Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Se está descargando tu SlideShare. ×

Enhancing Biodiversity and Resilience in Intensive Farming - WP3: Practice and Technology

Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Próximo SlideShare
AAB Advances in IPM 2014
AAB Advances in IPM 2014
Cargando en…3
×

Eche un vistazo a continuación

1 de 7 Anuncio

Enhancing Biodiversity and Resilience in Intensive Farming - WP3: Practice and Technology

Descargar para leer sin conexión

Maryam Yousefi, Johan Six, Anne Dray, Jaboury Ghazoul
WEBINAR
Enhancing Biodiversity and Resilience in Intensive Farming Systems: Results from an ETH Zürich-IFPRI Collaborative study
Co-organized by IFPRI, ETH Zürich, and Bayer
DEC 6, 2022 - 10:00 TO 11:30AM EST

Maryam Yousefi, Johan Six, Anne Dray, Jaboury Ghazoul
WEBINAR
Enhancing Biodiversity and Resilience in Intensive Farming Systems: Results from an ETH Zürich-IFPRI Collaborative study
Co-organized by IFPRI, ETH Zürich, and Bayer
DEC 6, 2022 - 10:00 TO 11:30AM EST

Anuncio
Anuncio

Más Contenido Relacionado

Similares a Enhancing Biodiversity and Resilience in Intensive Farming - WP3: Practice and Technology (20)

Más de International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (20)

Anuncio

Más reciente (20)

Enhancing Biodiversity and Resilience in Intensive Farming - WP3: Practice and Technology

  1. 1. Enhancing Biodiversity and Resilience in Intensive Farming WP3: Practice and Technology Maryam Yousefi, Johan Six, Anne Dray, Jaboury Ghazoul 1
  2. 2. Factors influencing the effectiveness of cover cropping The effects of cover crops on soil health and ecosystem services 2 1
  3. 3. Cover crop effects on soil health parameters (a), Cover crop effects on other ecosystem services Opportunities of cover cropping are 1) soil biodiversity and nutrient cycle enhancement 2) runoff and nitrogen leaching prevention 3) soil physical properties and carbon sequestration 4) pest and weed suppression Challenges: 1) lower crop yields 2) inconsistencies in soil water provision 3
  4. 4. A comparative meta-analysis on the effect of intercropping and agri-environmental schemes on biological pest control Arthropod abundance a:intercropping and b: AES  Intercropping was effective in suppressing herbivores and enhancing predators of pest species  Row intercropping allowed for effective pest management  The abundance of predators increased in wheat fields adjacent to flower strips, which declined beyond 5-m from the flower strips. 4 2 a b
  5. 5. 4 2 1 2 9 3 8 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 13 5 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Rice Wheat Maize Sorghum Artificial Intelligence Big Data Cloud Computing Machin learning Fuzzy logic Deep learning Block chain Edge computing other Techniques and technologies for data processing in smart farming identified within the reviewed papers  Pest and disease control  Irrigation control and management  Soil Health Management  Crop growth and decision making  Heavy Metal Assessment The Application of technology in cereal crop production 5 3 The Application:
  6. 6. 6  Well-designed and multifunctional cover crop implementation provides substantially more regulating and supporting ecosystem services than monocrop.  Automated irrigation control systems, perhaps drawing on Internet of Things technology, could in future address some of the shortcomings of cover crops.  The literature review results are generally well aligned with farmer opinions as reported by the interviews (WP1). Gap  There have been relatively few field experiments designed to investigate cover crop outcomes in Germany and France. Highlights
  7. 7. Thanks for your attention 7

×