Love defined by Science as the process of Ferromagnetism.

1. at MY BODACIOUS BLOG 3/24/10 5:02 AM
MY BODACIOUS BLOG
The Concept Chronicles
Gazette of a Graphomaniac: www.AlexGulkin.com
Love: A Force of Ferromagnetism?
March 22nd, 2010
Popular Science recently published an article in which love was “scientifically defined” through a
process of chemistry. A proposal that the nuclear magnetic process of Ferromagnetism was a biological
representation of the physiological occurence of “love.” In this proposed correlation, there was one very
specific and dogmatic notion:
This is not an exact quote, but it’s a close enough neighbor to convey the same concept:
Isolated, confined and ambiguous “love” is precisely proven to be a spontaneously occurring
magnetism. Ferromagnetism is a form of eventual self destructing magnetism that eventually will
become unable to sustane the bond that was formed (the magnetism formed is an illustration of “love”
developing, or occuring).
Why the quotations on the word love, you ask? Well, I’m feeling a bit analytical this morning, and it
must be made clear that this entry is simply a dictation of theory and interpretation. The approach and
illustration of the following investigation is impersonal, a universal and nonspecific approach to “love”
and all relationships where “love” is present. It is not my love, not my personal love, that I am
attempting to interperet or define. My determined love is something which is definitive and fixed,
without question, secure in my own heart and mind. The following exploratory is written from an
emotionally detached and objective point of view. MY perception and definition of love and personal
connection is a distinguished and predetermined resolve, pertaining only to me. In order to successfully
and diplomatically approach “love” in terms of inclusive definition and scientific relation, my personal
perception of “love” needs to be removed. Therefore, I quote “love” because I am not referring to the
love I know and understand, but the mysterious and enigmatic proposed properties of “love” as defined
by science, psychology, and substance.
Just wanted to make that clear before I continue…
Absolute and conclusive love is a phenomenon that I happily acknowledge to never fully understand.
Perhaps it is an act of God (if you believe in such an occurence), or perhaps it is an unpredictable and
unexplainable force of nature, and maybe terrorism is to blame somehow (refer to your local
government branch for this correlation)… Maybe love is an invention of man, a complex and
confidential entity used to manage and control mankind, facilitated by a variety of confidential
Government Administrations. A population regulation division, composed of a multitude of advisers,
assembly, and cabinets whose sole mission is Legislation through the control of the feeling civilians
feel as love. There also exists a good possibility that love is a universal element, one that is a
http://alexgulkin.com/wp/ Page 1 of 5

2. at MY BODACIOUS BLOG 3/24/10 5:02 AM
confidential entity of the universe. It’s explanation, it’s definition, heavily armed and guarded from
man. Perhaps this is simply because one’s absolute understanding of love would negate its’ power, deny
its’ consuming ability of the heart and mind. What we now call love may have been one of the worlds’
first nuclear experiments. A particular form of psychosomatic poison maybe? A perfect mixture of
carefully chosed chemical components that form a complex structure, eventually invading and effecting
the human psyche, thought process, and physiological state. Reasonable, it can be concluded that an
exposure to this chemical element causes a spontaneous, chemical magnetization. Acting as a drug,
initial exposure to the toxin facilitates feelings such as intense bliss, a natural and intense high of
endorphins, often followed by an intense mysery and emotional suffering. The only statement that I
have no speculation of is that love is a sensitive, uncontrollable and mysterious force; a bond that is just
as sensitive and erratic as it is strong and eternal. That, for me, is enough of a definition. However,
let’s briefly investigate this Scientific Theory of love outlined by the process of Ferromagnetism.
Spontaneous Vortex Phase of Ferromagnetism
A comprehensive overview of the Ferromagnetic Process
Scientifically, love is loosely defined as a simple biological and physiological process, a structural
equation modeling described by the forming of attachments, bonds, and affinites. Interesting that love
was approached as a process, I think… Simply because a process, by definition, includes outlined
phases. One interesting appropriation of this process compares love to the magnetic bonding process of
Ferromagnetism, the only process of magnetic attraction that is strong enough to be felt.
Ferromagnetism is a phenomenon which begins when uncharged materials spontaneously attract and
bond to one another, the first phase of this nuclear process. Mortal beings are represented as these
individually uncharged separate elements, which form a relatable strong bond and attraction. The
Ferromagnetic Porocess involves a very distinct and important transitional phase, which is, according
to science, a constant and unavoidable certainty. Following the spontaneous creation of the bond of
elements (or individuals), the exchange interaction (viewed as the degree of emotional intensity) of
these separately uncharged materials causes an intense rise of thermal energy. As a result of this
energy, an extremely high and unsustainabe temperature is reached. It is when the controllable
temperature is surpassed when the initial magnetic alignment is destroyed, as the magnetic field has
been actually melted by this extreme thermal energy. Although this theory is somewhat romantic in its’
scientific phenomenon comparison of unavoidable destruction, there exists no feasible way that it even
closely resembles a constant, determining truth of love. In this comparison, love has no choice but to
fail. The unavoidability factor of this phase is not true to life, and holds no water. While becomming
more and more rapidly rare and uncommon, love has proven itself to have the ability to be sustained
throughout the entire existance of mankind. By simply disregarding these instances, the proposed
definition of love is in no way a physiological certainty. At best, it is a mediocre representation.
Science has a lot of nerve, in my opinion, attempting to define something so extremely infinite and
individually variabled to a predictable magnetic process. At least psychology,theory and philosophy
have the respect to acknowledge the presence of varible change, the acceptance that each individuals
experience and dictation of love will be varied by personal and environmental forces. Science, as an
area of study, is the most arrogant. Self assured but without regard to common sense and
comprehensive conclusions, loyal only to properties and reactions.
That’s all for today… I simply had to acknowledge the absurdity of defining love and its’ power in
absolute and comprehensive terms as entirely illogical, and offensive in the aspect that it succeeds in
http://alexgulkin.com/wp/ Page 2 of 5

