Presentation by Dr Elizabeth Burton, General Manager (Americas) for the Global CCS Institute at the 3rd Congresso Brasileiro de Co2.

1. Challenges and Strategies for
CCS Globally
Elizabeth Burton
Global CCS Institute

2. The Global Status of CCS: 2014 Report
The Global Status of CCS: 2014 – Key Institute publication
The report:
 Provides a comprehensive overview of global
and regional developments in large-scale CCS
projects, in CCS technologies and in the policy,
legal and regulatory environment.
 Introduces and links to project descriptions for
around 40 lesser scale ‘notable’ CCS projects.
 Makes recommendations for decision makers.
 The full report is available online, including
supporting resources and data

3. CCS is vital to meet emission reduction goals
Source: IEA Energy Technology
Perspectives (2014)
We must accelerate the pace of transforming energy infrastructure
GtCO2emissions
150 GT stored
3000 CCS
projects

4. Large-scale CCS projects by region or country
Americas 5 6 6 10 27
Early
planning
Advanced
planning
Construction Operation Total
China 7 4 - - 11
Europe 3 4 - 2 9
Gulf Cooperation
Council
- - 2 - 2
Rest of World 4 - 1 1 6
Total 19 14 9 13 55

5. 2015
EOR
Dedicated Geological
Power
Generation
Operating 20172016
Hydrogen
production
Natural gas
processing
Chemical
production
Iron and steel
production
Synthetic
natural gas
Fertiliser
production
Oil refining
2018 2019 2020
= 1Mtpa of CO2 (areas of circle are proportional to capacity)
Coal-to-liquids
* Injection currently suspended
Boundary
Dam
Medicine
Bow
Kemper
Petra
Nova
ROAD
Sargas
Texas
Sinopec
Shengli
TCEP Peterhead
White Rose
HECA
Don Valley
Illinois Industrial
Yanchang
Sinopec
Qilu
Abu Dhabi
ACTL Agrium
Coffeyville
Century
Plant
Enid
Fertilizer
Val Verde
Air Products
Lost Cabin
Lula
SnøhvitSleipner
Shute Creek
In Salah*
Uthmaniyah
Quest
Gorgon Spectra
ACTL Sturgeon
Petro China
Jilin
Great
Plains
FutureGen 2.0
Actual and expected operation dates for projects

6. Boundary Dam opening was an important milestone for 2014

7. Capture capacity by year of operation

8. Deployment of CCS/CCUS requires three elements
‘We…are convinced that the research
and development, demonstration and
global deployment of {CCS} must be
accelerated… We are committed to
taking necessary actions
internationally and collaboratively to
promote the further development and
deployment of CCS.’
Carbon Sequestration Leadership
Forum, extract from the
Communique following the 5th
Meeting of the CSLF Ministers,
November 2013
TECHNOLOGY
UNDERSTANDING
AND ACCEPTANCE
POLICY AND
MARKETS
Business case
for
CCS/CCUS
The business case requires collaboration among researchers /
educators, government, and industry
Government

9. Mitigation cost increases in scenarios with limited
availability of technologies
Source: IPCC Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report, November 2014.
Percentage increase in total discounted mitigation costs (2015-2100)
relative to default technology assumptions – median estimate
450 138% 7% 6% 64%
2100 concentrations
(ppm CO2eq)
no CCS
nuclear
phase out
limited
solar/wind
limited
bioenergy
4 8 8 8
Symbol legend – fraction of models successful in producing scenarios (numbers indicate number of successful models)
All models
successful
Between 80
and 100% of
models
successful
Between 50
and 80% of
models
successful
Less than 50%
of models
successful

10. Strong policy incentives drive investment
Data source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance as shown in IEA presentation “Carbon Capture and
Storage: Perspectives from the International Energy Agency”, presented at National CCS week in
Australia, September 2014.
Clean energy investment between 2004-2013
USD billion
 Scale of renewables investment
is instructive
 CCS has not enjoyed
commensurate policy support
 EOR has provided impetus in
North America
 Policy parity is essential
 How do we get CCS onto a
similar curve?

11. Institute activities in the Americas
 Global/Region-wide
o Advocating for CCS/CCUS in climate-change policy
o Knowledge sharing among CCS/CCUS
professionals.
 United States
o Facilitating the dialog on CCS/CCUS among
policymakers, regulators and our Members.
o Advocacy at the state level.
 Canada
o Advocacy at the provincial level.
o Building public support for projects – school
programs.
 Mexico
o Facilitate progress on CCUS roadmap.
o Capacity development – professional and graduate
training.
o Facilitate pilot projects.

12. Institute activities in Brazil
 2012 Initiated capacity development dialog with key
stakeholders
 2013 Participated in joint workshop on BECCS
 2014 Participated in CEPAC advanced CCS workshop
 2015 CEPAC completes first CCS Storage Atlas of
Brazil, sponsored by the Institute
 2011 Participated in
UNIDO workshop on CCS
in industry
 2012 Sponsored CEPAC
staff to 34th International
Geological Congress and
CCS workshop

13. o Pre-release online on April 28, 2015
o Organized by the Center of
Excellence in Research and
Innovation in Petroleum, Mineral
Resources and Carbon Storage
(CEPAC) at the Pontifical Catholic
University of Rio Grande do Sul
(PUCRS) with support from the
GCCSI
First Edition of the Brazilian CCS Atlas

14. CO2 sources
Source-sink
matching
Pipeline networks
Integration of geographical data
Atlas Features

15. Global challenges for CCS decision makers
 Near-term policy support critical to move projects forward
and to give investors confidence to invest in CCS/CCUS.
o Long-term GHG emission reduction policies
o GHG mitigation policies that are technology neutral.
 Exploration and verification of sufficient storage resources
to accommodate large CO2 point sources.
 Ensuring substantial future emissions reductions in non-
OECD countries by supporting CCS/CCUS readiness and
deployment
 Ensuring CCS/CCUS options for industrial sources such
as refineries, iron and steel and cement
 CCS on bio-sources (BECCS) provides opportunity for net
negative emissions .

16. GLOBALCCSINSTITUTE.COM