4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
Decolonising study skills
1. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Do We Need to Decolonise
Study Skills?
Dr HelenWebster,
Writing DevelopmentCentre
2. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Three Questions:
‘Study skills’: learning to learn, and to know, to practise and to communicate
according to the expectations and conventions of the institution, discipline
and level of study.
• Why might we need to decolonise study skills?
• How would we go about decolonising study skills?
• To what extent is decolonising study skills possible?
2
Do We Need to Decolonise Study Skills?
3. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
“…universities remain white middle-class spaces.They require
students to adopt particular ways of being and doing – those which
conform to middle-class practices that define success in higher
education – ways of writing, speaking and the use of academic
language. Universities measure a particular type of success that is
possessed by those from white middle-class backgrounds.”
(Bhopal, 2018)
Why might we need to decolonise Study
Skills?
4. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
The ‘Study Skills’ Model
“The study skills model sees writing and literacy as primarily an individual and cognitive
skill.This approach focusses on the surface features of language form and presumes that
students can transfer their knowledge of writing and literacy unproblematically from one
context to another”. (Lea and Street, 2006).
Study Skills: [Remediation of] Student Deficit.
• ‘Fix it’, atomised [transferable] skills; surface language, grammar, spelling.
• Sources: behavioural and experimental psychology; programmed learning
• Student writing as technical and instrumental skill (Robinson-Pant and
Street, 2012).
5. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Typical Study Skills Advice
Avoid abbreviations and contractions. Write words out in full:
• ‘dept.’ as ‘department’
• ‘e.g’. as ‘for example’
• ‘didn’t’ as ‘did not’
• ‘they’re’ as ‘they are’
• ‘isn’t’ as ‘is not’
Avoid personal pronouns such as ‘I’/’we’ and ‘you’. Instead, sentences begin in
impersonal ways such as ‘it can be seen that…’
Linking ideas together:
Introducing an alternative viewpoint: conversely; in comparison; on the contrary; in fact; though; although.
(Cottrell, Study Skills Handbook)
6. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
A Typical Study Skills Approach
Identify
Hm, let’s have a look at your essay…
•Examine
•Diagnose
•Prescribe
7. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Issues
• Bolt-on remediation
• Normative and prescriptive
• Generic, simplistic and decontextualised (and ineffective?)
• Diagnostic / pathologising
“Academic practices are usually presented as neutral, decontextualised sets of
technical skills and literacy that students from socially disadvantaged backgrounds are
seen to lack” (Lillis, 2001, cited in Burke, 2015).
“Through taken- for-granted academic practices, constructions of difference are
formed, often in problematic ways.The tendency is to project a pathologising gaze on
racialised bodies that have historically been constructed as a problem, and as suffering
from a range of deficit disorders (e.g. lack of aspiration, lack of motivation, lack of
confidence and so on’)” (Burke, 2015).
8. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
The Academic Socialisation Model
‘Academic socialization is concerned with students’ acculturation into disciplinary and
subject-based discourses and genres. Students acquire the ways of talking, writing, thinking
and using literacy that typified members of a disciplinary or subject area community.The
academic socialization model presumes that disciplinary discourses are relatively stable
and, once students have learned and understood the ground rules of a particular academic
discourse, they are able to reproduce it unproblematically’. (Lea and Street, 2006).
Academic socialisation: acculturation of students into academic discourse
• Inducting students into new ‘culture’; focus on orientation to learning and
interpretation of learning task, e.g. ‘deep’, ‘surface’, ‘strategic’ learning; homogeneous
‘culture’, lack of focus on institutional practices, change and power.
• Sources: social psychology, anthropology, constructivism.
• Student writing as transparent medium of representation. (Robinson-Pant and Street,
2012).
9. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Typical Academic Socialisation Advice
Academic writing is clear, concise, focussed, structured and
backed up by evidence. Its purpose is to aid the reader’s
understanding.
Characteristics of academic writing. Academic writing is:
Planned and focused: answers the question and demonstrates an understanding of the subject.
subject.
Structured: is coherent, written in a logical order, and brings together related points and material.
material.
Evidenced: demonstrates knowledge of the subject area, supports opinions and arguments with
with evidence, and is referenced accurately.
Formal in tone and style: uses appropriate language and tenses, and is clear, concise and
balanced
10. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Issues
• Demystifying the ‘institutional practice of mystery’ (Lillis, 2001)
• These concepts aren’t transparent, straightforward or uncontested, and we (white,
middle class academics) may not know which ones need demystifying.
• Gatekeeping and assimilation - perpetuates social and cultural capital without
challenging or diversifying it.
• Demands more identity-work of students who do not share the dominant culture.
‘Inclusion tends to be more about fitting into the dominant culture than
about interrogating that culture for the ways that it is complicit in the
social and cultural reproduction of exclusion, misrecognition and
inequality.’ (Burke, 2015)
11. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Why do we need to decolonize study skills?
• Current expectations of how students learn, know, practise and
communicate
• Current approaches to teaching study skills
What impact do our current practices have on Black, Asian
or Minority Ethnic students?
