3. As teachers, we put our egos and
self-worth on the line every day
before an audience. No profession,
save stand-up comedy, is as prone
to both spectator-driven elation
and disheartenment.
4. OBJECTIVE
Upon successful completion of this instructional session, participants
will be able to use evaluation feedback for continuous
growth in teaching practice.
13. Concrete
Experience
Kolb
Active Reflective
Experimentation Observation
Abstract
Conceptualization
14. Concrete
Experience
Kolb
Active Reflective
Experimentation Observation
Abstract
Conceptualization
15. Concrete
Experience
Kolb
classroom teaching
planning to put into
practice new
techniques
Active Reflective
Experimentation Observation
analysis of teaching and
student learning
looking at educational
theory to understand/
improve practice
Abstract
Conceptualization
16. Four Lenses of Reflection on Practice
Our own Our
experiences students’
as experiences
teachers and of us as
learners teachers
Our The
colleagues’ theoretical
experiences and research
as teachers literature
and learners
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Four Lenses of Reflection on Practice
Our own Our
experiences students’
as experiences
teachers and of us as
learners teachers
Our The
colleagues’ theoretical
experiences and research
as teachers literature
and learners
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Four Lenses of Reflection on Practice
Our own Our
experiences students’
as experiences
teachers and of us as
learners teachers
Our The
colleagues’ theoretical
experiences and research
as teachers literature
and learners
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Four Lenses of Reflection on Practice
Our own Our
experiences students’
as experiences
teachers and of us as
learners teachers
Our The
colleagues’ theoretical
experiences and research
as teachers literature
and learners
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Four Lenses of Reflection on Practice
Our own Our
experiences students’
as experiences
teachers and of us as
learners teachers
Our The
colleagues’ theoretical
experiences and research
as teachers literature
and learners
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Things we know Things we know
we know we don’t know
Things
we don’t know
we don’t know
29. Things we know Things we know
we know we don’t know
Things
we don’t know
we don’t know
30. Things we know Things we know
we know we don’t know
Things
we don’t know
we don’t know
31. Things we know Things we know
we know we don’t know
Things Things
we don’t know we don’t know
we know we don’t know
32. Things we know Things we know
we know we don’t know
Things Things
we don’t know we don’t know
we know we don’t know
33. CONSCIOUS
COMPETENCE
KNOW DON’T KNOW
LEARNING
MATRIX
CONSCIOUS
Things we know Things we know
we know we don’t know
Things Things
UNCONSCIOUS we don’t know we don’t know
we know we don’t know
34. CONSCIOUS
JOHARI WINDOW
COMPETENCE
KNOW DON’T KNOW
LEARNING
MATRIX
CONSCIOUS
Things we know Things we know
we know we don’t know
Things Things
UNCONSCIOUS we don’t know we don’t know
we know we don’t know
36. ADVICE
Read them
Scan for red flags
Think ahead; evaluate yourself first
Tease out useful data
Show how you have responded to students’ concerns
Don’t read too much into them
Even if it’s personal, don’t take it personally
37. REVIEW OF
REVIEW OF ASSESSMENT
SYLLABUS STRATEGIES
PEERS
REVIEW OF CLASSROOM
SAMPLES OF OBSERVATION
STUDENT WORK
38. GETTING MEANINGFUL FEEDBACK ON LEARNING
Classroom Assessment Continuous Quality Improvement
Techniques Techniques
Minute Paper Two Way Fast Feedback
Muddiest Point Instantaneous Feedback
One Sentence Summary Plus/Delta Feedback Tool
Direct Paraphrasing Critical Incident Questionaire
Word Journal
Application Cards
40. KEY COMPONENTS OF INTEGRATED COURSE DESIGN
Specific Context of the
Characteristics of the
Teaching/Learning Nature of the Subject
Teacher(s)
Situation
Expectations That
Characteristics of the
Others Have for the
Learners
Course
SITUATIONAL FACTORS
Specific Context - physical layout of room, number of students, available tech\n
Specific Context - physical layout of room, number of students, available tech\n
Specific Context - physical layout of room, number of students, available tech\n
Specific Context - physical layout of room, number of students, available tech\n
Specific Context - physical layout of room, number of students, available tech\n
Specific Context - physical layout of room, number of students, available tech\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Scenario:\nImagine a course in which the teacher says s/he wants students to achieve the following learning goals:\n a) “learn all the important content” and\n b) “learn how to think critically about the subject.”\nBut when you examine what actually happens in class, it is a straight lecture course (this is the the\n“teaching/learning activity”). \n