SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Rapid and Sensitive Determination of
Acesulfame in Vinegar
Ran Liangji,1
Jin Yan,1
Xu Qun,1
and Jeffrey Rohrer2
1
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China;
2
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
ApplicationNote1104
Key Words
HPLC, Acesulfame k, Acclaim Mixed-Mode WAX-1 Column, Artificial
Sweetener, Sugar Substitute, Food Additive, Food Safety, Food Analysis
Goal
To develop an efficient high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
method for the rapid and sensitive determination of acesulfame in vinegar,
in compliance with the Chinese National Standard regulation
Introduction
Acesulfame (structure shown in Figure 1), a synthetic
sweetener 200 times sweeter than sucrose, has been
extensively used as a sugar substitute in foods and
beverages. The Standardization Administration of China
allows acesulfame to be added to fermented vinegar
products, but limits the added amount to no more than
4 µg/mL.1
Therefore, it is necessary to establish efficient
methods to sensitively and rapidly determine acesulfame
in fermented vinegar.
The typical method for determination of acesulfame
in vinegar uses HPLC, which is also recommended in
China GB/T 5009.140-2003.1-3
Table 1 lists details of
three methods for determining acesulfame in food and
beverages, each using either ammonium sulfate or
ammonium acetate as a mobile phase component. Use of
ammonium sulfate and ammonium acetate mobile phase
buffers with UV detection at ~220 nm may result in less
stable baselines than when using other HPLC mobile
phases. In addition, the polar compounds present in
vinegar samples may interfere with the separation of
acesulfame on a C18 stationary phase. To address these
issues, the authors investigated using other stationary
and mobile phases for this application. Figure 1. Structure of acesulfame.
Table 1. Methods for determining acesulfame in food products.
H3
C
N–
K+
S 0
0
0
0
Method Sample Column Mobile Phase Detection
GB/T5009.140-20031
Beverage C18
0.02 M Ammonium Sulfate/
Methanol/Acetonitrile, 10%
UV, 214 nm
Literature2
Food C18
0.02 M Ammonium Acetate/
Methanol (90:10, v/v)
UV, 230 nm
Literature3 Liquid
Seasoning
C18
0.02 M Ammonium Acetate/
Methanol (93:7, v/v)
UV, 230 nm
2 Equipment, Software, and Consumables
•	 Thermo Scientific™
Dionex™
UltiMate™
3000 Rapid
Separation LC (RSLC) system, including:
– LPG-3400RS Quaternary Pump (P/N 5040.0036)
– SRD-3400 Integrated Solvent and Degasser Rack
(P/N 5035.9245)
– WPS-3000TRS Well Plate Sampler, Thermostatted
(P/N 5840.0020), with 25 µL sample loop
(P/N 6820.2415)
– TCC-3000RS Thermostatted Column Compartment
(P/N 5730.0000)
	 – DAD-3000RS Diode Array Detector (P/N 5082.0010),
with 2.5 µL flow cell (P/N 6082.0300)
•	 Thermo Scientific™
Dionex™
Chromeleon™
Chromatog-
raphy Data System software, version 7.1 or above
•	 Thermo Scientific™
Target2™
Nylon Syringe Filters,
0.45 μm, 30 mm (P/N F2500-1)
Reagents and Standards
•	 Deionized (DI) water, 18.2 MΩ-cm resistivity, generated
from the Thermo Scientific™
Barnstead™
GenPure™
Pro
ultrapure water system (P/N 50131948)
•	 Acetonitrile, HPLC Grade (Fisher Scientific
P/N AC610010040)
•	 Ammonium phosphate monobasic, HPLC Grade,
(Fisher Scientific P/N A685-500)
•	 Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution, 50%
w/w/Certified (Fisher Scientific P/N SS254-500)
•	 Acesulfame potassium (Fisher Scientific
P/N NC0525062)
Conditions
Column:	 Thermo Scientific™
Acclaim™
Mixed-Mode
	 WAX-1, 3 µm, 3 × 150 mm (P/N 070088)
Mobile Phase:	 Acetonitrile/100 mM ammonium phosphate
	 (dissolve 13.6 g of ammonium phosphate in 1 L
	 of DI water, adjust pH to 6.8 with 50% NaOH
	 solution), 20:80 (v/v)
Flow Rate:	 0.8 mL/min
Injection Volume:	10 µL (partial-loop injection mode)
Temperature:	 30 °C
Detection:	 UV, 227 nm
Preparation of Standard Solutions
Stock Standard 1
Dissolve 0.01 g of acesulfame potassium standard in
10 mL of DI water. The concentration of Stock Standard 1
will be 1000 µg/mL.
