Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
FLAACOs 2014 Conference - Reducing Fragmentation in Post-Acute Care: A Citra Health Solutions Case Study
1. Reducing Fragmentation in Post-Acute Care:
A Citra Health Solutions Case Study
Ken Van Cara
VP New Products & Innovation
MedSolutions
Krista K. Sultan
Program Development
Manager
Citra Health Solutions
2. Today’s Intent
• The Current Environment of Post-Acute
Care
• Key Steps to Coordinating Care in the
Post-Acute Care Setting
• Exploring the Partnership Further:
Aligning Post-Acute Care for Citra
Health Solutions
2Confidential: Do Not Distribute
5. Fragmentation
Acute Symptoms Inpatient
Post-Op
The lack of coordination between acute and post-
acute care facilities creates severe fragmentation,
leading to higher costs, and over-treated, under-
treated, and readmitted patients.
Challenge is to align providers and post-
acute care facilities to reduce waste and
patient harm.
5Confidential: Do Not Distribute
6. Tremendous Waste
“Over half of the residents
who experienced harm
went to a hospital for
treatment, with an
estimated cost to
Medicare of $208 million
in August 2011”
Department of Health & Human Services (2014). Adverse Events in Skilled Nursing
Facilities: National Incidence Among Medicare Beneficiaries
6Confidential: Do Not Distribute
7. Patient Harm
“1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries
who had post-acute SNF stays
that were 35 days or less
experienced at least one
adverse event during their
stays”
“79% of these events either
extended the beneficiaries’ stays
in the SNF or resulted in
emergency department visits or
inpatient readmissions”“59% of these adverse
events and temporary harm
were clearly or likely
preventable”
Department of Health & Human Services (2014). Adverse Events in Skilled Nursing
Facilities: National Incidence Among Medicare Beneficiaries
7Confidential: Do Not Distribute
8. Readmission Penalties
“In 2013, the CMS began
penalizing excess readmissions
by trimming up to 1% from
payments for heart attack,
heart failure, and pneumonia.”
“Maximum penalties reached
2% in 2014 and will rise to 3%
in 2015, when they will also be
assessed for COPD and hip
and knee replacements”
SG2 (2013). Performance Guide: Reducing 30-Day Readmission Rates
8Confidential: Do Not Distribute
9. Readmission Penalties
1/4
Of Medicare FFS patients
discharged from a
hospital are readmitted
within 30 days.
$227M
Total readmission
penalties for 2014. For
2015, the maximum
penalty increases from
2% to 3%.
< 40%
Of hospitals have a process to
alert physicians within 48 hours
of a patient’s discharge or to
inform patients about test
results.
ACO
Providers share
financial risk for
avoidable
readmissions.
SG2 (2013). Performance Guide: Reducing 30-Day Readmission Rates
9Confidential: Do Not Distribute
10. What will it take?
“True coordination of
care – defined as the
organization of services
among the hospital,
physicians, post-acute
care provider, and patient
to encourage the delivery
of the highest-value
services – is required to
ensure the best possible
outcomes.”
Ackerly & Grabowski (2014). Post-Acute Care Reform –
Beyond the ACA
10Confidential: Do Not Distribute
12. Patient/Physician connectivity
Creates transparency into the acute and post-acute care settings to
improve continuity of care
Nurse outreach supports primary care follow-up visits
A Solution That Meets Multiple Needs
Improved post-acute experiences for members and their loved ones
Better clinical outcomes and medical cost reductions
Post-acute care site of service management
• Identifying facilities with the services and quality suited to the needs
of each member
• Supporting patient decision making and care site selection with
evidence based guidelines
Readmission reductions
12Confidential: Do Not Distribute
13. Individualized Plans of Care
• One Clinical Point of Contact
Coordinates a single,
individualized plan of care
throughout the entire post-acute
treatment – ideally managed by a
single point of contact.
Applies clinical decisions based on
evidence-based guidelines.
