Datacenter Dynamics Chicago 30 sept 2010
•
0 recomendaciones•52 vistas
Energy Efficiency in Datacenters Performance/Watt/Dollar
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Similar a Datacenter Dynamics Chicago 30 sept 2010
Similar a Datacenter Dynamics Chicago 30 sept 2010 (20)
Más de Dileep Bhandarkar
Más de Dileep Bhandarkar (20)
Último
Último (20)
Datacenter Dynamics Chicago 30 sept 2010
- 1. ©Microsoft® 2009 Performance/ Watt/Dollar Dileep Bhandarkar, Ph. D. Distinguished Engineer Global Foundation Services Microsoft Corporation Energy Efficiency in Datacenters 2010
- 2. ©Microsoft® 2009 CLOUD SERVICES 59 markets and 36 languages 76 markets and 48 languages Our Consumer Cloud Services
- 3. ©Microsoft® 2009 Our Commercial Cloud Services
- 4. ©Microsoft® 2009 Service Key Metric More than 1 billion authentications per day ~ 400 million active accounts Processes 3 – 5 billion e-mail messages a day More than 4 billion queries per month 10B messages each day/ 750M active accounts Over 450 million unique visitors monthly Key Operational Metrics
- 5. ©Microsoft® 2009 Datacenter Construction Costs Land: 0%-2% Core & Shell Costs: 5%-9% Architectural: 4%-7% Mechanical / Electrical: 70%-85% Land Core / Shell Mech /Elec Arch Where the costs are: >80% scale with power <10% scale with space Reduce!
- 6. ©Microsoft® 2009 Why Power is Important? Energy Consumption: US power rate 10.27 cents per Kilowatt hour) in 2008 according to DOE/eia (http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_3.html) In a typical data center for every watt in server power there can be another 0.5 to 1 watt consumed for power distribution losses and cooling. Power (Switch Gear, UPS, Battery backup, etc) Cooling (Chillers, CRACs, etc) Building load Demand from grid IT load Demand from servers, storage, telco equipment, etc PUE = Total Facility Power/IT Equipment Power
- 7. ©Microsoft® 2009 But There is More! Datacenters can cost between $10M and $20M per megawatt Capital depreciation costs are important Server acquisition costs may not dominate TCO Basic 1U Server - 5 year TCO Total Equipment cost per server Energy Usage cost per server Datacenter Capital cost per server Datacenter operating cost per server
- 8. ©Microsoft® 2009 Beyond Just Reducing PUE PUE is an excellent metric for evaluating effectiveness of datacenter infrastructure Server performance per watt can vary Rightsizing of server configuration can improve overall energy efficiency Low Power processors often offer best performance per watt Microsoft optimizes the total solution for best performance per watt per TCO$ 8
- 9. ©Microsoft® 2009 Holistic Optimization Datacenter and Servers together PUE is an excellent metric for evaluating effectiveness of datacenter infrastructure Server performance per watt can vary Rightsizing of server configuration can improve overall energy efficiency Low Power processors often offer best performance per watt Microsoft optimizes the total solution for best performance per TCO$ 9
- 10. Drive change in the industry through strong partnerships
- 12. 12 2 Socket server based on a half- width server design •6.3” x 16.7” •2 CPU Sockets •4 DIMM Slots per CPU Socket •4 SATA HDD Connections • Dual 1 GbE NIC •One 16x PCIe Card Slot 16x PCIe Slot 4x SATA HDD Connectors Optional 16x PCIe Card, not present in basic configuration 2x CPU Memory DIMMs
- 13. 13 2 to 4 TOR (2 to 4 RU) 96 Servers (Up to 48 RU) 2 Bulk Power (2x 3RU) Upper Power Domain Lower Power Domain
- 16. 1.0 1.07 1.18 1.0 1.10 1.6 1.0 1.24 1.56 1.0 0.87 0.76 1.0 0.79 0.46 2.33 GHz (50W) 2.67 GHz (80W) 3.167 GHz (120W) Performance System Price System Power Perf/W Perf/W/$ Assumption: Server Price = $2000 + CPUs, Server Power = 150W + CPUs The sweet spot is often at low power processors, especially when system price and power are considered. Your mileage may vary!
