The document discusses copyright issues related to using resources in teaching and learning. It addresses common misconceptions about copyright and outlines what is and is not allowed under copyright law. Key points include: copyright automatically protects original works without registration; fair use exceptions exist for research, review, and examination purposes but only small portions can be used; explicit permission or an applicable license is needed to copy or adapt copyrighted material for other uses.
2. Intellectual Property Rights
• Copyright
• Patents
• Trademarks
• Design right
• Database right
• Performers rights
• Confidentiality
3. Copyright misconceptions
• OK to copy if it is for educational purposes
• OK to copy if you acknowledge
• Ok to copy if the material is on the
internet
4. Digital copyright
Why are rightsholders concerned?
• ease of copying
• quality of copy
• low cost of dissemination
• ease of 'passing off'
• pace of technological change
6. Copyright ownership
There is no such thing as copyright free
material (at the time of creation)
It will originally belong to
• creator
• employer, if within contract of employment
• multiple copyrights are common
7. What are the rights?
Only the copyright owner can
• copy
• adapt or amend the work
• communication to the public by electronic
means (web, intranet, VLE etc)
• rent or lend (though libraries are allowed to
do this)
• perform, show or play in public, broadcast
8. When are you allowed to copy?
Authorisation must have been given
• law (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
1988)
• licence terms
– blanket licence eg CLA, ERA
– resource specific eg creative commons licence
• specifically authorised by the copyright holder
or be out of copyright
9. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
Exam defence (32.3)
"copyright is not infringed by anything done for the
purpose of an examination"
• taken to include 'summative assessment'
• acknowledgement must be give
• only for viewing by the examiner and examinee
10. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
Fair dealing defences
Fair dealing for research and private study for
non commercial purposes (29)
• literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works
• excludes sound recordings and videos
• acknowledgement must be give
• amount used must be 'fair'
11. Fair dealing for criticism or review (30)
• includes all forms of materials provided they
have been made available to the public
• acknowledgement must be give
• amount used must be 'fair'
• does not include 'illustrative purposes'
12. More information
Copyright guidance for Sheffield Hallam University staff and
students
http://catalogue.shu.ac.uk/record=b1568097~S1a
Video, images and audio: media literacy skills for
discovering, evaluating and re-using visual and sound
resources
http://catalogue.shu.ac.uk/record=b1570896~S1a
Electronic theses: guidance for Sheffield Hallam University
researchers
http://catalogue.shu.ac.uk/record=b1599144~S1a
13. Finding resources to reuse
Library Gateway - video, images and audio
http://libguides.shu.ac.uk/vis
JISC Digital Media
http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/crossmedia/advice/finding-video-
audio-and-images-online
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/
Google images
http://www.google.co.uk/imghp
http://www.google.com/advanced_image_search
14. Student has found some images on a
website and wants to copy them into an
assignment or a website they are creating.
What issues do they need to consider?
15. David Hoffman v Drug Abuse Resistance
Education (UK) Ltd [2012] EWPCC
copying photographs sourced on a website
• carefully check ownership of images found on
websites
• use images where
– copyright has expired
– licenced for use eg creative commons licence
– buy stock photos
– take your own, remember to use a 'release form'
16. Example of a Release Form
Name: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I consent and agree that (name of institution), its employees or agents, have the right to interview, photograph
or video me (and /or my property) for possible inclusion in ---- (details of the website / package)
I release to (name of institution), its employees or agents, the right to use, at their discretion, the material in
print or digital form within the above context for the educational purposes of staff and students at (name of
institution).
I agree that the materials may be used for other non commercial purposes at the discretion of (name of
institution).
I am at least 18 years of age, have read and understand the above statements and am competent to execute
this agreement.
Should commercial exploitation of the materials be considered at a later stage your permission will be sought.
Unless otherwise stated your name and contact details will be kept confidential.
Signed....................................................
Date.......................................................
17. Student is creating a webpage and wants to
link to materials on another website.
What issues do they need to consider?