• Appropriate Site Selection
Support
Builds on individual risk
assessment with an understanding
each patient’s clinical,
environmental, and psycho-social
resources and needs:
• Caregiver
• Transportation
• Home Environment
• Health Literacy and Cognitive
Ability
• Activities of Daily Living
13Confidential: Do Not Distribute
14. Individualized Plans of Care
• Length of Stay Management at
Every Site
Work directly with patients and post-acute
care clinicians to review patient progress
and ensure appropriate utilization of
facilities
• Readmission Reduction
Reconnect individual with primary care
physician
Provide Transition Coaching / Medication
Reconciliation
Deliver Patient Engagement Materials
14Confidential: Do Not Distribute
15. Robust Transition Support
Transition to the
Appropriate Site of Care
Assessment and
engagement with
members
on acute admission
Continuous
monitoring of
patient progression
along the care
continuum
Transition coaching
based on member’s
needs and readmission
risk level
Transition Home as
Soon as Appropriate
Transition Coaching to
Reduce Poor Outcomes
& Readmissions
15Confidential: Do Not Distribute
16. Technology-Enablement
One of the keys to Citra Healthcare's success was their use of
MedSolutions' post-acute care management system, which:
Tracks members over time
across sites of care
Ensures appropriate
utilization of facilities
Performs medication
reconciliation
Accesses evidence-based
guidelines
Develops and delivers care
plans and member education
materials
16Confidential: Do Not Distribute
17. Exploring the Partnership Further:
Citra Health Solutions & MedSolutions
Krista K. Sultan RN, BSN, MS
Program Development Manager
Citra Health Solutions
18. Partnership
Citra Health Solutions partnered with MedSolutions due to a
lack of care coordination for their Medicare ACO patients.
Medicare Shared
Savings ACO
Lack of Post-Acute
Care Coordination
Financial and
Quality ConcernsCommunication
Gap
Little Visibility Into
Hospital
PCP Only
19Confidential: Do Not Distribute
19. Post-Acute Care Process
MedSolutions was hired to create a coordinated
approach that included all five elements of Citra
Health Solutions as part of the solution
We partnered to create and launch a collaborative
approach that brought the hospital, Citra, and
hospitalist stakeholders together, without making
any large-scale changes to the processes already in
place
Using the MedSolutions approach, which
incorporates the keys to care coordination success,
Citra Health Solutions has realized a 43% reduction
in utilization of Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) and a
25% reduction in Inpatient Rehab Facilities (IRFs)
20Confidential: Do Not Distribute
20. Program Results
Discharges
To
Initial
Discharge
Recommendation
Actual Discharge w/
MedSolutions
Recommendation
%
Increase/
decrease
Estimated
Saved
(PMPM)
Discharges % Discharges %
Home 22 32.4% 27 39.7% 23% --
Home Health 19 27.9% 21 30.9% 11% $1.08
SNF 16 23.5% 10 14.7% -38% ($18.54)
IRF 4 5.9% 3 4.4% -25% ($6.17)
Other 7 10.3% 7 10.3% 0% --
Totals 68
100.0
%
68 100.0% -- ($23.62)
Program Effectiveness
20% of patients were discharged to a more appropriate post-acute setting
Significant reduction in SNF and IRF over-utilization and corresponding increase
in use of Home Health and Home settings
(Important note: Medicare FFS setting – we could only
recommend)
21Confidential: Do Not Distribute
21. Patient Scenario
The Discharge Planner took MedSolutions’ recommendation
and sent patient “A” home.
22Confidential: Do Not Distribute
22. Quotes of Success
“In a previously unmanaged patient environment,
Citra and MedSolutions partnered to develop a
unique solution for managing post-acute spend.
Citra’s management of the patient-physician
relationship and patient profile coupled with
MedSolutions’ expert staff and clinical guidelines
resulted in positive behavior change that out-
performed traditional methodologies. The success
utilizing influential techniques rather than denial truly
embodies the transformation of healthcare today.”
