3. Source
Various articles
Handbook of Gabriel M. Danovitch
Various other standard text books
2010 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the
care of kidney transplant recipients
4.
5.
6. Kidney transplant(KT) infection –
Risk factors
Pretranspaltation
Comorbid illness (DM, malnutrtion, immunosupression)
Immunosuppression for chonic conditons
Unrecognized or undertreated infections
Colonization by unusual or resistant organism (VRE - stool, MRSA – nares/skin,
Pseudomonas/enterobacteriace – UTI, yeast - skin)
Preoperative antibiotic exposure
Duration/frequency of hospitalization
Perioperative
Complexity of surgery/requirement of re-exploration
Prolonged operative time
Graft injury or prolonged ischemia
Bleeding/multiple BT
Infected graft
Contaminated preservation fluid
Foreign body
7. Kidney transplant(KT) infection –
Risk factors
Post-transplantation
Graft failure/dysfunction- needing immunosuppresion
Complicated post op management – development or worsening of comorbid
illness
Infection with immunomodulating viruse
Prolonged hospitalization, catheters,stents, intubation
Drains
Anastomotic breakdown
Leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, acquired hypogammaglobulinemia
Prolonged antibiotic therapy
Selected occupation/endemic infections
Lack of appropriate hand hygiene by caregivers
Marijuana abuse
8. Making clinical decision
Factors that may assist in recognizing the
causative organism
Timing of infection
Status of donor and recipient
State of immunosuppresion
9. The Timeline of Posttransplant
Infections
Nosocomial
Technical Opportunistic, Relapsed, Residual Common infections
HSV, CMV, HBV, HCV,
Transplantation 4 Weeks LISTERIA, PCP, TOXO
6-12 Months Long-term
Donor- Nosocomial
derived infection Period of most intensive
infection immune suppression
Common Variables in Immune Suppression
Rejection, antirejection therapy, new agents
Neutropenia, lymphopenia
Viral coinfection (CMV, HCV, EBV)
10. Changing Timeline of Infection after Transplantation
Fishman J. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2601-2614
11. Conditions predisposing to early
and nosocomial infection
Intubation (>3 days)
Catheters (urinary, venous, balloon pumps, dialysis, other mucosal injuries)
Ascites, peritoneal dialysis
Constipation, endoscopy, Clostridium difficile colitis
Broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents
Deep vein thrombosis, atelectasis, decubitus ulcers
Metabolic (malnutrition/uremia/hyperglycemia)
Latent infections (viral and parasitic)
Colonization (bacterial and fungal)
Exogenous immune suppression
12. Donor derived infections
Possible infections from the allograft include:
Tuberculosis
Known pathogens (screened): HBV, HCV, HIV
Uncommon pathogens: West Nile virus, Chagas’
disease,
Toxoplasma gondii, rabies, lymphocytic choriomeningitis
virus
Common “sticky” bacteria (may be nosocomial
colonizers of donor): Pneumococcus, Staphylococcus,
Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, Aspergillus, Candida
13. Donor-derived Infection
Most are latent
CMV, TB, T.cruzi
The majority of these are sub-clinical in healthy patients,
but can be catastrophic when transplanted into an
immunosuppresed patient
Rarely can be acute
West Nile, rabies, HIV, hepatitis
At present, routine evaluations of donors for infectious
diseases relies upon serologic antibody testing, and thus
sensitivity is not 100% for those that may not have had time
to seroconvert
14. Donor-derived
Transplantation of organs from deceased donors with viral
syndromes is controversial
Livers with known Chagas or Hep B infection may be used as there
are effective treatments for these infections
Hep C infected organs are sometimes transplanted into Hep C(+)
donors
16. Recipient-derived Infections
Infections that can be treated or controlled do not
necessarily preclude transplantation
Most commonly screened for:
TB
Syphilis and other STD
Viral: CMV, EBV, VZV, HSV, HIV, HBV, HCV
Other things to think of
T.cruzi, strongyloides, cryptococcus
Endemic fungi: histoplasma, coccidioides, paracoccidioides,
aspergillus, blastomycosis
18. Immunizations
Pt’s should be immunized for
Consider in endemic area
MMR
•Rabies, (2D)
HBV •Tick-borne (2D)
Influenza •Meningoencephalitis, (2D)
Strep pneumoniae •Japanese B encephalitis-
Tetanus inactivated (2D)
Diphtheria •Meningococcus, (2D)
•Pneumococcus, (2D)
Pertussis
•Salmonella typhi-
Polio inactivated. (2D)
VZV – if never infected