Stock Standard 2
Dilute 400 μL of Stock Standard Solution 1 to 10 mL with
DI water. The concentration of Stock Standard 2 will be
40 µg/mL.
Stock Standard 3
Dilute 500 μL of Stock Standard Solution 2 to 10 mL with
DI water. The concentration of Stock Standard 3 will be
2 µg/mL.
Standard Solutions for Calibration
For calibration, prepare eight working standard solutions
with different concentrations by diluting the proper
amount of the stock standard solutions with DI water.
The volumes of each solution needed to make the
calibration standards are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Preparation of calibration standards.
Acesulfame Stock Std
for Calibration, Concn
(µg/mL)
Volume of Acesulfame Stock
Std for Calibration
(mL)
Volume of
DI Water
(mL)
Final Volume of
Calibration Std
(mL)
Final Concn of
Calibration Std
(µg/mL)
Stock Standard 2,
40
5.0 5.0
10
20
2.5 7.5 10
1.25 8.75 5.0
0.625 9.375 2.0
Stock Standard 3,
2
5.0 5.0
10
1.0
2.5 7.5 0.5
0.25 9.75 0.05
0.125 9.875 0.025
3Preparation of Samples
Two vinegar samples were purchased from a supermarket
in Chengdu, People’s Republic of China.
Dilute 1 mL of the vinegar sample to 100 mL with DI
water in a 100 mL volumetric flask. Pass the sample
through a 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to injection.
Dilute 5 mL of the 10 μg/mL calibration standard and
1 mL of the vinegar sample with DI water in a 100 mL
volumetric flask. The spiked concentration of acesulfame
in the vinegar sample will be 0.5 µg/mL. Pass the sample
through a 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to injection.
Results and Discussion
Optimization of Chromatographic Conditions
Three columns with different stationary phases were
evaluted for the separation of acesulfame: the Acclaim
120 C18, Acclaim PolarAdvantage II (PA2), and the
Acclaim Mixed-Mode WAX-1 columns. Under the
recommended chromatographic conditions shown in
References 1–3, the acesulfame peak tailed with weak
retention (close to the void volume) on the Acclaim PA2
column. When using the Acclaim 120 C18 column, the
elution of some compounds from a vinegar sample
required a long time (nearly 20 min). The Acclaim
Mixed-Mode WAX-1 column—which has been applied
to the determination of additives including acesulfame in
beverages—showed good separation of acesulfame from
other compounds found in vinegar samples and was,
therefore, used in this application.4
Here, ammonium acetate/ammonium phosphate mobile
phase buffers and methonal/acetonitrile mobile phase
solvents were evaluted using an Acclaim Mixed-Mode
WAX-1 column. Compared to ammonium acetate and
methanol, ammonium phosphate/acetonitrile yielded
better peak symmetry, a smoother baseline, and a faster
separation of acesulfame. Therefore, an acetonitrile/
ammonium phosphate mobile phase was used in
this work.
In addition, investigations of the concentration and pH
value of the mobile phase buffer showed that a 0.1 M
buffer concentration at pH 6.8 yielded a reproducible
separation of acesulfame in vinegar samples. Figure 2
shows a chromatogram of a 0.025 µg/mL acesulfame
standard under the optimized chromatographic
conditions.
Reproducibility, Linearity, and Detection Limit
Short-term method reproducibility was estimated by
making seven consecutive injections of a vinegar sample
spiked with acesulfame to a concentration of 0.5 µg/mL.
The retention time RSD was 0.1 and the peak area RSD
was 0.4, demonstrating good short-term precision for this
HPLC method.
Figure 2. An acesulfame standard.
Figure 3. Calibration curve for acesulfame.
