25. limited utility of screening labs and ekg in
unintentional asymptomatic pediatric ingestions
WANG GS ET AL. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE. 2013
+
=
30. intro
POINT OF THE STUDY:
!
ASSESS THE UTILITY OF screening labs/ekg
!
IN THE MANAGEMENT OF
!
UNINTENTIONAL asymptomatic INGESTIONS
BY CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN 12 YO
WHO PRESENT TO ED
31. methods
RETROSPECTIVE CHART REVIEW
!
PEDIATRIC PATIENTS <12 YO
!
PRESENTING TO CHILDREN’S ED (~60,OOO VISITS/YEAR)
!
EVALUATION OF INGESTION
!
FROM JAN 2005 THROUGH DEC 2008
!
CASES IDENTIFIED BY ICD 9 CODE
33. methods
WHAT DATA DID THEY GRAB?
!
AGE, SEX, DATE OF VISIT
!
TYPE OF INGESTION
!
INTENTIONALITY
!
VITAL SIGNS, EXAM, MENTAL STATUS
!
USE OF LABS/TESTS AND RESULTS
!
USE OF REGIONAL POISON CENTER
!
UNSCHEDULED RETURNED VISITS/DISPOSITION
35. methods
CRITERIA FOR screening LAB/TEST
IN THIS STUDY:
!
ABNORMALITIES NOT LISTED UNDER
POTENTIAL SIDE EFFECTS IN LEXICOMP
36. methods
NORMAL EKG= NSR
!
NOT NORMAL BUT OK (I)
MILD ABNORMALITY (I; NO CARDS F/U)= SINUS DYSRHYTHMIA, ATRIAL
ENLARGEMENT, SINUS BRADYCARDIA, 1ST DEGREE AV BLOCK
!
ABNORMAL (II, III)
MODERATE ABNORMALITY (II; YES CARDS F/U)= RIGHT OR LEFT BBB,
BIVENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY, WPW, PROLONGED QTC
!
SIGNIFICANT ABNORMALITY (III; CARDS C/S NOW!)= COMPLETE AV BLOCK,
A FIB, PACING WITH LOSS OF CAPTURE, ATRIAL TACH
37. methods
DEFINITION OF “CHANGED MANAGEMENT”
RESULT REQUIRING INTERVENTION/TX
!
NON POISON CENTER SUBSPECIALTY CONSULT
!
PROLONGED ED STAY
38. results
595 KIDS <12 YO EVAL IN ED FOR UNINTENTIONAL INGESTION
!
47 BUTTON-BATTERY INGESTIONS
!
MEDIAN AGE 2.6 YEARS (56% MALE)
41. results
AT LEAST 1 LAB OR EKG OBTAINED IN 233 (39%) PATIENTS
!
73 (12%) PATIENTS RECEIVED EKG
!
3 PATIENTS HAD CLASS II EKG ABNORMALITIES
(ALL UNRELATED TO INGESTION
CARDS CONSULTED BUT NO IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION)
!
NONE OF THE 24 SCREENING EKGS WERE ABNORMAL
49. results
51 (9%) ADMITTED= 23 (45%) INPATIENT + 28 (55%) PICU
!
11 (2%) TO OR (10 BUTTON BATTERY REMOVAL + 1 CAUSTIC INGESTION)
!
1 DEATH (HEMATEMESIS, BUTTON BATTERY IN STOMACH, UNSUCCESSFUL
RESUSCITATION IN OR
50. limitations
RETROSPECTIVE CHART REVIEW
IN A SINGLE TERTIARY CARE CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL
= NOT GENERALIZABLE
!
SINGLE CHART REVIEWER NOT BLINDED TO STUDY QUESTION
= POSSIBLE/PROBABLE BIAS
51. take home
SCREENING TESTS ONLY HELPFUL IN KIDS WHO WERE SYMPTOMATIC
WITHOUT AN INGESTION HISTORY
KIDS <12 YO WITH UNINTENTIONAL INGESTIONS WITH
NORMAL VITALS AND MENTAL STATUS HAD NO POSITIVE SCREENING TESTS
THE ONLY SCREENING TESTS THAT CHANGED MANAGEMENT:
KIDS WITH MULTIPLE SX OR ALTERED MENTAL STATUS WITHOUT AN INGESTION
HISTORY
56. pediatric pathophysiologic considerations
LIMITED CARDIOVASCULAR RESERVE
!
CARDIAC OUTPUT HEAVILY RELIANT ON HR
!
ADRENERGIC TONE ALLOWS FOR BP TO REMAIN STABLE
UNTIL ADVANCED SHOCK
!
DRUGS CAUSING BRADYCARDIA (CA CHANNEL BLOCKERS, PESTICIDES)
CAN PRECIPITATE CIRCULATORY ARREST IN SMALL DOSES
57. pediatric pathophysiologic considerations
KIDS ARE MORE SENSITIVE TO SPECIFIC DRUGS
!
OPIOID RECEPTOR AGONISTS CAN CAUSE ENHANCED
CNS AND RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION
(DEXTROMETHORPHAN COUGH SYRUPS, CLONIDINE, CODEINE)*
!
MORE PRONE TO PARADOXICAL REACTIONS TO BENZODIAZEPINES**
!
INCREASED TENDENCY TO QTC PROLONGATION (BETA BLOCKERS,
ANTIDYSRHYTHMIC DRUGS)***
* MEGARBANE 2013, BAMSHAD 1990, KIM 2012, MCCARRON 1991,
** TOBIN 2008
*** LAER 2005