Consideration should be given to boosters for any of the above prior to
transplantation as live vaccines are generally contraindicated post-
transplant, and immunologic memory will become impaired
19. Monitoring Immunosuppression
There are no specific tests currently available to
determine the overall susceptibility of patients to
infection…
…but they are being developed
Currently, the known determinants contributing to the
overall risk of infection are the dose, duration, and
sequence of immunosuppressive therapies
24. CMV
• Among all organ transplant KT pt have lowest risk for
CMV disaese
• CMV is still among the most important infectious
complications after transplant
• It is widely distributed in general population ranging from
40-97%
• Once CMV infection is established, then its replication is
highly dynamic with rapid increases in viral load
• Transmitted by Allograft, blood products, Sexual contacts
24
25. CMV and Kidney Transplantation
It usually develops during the first few months of
Tx. when patient is immunosuppressed.
In the absence of prophylaxis, CMV reactivation can
occur in over 75% of recipients depending on other
risk factors
It has also been implicated as a cause of acute and
chronic allograft injury.
CMV may play a crucial role in chronic graft
vasculopathy resulting CAN, bronchiolitis and
accelerated CAD
26. CMV Infection: Risk Categories in
Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Donor (D) or Recipient (R)
Risk Category
Seropositivity (+/-)
High D+/R-
Intermediate D+/R+, D-/R+
Low D-/R-
Fishman JA, Emery V, Freeman R, et al. Cytomegalovirus in transplantation –
26 challenging the status quo. Clinical Transplantation. 2007;21:149-158.
32. Diagnosis of CMV
Pretransplantation screening
CMV – IgM, IgG
Disease
Culture based – Tissue culture
PCR
New era for CMV diagnosis by the PP65
antigenemia assay. This test is sensitive and specific.
Quantitative method is used for monitoring
response
33. Anti-CMV Therapy
Valganciclovir: a prodrug form of ganciclovir with improved oral
bioavailability(=Ganciclovir)
Ganciclovir: intravenous or oral
Foscarnet: is an inhibitor CMV DNA polymerase (UL54)
‒ Useful for ganciclovir resistant CMV
‒ Major limitation is nephrotoxicity
Cidofovir: inhibits viral DNA polymerase
‒ Useful for ganciclovir resistant CMV
Maribavir: is an investigational agent that prevents viral encapsidation
and nuclear egress
33
34. Ganciclovir
Adverse effects:
– Hematologic: neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia(additive with
Azathiopurine)
– Gastrointestinal: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence,
anorexia
– Neurologic: headache, confusion, hallucination, seizures
– Other: pain and phlebitis at injection site (due to high pH), sweating, rash,
itch, increased serum creatinine and blood urea concentrations
Toxicity:
– Human carcinogen, teratogen, and mutagen
– Inhibits spermatogenesis
– Increased seizure threhold on use with Imipenem
Pharmacokinetics:
– 90% of plasma ganciclovir is eliminated unchanged in the urine with a half-life
of 2-6 hrs, depending on renal function (elimination takes over 24 hours in
end-stage renal disease)
5-10 mg/kg/d in two divided dose for 4-6 weeks for treatment
34
35. Valganciclovir
Dose :
Oral 900mg BD for mild to moderate CMV disease for 14-21 days
Pt with severe tissue invasive disease, who fail to achieve a reduction in viral load
after 7 days should receive iv ganciclovir
Weekly monitoring of viral load
Adverse effects:
– Similar to ganciclovir
– Myelosuppression is one of the main side effects that may limit prolonged use of
valganciclovir
Pharmacokinetics:
– Oral bioavailability ~ 60%
• Fatty foods significantly increase the bioavailability
– Eliminated as ganciclovir in the urine, with a half-life of about
4 hours
35
36. CMV Prevention
• Two strategies
• Universal prophylaxis
– Therapy from the time of transplant to all patients
or a subgroup of patients at high risk for CMV disease
• Pre-emptive therapy
– Patients are monitored at regular intervals for early evidence of
CMV replications guided by laboratory monitoring
– Treatment is started when CMV viral load or antigenemia
reaches a certain threshold
– Useful for low/intermediate risk
– In patients with CMV disease, we suggest weekly monitoring of CMV
by NAT or pp65 antigenemia.(2D)
36
38. Prophylaxis vs. Pre-emptive Therapy
Prophylaxis Pre-emptive
Evidence of efficacy +++ ++
Indirect effects/mortality ++ +
Other viruses + for some ?