18. GeenStijl.nl v Sanoma Out-Law.com
(Court of Amsterdam)
linking to infringing photos
• carefully check ownership of images found on
websites
• good practice for hyperlinking
– link to the homepage, deep links may require permission
particularly if they bypass brand
identity, advertisements, legal notices
– any link must open within its' own frame.
– links should be text links, only use logos if permission has
been given.
19. Student is working on an assignment and wants to
reproduce some tables / diagrams she has found in
a book. She also wants to adapt one of the
diagrams. To support her argument she wants to
quote from the book.
The student produces a good piece of work and the
module tutor wants to put it on the module
Blackboard site as an exemplar.
What are the copyright implications?
Copyright is a big topic so we are going to focus on those aspects that relate to students/ lecturers reusing materials created by someone else.Going to look the principles of copyright and then how we apply them to a few examples. Based on your experiences on working of the Help Desk you may have some you can share. Look at some recent legal casesgeneral copyright principles which underpin these decisions, principles which you can apply when considering if you can reuse someone else's work.Some things are black and white, but there are many grey areas, open to interpretation - in these cases you way up the risk of doing something. You need to be well informed in order to do this.I am basing what I say on UK law. So be aware it could be different in other countries. There is some harmonization internationally and particularly across Europe, but there are also differences.Please ask questions as we go along and share any experiences you may have had.
Law seeks to balance Rights of Creator/ copyright holder v rights of society to have access to materials to stimulate further creativity Copyright applies irrespective of the medium What is 'fair' . Can be grey areas - weigh up risk
Successive governments have had reviews into copyright law to report on whether or not it meets the needs of today's digital society.No, changes are neededDraft legislation - out for discussion, proposal that new legislation will be introduced in April. Wait and see. I am taking about the current legisaltion but will mention where there might be changes
broadcast - 50 years from end of calendar yr date of broadcastsarticle photo etc 70 years from year end when creator diesIt doesn't make any difference how the material is made available . Misconception that the internet is the public domain.Public domain means materials for which the copyright has expired or the copyright has been waived.It does not mean available on the internet. - freely available to see, not reuse.
multiple copyrights eg on a websiteStudents rights - SHU regulations treats them as staff. But, best practice to be explicit
Moral rights - only raise if relevant to discussionCopyright owner of a photo = photographer. However, if the photo has been commissioned for private and domestic purposes the commissioner has a moral right not to have the photos issued to the public. In theory he could sell this to the newspaper etc however the right to privacy restricts the right of the copyright owner to deal freely with the photo - the commissioner might not wish to be seen publicly
Law - defences -see next slide ' ; Licence eg Creative commons; Seeking permission can be time consuming try other options first
Special provision in the UK copyright law to allow full creativity - counts to your final marks
Fair dealing defences only come into play if what you are copying is 'substantial'Can copy if not substantial - not defined in law, refer to case law, very week to rely on this.
fair dealing - a test is 'is the amount copied fair'. So, a photo could be reproduced for crit and review (but not for reporting news) but reproducing a complete work not tested in law - unlikely to be objected to for this purposeQuotation limits. not set in law, single extract no more than 400 words , multiple extracts 800/ 300
Charity hired web design company to do their website. The web design company used images from a Govt website, thinking they could be reused. However, the images had been licensed by the govt from a photographer for the purpose of using on their website. The photographer sued the charity £28.5 K (approx £250 per photo) .Web design company had gone bust. The charity lost . 'Ignorance is no defence' Charity had to pay £10,000 in damages + legal fees to the photographer.Another example in 2012. Ukfield Community Technical College fined £23,000 for reproducing third party materials on their website. Take your own :- incidental inclusion eg filming in the street and happen to capture a company's log or background music coming from a shop. However, if they are deliberately included then permission is needed.Photos of people - permission unless just in the background but beware if theya re clearly identifiable might have a case of someone being where they shouldn't be - may see blurring of faces.
Judgement in the Netherlands, but would be influential in the courts in the UK.A News site linked to infringing images which had been posted without permission on a website. The news site has been ordered to pay the original publisher 28,400 euros to cover their costs plus a fine of 50,000 if it fails to comply with the court request to remove the links. Legal notice - terms and conditions about linking and reuse of the website content.