1. LOGO
New methodologies for assessing
“Emotional Perception” as a component
of Emotional Intelligence”
Edgar Breso, PhD.
@ebreso
Universitat Jaume I de Castelló
www.emotional-apps.com
ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013

3. Emotional Perception
Indicate how much of each emotion is expressed by
this face:
None
1
2
3
4
Happiness
Anger
Fear
5 Very Much

5. Contents
1
What is the problem
2
How is our proposal
3
What is the difference?
4
What is next?

6. www.emotional-apps.com
Problems of current surveys
v Mostly related to the test development itself
but not to the theoretical model
§ Perception: assess the emotion elicited in the
observer instead of the emotion showed.
- There is no task for assessing the expression of
emotion
§ Use: connection between performance of these
tasks, and the “using emotion” abilities is not clear.
§ Managing: There is not enough evidence for
whether and how theoretical knowledge is related
to one’s actual ability to manage emotions
Further information: Maul, 2012

7. Contents
1
2
3
4
How is our proposal

9. Contents
1
2
3
4
What is the difference?

10. Apple store / Google Play
www.emtional-apps.com

11. ww.emotional-apps.com

12. www.emotional-apps.com

13. www.emotional-apps.com
What is the difference
MEIT
First “real MOBILE ability test”
Take advantage of DEVICES’ possibilities
More dynamic experience
Consider TiME
as a Variable
Bet/challenge users “gamification”

14. www.emotional-apps.com
CONCLUSIONS
v MEIT is not an adaptation of MSCEIT, it is an
“evolution” in the EI assessment.
v MEIT is still “under construction.” We have
already done a lot of work but we need your
feed-back to carry on the development and
improve the final result.
v We are open to international projects and
collaborations with universities and/or
companies.

15. LOGO
New methodologies for assessing
“Emotional Perception” as a component
of Emotional Intelligence”
Edgar Breso, PhD.
@ebreso
Universitat Jaume I de Castelló
www.emotional-apps.com
ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013