Ease ++ +/-
Late onset disease ++ -
Resistance Low Very Low
38
39. Effects of Anti-CMV Prophylaxis
on Concomitant Infections
39
Hodson EM, et al. Lancet. 2005;365:2105-2115.
40. Universal prophylaxis
Acyclovir, ganciclovir, valacyclovir, valgancilovir and immune-
globulin.
Acyclovir: Possesses comparatively poor vitro activity against CMV
at clinically achievable levels.
Ganciclovir:
Use in D+ & R-ve patients immediate after Tx.
Valacyclovir:
Oral 8 gm per day for 3 months
Less effective than gancyclovir.
All prophylaxsis for 3mth or 6 wk after tt with T cell depleting
antibody
(Dose adjustment necessary for all)
41. Guidelines for CMV prevention in kidney
recipients
Group: Recommendations:
* Kidney * Oral ganciclovir
D+ve/R-ve for 3 months/IV
ganciclovir 1-3 M
*Kidney
R+ve * As above
Start prophylaxis within 10 days post Tx. And continue for 100 days
43. Late Onset CMV Disease Definition
• CMV disease occurring > 3 months post
transplant
• May be primary infection (D+/R-) or recurrence
(R+)
• Incidence 3%-17%
• In IMPACT study 37% with 3 months of
prophylaxis in D+/R-
43 Limaye, AP, et al. Transplantation. 2004;78(9):1390-1396.
46. HSV & HZV
Seroprevalence for HSV-1 in the adult population is
as high as 60 percent, while VZV rates can be as
high as 90 percent
Infection in the renal transplant patient is usually
caused by reactivation of latent virus.
Within 6 weeks
HSV infection usually presents with oral or genital
lesions, but in some instances can cause
esophagitis,hepatitis, encephalitis or pneumonitis
47. HSV & HZV
ZV reactivation usually presents as dermatomal zoster,
but can disseminate
In the absence of prophylaxis, HSV and VZV may be
seen early
The incidence of HSV in renal transplant recipients is
estimated to be approximately 53% and VZV 4 to 12%
Due to high seroprevalence in the adult
population, serologies are rarely helpful in the setting of
active infection.
48. HSV & HZV
Diagnosis
Direct fluorescence antibody for HSV and VZV from vesicular lesions or
PCR from CSF or visceral tissue samples.
Treatment
Disseminated infections involves intravenous acyclovir,
Less severe infection ; oral acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir
Acyclovir resistance - foscarnet, cidofovir, and topical trifluridine
-monitoring of KFT
VZV immunoglobulin ASAP but no later than 96 hr
If immunoglobulin is N/A or more than 96 h have passed, a 7-day course of
oral acyclovir begun 7–10 days after varicella exposure. (2D)
50. Epstein Barr Virus
EBV remains latent in lymphocytes following
primary infection.
Can cause replication and clonal expansion of the B
cells that serve as its primary reservoir and other
cell lines as well.
However, a competent immune system, specifically
T cell response, prevents these cells from
propagating.
When T cell function is impaired, as is the case in
renal transplant patients, this surveillance system
can fail and post transplant lymphoproliferative
disorder (PTLD) can develop
51. Epstein Barr Virus & PTLD
Risk of development of PTLD,
with higher incidence rates observed in patients
receiving cytolytic therapies,
including antithymocyte globulin and
OKT3
Occur more commonly in pediatric kidney recipient
EBV seropostive donor and recipient both are at
increased risk of PTLD
PTLD most commonly occurs in the first year post
transplant
52. Serologies for EBV
Serologies for EBV of both donor and recipient should be
obtained before transplant.