- 17. ChicagoQuincy Dublin Amsterdam Hong Kong Singapore Japan "Datacenters havebecomeasvitaltothefunctioning ofsocietyaspowerstations."--TheEconomist San Antonio Multiple global CDN locations in the Americas, Europe and APAC. Microsoft has more than 10 and less than 100 DCs worldwide. Quincy, Washington: approx 500K sq ft, 27MW, uses entirely hydro-electric power San Antonio, Texas: approx 477K sq ft, 27MW, uses recycled water for cooling Chicago, Illinois: 707,000 square feet with critical power of 60 MW, uses water side economization, containers Dublin, Ireland: approx 570K sq ft, up to 27MW, uses outside air for cooling.
- 18. Microsoft’s Data Center Evolution Containers Scalability Sustainability Data Center Colocation Generation 1 Generation 4 Modular Data Center Server Capacity Rack Density and Deployment Quincy and San Antonio Generation 2 Chicago and Dublin Generation 3 Deployment Scale Unit IT PAC Time to Market Lower TCO Scalable Data Center
- 19. ©Microsoft® 2009 Chicago Datacenter Two-story datacenter First floor: container bay medium reliability Second floor: high- reliability traditional co-location rooms Can deploy at scale Optimized energy and cooling efficiency Allows OEMs to build customized solutions based on Microsoft specifications
- 20. ©Microsoft® 2009 Container Selection Process “CBlox” specification defined all of the interface requirements to the Data Center: Physical Dimensions – length, width, height, weight Chilled Water temperature & flow rate Power – voltage and wattage Selection based primarily on: $/Server # of Servers/container
- 23. ©Microsoft® 2009 Modularize and pre-manufacture the entire datacenter Lower the Total Cost of Ownership Increase scalability and Right Time to Market Standardize components to improve operations and reliability Paradigm Shift to Ultra Modularity
- 24. ©Microsoft® 2009 Microsoft’s Future Datacenters • No mechanical cooling • Ultra-efficient water utilization • Utilize more renewable building materials • Reduce time to market by >50% • Low initial capital investment • Scale with business demand • 30 % - 50 % more cost effective for the same class of service • Outstanding PUE
- 25. ©Microsoft® 2009 Gen 4 Datacenter Strategy Standardized Gen, UPS, IT compute PACs and support equipment Multiple Datacenter Classes, Colo and Modular PAC’s (Pre-Assembled Components) Support equipment designed to be installed on indoor skids or outdoor PAC’s Primary Cooling via Airside Economizers Secondary Cooling via Air Cooled or Water Cooled Chillers, or Fluid Cooler Warmest server intake temperatures compared to all other Generations Colo - No Raised Floor with Hot/Cold Aisle containment
- 26. ©Microsoft® 2009 ITPAC Design 26 video http://www.microsoft.com/showcase/en/us/details/84f44749-1343-4467-8012-9c70ef77981c 20 foot, 170 KW, 9 rack Proof of Concept ITPAC CE and ETL certified as a Air Handler Operating outside for over 1 year
- 27. ITPAC POC Units
- 28. ©Microsoft® 2009 Conclusions Holistic optimization of server and datacenter design Platform energy efficiency remains a major focus area (Perf/Watt/Dollar) Stranding Power is expensive Focus on Infrastructure Cost reduction via high temperature and free air cooling Workload analysis is critical to rightsizing Total Cost of Ownership is important Measure and Control Server Parameters Conventional Wisdom is often wrong! 28
- 30. © 2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. Microsoft is a trademark of the Microsoft companies. The Microsoft Financing marks are used by CIT Financial Ltd. under license. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.