Calibration linearity for UV detection of acesulfame was
investigated by making three consecutive 10 µL injections
of a standard prepared at eight different concentrations
(i.e., 24 total injections). Linearity was observed from
0.025 to 20 μg/mL when plotting the concentration vs
peak area (calibration curve shown in Figure 3). The
linear regression equation was A = 0.4874c (forced to the
origin), where A represents peak area and c represents
analyte concentration. The coefficient of determination
was 1.000. This calibration curve was used to quantify
acesulfame in vinegar samples.
Five replicate injections of an acesulfame standard
with a concentration of 0.025 μg/mL were used for
estimating the method detection limit (MDL) using
a signal-to-noise ratio = 3. The measured MDL of
acesulfame was 0.008 μg/mL. The detection limit of
acesulfame in a vinegar sample is 0.8 μg/mL (100-fold
dilution of the sample), which is much lower than the
4 μg/mL that is specified in GB/T 5009.140-2003.1
Peak: 1. Acesulfame 0.025 µg/mL
Minutes
–0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
mAU
1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 5 10 15 20 25
PeakArea(µS*min)
Concentration (µg/mL)
ApplicationNote1104
AN71251-EN 0914S
Africa +43 1 333 50 34 0
Australia +61 3 9757 4300
Austria +43 810 282 206
Belgium +32 53 73 42 41
Brazil +55 11 3731 5140
Canada +1 800 530 8447
China 800 810 5118 (free call domestic)
400 650 5118
Denmark +45 70 23 62 60
Europe-Other +43 1 333 50 34 0
Finland +358 9 3291 0200
France +33 1 60 92 48 00
Germany +49 6103 408 1014
India +91 22 6742 9494
Italy +39 02 950 591
Japan +81 6 6885 1213
Korea +82 2 3420 8600
Latin America +1 561 688 8700
Middle East +43 1 333 50 34 0
Netherlands +31 76 579 55 55
New Zealand +64 9 980 6700
Norway +46 8 556 468 00
Russia/CIS +43 1 333 50 34 0
Singapore +65 6289 1190
Sweden +46 8 556 468 00
Switzerland +41 61 716 77 00
Taiwan +886 2 8751 6655
UK/Ireland +44 1442 233555
USA +1 800 532 4752
www.thermoscientific.com/chromatography
©2014 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. ISO is a trademark of the International Standards Organization. All other trademarks
are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is presented as an example of the capabilities of Thermo Fisher
Scientific products. It is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of
others. Specifications, terms and pricing are subject to change. Not all products are available in all countries. Please consult your local sales
representative for details.
Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Sunnyvale, CA USA is
ISO 9001:2008 Certified.
Analysis of Vinegar Samples
Acesulfame was not found in either vinegar sample.
Figure 4 shows chromatograms of a vinegar sample and
the same sample spiked with acesulfame. To judge method
accuracy, three injections were made of the two vinegar
samples spiked with a 0.5 μg/mL acesulfame standard.
The average recoveries were 90 and 96%, respectively,
demonstrating good method accuracy.
Conclusion
This work describes an efficient HPLC method using a
mixed-mode column with UV detection for a rapid and
sensitive determination of acesulfame in vinegar. This
approach offers the advantages of simple sample
preparation, good method reproducibility, and a wide
linear calibration range.
References
1.	GB/T 5009.140-2003: Determination of Acesulfame K
in Beverages; Standardization Administration of China
(SAC), General Administration of Quality Supervision,
Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of
China: Beijing, 2003.
2.	Chen, Y.; Xie, X.F.; Di, J.W. Determination of
Acesulfame, Benzoic Acid, Sorbic Acid and Saccharin
Sodium in Food by HPLC. PTCA (Part B: Chem. Anal.)
2007, 43, 887–888. [Online] www.doc88.com/
p-289792538614.html (accessed July 30, 2014).
3.	Dong, M. Simultaneous Determination of Acesulfame,
Benzoic Acid, Sorbic Acid and Saccharin Sodium in
Compound Liquid Seasoner by Reversed Phase High
Performance Liquid Chromatography. Commodities
and Quality (Shang pin yu zhi liang) 2013, 3, 244, 252.
4.	Dionex (now part of Thermo Scientific) Application
Note 193: Determination of Additives in Carbonated
Beverages. Sunnyvale, CA, 2007. [Online] www.
thermoscientific.com/content/dam/tfs/ATG/CMD/
CMD%20Documents/AN-193-Determination-
Additive-Carbonated-Beverages-LPN1961.pdf
(accessed July 30, 2014).