Allograft recipients who are EBV negative before transplant
and receive an organ from a seropositive donor are at
greatest risk for PTLD;
Currently there is no single standard strategy to prevent
PTLD.
In some centers, high-risk individuals are screened regularly
for the presence of EBV viremia and immunosuppression
decreased when viremia is observed.
Effective prevention of CMV may also prevent EBVinfections
A recent trial demonstrated that CMV Ig did not prevent the
onset of PTLD in high risk recipients
53. PTLD
Definitive diagnosis of PTLD requires histopathologic
confirmation, preferably of tissue obtained by excisional biopsy.
In the case of CNS PTLD, analysis of CSF for EBV PCR and
cytology should be performed.
Although viremia may be noted at the time of PTLD, its
detection cannot be used to confirm or refute the diagnosis.
Staging is performed by histologic type
(monoclonal versus polyclonal, T cell versus B cell) and location
(allograft, other organ, metastasis).
Often the Ann Arbor classification, used for other non-Hodgkin
lymphomas, is utilized
55. HHV-6,7,8
HHV-6 is a cofactor for CMV
Human Herpes Virus 8 (HHV8) is a gamma
herpes virus that has been associated with
Kaposi's Sarcoma(30 month), primary effusive
lymphoma, and Multicentric Castleman's
Disease (lymphoproliferative disorder)
Routine screening of HHV 6 & 8 are not
performed
57. Hepatitis B
All nonimmune patients with chronic renal failure
should be vaccinated with Hepatitis B vaccine and
immunity verified with Hepatitis B surface antibody
screening following completion of the vaccination
series
HBsAb titer o10 mIU/ml receive booster vaccination to
raise the titer to X100 mIU/ml.
All HBsAg positive pt should undergo live biopsy,
because it is difficult on clinical ground only to
estimate severity of liver disease in CKD(AST tend to be
spuriously low)
59. Hepatitis B
Risk factor for progression of HBV related liver disease
Alcohol
Infection- ↑ duration, ↑ HBV DNA, genotype C, coinfection with
hepatitis C & D, HIV, immunosuppresion
Calcineurin inhib & Azathioprine
All pt with Hep B should receive antiviral therpy after transplantation
(Only 5% fail to recover)
Tenofovir or entecavir are preferable to lamivudine
Adefovir or tenofovir for KTRs with lamivudine resistance (>5 log10
copies/ml rebound of HBV-DNA).
Dose reduction is needed – Lamivudine, Adefovir, IFN
During therapy with antivirals, measure HBV DNA and ALT levels
every 3 months to monitor efficacy and to detect drug resistance.
Screen for hepatocellular carcinoma every 12 m with liver ultrasound
and alpha feto-protein
61. Anti HCV +ve
HCV RNA -ve HCV RNA +ve
Liver Bx
Normal LFT
Normal Hepatitis Cirrhosis or precirrhosis
Antiviral Rx Defer transplant or
List for renal transplant consider combined liver-
kidney transplant
HCV RNA -ve HCV RNA +ve
Pt by pt decision
62. HCV
Cyclosporin inhibit HCV replication, Azathioprine &
Antilymphocye therapy ↑ replication
For sustained virological response IFN & ribavirin should be
co administered very carefully because of risk of hemolytic
anemia and its metabolites are not cleared by HD
Dose modification needed - Ribavirin
Measure ALT monthly for the first 6 m & every 3–6
months,thereafter
Perform imaging annually to lookfor cirrhosis and
hepatocellular carcinoma.
