Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

Energy Self-Reliant States - 3rd edition

1.855 visualizaciones

Publicado el

Forty-seven of the nation’s 50 states can meet 100% of their electricity needs with renewable electricity produced solely in-state.

Publicado en: Medio ambiente
  • Sé el primero en comentar

  • Sé el primero en recomendar esto

Energy Self-Reliant States - 3rd edition

  1. 1. E N E R G Y S E L F - R E L I A N T S TAT E S 3 R D E D I T I O N , 2 0 2 0
  2. 2. 92% 23% 59% 96% POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM ALL RENEWABLES 50 to 99% 100% or more given current electricity consumption All Renewables Potential Source: U.S. EIA Sales by State by Sector (2017). https://bit.ly/2ZHd7Ls Forty-seven of the nation’s 50 states can meet 100% of their electricity needs with renewable electricity produced solely in-state. (The remaining three can do a lot, too).
  3. 3. A L O T H A S C H A N G E D I N 1 0 Y E A R S
  4. 4. $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 2009 2019 Sources: NREL, Lazard A DECADE OF COST DECLINES IN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION Rooftop solar Utility-scale solar Wind energy
  5. 5. 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Wind capacity Solar capacity A DECADE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY GROWTH Megawatts Sources: AWEA, SEIA
  6. 6. M O R E R E N E WA B L E E L E C T R I C I T Y P O T E N T I A L T H A N E V E R
  7. 7. Source: U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Assessment, U.S. NREL (2016). https://bit.ly/2Z1g2PT 30% 23% 44% 33% 41% 31% 53% 31% 29% 34% 60% 26% 32% 40% 50% 35% 23% 75% 38% 34% 32% 27% 33% 27% 27% 14% 34% 43% 33% 44% 19% 38% 35% 41% 39% 34% 40% 34% 28% 38% 46% 31% 36% 38% 63% 55% 63% 47% 43% 49% 2008 data 23% Rooftop Solar Potential POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM ROOFTOP SOLAR POWER 0% 1 to 14% 15 to 34% 35 to 49% 50% or More all buildings
  8. 8. Source: Enabling Wind Power Nationwide, U.S. DOE (2015). https://bit.ly/34PZHAZ 60% 23% 15% 16% 15% 190% 47% 57% 323% 17% 60% 40% 26% 53% 47% 93% 67% 78% 360% 294% 279% 225% 407% 952% >1,000% >1,000% 580% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% 312% 542% 756% 415% 231% 295% >1,000% 356% 974% >1,000% >1,000% 513% >1,000% POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM ONSHORE WIND POWER 0 to 9% 10 to 24% 25 to 49% 50 to 99% 100% or more Onshore Wind Potential
  9. 9. Source: WindExchange, U.S. NREL (2010). https://bit.ly/2NXjyVj 0% 23% 0% 159% 476% 0% 79% 463% 0% 793% >1,000% 584% 297% 318% >1,000% 24% 0% 801% 0% 0% 0% 466% >1,000% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 107% 0% 591% 0% >>1,000% 54% >1,000% 10% 110% 356% >1,000% 109% 0% 0% 0% >1,000% 0% POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM OFFSHORE WIND POWER 0% 1 to 24% 25 to 49% 50 to 99% 100% or more Offshore Wind Potential
  10. 10. Source: Assessment of Geothermal Resources, USGS (2008). https://bit.ly/2NZKR11 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 18% 34% 3% 0% 1% 10% 18% 11% 2% 11% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 81% 104% POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM CONVENTIONAL GEOTHERMAL POWER 0% 1 to 9% 10 to 24% 25 to 49% 50% or More Conventional Geothermal Potential
  11. 11. Source: Feasibility Assessment, U.S. DOE (2006). http://bit.ly/2nbVcwZ 2% 23% 0% 1% 0% 3% 1% 0% 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 6% 5% 1% 1% 2% 13% 16% 35% 45% 12% 5% 6% 0% 2% 1% 4% 5% 3% 1% 3% 1% 5% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 15% 6% 16% 4% 3% 12% 172% POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM SMALL HYDRO POWER 0% 1 to 9% 10 to 24% 25 to 50% Over 50% Hydro Potential
  12. 12. WE DIDN’T EVEN COUNT UTILITY- SCALE SOLAR!
  13. 13. E F F I C I E N C Y M AT T E R S
  14. 14. Source: U.S. EIA Sales by State by Sector (2017). https://bit.ly/2ZHd7Ls 403% 23% 150% 526% 703% 681% 203% 957% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% 837% 664% >1,000% 312% 426% 978% >1,000% 840% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% 913% 691% >1,000% 750% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM ALL RENEWABLES 0 to 9% 10 to 24% 25 to 49% 50 to 99% 100% or more All Renewables Potential matching New York’s energy intensity >1,000% >1,000%
  15. 15. P L E N T Y O F P O W E R F O R E L E C T R I C C A R S A N D B U I L D I N G S
  16. 16. Source: Electrification Futures Study, U.S. NREL (2017). https://bit.ly/2O16IFn 67% 23% 41% 144% 317% 164% 107% 434% 262% 596% 797% 498% 249% 256% 840% 103% 73% 543% 320% 234% 221% 526% >1,000% 748% >1,000% >1,000% 397% >1,000% 815% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% 880% >1,000% 398% >1,000% 308% 253% 396% >1,000% 287% 606% 907% >1,000% NO ELECTRIFICATION DATA POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM ALL RENEWABLES 0 to 9% 10 to 24% 25 to 49% 50 to 99% 100% or more in a high electrification scenario All Renewables Potential
  17. 17. E F F I C I E N C Y + E L E C T R I F I C AT I O N = 1 0 0 % I N 4 9 S TAT E S
  18. 18. 151% 23% 72% 248% 370% 321% 115% 652% 576% >1,000% 948% >1,000% 416% 335% 863% 156% 177% 543% 473% 410% 494% 788% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% 573% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% >1,000% 548% >1,000% 559% 415% 396% >1,000%343% 815% >1,000% >1,000% NO ELECTRIFICATION DATA POTENTIAL PERCENTAGE OF ELECTRICITY FROM ALL RENEWABLES 0 to 9% 10 to 24% 25 to 49% 50 to 99% 100% or more low energy intensity* and high electrification *energy use under low energy intensity (electricity use per GDP) is calculated where intensity is equivalent to New York All Renewables Potential
  19. 19. R E A D M O R E AT I L S R . O R G

×