size (sq/ft) Enterprises served in 2015 Mid Way Business Center 2001 5,000 13 Piedmont Food & Ag Processing Center 2011 10,400 30 The Cube (UNC- Campus Y) 2012 1,500 10 LaUNCh Chapel Hill 2013 3,400 18 1789 2013 3,500 50 TOTALS 23,800 sq/ft 121 enterprises Personal Interviews
  • 110. 2014 Total Assessed Property Value (Billions) $1.92 $6.37 $0.68 $6.64 Carrboro Chapel Hill Hillsborough Rest of Orange County TOTAL $15.6 Billion Orange County Tax Administration
  • 111. 2014 Commercial vs Residential Tax Base 12.8% 18.5% 15.8% 40.5% 2.9% 4.3% 7.6% 1.2% 84.3% 77.3% 76.6% 58.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Orange County Chapel Hill Carrboro Hillsborough Commerical Apartments Residential Orange County Tax Administration
  • 112. 2014 Orange County Commercial Assessed Value (Millions) $303.4 $1,176.0 $273.7 $238.4 Carrboro Chapel Hill Hillsborough Rest of Orange County Orange County Tax Administration
  • 113. Orange County Assessed Value TOTAL $15.6 Billion $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 Commercial Residential Apartment Rest of Orange County Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro $1.99 Billion $451.7 Million $13.16 Billion Orange County Tax Administration
  • 114. Orange County Taxable Sales (Millions) NC Department of Revenue $907 $1,422$1,477 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600
  • 115. Orange Co. Gross Sales Tax Collection (Millions) NC Department of Revenue $40.82 $67.84 $70.47 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80
  • 116. Percent Share of Orange County Sales Tax Revenue Distribution 62% 9% 25% 0% 3% 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Orange County Carrboro Chapel Hill Durham Hillsborough Mebane NC Department of Revenue
  • 117. Retail Demand: How It Works • The average Orange County household spends $34,229 on retail purchases including food. • Total Retail Demand is the product of 53,141 households multiplied by the $34,229 in retail purchase power equaling ~$1.82 billion • The Retail Gap is delta between demand and annual retail sales in each county.
  • 118. 2014 Average Local Household Retail Demand (with Food and Drink) $23,560 $31,342 $28,247 $25,745 $34,229 $36,238 Alamance County (NC) Chatham County (NC) Durham County (NC) Johnston County (NC) Orange County (NC) Wake County (NC) NC Department of Commerce
  • 119. 2014 Retail Demand vs Retail Sales (Billions) NC Department of Commerce $1.8 $0.9 $3.3 $1.5 $1.7 $0.9 $0.8 $3.4 $1.8 $1.9 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 Orange Chatham Durham Alamance Johnston 2014 Total Retail Demand 2014 Retail Sales
  • 120. Total Retail Gap (Millions) (with Food and Drink) NC Department of Commerce $727.9 $235.8 $375.8 ($153.8) $59.9 $866.5 $133.6 ($104.7) ($338.9) ($195.6) ($400,000,000) ($200,000,000) $0 $200,000,000 $400,000,000 $600,000,000 $800,000,000 $1,000,000,000 Orange County Chatham Durham Alamance Johnston 2012 Retail Gap 2014 Retail Gap
  • 121. Retail Gap Change from 2012 to 2014 (Millions) $138.6 ($102.2) ($480.6) ($185.1) ($255.5) ($600,000,000) ($400,000,000) ($200,000,000) $0 $200,000,000 Orange Chatham Durham Alamance Johnston NC Department of Commerce
  • 122. Orange Retail Gap (Millions) NC Department of Commerce $233 $205 $82 $82 $77 $41 $30 $30 $20 ($7) ($50) $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 General Merchandise Stores Motor Vehicles Parts and Dealers Food and Beverage Stores Health and Personal Care Stores Clothing/Accessories Stores Electronics and Appliance Stores 2014 Retail Gap: Furniture/Home… Gasoline Stations Sports/Hobby/Book/Music Stores Food Services & Drinking Places