Test HCV-infected patients at least every 3–6 months for
proteinuria. (Not Graded)
63. West Nile Virus
West Nile Virus is a flavivurus that causes a febrile
illness, associated with encephalitis, and can be fatal
To prevent infection, summer seasonal screening
should be considered for donors before transplant
Preventive measures regarding mosquito bites
Treatment not standardized - reduction in
immunosuppression
65. Parvovirus B19
Causes
Refractory anemia
Pancytopenia
Thrombotic microangiopathy
Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis
Encephlitis
Graft dysfunction
80% in first three month
Diagnosis
Bone marrow – Giant proerythroblast
Confirm by detection of B19 in serum by PCR
High dose IVIG x 10 days
Reduction of immunsuppresion
67. Bacterial infections
UTI – Prophylaxsis for 6 m with TMP-SMX
Even low level of bacteriuria can lead to
septicemia
2 set of blood culture should be obtained
Surgical site infection – 2-25%
68. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
in Transplantation
Common bacterial pathogen after kidney
transplantation
“Predictor” of morbidity and mortality that reflects
overall “illness” of patient
VRE may not be detectable from a single stool culture
and 3 samples should be obtained at weekly interval
for 3 weeks before discontinuing search for VRE
69. Clostridium difficile infection
With in 2 weeks - diarrhea
Diarrhea occur in 13% of kidney transplant
Infectious agent 41%
Medications 34%
70. Bacterial infection contd..
Nocardia
Early rejection, ↑imunnosupp, neutropenia, uremia
1-6 m after acute or subacute chest presentation
High dose TMP-SMX 15mg/kg for at least 12 month
TB
RIF>ETH – neutropenia
INH increase levels of cyclosporin, tacrolimus. RIF decrease
these level
Interactions are predictable occurs in 1-3 days of initiating
ATT, dose adjustment needed
Consider substituting rifabutin for rifampin to minimize
interactions with CNIs and mTORi
71. Bacterial infection contd..
Legionella
Urinary antigen test 70-100% specific
Tt for 21 days
Rhodococcus
Months to years after Tx
D/d with PTB
Mixed infection
73. Fungal infections
Incidence of fungal infections in renal transplant recipients is
less than other SOT but mortality high :
Limited diagnostic tools
Potential for rapid clinical progression
Risk factor for colonization with yeast and molds after KT:
Corticosteroid therapy
Broad spectrum antibiotic
Co morbid disease
Domiciliary exposure
Hand book of renal transplant:( Gabriel)
74. Fungal infections
Clincal scenario where fungal infection is seen
1. Presence of urinary catheter
2. Endotracheal tube
3. Immunomodulating viral inf reactivation
4. Ch. Graft dysfunction
5. During treatment of post transplant malignancies
Hand book of renal transplant:( Gabriel)
75. Extent of problem
Incidence of major invasive fungal
infection(IFI) among Kidney recipient patient:
2. Candida:76-95%
3. Cryptococcus:0-39%
4. Other fungi:0-39%
5. Aspergillus:0-26%
Hand book of renal transplant:( Gabriel)
76. Candida
Occurs most commonly Sources:
during the 1st month Endogenous: Source of
following transplant colonization
associated with Exogenous: lack of hand
washing of health workers
Hand book of renal transplant:( Gabriel)
79. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN CANDIDEMIA
Associated with death:
-more severe clinical symptoms
-persisting neutropenia
-organ involvement
-↑ age
Beter survival if:
*catheter is removed
*neutropenic patients given antifungals
84. Invasive aspergillosis: Treatment
Conventional amphoterin B: 20-83% response
?iv itraconazole: limited data
Lipid formulations of ampho B
5 mg/kg/day liposomal ampho B
Surgical intervention
85. Zygomycosis
Median 2 months post-transplant
Most cases occur within 6 months of
transplant
Rhinocerebral form
76% diabetes and corticosteroids
56% mortality
86. Prophylaxis
AmBisome
Itraconazole
Prophylaxsis with systemic antifungal agent is not
recommended after uncomplicated KT, it may be
indicated in those with persistent candiduria.
Azole Ambisome for a period of risk for infection
Those with past history fo endemic mucosis,
radiographic e/o healed leison – life long azole
87. Successful management
Prompt recognition of infection
Adjustment of level of immunosuppression
Antifungal therapy and surgery
88. Treatment
Conventional amphotericin B
1-1.5 mg/kg/day
Nephrotoxicity big issue
18% require haemodialysis
Liposomal amphotericin B
Much reduced nephrotoxicity
Superior efficacy
Itraconazole: iv formulation: little data
Voriconazole/caspofungin: little data. (apppears to be
superior to Amb)
89. Future Strategy Against Probable
Invasive Fungal Infection?