Figure 4. A vinegar sample (a) and the same sample spiked with 0.5 μg/mL of
acesulfame standard (b).
Peak: 1. Acesulfame
Minutes
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
–5.0
0
5.0
10.0
15.0
18.8
mAU
1
a
b

More Related Content

Featured

AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Applitools
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at WorkGetSmarter
 

Featured (20)

AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
 
Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
 
ChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slidesChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slides
 
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike RoutesMore than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
 

AN-1104-LC-Acesulfame-Vinegar-AN71251-EN

  • 1. Rapid and Sensitive Determination of Acesulfame in Vinegar Ran Liangji,1 Jin Yan,1 Xu Qun,1 and Jeffrey Rohrer2 1 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA ApplicationNote1104 Key Words HPLC, Acesulfame k, Acclaim Mixed-Mode WAX-1 Column, Artificial Sweetener, Sugar Substitute, Food Additive, Food Safety, Food Analysis Goal To develop an efficient high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the rapid and sensitive determination of acesulfame in vinegar, in compliance with the Chinese National Standard regulation Introduction Acesulfame (structure shown in Figure 1), a synthetic sweetener 200 times sweeter than sucrose, has been extensively used as a sugar substitute in foods and beverages. The Standardization Administration of China allows acesulfame to be added to fermented vinegar products, but limits the added amount to no more than 4 µg/mL.1 Therefore, it is necessary to establish efficient methods to sensitively and rapidly determine acesulfame in fermented vinegar. The typical method for determination of acesulfame in vinegar uses HPLC, which is also recommended in China GB/T 5009.140-2003.1-3 Table 1 lists details of three methods for determining acesulfame in food and beverages, each using either ammonium sulfate or ammonium acetate as a mobile phase component. Use of ammonium sulfate and ammonium acetate mobile phase buffers with UV detection at ~220 nm may result in less stable baselines than when using other HPLC mobile phases. In addition, the polar compounds present in vinegar samples may interfere with the separation of acesulfame on a C18 stationary phase. To address these issues, the authors investigated using other stationary and mobile phases for this application. Figure 1. Structure of acesulfame. Table 1. Methods for determining acesulfame in food products. H3 C N– K+ S 0 0 0 0 Method Sample Column Mobile Phase Detection GB/T5009.140-20031 Beverage C18 0.02 M Ammonium Sulfate/ Methanol/Acetonitrile, 10% UV, 214 nm Literature2 Food C18 0.02 M Ammonium Acetate/ Methanol (90:10, v/v) UV, 230 nm Literature3 Liquid Seasoning C18 0.02 M Ammonium Acetate/ Methanol (93:7, v/v) UV, 230 nm
  • 2. 2 Equipment, Software, and Consumables • Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ UltiMate™ 3000 Rapid Separation LC (RSLC) system, including: – LPG-3400RS Quaternary Pump (P/N 5040.0036) – SRD-3400 Integrated Solvent and Degasser Rack (P/N 5035.9245) – WPS-3000TRS Well Plate Sampler, Thermostatted (P/N 5840.0020), with 25 µL sample loop (P/N 6820.2415) – TCC-3000RS Thermostatted Column Compartment (P/N 5730.0000) – DAD-3000RS Diode Array Detector (P/N 5082.0010), with 2.5 µL flow cell (P/N 6082.0300) • Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ Chromeleon™ Chromatog- raphy Data System software, version 7.1 or above • Thermo Scientific™ Target2™ Nylon Syringe Filters, 0.45 μm, 30 mm (P/N F2500-1) Reagents and Standards • Deionized (DI) water, 18.2 MΩ-cm resistivity, generated from the Thermo Scientific™ Barnstead™ GenPure™ Pro ultrapure water system (P/N 50131948) • Acetonitrile, HPLC Grade (Fisher Scientific P/N AC610010040) • Ammonium phosphate monobasic, HPLC Grade, (Fisher Scientific P/N A685-500) • Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution, 50% w/w/Certified (Fisher Scientific P/N SS254-500) • Acesulfame potassium (Fisher Scientific P/N NC0525062) Conditions Column: Thermo Scientific™ Acclaim™ Mixed-Mode WAX-1, 3 µm, 3 × 150 