3. at MY BODACIOUS BLOG 3/24/10 5:02 AM
belittling the knoledge of mankind. I’m disappointed in you, Science. Your distinct inaccuracy and
conceit plagues me.
I’ll leave you now with this:
Sigh No More- Mumford & Sons
♥ Have a great night everybody!
-Alex
MY PAGES
Gazette of a Graphomaniac: www.AlexGulkin.com
Love: A Force of Ferromagnetism?
MY FACEBOOK
The Concept Chronicles Briefing
MY RECENT BLOGS
The clock nearing six, hungry, tired, and sick.
“And now I cling to what I knew, I saw exactly what was true..”
This Heart’s On Fire
This is your brain on WP
IPhone Test
http://alexgulkin.com/wp/ Page 3 of 5

4. at MY BODACIOUS BLOG 3/24/10 5:02 AM
Chronicle Comments
Digunderground on IPhone Test
CONCEPT CHRONICLE CATEGORIES
Happy-Ness (2)
On-The-Run-Fun (4)
BLOG TOPIC TAGS
iphone
1984 Dorothy Parker George Orwell Henry David Thoreau Jim Croce LCD Soundsystem Mumford &
Sons Operator Rod McKuen The Cave Thor Walt Whitman Wolf Parade WordPress
CONCEPT CHRONICLE FEED
The clock nearing six, hungry, tired, and sick. March 23, 2010
I don't apologize for being hard to know […]
Alex Gulkin
“And now I cling to what I knew, I saw exactly what was true..” March 23, 2010
Henry David Thoreau: “In human intercourse the tragedy begins, not when there is
misunderstanding about words, but when silence is not understood.” Mumford & Sons: After
the Storm Excerpt: And now I cling to what I knew I saw exactly what was true But oh no
more. That’s why I hold, That’s why I hold with all I have. That’s why I hold. I [...] […]
Alex Gulkin
This Heart’s On Fire March 18, 2010
Adam and Thor: The Incredible Man-Dog-Duo […]
Alex Gulkin
SEARCH BLOGS
Search for: Search
BAD ASS SHIT
AdamTout.com An awesome, comprehensive collection of Adam’s creations!
Andrew Johnson – Relaxation Therapy Audio Track of Andrew P. Johnson – Deep Relaxation
Kahlil Gibran On Love An excert from Gibrans classic collection of poetry, The Prophet.
Stephanie Bryant, Great Music. A taste of some great music by Stephanie D. Bryant
Concept Chronicle Archives
http://alexgulkin.com/wp/ Page 4 of 5

5. at MY BODACIOUS BLOG 3/24/10 5:02 AM
Select Month
CONCEPT CHRONICLE CALENDAR
March 2010
M T WT F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
BODACIOUS BLOG OPTIONS
Site Admin
Log out
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
WordPress.org
Powered by WordPress | Using Bluebird theme by Randa Clay | Copyright © MY BODACIOUS BLOG |
Top
http://alexgulkin.com/wp/ Page 5 of 5