C Fluconazole
U le
p tib
L s ce
T su
Empirical U
or R
AmBisome E
positve risk of aspergillosis AmBisome
test
R
E
no
S re
U sp glucan synthesis
o ns inhibitor (IV) or
L e new azole orally
T
90. PNEUMOCYSTIS JIROVECII
PNEUMONIA
PCP prophylaxis with daily TMP-SMX for 3–6
months after transplantation. and for 6wk after
treatment for acute rejection
Diagnosed by BAL and/or lung biopsy be treated
with high-dose intravenous TMP-SMX,
corticosteroids, and a reduction in
immunosuppressive medication
Treat with corticosteroids for KTRs with moderate
to severe PCP (as defined by PaO2 o70mmHg in
room air or an alveolar gradient of 435mmHg)
92. Malaria
Usually severe
Pyrexia, which may lack the typical periodicity or rigors
Anemia is severe, being typically hemolytic and occasionally
hemophagocytic, often associated with thrombocytopenia
Acute graft dysfunction may occur as a consequence of the
hemodynamic consequences of falciparum infection*. Whether the
immune response to malarial infection has an impact on
subsequent rejection is unknown
Antimalarial drugs can be used safely
Drug-drug interactions must be taken into consideration as those
between quinine & chloroquine with cyclosporine *
*Barsoum RS. Malarial acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000.;11(11):2147-54
Tan HW, Ch’ng SL. Drug interaction between cyclosporine A and quinine in a renal transplant patient with malaria. Singapore Med J 1991; 32: 189-190
Nampoory MR, Nessim J, Gupta RK, Johny KV. Drug interaction of chloroquine with ciclosporin. Nephron 1992; 62: 108-109
93. Schistosomiasis
Recrudescence of schistosomal glomerulopathy
has been reported in an endemic area in South
America, where mesangioproliferative
glomerulonephritis with schistosomal antigen
deposits developed in a recent kidney transplant
recipient who originally had been infected with
S. mansoni.
Prophylactically treat patients with such
infection
94. Toxoplasmosis gondii
Lack of T cell immunity
Diagnosis by PCR
Protected when given TMP-SMX for P. carnii
95. Approach to the kidney
transplant pt with fever
Infection
Graft rejection
Drug allergy
Non infective systemic inflammatory response
Pancreatitis
Pulm. Embolism
Cytokine release syndrome
Risk for infection is determined by epidemiologic exposures and the intensity of immune defects. Significant exposures may be derived from the organ itself, preexisting in the recipient, from the hospital environment, or due to exposures in the community. The timing of specific infections is dependent on the specific immunosuppressive regimen for each individual and other factors (“the net state of immune suppression”). The timeline of infections is an idealized view of the changing risk factors (eg, surgery/hospitalization, immune suppression, acute and chronic rejection, emergence of latent infections, exposures to novel community infections over time). The pattern of infections is changed with alterations in the immunosuppressive regimen (pulse-dose corticosteroids or intensification for graft rejection), intercurrent viral infection, neutropenia (drug toxicity), graft dysfunction, or significant epidemiologic exposures (travel or food). The timeline reflects three overlapping periods of risk for infection: (1) the perioperative period to approximately 4 weeks after transplantation, (2) the period 1 to 6 months after transplantation (depending on the rapidity of taper of immune suppression and the type and dosing of antilymphocyte “induction,” which may persist) and (3) the period beyond the first year after transplantation.
Figure 4. Changing Timeline of Infection after Organ Transplantation. Infections occur in a generally predictable pattern after solid-organ transplantation. The development of infection is delayed by prophylaxis and accelerated by intensified immunosuppression, drug toxic effects that may cause leukopenia, or immunomodulatory viral infections such as infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). At the time of transplantation, a patient's short-term and long-term risk of infection can be stratified according to donor and recipient screening, the technical outcome of surgery, and the intensity of immunosuppression required to prevent graft rejection. Subsequently, an ongoing assessment of the risk of infection is used to adjust both prophylaxis and immunosuppressive therapy. MRSA denotes methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, VRE vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, HSV herpes simplex virus, LCMV lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, PCP Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, HBV hepatitis B virus, VZV varicella-zoster virus, SARS severe acute respiratory syndrome, PML progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and PTLD post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Modified from Fishman and Rubin1 and Rubin et al.45
Early infections are most common in those patients with poor initial graft function, surgical complications, or prolonged instrumentation, including intubation and vascular or drainage catheters. Infections early after transplantation should be anticipated in individuals with technical misadventures. Colonization with nosocomial organisms occurring during hospitalization may provide the source of future infections during periods of increased immune suppression, as with treatment of graft rejection.