mm (P/N 070088) Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile/100 mM ammonium phosphate (dissolve 13.6 g of ammonium phosphate in 1 L of DI water, adjust pH to 6.8 with 50% NaOH solution), 20:80 (v/v) Flow Rate: 0.8 mL/min Injection Volume: 10 µL (partial-loop injection mode) Temperature: 30 °C Detection: UV, 227 nm Preparation of Standard Solutions Stock Standard 1 Dissolve 0.01 g of acesulfame potassium standard in 10 mL of DI water. The concentration of Stock Standard 1 will be 1000 µg/mL. Stock Standard 2 Dilute 400 μL of Stock Standard Solution 1 to 10 mL with DI water. The concentration of Stock Standard 2 will be 40 µg/mL. Stock Standard 3 Dilute 500 μL of Stock Standard Solution 2 to 10 mL with DI water. The concentration of Stock Standard 3 will be 2 µg/mL. Standard Solutions for Calibration For calibration, prepare eight working standard solutions with different concentrations by diluting the proper amount of the stock standard solutions with DI water. The volumes of each solution needed to make the calibration standards are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Preparation of calibration standards. Acesulfame Stock Std for Calibration, Concn (µg/mL) Volume of Acesulfame Stock Std for Calibration (mL) Volume of DI Water (mL) Final Volume of Calibration Std (mL) Final Concn of Calibration Std (µg/mL) Stock Standard 2, 40 5.0 5.0 10 20 2.5 7.5 10 1.25 8.75 5.0 0.625 9.375 2.0 Stock Standard 3, 2 5.0 5.0 10 1.0 2.5 7.5 0.5 0.25 9.75 0.05 0.125 9.875 0.025
  • 3. 3Preparation of Samples Two vinegar samples were purchased from a supermarket in Chengdu, People’s Republic of China. Dilute 1 mL of the vinegar sample to 100 mL with DI water in a 100 mL volumetric flask. Pass the sample through a 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to injection. Dilute 5 mL of the 10 μg/mL calibration standard and 1 mL of the vinegar sample with DI water in a 100 mL volumetric flask. The spiked concentration of acesulfame in the vinegar sample will be 0.5 µg/mL. Pass the sample through a 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to injection. Results and Discussion Optimization of Chromatographic Conditions Three columns with different stationary phases were evaluted for the separation of acesulfame: the Acclaim 120 C18, Acclaim PolarAdvantage II (PA2), and the Acclaim Mixed-Mode WAX-1 columns. Under the recommended chromatographic conditions shown in References 1–3, the acesulfame peak tailed with weak retention (close to the void volume) on the Acclaim PA2 column. When using the Acclaim 120 C18 column, the elution of some compounds from a vinegar sample required a long time (nearly 20 min). The Acclaim Mixed-Mode WAX-1 column—which has been applied to the determination of additives including acesulfame in beverages—showed good separation of acesulfame from other compounds found in vinegar samples and was, therefore, used in this application.4 Here, ammonium acetate/ammonium phosphate mobile phase buffers and methonal/acetonitrile mobile phase solvents were evaluted using an Acclaim Mixed-Mode WAX-1 column. Compared to ammonium acetate and methanol, ammonium phosphate/acetonitrile yielded better peak symmetry, a smoother baseline, and a faster separation of acesulfame. Therefore, an acetonitrile/ ammonium phosphate mobile phase was used in this work. In addition, investigations of the concentration and pH value of the mobile phase buffer showed that a 0.1 M buffer concentration at pH 6.8 yielded a reproducible separation of acesulfame in vinegar samples. Figure 2 shows a chromatogram of a 0.025 µg/mL acesulfame standard under the optimized chromatographic conditions. Reproducibility, Linearity, and Detection Limit Short-term method reproducibility was estimated by making seven consecutive injections of a vinegar sample spiked with acesulfame to a concentration of 0.5 µg/mL. The retention time RSD was 0.1 and the peak area RSD was 0.4, demonstrating good short-term precision for this HPLC method. Figure 2. An acesulfame standard. Figure 3. Calibration curve for acesulfame. Calibration linearity for UV detection of acesulfame was investigated by making three consecutive 10 µL injections of a standard prepared at eight different concentrations (i.e., 24 total injections). Linearity