  • 123. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 124. Sales Tax Revenue Per Capita 2012 and 2013 NC Department of Revenue $109 $135 $129 $192 $153 $126 $148 $135 $128 $210 $152 $129 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 $220 Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Johnston Wake
  • 125. Sales Tax Revenue Per Capita John Locke Foundation $117.56 $147.95 $116.37 $135.04 $133.74 $127.95 $162.23 $210.19 $129.31 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 $220 2010 2011 2012 2013 Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Wake
  • 126. Sales Tax Per Capita Rankings John Locke Foundation 42 55 53 19 61 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2010 2011 2012 2013 Orange Alamance Chatham Durham Wake
  • 127. 2013 Per Capita Income Rank vs Per Capita Retail Sales Rank John Locke Foundation 12 2 19 42 051015202530354045 Durham Orange Per Capita Income Rank Percapital Retail Sales Rank
  • 129. Cost of Living - Composite Index (100=US Average) Chapel Hill, 103.6 Durham, 88.7 Raleigh, 90.5 Madison, 104.5 Ann Arbor, 95.3 Boulder , 109.6 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Council for Community and Economic Research
  • 130. Chapel Hill, 114.1 Durham, 70.8 Raleigh, 72.4 Madison, 111.2 Ann Arbor, 90.8 Asheville, 97.2 Boulder , 130.2 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Council for Community and Economic Research Cost of Living – Housing (100=US Average)
  • 131. 2013 City and Town Tax Rates 0.33 0.3826 0.494 0.5675 0.675 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Huntersville Cary Raleigh Apex Asheville Charlotte Wilmington Fayetteville Concord Winston-Salem Chapel Hill Hickory Wilson Greenville Gastonia Jacksonville Monroe Kannapolis Durham Burlington Rocky Mount Greensboro Salisbury Goldsboro High Point NC Department of Revenue
  • 132. 2013 Total of All Jurisdictions Property Tax Rate 0.864 0.9166 1.3119 1.4554 1.5404 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 Cary Raleigh Apex Wilmington Hickory Huntersville Asheville Burlington Jacksonville Winston-Salem Concord Fayetteville Greenville Monroe Charlotte Wilson Rocky Mount Salisbury Kannapolis Durham Goldsboro Gastonia Greensboro High Point Chapel Hill NC Department of Revenue
  • 133. 2013 Property Tax Rates Assessed on Median House Price $1,100.00 $1,604.05 $1,819.25 $2,164.64 $2,224.80 $4,898.47 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000 Burlington Kannapolis Salisbury Rocky Mount Hickory Winston-Salem Fayetteville Monroe Goldsboro Wilson Greenville Gastonia Jacksonville Raleigh Wilmington Greensboro High Point Charlotte Asheville Concord Durham Apex Cary Huntersville Chapel Hill NC Department of Revenue and RealEstate.com
  • 134.
  • 136. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 137. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 138. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 139. Totally and Partially Protected Lands (Acres) 1,229 4,088 7,784 10,804 12,722 14,473 3,151 5,230 8,613 9,609 10,185 10,174 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Pre-1981 1981-90 1991-2000 2001-04 2005-08 2009-13 Totally Protected Lands Partially Protected Lands 8,250 acre (50%) increase since 2000 #1 Duke University (5,092 acres) 2014 Orange County State of the Environment
  • 140. Greenway Trails (miles) 100 26.6 71.3 40 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Raleigh Durham Cary Chapel Hill Wake County Economic Development
  • 141. Greenway Trail Miles per 1000 people 0.23 0.09 0.46 0.67 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 Raleigh Durham* Cary** Chapel Hill Wake County Economic Development
  • 142. Park Acreage per 1,000 people 21.55 6.17 11.60 5.37 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Raleigh Durham* Cary Chapel Hill Wake County Economic Development * Durham acreage includes lakes and undeveloped parks.
