1. REPURPOSING FARM POLICIES:
WHAT A FEW YEARS OF WORK HAVE
TAUGHT US
David Laborde
MTID, IFPRI

2. Some modelling works done

4. 2020: What is the
effect of current
farm policies on
agricultural
emissions?
(no land use)
2021: Counting the
cost of various
agricultural support
instruments on
nature, climate,
nutrition, health and
equity by 2030
2021: Reallocating
farm subsidies
towards products
with low emissions
and/or high nutrition
potential

6. 2022: Phasing out
of existing policies
by 2040 (with land
use) and focus on
green innovations
2022: Trade-offs of
repurposing
policies towards
healthier diets and
consumer
incentives
2022: Hidden
gains and
costs of
current
policies
2022:
Repurposing:
how to make
it works for
the Global
South?

7. Some lessons learned

8. Farm policies are complex and diverse, and people are prone to over-simplification
Subsidies are just a part of the decision making by farmers: even without subsidies
production will occur (somewhere)
Ex-ante policy goals and ex-post policy impacts could be different: what should
be the criteria to define “harmful” subsidies?
Policy reform is a country level process, but many environmental impacts are
cross-border
Removing all existing subsidies will make things worst in today’s world and
productivity matters
How to reform policies: “do no harm”, with a well focused approach, or “do good”
and tackle the multi-dimension of the food system transformation
Integrating Global South countries in the discussions remain challenging

9. Farm policies are complex and diverse, and people are prone to over-simplification
Subsidies are just a part of the decision making by farmers: even without subsidies
production will occur (somewhere)
Ex-ante policy goals and ex-post policy impacts could be different: what should
be the criteria to define “harmful” subsidies?
Policy reform is a country level process, but many environmental impacts are
cross-border
Removing all existing subsidies will make things worst in today’s world and
productivity matters
How to reform policies: “do no harm”, with a well focused approach, or “do good”
and tackle the multi-dimension of the food system transformation
Integrating Global South countries in the discussions remain challenging

10. Understanding policy impacts
• Two main type of policies
Subsidies aka
domestic
support
Trade policies
aka import and
export
taxes/subsidies
• 4 types of effects
How much
to produce
(scale)
What to
produce
(products)
How to
produce
(practices)
Where to
produce
(location)

11. Defining harmful for the environment is not
straightforward. E.g. of Input Subsidies category (2020)
Input type Value (US$ bn) Share
Chemicals and pesticides 0.2 0.2%
Environment 8 7.7%
Extension services 9.6 9.3%
Feed 0.5 0.5%
Fertilizer 19.9 19.3%
Financial services 17.6 17.0%
Fuel 15.6 15.1%
Insurance 7.7 7.5%
Irrigation 6.7 6.5%
Mechanization 7.3 7.1%
Quality control 0.1 0.1%
Risk management 1.2 1.2%
Seed 0.3 0.3%
Transport 0.1 0.1%
Source: Laborde and Manun, 2022, based on OECD PSE database

12. Farm policies are complex and diverse, and people are prone to over-simplification
Subsidies are just a part of the decision making by farmers: even without subsidies
production will occur (somewhere)
Ex-ante policy goals and ex-post policy impacts could be different: what should
be the criteria to define “harmful” subsidies?
Policy reform is a country level process, but many environmental impacts are
cross-border
Removing all existing subsidies will make things worst in today’s world and
productivity matters
How to reform policies: “do no harm”, with a well focused approach, or “do good”
and tackle the multi-dimension of the food system transformation
Integrating Global South countries in the discussions remain challenging

13. True cost of
removing
existing
subsidies
Steven Lord, 2022, Forthcoming, FSEC
Steven Lord, 2022, Forthcoming, FSEC

14. Farm policies are complex and diverse, and people are prone to over-simplification
Subsidies are just a part of the decision making by farmers: even without subsidies
production will occur (somewhere)
Ex-ante policy goals and ex-post policy impacts could be different: what should
be the criteria to define “harmful” subsidies?
Policy reform is a country level process, but many environmental impacts are
cross-border
Removing all existing subsidies will make things worst in today’s world and
productivity matters
How to reform policies: “do no harm”, with a well focused approach, or “do good”
and tackle the multi-dimension of the food system transformation
Integrating Global South countries in the discussions remain challenging

15. A brief history of farm policy goals, and level of
development
Producing
more (Green
revolution)
Supporting
farmer income
Environmental
considerations
Health and
nutrition
The future?
The past?

16. Multi-dimension targets: Tackling trade-offs, cross-
border effects and the need to enlarge the policy space
Glauber and Laborde, 2022

17. Farm policies are complex and diverse, and people are prone to over-simplification
Subsidies are just a part of the decision making by farmers: even without subsidies
production will occur (somewhere)
Ex-ante policy goals and ex-post policy impacts could be different: what should
be the criteria to define “harmful” subsidies?
Policy reform is a country level process, but many environmental impacts are
cross-border
Removing all existing subsidies will make things worst in today’s world and
productivity matters
How to reform policies: “do no harm”, with a well focused approach, or “do good”
and tackle the multi-dimension of the food system transformation
Integrating Global South countries in the discussions remain challenging