Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
NV Broadband Summit 11.18.13
1. The Nevada SchoolSpeedTest:
Measuring Nevada K-12 Readiness For Online Learning and
Assessment
November 18, 2013
Spencer Watson, Outreach Coordinator
2. K12 Network Needs: Administration → Learning
Potential Users on K-12 Networks Nationwide
60
55
Millions of Users
50
40
30
20
10
1.6
3.3
Administrators
Teachers
0
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
Students
2
3. Getting Speed to the Classroom
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
3
4. Nevada SchoolSpeedTest Month
Objectives:
•
Measure the Internet speed at every K-12 school in Nevada with the
SchoolSpeedTest.
•
Gather data about real-world performance of school Internet and current
readiness of K-12 networks for SBAC Assessments, 1:1 Device
programs, and digital learning goals.
Participation:
550 schools participated in SchoolSpeedTest
–
–
–
–
Confidential
20 tests per site on average
35% of tests taken by teachers
23% of tests taken by students
23% of tests taken by technology staff
EducationSuperHighway
4
5. Summary of Findings
Online Assessment Readiness
Nevada schools more ready for Online Assessment
and Digital Learning than national average
100%
90%
Assessment Readiness:
17%
36%
83% of NV Schools Ready for SBAC Assessment
–
–
39% for media-rich online assessment
44% ready for basic assessment
Digital Learning Readiness:
Percent of schools
80%
70%
60%
44%
50%
32%
40%
30%
20%
39%
32%
10%
28% of schools meet or exceed recommendations for
robust digital learning (vs. 23% nationwide)
0%
Nevada sample
Average kbps / student:
Ready (50+ kbps)
National sample
Basic (20-50 kbps)
Not ready (<20 kbps)
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
5
6. Nevada Schools: Online Assessment Readiness
At current bandwidth availability, 39% of schools can support media-rich online
assessment, while 17% of schools are not ready for any online assessment
Nevada Schools Online Assessment Readiness (avg kbps/student)
% of schools
Not ready for online
assessment
50%
% of students
Basic assessment
ready
44%
Media-rich
assessment ready
47%
39%
40%
32%
30%
21%
20%
17%
10%
0%
<20 kbps/student
Confidential
20-50 kbps/student
EducationSuperHighway
50+ kbps/student
6
7. Nevada Schools: Digital Learning Readiness
Schools’ long-term connectivity goals should focus on developing capacity for digital learning;
28% of schools today are ready for technology-rich digital learning
Nevada Schools Digital Learning Readiness (max kbps/student)
% of schools
Not ready
% of students
Basic
connectivity
60%
Emerging
reliance
Digital learning
ready
54%
50%
39%
40%
34%
32%
28%
30%
20%
12%
10%
1%
0.2%
0%
<10 kbps/student
Confidential
10-50 kbps/student
50-100 kbps/student
EducationSuperHighway
100+ kbps/student
7
8. In rural areas, lack of infrastructure prevents some
schools from accessing high-speed Internet
Bandwidth per Site by Locale
60
49
Mbps per site
50
40
39
37
35
30
20
12
10
0
Major City
(n=64)
Urban Cluster
(n=202)
Suburban Cluster
(n=99)
Remote Town
(n=35)
Remote Rural
(n=57)
Category Avg
Note: Excludes 93 schools with 1000+ students (analyzed separately, ~163k students)
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
8
9. Impact of lower connectivity in rural areas on students
Rural Schools: Bandwidth per Student
60%
53%
49%
Percent of schools
50%
40%
31%
30%
20%
Greater proportion
of rural schools
are not ready
25%
19%
21%
10%
4%
0.3%
0%
Not ready
Basic
(10-50)
Remote Rural
Emerging
(50-100)
Tech. rich
(100+)
Rest of NV
Note: Excludes 93 schools with 1000+ students (analyzed separately, ~163k students)
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
9
10. Furthermore, lower per-site connectivity increases
likelihood of network congestion in rural schools
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Major City
Urban Cluster
Suburban
Cluster
Less Congestion
Remote Town
Remote Rural
More Congestion
N (less congestion) = 400
N (more congestion) = 22
N (excluded – fewer than 10 tests) = 128
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
10
11. However, significant variation in bandwidth per site
across rural schools statewide
Wells High School
66
Amargosa Middle School
39
Eureka Elementary School
35
Pershing County High School
33
Carlin High School
Highest Mbps / site
32
21 schools (average)
17
Mc Dermitt High School
6
Mc Dermitt Elementary School
5
Median Mbps / site
2
21 schools (average)
Lund High School
1
Lund Elementary School
1
Duckwater Middle School
0.8
Round Mountain High School
0.3
Lowest Mbps / site
Ruby Valley Elementary… 0.03
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Mbps / site
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
11
12. In urban and suburban areas, concentration of very
large schools reduces bandwidth availability per student
Measured Bandwidth per Student
100+ kbps/student
100%
90%
50-100 kbps/student
10-50 kbps/student
1%
2%
17%
10%
15%
33%
Percent of schools
80%
70%
<10 kbps/student
16%
38%
52%
60%
91%
50%
40%
30%
64%
65%
48%
20%
38%
10%
2%
0%
Small
(<250 students)
Medium
(250-400 students)
Large
(400-650 students)
Very Large
(650-1000 students)
9%
Mega
(1000+ students)
School Size (number of students)
Confidential
EducationSuperHighway
12
13. For More Information
Thank you, Nevada.