  • 143. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 145. Air Quality: Orange County Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector 2009 Orange County State of the Environment Report Transportation, 49% Residential, 19% Commercial/ Institutional, 29% Solid Waste, 1% Industrial , 2%
  • 146. Annual Ozone Exceedances Orange County State of the Environment
  • 147. Air Pollution and Volatile Organic Compounds Orange County State of the Environment
  • 148. Air Pollutants by Source Over Time Orange County State of the Environment
  • 149. Water Sales and Accounts 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 CustomerAccounts WaterSales(MillionGallonsPerDayAverage) Actual Water Sales Customer Accounts Reclaimed Water to UNC begins 2009 OWASA
  • 150. Monthly Water & Sewer Bills 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 RateIncrease AverageMonthlyBillBasedon4,000gallons permonthresidentialcustomer Average Bill Projected Average Bill Rate Increase Projected Rate Increase 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 3% 3% 3% OWASA
  • 151. Orange County Water Users (MGD) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1997 2002 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012 Mebane MGD Orange-Alamance MGD Hillsborough MGD OWASA MGD 2014 Orange County State of the Environment
  • 153. 2016 Health Indicators Health Indicator Orange County Chatham County Who is #1 Length of Life #1 #7 Orange Quality of Life #7 #15 Currituck Health Behaviors #3 #6 Polk Clinical Care #1 #12 Orange Social and Economic Factors #1 #8 Orange Physical Environment #4 #53 Hyde 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 154. Number of Uninsured 22,338 8,704 39,718 15,650 110,159 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 155. Percent of Adults Smoking 18 19 16 17 17 15 0 5 10 15 20 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 156. Percent of Adults Obese 29 34 27 28 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 157. Percent of of People with Insufficient Sleep 33 33 29 33 30 30 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 158. Orange County Diagnosis of Asthma (All Ages) in Hospital Discharges per 100,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 48 72.7 62.8 45.6 NC State Center on Health Statistics
  • 159. Orange County Pregnancy Rate Girls Age 15-17 (per 1000) NC State Center for Health Statistics 26.1 9.1 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 White Minority Total
  • 160. Total Orange County Teen Pregnancies (Girls 15-17) NC State Center for Health Statistics 23 22 26 27 36 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
  • 161. Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight 9 9 8 9 8 8 7.4 7.6 7.8 8 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.8 9 9.2 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 162. Orange County Infant Mortality Rate (per 1000 live births) NC State Center for Health Statistics 12.0 3.4 8.8 7.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Orange County State
  • 163. Percent of Adults Diabetic 11 11 12 10 8 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 164. HIV Prevalence Rate (per 100,000) 327 271 174 656 257 375 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 165. Child Mortality Rate 58 58 40 68 35 48 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 166. Motor Vehicle Mortality Rate 15 12 16 9 9 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 167. # Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths 23 11 39 19 132 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 168. Percent of Children in Single Parent Households 36 40 31 42 26 28 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 NC Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 170. Chatham County Crime Index 100 = U.S. Average 94 50 45 49 81 122 72 49 40 60 80 100 120 140 Murder Index Rape Index Robbery Index Assault Index Property Crime Index Burglary Index Larceny Index Motor Vehicle Theft Index 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 171. Orange County Crime Index 100 = U.S. Average 105 56 51 62 64 51 112 131 111 61 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Total Crime Index Personal Crime Index Murder Index Rape Index Robbery Index Assault Index Property Crime Index Burglary Index Larceny Index Motor Vehicle Theft Index 2016 County Health Rankings - Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • 172. Property Crime Rate (per 100,000) State Bureau of Investigation 6,112 3,200 7,427 3,026 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 Chapel Hill Carrboro