11
12. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
The Academic Literacies Model
Academic literacies is concerned with meaning-making, identity, power and authority, and
foregrounds the institutional nature of what counts as knowledge in any particular
academic context. It […] views the processes involved in acquiring appropriate and effective
uses of literacy as more complex, dynamic, nuanced, situated and involving both
epistemological issues and social processes, including power relations among people,
institutions and social identities. (Lea and Street, 2006).
Academic Literacies: Students’ negotiation of conflicting literary practices
• Literacies as social practices; at level of epistemologies and identities; institutions as
sites of/constituted in discourses and power; variety of communicative repertoire,
switching with regard to linguistic practices, social meanings and identities,
• Sources: New Literacy studies; critical discourse analysis, systemic functional
linguistics, cultural anthropology.
• StudentWriting as constitutive and contested. (Robinson-Pant and Street, 2012).
How would we go about decolonising study skills?
13. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Academic Literacies Advice?
In this situation,
Authority
• Who can
you be?
• Who do
you want to
be?
• Who do you
need to be?
Authorial
Presence
• How can
you say it?
• How do
you want to
say it?
• How do you
need to say
it?
Authorship
• What can
you say?
• What do
you want to
say?
• What do you
need to say?
‘Heuristic’ adapted from Lillis, 2001
14. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
Formulation in Learning Development
“The clinician brings knowledge derived from theory, research and clinical
experience, while the service user brings expertise about their own life and
the meaning and impact of their relationships and circumstances”
(Johnstone, 2017)
The LDer
brings…
The student
brings…?
15. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
The Five Ps of LD
Presentin
g
“Problem”
Pertinent
factors
Perceptio
n of task
Process
Product
16. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
How do we need to decolonize study skills?
• Current expectations of how students learn, know, practice and
communicate
• Current approaches to teaching study skills
What work do we need to do?
16
17. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
“What remains problematic, however, is the current uncritical
dissemination of the grounds upon which the [decolonisation] agenda is
based.These grounds, concerned as they are with access and completion
rates of BAME students are instrumental, and all too insidiously tied to a
neoliberal logic of capital, and the bottom line.Try as we might, I cannot
stress enough how we cannot begin to even fathom what a genuinely
decolonised HE curricula would look or feel like, for we have never known
one, let alone a truly decolonised society.
The above notwithstanding, we do not need to resign ourselves. It’s just
that the university is not the apropos forum for decolonisation to take
place – it is too implicated in the legacy and logic of colonialism.”
(Dhillon, 2020)
18. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
To what extent is decolonising study skills
possible?
…. Or is it something else we’re doing?
• Current approaches to teaching study skills
• Current expectations of how students learn, know, practice and
communicate
• Other dependencies: employability, academic publishing, etc
• Other tensions: appropriation, expropriation
18
19. Writing Development Centre. University Library.
References
Bhopal, K. (2018) White Privilege:The Myth of a Postracial Society. Bristol: Policy Press.
Burke, P. (2015) ‘Widening Participation in Higher Education: Racialised Inequalities and Misrecognitions’. In C.
Alexander and J Arday (eds), Aiming Higher: Race, Inequality and Diversity in Higher Education. London:
Runnymeade, pp. 21-4.
Dhillon, S. (2020) ‘Why Neoliberal Universities can’t expect their libraries to facilitate decolonisation’ Copyright
Licensing Agency, 14th April 2020. Available at https://cla.co.uk/blog/higher-education/why-neoliberal-
neoliberal-universities-cant-expect-their-libraries-to-facilitate-decolonisation
Lea, M. and Street, B. (2006). ‘The Academic Literacies Model:Theory and Applications’ Theory into Practice,
45(4) 368-377.
Lillis,T. (2001) StudentWriting: Access, Regulation and Desire. London: Routledge.
Robinson-Pant, A. And Street, B. (2012) ‘Students’ andTutors’ Understanding of ‘New’ Academic Literacy
Practices’ in: M. Castello and C. Donahue (eds). University Writing: Selves andTexts in Academic Societies.
(London: Routledge. 71-92.
Problematic in terms of values
Also in terms of what we’re missing – the student’s expertise
This is academic socialisation, not academic literacies.
Lave and Wenger – communities of practice, novice/expert
Not really looking at processes or practices of learning other than communication, and even then too skewed towards writing as product
I’ve added the last layer as a place to bring together the writer and the reader and negotiate a way forward. wAS developed as a research heuristic, but could be a nice model for a developmental conversation.
The resisting writer- negotiation and identities, constraints and potential. Polyphony – your ‘own’ words and ideas?
Also helps to validate invisible or unintended learning – what we capture is a sampling, a snapshot only
Can – both constraint and possibilities – open up multiples.
Need – this brings in the lecturer’s dimension and is where negotiation happens
Could be a workshop discussion, and also a pro forma for them to work through an assignment with
In the centre is the curriculum, discipline community, institution or lecturer, which neither of you can fully speak to, but both of you can piece together
The original 5 Ps from CBT are Presenting Problem, Predisposing, precipitating, Perpetuating and Protective factors.