Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

0

Compartir

Descargar para leer sin conexión

Snapshot of optional open review history and signing at PeerJ

Descargar para leer sin conexión

Short talk given at the "Towards a collaborative agenda on peer review" workshop at the Springer Nature London office in October 2018. PeerJ (the Life science and bio journal) received an Impact Factor in Jun 2015 - that event affected author behavior (and geography) on choosing open reviews or not.

License: CC BY 4.0

Audiolibros relacionados

Gratis con una prueba de 30 días de Scribd

Ver todo
  • Sé el primero en recomendar esto

Snapshot of optional open review history and signing at PeerJ

  1. 1. A snapshot of optional open review history and signing Jason Hoyt, Ph.D. – CEO @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com October 15th, 2018. London Meeting: Towards a collaborative agenda on peer review. Venue: The Stables Springer Nature, London, United Kingdom
  2. 2. PeerJ Ecosystem PeerJ PeerJ CompSci PeerJ Preprints Rapid communication, immediately available. Europe PMC, GScholar indexed. DOI Peer-reviewed Non-PeerJ Journal v1 v2 v3..n Optional submission for peer review to journal outside of PeerJ r1 r2..n 2Public & private feedback on each version. Submit for peer review when ready. 1 Direct submission for peer review Optional: Named reviewers Optional: Public review history w DOIAccepted, Published, & PubMed index Two options @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  3. 3. Publications with Public Review History N = 5,710 articles @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com PeerJ receives first Impact Factor – June 2015. Submission rates double & author demographics change to ”late adopter”
  4. 4. By Country - Public Review History Past 12 Months “Mature” – 64% “Emerging” – 54% UK – 66% US – 64% China – 51% N = 1,825 articles @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  5. 5. By Subject - Public Review History (Past 12 Months) Min publications by subject – 32, Max – 254, Median - 74 @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  6. 6. Signed Reviewers N = 28,524 Reviewers Number Signed = 10,035 @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  7. 7. By Country – Signed Reviews Past 12 Months “Mature” – 33% “Emerging” – 31% UK – 39% US – 31% China – 18% N = 9,511 reviews @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  8. 8. By Recommendation - Signed Reviews (Past 12 Months) @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  9. 9. By Country AND Recommendation - Signed Reviews (Past 12 Months) N = 9,511 Reviews @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  10. 10. Data – Where to get it? peerj.com/data …. peerj.com/reviews @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com
  11. 11. Issues with hidden peer review Reviewer bias / Truly blind review difficult to achieve Questionable practices – why was it accepted, what were the rebuttals? Predatory journals – was any review actually performed? Steep learning curve on how to review properly Plan S? @JasonHoyt / jason@peerj.com

Short talk given at the "Towards a collaborative agenda on peer review" workshop at the Springer Nature London office in October 2018. PeerJ (the Life science and bio journal) received an Impact Factor in Jun 2015 - that event affected author behavior (and geography) on choosing open reviews or not. License: CC BY 4.0

Vistas

Total de vistas

256

En Slideshare

0

De embebidos

0

Número de embebidos

19

Acciones

Descargas

1

Compartidos

0

Comentarios

0

Me gusta

0

×