  • 173. Violent Crime Rate (per 100,000) State Bureau of Investigation 186.5 315.3 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Chapel Hill Carrboro
  • 174. County Property Crime Rates (Per 100,000) State Bureau of Investigation 4,146 2,854 2,229 1,875 5,918 4,436 3,591 2,140 2,983 2,195 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake
  • 175. County Violent Crime Rates (Per 100,000) State Bureau of Investigation 381.2 182.9 675.5 151.1 240.5 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Alamance Chatham Durham Orange Wake
  • 177. School Size Over Time N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 178. Total Per Pupil Expense Over Time N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 179. 179 NC Department of Public Instruction 2014 Per Pupil Funding by School District $5,176 $5,358 $5,411 $5,370 $4,883 $5,027 $5,390 $1,846 $3,195 $3,461 $3,521 $5,514 $2,219 $2,095 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 Alamance-Burlington Schools Chatham County Schools Durham County Schools Orange County Schools Chapel-Hill/Carrboro City Schools Wake County Schools NC Average PupilState PupilFederal PupilLocal
  • 180. Total Per Pupil Funding All Sources $8,029 $9,439 $9,989 $9,602 $10,872 $7,880 $8,477 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Alamance-Burlington Schools Chatham County Schools Durham County Schools Orange County Schools Chapel-Hill/Carrboro City Schools Wake County Schools NC Average NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 181. CHCCS, Orange and NC 4 and 5-Year Graduation Rates (by freshman year) N.C. Department of Public Instruction 91.0% 94.8% 88.0%87.9% 60.0% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100.0% CHCCS 4-year CHCCS 5-year OCS 4-year OCS 5-year NC 4-year NC 5-year
  • 182. Chatham 4 and 5-Year Graduation Rates (by Freshman Year) 87.3% 83.5% 60.0% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% CCS 4-year CCS 5-year NC 4-year NC 5-year N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 183. School District Dropout Rates N.C. Department of Public Instruction 2.04% 0.67% 2.39% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% OCS Rate CHCCS Rate NC Rate
  • 184. Percent of All Students “College and Career Ready” by School District Compared to State Average “College and Career Ready” means to score Level 4 or above on a 1-5 scale on End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) test
  • 185. 2015 Percent of All Students "College and Career Ready" All EOG/EOC Subjects 70.8 50.7 35 47.6 40.2 46.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 186. 2015 Percent of All Students "College and Career Ready" EOG Reading Grade 3 69.2 53.4 35.1 43.5 42.4 46.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 187. 2015 Percent of All Students "College and Career Ready" EOG Math 8 68.3 41.2 29.1 43.1 27.6 35.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 188. Percent of Students “College and Career Ready” by Race and Economic Status Within District “College and Career Ready” means to score Level 4 or above on a 1-5 scale on End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) test
  • 189. 2015 CHCCS Percent “College and Career Ready” On All EOC/EOG Subjects 77.9 31.7 38 85.4 29.5 0 20 40 60 80 100 Asian Black Hispanic White Economically Disadvantaged N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 190. 2015 CHCCS Percent “College and Career Ready” (4+) on EOG Reading Grade 3 NC Department of Public Instruction 69.2 39 35 85.4 30.9 0 20 40 60 80 100 Asian Black Hispanic White Economically Disadvantaged
  • 191. 2015 CHCCS Percent “College and Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8 78.2 24.3 40.5 80.8 25.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Asian Black Hispanic White Economically Disadvantaged N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 192. Percent of CHCCS Middle/High Students Proficient on End of Course Test 44.3 55.1 93.1 43.0 34.7 0 20 40 60 80 100 Black Students Hispanic Students White Students Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 193. Percent of Students “Proficient” by Race, Disability and Economic Status Compared with Surrounding School Districts and State Average “Proficient” means to score Level 3 or above on a 1-5 scale on End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) test
  • 194. Percent of CHCCS Students “Proficient” on Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-15) 41.9 47.4 90.2 39.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Black Students Hispanic Students White Students Economically Disadvantaged NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 195. Percent of Chatham Students “Proficient” on Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015) 34.3 38.1 72.2 38.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Black Students Hispanic Students White Students Economically DisadvantagedNC Department of Public Instruction