was observed from 0.025 to 20 μg/mL when plotting the concentration vs peak area (calibration curve shown in Figure 3). The linear regression equation was A = 0.4874c (forced to the origin), where A represents peak area and c represents analyte concentration. The coefficient of determination was 1.000. This calibration curve was used to quantify acesulfame in vinegar samples. Five replicate injections of an acesulfame standard with a concentration of 0.025 μg/mL were used for estimating the method detection limit (MDL) using a signal-to-noise ratio = 3. The measured MDL of acesulfame was 0.008 μg/mL. The detection limit of acesulfame in a vinegar sample is 0.8 μg/mL (100-fold dilution of the sample), which is much lower than the 4 μg/mL that is specified in GB/T 5009.140-2003.1 Peak: 1. Acesulfame 0.025 µg/mL Minutes –0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 mAU 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 PeakArea(µS*min) Concentration (µg/mL)
  • 4. ApplicationNote1104 AN71251-EN 0914S Africa +43 1 333 50 34 0 Australia +61 3 9757 4300 Austria +43 810 282 206 Belgium +32 53 73 42 41 Brazil +55 11 3731 5140 Canada +1 800 530 8447 China 800 810 5118 (free call domestic) 400 650 5118 Denmark +45 70 23 62 60 Europe-Other +43 1 333 50 34 0 Finland +358 9 3291 0200 France +33 1 60 92 48 00 Germany +49 6103 408 1014 India +91 22 6742 9494 Italy +39 02 950 591 Japan +81 6 6885 1213 Korea +82 2 3420 8600 Latin America +1 561 688 8700 Middle East +43 1 333 50 34 0 Netherlands +31 76 579 55 55 New Zealand +64 9 980 6700 Norway +46 8 556 468 00 Russia/CIS +43 1 333 50 34 0 Singapore +65 6289 1190 Sweden +46 8 556 468 00 Switzerland +41 61 716 77 00 Taiwan +886 2 8751 6655 UK/Ireland +44 1442 233555 USA +1 800 532 4752 www.thermoscientific.com/chromatography ©2014 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. ISO is a trademark of the International Standards Organization. All other trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is presented as an example of the capabilities of Thermo Fisher Scientific products. It is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Specifications, terms and pricing are subject to change. Not all products are available in all countries. Please consult your local sales representative for details. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA USA is ISO 9001:2008 Certified. Analysis of Vinegar Samples Acesulfame was not found in either vinegar sample. Figure 4 shows chromatograms of a vinegar sample and the same sample spiked with acesulfame. To judge method accuracy, three injections were made of the two vinegar samples spiked with a 0.5 μg/mL acesulfame standard. The average recoveries were 90 and 96%, respectively, demonstrating good method accuracy. Conclusion This work describes an efficient HPLC method using a mixed-mode column with UV detection for a rapid and sensitive determination of acesulfame in vinegar. This approach offers the advantages of simple sample preparation, good method reproducibility, and a wide linear calibration range. References 1. GB/T 5009.140-2003: Determination of Acesulfame K in Beverages; Standardization Administration of China (SAC), General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, 2003. 2. Chen, Y.; Xie, X.F.; Di, J.W. Determination of Acesulfame, Benzoic Acid, Sorbic Acid and Saccharin Sodium in Food by HPLC. PTCA (Part B: Chem. Anal.) 2007, 43, 887–888. [Online] www.doc88.com/ p-289792538614.html (accessed July 30, 2014). 3. Dong, M. Simultaneous Determination of Acesulfame, Benzoic Acid, Sorbic Acid and Saccharin Sodium in Compound Liquid Seasoner by Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Commodities and Quality (Shang pin yu zhi liang) 2013, 3, 244, 252. 4. Dionex (now part of Thermo Scientific) Application Note 193: Determination of Additives in Carbonated Beverages. Sunnyvale, CA, 2007. [Online] www. thermoscientific.com/content/dam/tfs/ATG/CMD/ CMD%20Documents/AN-193-Determination- Additive-Carbonated-Beverages-LPN1961.pdf (accessed July 30, 2014). Figure 4. A vinegar sample (a) and the same sample spiked with 0.5 μg/mL of acesulfame standard (b). Peak: 1. Acesulfame Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 –5.0 0 5.0 10.0 15.0 18.8 mAU 1 a b