Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

Open Source on Wheels - Tech Day by Init 2017

772 visualizaciones

Publicado el

In the last few years, a seismic shift has taken place in the automotive infotainment industry, going from proprietary solutions to open source platforms and collaboration. In this talk, we discuss some of the key challenges and their technical solutions, but also what lays ahead – how can we learn from automotive and bring open source collaboration to other industries. This talk will take you from electrical engineering to stunning user interfaces packaged in one of the most expensive consumer electronics devices on the market – cars.

Publicado en: Motor
  • Hello! I do no use writing service very often, only when I really have problems. But this one, I like best of all. The team of writers operates very quickly. It's called ⇒ ⇐ Hope this helps!
    ¿Estás seguro?    No
    Tu mensaje aparecerá aquí
  • Hey guys! Who wants to chat with me? More photos with me here 👉
    ¿Estás seguro?    No
    Tu mensaje aparecerá aquí

Open Source on Wheels - Tech Day by Init 2017

  1. 1. Tech Day by Init // Stockholm 2017-11-30 Open Source on Wheels Luxoft Digital Cockpit
  2. 2. Introduction  Johan Thelin, System Architect at Luxoft  Qt Champion, Foundations of Qt Development, QmlBook, Pelagicore, Nokia Qt Development Frameworks  Embedded Linux for 10+ years, LinuxJournal, Datormagazin,
  3. 3. • 200+ visitors • 15+ speakers • All about free and open source • Hosted in Gothenburg • April 23 – Save the Date! foss-north 2018
  4. 4. In-Vehicle Infotainment
  5. 5. Automotive Challenges  Length of projects  Size of projects  Complex supplier relationships  Purchasing processes  …  Sudden loss of power  Boot time requirements  Aborted shutdown requirements  FLASH wear  Latency requirements  Expected life of product
  6. 6. Legal Challenges  There is a difference between building a screen into a car and bringing a screen into the car  Safety requirements  Driver disruptions  Driver workload management  Driven by liability and legal requirements
  7. 7. Start-up Timing START
  8. 8. Start-up – Example Figures  Boot splash  Available on networks  Rear view camera  Basic contents (radio tuner, media, phone)  Complex contents (navigation, web, 3rd party apps) ~100ms ~ 1000ms ~ 2000ms ~ 4000ms ~ 10000ms
  9. 9. Start-up – Aborted Shutdown START STOPSTART
  10. 10. Start-up – Sudden Loss of Power START
  11. 11. FLASH…  Vehicles are meant to run for at least 15 years…  Part prices push FLASH sizes down  Meaning that wear increases  Complicated by software updates and reliability (never brick a car)  This is a real challenge!
  12. 12. Multiple Parallel Interaction Interfaces  Knobs and buttons  Touch  Speech  Rear-seat controls  Paired devices  …
  13. 13. Latency Requirements  Timescale: 60 fps means around 16ms per frame  Latency requirements are in the region of 100ms for good UX  Handling events over shared busses, e.g. LIN, CAN, FlexRay  Ensuring performance in the device  Some events might need to be signaled further, e.g. shared with an instrument cluster or heads-up display
  14. 14. Functional Safety  ASIL, ISO26262  Software development process requirements  You might kill someone!  Do not confuse, disturb or present the wrong information  Autonomous vehicles takes this even further – handing over the car to the driver in time is critical
  15. 15. Open Source Stacks  There are two major open source efforts in the IVI space  GENIVI  AGL (Automotive Grade Linux)  GENIVI defines a standard automotive platform  Identifying existing components  Developing components to fill the gaps  Comes from Autosar – changing to code first now  AGL does the same thing but within Linux Foundation  Both project build demonstrator/development platforms
  16. 16. Qt Automotive Suite + PELUX  Preintegrated Linux reference platform  GENIVI + selected open source stacks + QtAuto  Prebuilt for selected targets with public CI  Unified UX across all screens in the vehicle  Framework to enable apps  Supports 2D, 3D, Wayland, multi-touch, gestures...
  17. 17. A Word on Licenses  We’re targetting a device with wheels  The device is a part of a complex vehicle network where failures can lead to fatal injuries  The industry is extremely cautions when it comes of (L)GPLv3  Signed target images  You cannot reflash your car
  18. 18. Architecture Trends Monolith Skin Service Skin Platform Service Service
  19. 19. Architecture – Next Step? Service App Platform Service Service Service Skin Platform Service Service App System UI
  20. 20. Architecture Trends  Move to a smaller “main” project  More contents packaged in a reusable way  Easier to add “real” contents during the 15 years in the field (20 years counting the development project!) Service App Platform Service Service App System UI
  21. 21. Supplier Structure OEM T2 T2 T3T3 T4 T3 T1
  22. 22. Supplier Structure OEM T2 T2 T3T3 T4 T3 T1 Requirements Liabilities Processes PriceStructure
  23. 23. Requirements – Too Many and Too Few  Often focused on “micro controller level”  Hardware integration  Really detailed timing  Continues at high level higher in the stack  “The CD player shall retry reading 3 times upon encountering errors”  With gaps  “HTML5 Compliant Web Browser”  This makes adoption of open source really hard because changing requirements requires a commercial discussion
  24. 24. Open Source This? OEM T2 T2 T3T3 T4 T3 T1
  25. 25. Open Source This? OEM T2 T2 T3T3 T4 T3 T1
  26. 26. GENIVI  Consortium of OEMS and Tns  Pushing open source top down  Jointly building the platform from the bottom OEM T2 T2 T1 Service App Platform Service Service App System UI
  27. 27. Learnings  Solve common problems and share it through open source  Identify common ground, e.g. the common base platform  Discuss common problems openly, e.g. what components are missing  Reserve space for differentiation  Focus on components rather than everything  Define a common architecture, e.g. Works with Xyz
  28. 28. Learnings  Understand how licenses work and what is compatible with your industry  Try to avoid requirements used to exclude existing components  This is just a form of not-invented-here  Code first
  29. 29. I’d like to Extrapolate  Automotive accepts Linux now  It is not being used higher up in the stack, e.g. for functions  What is holding is back?  Media – codec licensing  Bluetooth – interoperability testing  SIL – process related, incompatible with community driven projects  These are not engineering problems – they can be challenged!
  30. 30. Thank you for your attention! We are looking for talent!