  • 196. Percent of Economically Disadvantaged Students “Proficient” on Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015) 39.1 38.3 30.9 38.5 41.6 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 197. Percent of Students with Disabilities “Proficient” on Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015) 32.4 18.2 15.5 19.8 20.7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 198. Percent of Hispanic Students “Proficient” on Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015) 47.4 38.1 36.1 42.5 45.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 199. Percent of Black Students “Proficient” on Combined EOG and EOC Scores (2014-2015) 41.9 34.3 34.2 34.7 37.3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 CHCCS Chatham Durham Orange North Carolina NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 200. Percent of CHCCS Middle/High Students “Proficient” on End of Course Test 44.3 55.1 93.1 43.0 34.7 39.6 44.6 76.0 43.1 17.7 Black Students Hispanic Students White Students Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Chatham CHCCS NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 201. Improvement/Decline of Students “College and Career Ready” by Race and Economic Status Between 2013-14 and 2014-15 School Years “College and Career Ready” means to score Level 4 or above on a 1-5 scale on End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) test
  • 202. Percent of Hispanic Students “College and Career Ready” on EOG Reading Grade 3 NC Department of Public Instruction 20 25 30 35 40 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015
  • 203. Percent of Hispanic Students “College and Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8 NC Department of Public Instruction 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015
  • 204. Percent of Black Students “College and Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8 NC Department of Public Instruction 5 10 15 20 25 30 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015
  • 205. Percent of Black Students “College and Career Ready” EOG Reading Grade 3 NC Department of Public Instruction 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015
  • 206. 2015 CHCCS Percent of White Students “College and Career Ready” EOG Reading Grade 3 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015 N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 207. 2015 CHCCS Percent of White Students “College and Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015 N.C. Department of Public Instruction
  • 208. Percent of Economically Disadvantaged Students “College and Career Ready” EOG Reading Grade 3 NC Department of Public Instruction 15 20 25 30 35 40 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015
  • 209. Percent of Economically Disadvantaged Students “College and Career Ready” EOG Math Grade 8 NC Department of Public Instruction 5 10 15 20 25 30 CHCCS Orange Durham Chatham Alamance North Carolina 2014 2015
  • 210. Percent of Students Meeting UNC’s Minimum ACT Score Requirements
  • 211. Percent of Students Who Met the UNC Minimum ACT Requirements 49.4 62.9 95 48.0 44.948.2 45.4 81.9 53.1 30.0 35.6 40.6 70.9 35.6 18.1 Black Students Hispanic Students White Students Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities CHCCS Chatham Orange NC Department of Public Instruction
  • 213. UNC Chapel Hill’s 29,278 Students Undergraduate, 18,503 Graduate, 8,262 Professional, 2,513 UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
  • 214. Fall 2015 UNC Chapel Hill Student Housing UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Resident Student Housing, 8,113 Married Student Housing, 374 Off-Campus, 18,541 Fraternity & Sorority, 841 Other University Affiliated Housing (Granville Towers), 1,215
  • 215. UNC Student Information - Fall 2015 N % Headcount 29,084 Full-Time 24,070 82.8% Part-Time 5,014 17.2% FTE 26,878 Men 12,514 43.0% Women 16,570 57.0% White 18,252 62.8% African-American 2,353 8.1% Other* 8,479 29.2% Undergraduate 18,415 63.3% Graduate 8,109 27.9% Professional 2,560 8.8% In-State 21,153 72.7% Out-of-State 7,931 27.3% Number of First-Year Undergraduate 3,946 13.6% UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
  • 216. UNC Student Enrollment UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 1980, 21,465 1990, 23,852 2000, 24,872 2015, 29,084 15,000 17,000 19,000 21,000 23,000 25,000 27,000 29,000 31,000