Nicole Bradberry - President and
COO of Citra Health Solutions
23Confidential: Do Not Distribute
23. Quotes of Success
“At [St. Vincent’s] Southside, the pilot has been a
successful one. The MedSolutions team have been
very supportive and responsive to the needs of the
CM department and the patients they have serviced.
The implementation was very seamless for all, while
initially there were a few bumps in the road with
communication, there now appears to be a
solid/open line of communication established, which I
think has been a huge factor to the success we have
had this far.
We look forward to continuing the partnership.”
LaRhonda Brown – Case Management,
St. Vincent’s Healthcare - Southside
Confidential: Do Not Distribute 24
24. Reach Us
Ken Van Cara
MedSolutions
615-468-4266
Kenneth.VanCara@MedSolutions.c
om
http://www.MedSolutions.com
Krista K. Sultan RN, BSN, MS
Citra Health Solutions
KSultan@CitraHealth.com
Q&A
Editor's Notes
Ken present – with partnership with Krista.
Ken present transition.
Ken present.
Ken present.
Ken present.
Examples of adverse events: “The term ‘adverse event’ describes harm to a patient or resident as a result of medical care. An adverse event indicates harm to the patient as a result of medical care, including the failure to provide needed care. Adverse events include medical errors but they may also include more general substandard care that results in patient or resident harm, such as infections caused by the use of contaminated equipment. However, adverse events do not always involve errors, negligence, or poor quality of care and are not always preventable. *See research for additional explanation.
In February 2014, the Department of Health and Human Services conducted a study on the incidence of adverse events in skilled nursing facilities among Medicare patients. Their results showed the high instances of adverse events in skilled nursing facilities. Many of which were completely preventable. The study also found that along with this severe patient harm, came tremendous waste in the system. This waste could’ve been avoided in many cases by proper oversight into the post-acute facility. Preventing patient harm does not come at a cost – it saves costs.
Ken present.
Ken present.
Ken present.
Ken present.
How do we address the growing problems in post-acute care, both in costs and patient harm? The New England Journal of Medicine and other well-known health institutions believe that the only solution is truly coordinated care between the hospital, physicians, patients, and the post-acute provider to ensure there are no gaps or breaks along the care continuum. There must be a bridge between the hospital or acute care facility and the post-acute facility for true care coordination and quality improvement.
Ken present transition.
Ken present.
Ken present.
Caregiver- Family or loved ones that are willing and able to help with recovery?
Transportation - Can the individual get to an appointment with their PCP or physical therapy appointment?
Home Environment - Does the home have the things a member needs to recuperate comfortably and safely? Can we setup a bed for them on the 1st floor, if their bedroom is currently on the 2nd floor? Are there lift chairs or wheelchair ramps needed?
Health Literacy & Cognitive Ability - Does the member have the health literacy or cognitive ability to understand and follow their care plan?
Activities of Daily Living - Does the member have the ability to prepare meals, bath, dress, use the telephone, use transportation?
Ken present.
Ken present.
Ken present.
Ken present. If he would like.
Overall, not sure about this slide – that will be a Ken call. I have incorporated the notes from Mike that were used in an earlier slide – see them below in the notes section. I have “hid” the slide for now, until Ken decides whether or not to continue using it.
Network Evaluation Score: Innovative tool to rate, score, and compare facilities & networks
Care Management: Streamlined workflow to understand member’s condition and coordinate care
Case Management: Focus on member’s unique clinical presentation and needs & see workload for the day and case statuses
Utilization Management: View authorizations & benefits (HAVE RENAMED THIS ONE)
Risk Stratification: Review members for specific readmission rates
Evidence-Based Guidelines: Ensure most comprehensive guidelines are applied to decisions
Provider Score Report: Search by city, state, zip, provider type to compare scores
Medication Review: Perform automated review, indicating red flags
Reporting: Gain transparency into population health & view health outcomes and impactive programs
Expense Review: Expenses listed by site of care & opportunity for hard and soft savings
Claims Management: Process and pay claims
Marks transition to Krista’s portion of presentation.