Questions or More Information:
Spencer Watson, Outreach Coordinator
spencer@EducationSuperHighway.org
EducationSuperHighway: www.EducationSuperHighway.org
SchoolSpeedTest: www.SchoolSpeedTest.org
Confidential
Editor's Notes
When schools began to adopt the Internet, it was first used in the front office for administration and staff management. Then it moved to the teachers desk for grades and student management, with some student use. This totals about 5M users – and if the Internet went down, you were inconvenienced, but submitted grades later.In order to move to the students desk, and implement 1:1 and online assessment goals, we have to add 55M users – 11x more. While best efforts worked for schools before, now Internet infrastructure is mission critical for classrooms, because if the Internet goes down instruction stops. To meet increased demand and the growing BW needs of todays cloud and streaming tools, we need to re-evaluate our networking strategies to be fast: from top to bottom in order to effectively deliver content to the classroom,
In order to effectively implement digital learning and assessment in the school you need three things:High Speed Internet to the district office or network hubA fiber or high-speed WAN capable of distributing BW to the schoolEnough network hardware and WiFi access points for students and teachers to connect to, and with enough capacity for speed.Transition: In order to see what speeds are available in Nevada’s classroom’s today, we worked with the NDOE to launch the NV SST.
The NV SST Month in October created a statewide database of how much bandwidth is available in NV schools. This apples-to-apples comparison will help districts and NDOE make data driven decisions about readiness for 1:1 device programs, digital learning, and assessment. 550 schools participated (75% of NV schools). 458 schools took 7+ tests, helping us get a picture of available bandwidth at different times of day and on different days of week.
From the results of the NV SST we learned that NV is more ready for Online Assessment and Digital Learning goals than the national average. 83% of schools meet recommendations for SBAC assessments, compared to 64% nationwide. And 28% of NV schools meet or exceed bandwidth recommendations for digital learning, compared to 23% nationwide. Transition: Looking at Nevada’s readiness for SBAC assessment more closely…
We see that 39% of NV schools are ready for SBAC’s media rich assessment. 44% are ready for the basic assessment. Only 17% of schools do not meet bandwidth needs at all, but that still represents nearly a third of students. This readiness estimate is based on SBACs recommendations that schools have 50 kbps/student for media-enriched testing, and 10-20 kbps/student for basic assessment.Transition: In addition to readiness for SBAC assessments we also looked at NV’s readiness for digital learning in the classroom.
Using the per-user bandwidth recommendations that the State Education Technology Directors Association set down in their research paper The Broadband Imperative, we broke down Nevada schools readiness for digital learning into three categories:28% of NV schools meet today’s bandwidth recommendations for technology rich learning, for full 1:1 device programs and blended learning39% of NV schools meet recommendations for partial 1:1 programs and increased instructional use of online content.32% (which is also 54% of students) meets bandwidth needs for basic web use for research and mostly rotational lab useTransition: While looking at the data from across the state, we also discovered some interesting trends I’d like to share with you.
As you might expect, many remote rural schools are challenged with acquiring high-speed connections
What you may not expect is that despite having smaller connections, because they also fewer students on the network, 53% of rural schools are technology rich, a greater proportion of schools to the NV average. Of course there are also a much greater proportion of rural schools who are struggling and do not meet BW needs for implementing any online learning.
Where low connectivity is impacting them more than in per-student bandwidth is in congestion. Rural sites are more likely to suffer times when the Internet is slower than it should be than their more rural peers.
This is because the median connection size for a rural school is 5-6 Mbps. This means that for many rural schools, having more than one or two users downloading content can use up the entire bandwidth. As you can see at the top of this chart, though there are some rural schools have been successful in getting larger connections.
In contrast, urban schools have a much more competitive environment for connectivity – and much larger connections. But because of their much larger populations of users, larger schools also have much lower per student bandwidth.Most are still ready for SBAC assessment, but many lager schools do not meet per-student bandwidth recommendations for robust digital learning.Currently, many large schools are currently able to balance their use against their capacity, but as instructional use of programs like the ones being spoken about today, it is likely that we will have to continue growing large school’s per-student bandwidth so every student and teacher can use online tools for todays mission critical instruction needs.
Thanks for letting me share with you some of our results. If you have any questions about the NV SST, about us, or our programs, I’m more than happy to answer any questions. Also feel free to email me at spencer@esh..