  • 217. Percent Growth of UNC Enrollment (1.06% Annual Average) UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 0.96 2.50 2.21 1.27 1.97 1.48 1.62 1.51 1.53 1.22 1.64 -0.86 0.48 -0.52 0.03 -0.18% -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
  • 218. UNC’s 12,187 Permanent Employees UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment SPA 6,338 52% EPA Non-Faculty 2,071 17% Faculty 3,778 31%
  • 219. UNC, Chapel Hill Revenues UNC Chapel Hill Operating Revenues Student Tuition & Fees, net $395,005,215 13.2% Patient Services, net $323,700,133 10.8% Federal Grants & Contracts $716,563,873 24.0% State & Local Grants & Contracts $17,226,880 0.6% Nongovernmental Grants & Contracts $106,761,998 3.6% Sales & Services, net $461,579,399 15.4% Interest Earnings on Loans $1,167,156 0.0% Other Operating Revenues $9,280,125 0.3% TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES $2,031,284,779 68.0% UNC Chapel Hill Non-operating Revenues State Appropriations $479,186,534 16.0% Non-capital grants – federal student financial aid $36,232,220 1.2% Other non-capital grants $88,596,395 3.0% Non-capital Gifts, net $155,065,095 5.2% Net Investment income $195,406,736 6.5% Federal interest subsidy on debt $2,107,038 0.1% NET NON-OPERATING REVENUES $956,594,018 32.0% UNC Chapel Hill TOTAL REVENUES $2,987,878,797 100.0 % UNC Chapel Hill OIRA
  • 220. UNC, Chapel Hill Expenses UNC Chapel Hill Operating Expenses by Function Instruction $683,793,069 22.9% Research $714,092,851 23.9% Public Service $152,660,508 5.1% Academic Support $110,417,006 3.7% Student Services $35,845,376 1.2% Institutional Support $130,905,011 4.4% Operations & Maintenance $162,016,441 5.4% Student Financial Aid $119,452,838 4.0% Auxiliary Enterprises $662,094,175 22.1% Depreciation $136,492,665 4.6% GASB 68 Pension Standard Implementation $16,913,662 0.6% TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES $2,924,683,602 97.7% Non-Operating Expenses Interest & Fees on Debt $67,458,622 2.3% NET NON-OPERATING REVENUES $67,458,622 2.3% TOTAL REVENUES $2,992,142,224 100.0% UNC Chapel Hill OIRA
  • 222. State Appropriations (FY 2015 UNC Chapel Hill) UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment $479,186,534 $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
  • 223. UNC Chapel Hill Licensed Rev (millions) UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment $3.0 $2.8 $1.5 $2.4 $3.8 $7.9 $3.0 $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 $9.0 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
  • 224. UNC Campus Gross Square Feet (1000s) UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 7,847 9,639 12,312 18,394 19,536 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
  • 225. N University Master Plan – Land Holdings
  • 226. UNC Chapel Hill Annual Research Funding (2000-2014) UNC Office of Institutional Research and Assessment $792,729,006 $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 $700,000,000 $800,000,000 $900,000,000 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  • 227. U.S. Patent Applications (1,946 Since FY2000) 110 115 107 86 105 119 113 109 121 111 132 124 127 153 142 172 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 UNC Office of Technology Development
  • 228. UNC Chapel Hill Number of U.S. Patents Issues (549 since FY2000) UNC Office of Technology Development 57 52 37 34 35 29 32 32 21 22 27 33 31 25 34 48 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
  • 229. UNC Chapel Hill’s 95 Start-Up Companies UNC Office of Technology Development 5 11 3 3 3 1 6 1 7 1 5 7 9 14 10 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
  • 235. 2014 Visitor Spending Up in Orange County, Tourism Impact Highlights • The travel and tourism industry directly employs nearly 1800 in Orange County. • Total payroll generated by the tourism industry in Orange County was $33.55 million. • State and local tax revenues from travel to Orange County amounted to $13.34 million, representing a $95.33 tax saving to each county resident. • Domestic Visitors spending in Orange County in 2014 was $181.65 million. This is a $7.75% increase over 2013, which was the largest in North Carolina. • The Visitors Bureau budget is designed to grow the economy through the tourism sector. • Approximately $1 million annually is spent on sales, marketing, publications, a walk-in Visitors Center, on-line marketing and national travel promotions designed to turn the spotlight on Orange County. Source: “2014 Economic Impact of Travel on North Carolina Counties”. Prepared for VisitNC by the U.S. Travel Association.