Krista present. See Krista’s original notes below.
Little Visibility Into Hospital: There was a time with primary care physicians always followed their patients when they were admitted to the hospital. Unfortunately, that is no longer the most common practice. Most patients are cared for by hospital-based internists during their inpatient stay. Often a patient’s primary care physician will not be aware until some time after discharge that their patient has been hospitalized at all. This makes follow-up care after an inpatient stay in the hospital difficult to coordinate in a timely manner.
Communication Gap: There are a number of different parties involved in coordinating care in the inpatient setting. Hospitalists, specialists, case managers, nurses, physical and occupational therapists all work together inside the hospital to create and manage the plan of care once a patient is admitted to the hospital. What happens, however once the patient is discharged from the hospital? Whose responsibility is it to coordinate care once the patient leaves the hospital? The natural answer to this question is of course – the primary care physician. The PCP historically plays the role of being the first and central point of care in the patient’s journey throughout the healthcare system. However, if the PCP does not have clear visibility to when the patient is admitted to and discharged from the hospital, then how can they effectively coordinate care?
Financial and Quality Concerns: Since the Affordable Care Act was signed in March 2010 there has been a steady increase on the emphasis of quality in health care. This legislation has gradually increased the number of financial incentives for hospitals and providers delivering high quality care, as well as financial penalties for those who do not meet quality standards. Patients have more visibility into quality ratings than ever before and are encouraged to factor these ratings into how they select where and when to receive healthcare.
Medicare Shared Savings ACO: 2012 marked the beginning of the Medicare Shared Savings Program, where providers participating in accountable care organizations (ACOs) could potentially take home a portion of their Medicare Savings each year. One of the largest expenses for any ACO is inpatient hospitalization making this a target expense for any ACO serious about saving. Hospital readmission is a notable area of focus because it is easy to see that patients are most vulnerable for admission to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. This new structure for delivering healthcare placed an increased emphasis on creating a smooth transition between healthcare services.
Lack of Post-Acute Care Coordination: When patients are discharged from an inpatient setting it is imperative that they follow-up with their primary care physician so that their PCP can monitor their transition between healthcare settings. The large majority of inpatient stays lead to changes in medication regimes that if not executed properly can lead to hospital readmissions. It is also important that patients understand the signs and symptoms of disease progression and exacerbation so that they can seek help early if their condition should worsen. In order for the PCP to take on this role of care coordinator they must first be aware of the patient’s stay in the hospital. Communication between acute care facilities and community based practitioners is poor which unfortunately leads to poor patient outcomes and avoidable readmissions.
Krista present. See Krista’s original notes below.
There are a number of different care transition programs that have been published advertising success in mediating patient transitions from an acute care setting. The single common denominator is having a dedicated clinical provider assuming the role of care navigator. In this role, the practitioner serves as a central liaison between hospital staff, patient, and community practitioners. In the current paradigm, the ACO model was used as the central theme in coordinating care. ACO patients were identified when entering the acute care setting and paired with a care navigator. Using this central practitioner as an anchor, the patient was effectively guided through the care transition while keeping all stakeholders informed of their progress. Thus by adding a central advocate for the patient the communication gap was bridged.
Patient
Hospital
Providers
Care Management
Hospitalists
Ken present.
Krista present. Some of Krista’s original notes are below.
In this case, when the nurse case manager intervened she not only allowed the patient to be discharged to a lower level of care, she also advocated for a safer and more cost effective method of treatment. In addition to saving money on the discharge setting she also reduced the hospital spend by having the patient transitioned to oral medication. Once the patient’s kidney function had been restored with intravenous fluid therapy there was no need to continue with IV treatment. The longer IV treatment is continued the more likely the patient is to experience a complication such as infection or thrombosis. Thus in this case the treatment recommendation was not only the most cost effective, but also the most conservative course of treatment.
Krista present.
Krista present.
We will prepare some questions for you all to have as reference and to spur the conversation if questions come in slowly.