Information about possible donor-derived infections is critical to the management of the transplant recipient. The greatest risk is for nosocomial infection from the donor’s hospital or endemic infection from the donor’s past exposures, including travel and work. In the setting of “unusual” infectious syndromes, the local organ procurement organization may have additional information or tissues available for testing. Johnston L, Chui L, Chang N, et al. Cross-Canada spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via transplant organs. Clin Infect Dis . 1999;29:819-823.
Infectious complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in any transplant patient.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a member of the Herpesvirus group and shares with this family the characteristic ability to remain latent in the body over long periods. CMV most often presents as an acute primary infection or as a latent infection that is reactivated to clinical disease only during immunosuppression. CMV infection is defined as viral replication in the presence or absence of symptoms, whereas CMV disease requires symptomatic viral reactivation with either a viral syndrome or tissue invasive disease. CMV is a common pathogen in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV is an established cause of morbidity and an occasional cause of mortality during the first year post transplant. Without prophylaxis, CMV infection can be detected in >75% of SOT recipients, with an overall mean incidence of symptomatic CMV disease in the transplant population of 30% (range 11-72%). CMV infection is most frequent and most severe in lung recipients. Like all herpes viruses, once CMV infection is established its replication is highly dynamic. This can lead to a rapid increase in viral load, which is a measure of the severity of a viral infection and represents the amount of virus in an involved body. Infection with increased viral load may then lead to tissue invasive disease. (1) Fishman JA, Rubin RH. Infection in organ-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med . 1998;338; 1741. (2) Hodson EM, Jones CA, Webster AC, et al. Antiviral medications to prevent cytomegalovirus disease and early death in recipients of solid-organ transplants: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet . 2005;365:2105-2115.
Risk categories for CMV infection have been developed and can be used to target preventive measures / therapies. Those at highest risk of symptomatic CMV disease are CMV seronegative patients (R-) who receive organs from CMV seropositive donors (D+) (High Risk D+/R-), and CMV seropositive patients on heavily immunosuppressive regimens. Low risk D-/R- patients should receive CMV negative or leukodepleted blood products. Some may occasionally develop CMV disease due to exogenous exposure or inaccurate testing. Fishman JA, Emery V, Freeman R, et al. Cytomegalovirus in transplantation – challenging the status quo. Clinical Transplantation . 2007;21:149-158.
Like most viral infections, the development of CMV infection and its severity reflects the balance between the unique properties of the virus and factors related to the robustness of the host immune response. Viral factors contributing to the development of CMV infection include the amount of virus to which the individual is exposed as well as the replication dynamics of that virus. The ability of the virus to evade the host immune system and other factors unique to that viral species also determine its virulence. The presence of other viral and bacterial co-infections also increase susceptibility to infection by CMV. Host factors include the state of host immune defense mechanisms such as their ability to mount a full cell-mediated (T-cell) or humoral (B-cell) response. This is compromised through the use of therapeutic immunosuppressive agents in SOT. In addition, the immune status of the donor organ and recipient also determine the likelihood of CMV infection.
Reactivation of CMV in the context of SOT is a result of a combination of events. The use of immune suppressive therapies, especially those designed to suppress cell-mediated immune responses such as monoclonal anti-lymphocytic antibodies, co-infection with other herpes viruses, acute organ rejection, and the sepsis resulting from co-infection as well as prolonged and complex surgery increases the likelihood of reactivation of latent CMV.
CMV infections produce a number of ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ effects. CMV has the propensity to establish lifelong 'latency' infection in the host after the initial infection has resolved, and can be reactivated in the immunocompromised individual.