  • 236. Chapel Hill/Orange Co. Hotel Occupancy 58.9% 59.6% 64.1% 65.1% 65.4% 69.9% 69.7% 52% 54% 56% 58% 60% 62% 64% 66% 68% 70% 72% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
  • 237. $107.35 $102.12 $101.61 $104.38 $106.49 69.9% 69.7% $90.00 $95.00 $100.00 $105.00 $110.00 $115.00 $120.00 $125.00 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Chapel Hill/Orange County Average Daily Rate Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
  • 238. Chapel Hill/Orange Co. Room Revenue $63.3 $60.9 $65.2 $68.0 $69.6 $79.5 $83.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 RevPAR, or revenue per available room, is a performance metric calculated by multiplying a hotel's average daily room rate (ADR) by its occupancy rate. Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
  • 239. 2014 Taxes Generated by Tourists (in Millions) $3.88 $9.46 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Local State 2014 • In 2014, visitors to Orange County generated $13.34 million in State and Local Taxes (including sales, lodging, food & beverage, gas and other) Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
  • 240. Tourism Spending in Orange County (In Millions) $136.30 $144.07 $156.82 $161.60 $168.59 $181.65 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau
  • 241. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Community Survey
  • 242. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 243. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 244. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 245. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 246.
  • 247. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 248. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 249. 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Survey
  • 250. Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for singles and foodies! • Carrboro was ranked at the top of Livability’s list of “10 Best Cities for Singles” • Durham-Chapel Hill is No. 1 'vegetarian city' in the U.S. according to the Huffington Post • Chapel Hill named #8 Best College Town in America for Food & Drink by Thrillist
  • 251. Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for sports fans! • Chapel Hill named one of Four Slam Dunk College Towns by National Geographic • Chapel Hill among Best Cities for Baseball Fans by WalletHub • Chapel Hill among Best Cities for Soccer Fans by WalletHub • Chapel Hill among Best Cities for Sports Fans by WalletHub
  • 252. Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for students! • Orange County has 9th-best schools in the U.S. • Multiple UNC-Chapel Hill graduate programs ranked by U.S. News & World Report • For the 15th time, UNC-Chapel Hill is ranked #1 best value in public schools across the country and also #1 for best out-of-state value, a new category added this year by Kiplinger’s Personal Finance • Durham-Chapel Hill No. 2 among best U.S. metros for college students • UNC-Chapel Hill’s campus tops a list of the “21 of the Most Beautiful College Campuses in America”
  • 253. Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for anyone! • Carrboro ranked one of the top 10 Best Suburbs to Buy a House in North Carolina • Carrboro among the Top 100 Best Small Towns in the U.S. • Chapel Hill is No. 11 on a list of “America's Most Affordable Places,” published by NerdWallet • Chapel Hill among the “Most Educated Places in America” • Chapel Hill’s ranking among Top 100 Best Places to Live continues to improve
  • 254. Chapel Hill/Carrboro are great places for anyone! • Chapel Hill is the best North Carolina city for public transportation and ranks 107th in the nation, according to real estate news site Redfin • Chapel Hill rated #1 in Top 10 College Towns You’ll Never Want to Leave by College Magazine • Chapel Hill tops the list of the “10 most fun cities in North Carolina,” according to lifestyle and travel site The Retired Blog • Orange County is the third-best place in the U.S. to retire, according to a report by real estate research site FIndTheHome
  • 255. slideshare.net/carolinachamber Check the Chamber’s SlideShare account for the entire presentation.
  • 256. Connect With Us Facebook.com/ChapelHillCarrboroChamber Twitter: @CarolinaChamber Instagram: @carolinachamber flickr.com/photos/carolinachamber LinkedIn: Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber group carolinachamber.org