The direct effects of CMV infection, namely CMV disease, present as either CMV syndrome or as Tissue Invasive Disease. CMV syndrome presents as a Flu- or Infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome, often with neutropenia. Tissue invasive disease presents as nephritis, hepatitis, carditis, pneumonitis, pancreatitis, retinitis or colitis with the transplanted organ usually showing the greatest inflammatory pathology. Tissue invasive disease was often fatal prior to the development of anti-vial therapy.
Indirect effects cover those conditions that develop independently of significant CMV viremia, and that result in part is from the influence of the virus on the host’s immune response. These effects are diverse including increased graft rejection, secondary fungal and bacterial infections, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, decreased graft and patient survival, cancer. In animal models a role for CMV infection in rejection of kidney, lung, heart, and liver allografts has been shown. In addition, anti-CV prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the frequency of organ (renal) rejection in D+/R- patients.
Two principal strategies have been advanced for the prevention of CMV disease after organ transplantation: Universal prophylaxis where therapy to all subjects or all of a particular group of subjects such as D+/R- individuals receive prophylaxis, and pre-emptive therapy, where individuals are monitored regularly post-SOT and therapy initiated when there is evidence of CMV reactivation or infection.
Pre-emptive therapy requires serial monitoring via nucleic acid amplification testing or immunofluorescence assays for the pp65 (CMV) antigen.
This slide compares the relative advantages offered by universal prophylaxis over pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy. Prophylaxis has been shown to be efficacious and is associated with a reduced all cause mortality. Prophylaxis may also reduce the incidence of other viral infections, as well as bacterial and protozoal opportunistic infections. Prophylaxis is easier to implement, requiring less frequent assessments, and resistance to the antiviral medication is low.
Universal prophylaxis, has also been shown to markedly reduce rates of co-infection with other viruses such Herpes Zoster, and reduces bacterial and protozoal infection rates. This reduces the morbidity and costs associated with these infections and improves outcomes from SOT. Hodson EM, Craig JC, Strippoli GFM, Webster AC. Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003774. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003774.pub3
Late-onset CMV disease is defined as occurring > 3 month following transplantation. Late-onset CMV occurs either as a primary infection in D+/R- individuals or recurrence in R+ patients. Epidemiological studies show that late-onset CMV is associated with significant morbidity. Limaye et al. reported that CMV disease developed in 19 of 259 recipients (7% [95% confidence interval 0.04–0.11]) of a liver transplant at a median of 4.5 months post transplant. Subjects developing late onset-CMV, were more likely to develop CMV syndrome (63%) or CMV tissue-invasive disease (37%), and CMV disease was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality during the first post-transplant year (hazard ratio 14 [95% confidence interval 3.8 –54], P=0.0007). Limaye AP, Bakthavatsalam R, Kim HW, et al. Late-onset cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients despite antiviral prophylaxis. Transplantation . 2004;78: 1390–1396.
Oral antiviral therapy is an effective means of preventing CMV disease. In this double-blind, double-dummy randomized study of 364 high-risk, seronegative (D+/R-) SOT recipients a 900 mg once-daily regimen of valganciclovir was compared with a 1g three-times daily regimen of oral ganciclovir in CMV prevention. Both regimens were effective while on prophylaxis but once prophylaxis was discontinued a substantial portion of patients developed late-onset CMV disease. The rate of investigator diagnosed CMV disease was even higher than shown here (~30%). Paya C, Humar A, Dominguez E, Washburn K, Blumberg E, Alexander B, Freeman R, Heaton N, Pescovitz MD. Valganciclovir Solid Organ Transplant Study Group. Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant . 2004 Apr;4(4):611-620.
Vancomycin-resistant enterococcis (VRE) are an example of a common infectious agent seen early after transplantation. The incidence of VRE reflects excessive use of antimicrobial agents and attention to the avoidance of transmission of nosocomial infections. VRE are not especially virulent or invasive pathogens—colonization with VRE is common in patients undergoing organ transplantation. VRE emerge under antimicrobial pressure in “sick” patients—those with metabolic abnormalities, invasive monitoring, or drainage catheters.