Tao Zhang is a digital user experience specialist at Purdue University Libraries. Some of his projects include redesigning the Purdue University Libraries website based on user research including personas and use cases. He has also conducted usability evaluations and improvements for websites such as HABRI Central. Zhang has designed interfaces for tools like DMPTool, focusing on workflow and consistency. Additionally, he helped develop a crowdsourcing online help system for library users to engage students, faculty, and librarians through gamification. Zhang's work involves user research, usability evaluation, and interface design grounded in library science and human factors principles.
1. User-Centered Design at Purdue
University Libraries
Tao Zhang, PhD
Digital User Experience Specialist
Purdue University Libraries
zhan1022@purdue.edu
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~zhan1022/
2. About Me
10/2011-present
Digital User Experience Specialist, Purdue University
Libraries
09/2009-10/2011
Research Associate, Department of Electrical
Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt
University
09/2009, PhD in Industrial Engineering, North Carolina
State University
4. Projects
• Purdue University Libraries website redesign
• Usability evaluation and improvement for Human
Animal Bond Research Initiative (HABRI)
Central website
• User Interface design for Data Management
Planning Tool (DMPTool) – Grant from Sloan Foundation
• Development of a crowdsourcing online help
system for library users – 2013 IMLS Sparks! Ignition
Grant
5. Purdue University Libraries Website
Redesign
• From user research to website design
– Personas
– Use cases
• Research-driven creativity
• Iterative design
– Sitemap
– Homepage
– Landing pages
10. Content Strategy
• Audit
• Migration
• Process for content creation and maintenance
– Planning & tracking
– Content source
– Design
– Publish
• Increasing emphasis of content from industry to
academic libraries
11. Usability Evaluation of HABRI Central
Website
• Test page/interface design
– Visual perception
– Information hierarchy
– User acceptance & task performance
• Usability test
– Task scenario (search & download, submission &
upload)
– User goals
– Workflow
Zhang, T., Maron, D. J., & Charles, C. C. (2013). Usability evaluation of a
research repository and collaboration website. Journal of Web Librarianship,
7(1), 58-82.
12. Analyze Test Results
• Quantitative data:
– Path, # of steps
– Time
– Errors
• Qualitative assessment:
– Back to Human Factors principles
– Keep user goals in mind
13. Interface Improvement
• Adding authors when submitting a resource
• Participants spent longer time in this step than
other steps
Previous design:
New design:
14. Workflow Improvement
Select Resource Type
Compose resource
metadata
Attach file
Input author information
Add tags
Authorization
Submit
Upload a resource Submit a citation
Select citation Type
Input citation details
Input tags and badges
Link resource
("Citation for")
Affliation
Submit
Contribute to HABRI Central
Select type
Input metadata
Have actual
files?
Upload files
Input author info, tags
Copyright Authorization
Submit
Yes
No
15. Interface Design for DMPTool
• Tool for creating ready-to-use data management
plans for specific funding agencies
• Limited time and resources
• Interface design based on functional
requirements and use cases
• Iterative design process
– Workflow for creating data management plans
– Interface for different user roles
– Maintain consistency
18. Develop a Crowdsourcing Library Help
System
Online, community-driven questions and answers
site
• Engaging students, faculty, and librarians
• Gamification mechanism (votes, reputation, badges)
• Interactive knowledge base
• Shift of traditional reference service model
My role: project technical lead
• Functional requirements and implementation
• Interface design
• Usability evaluation
Iterative methodology that puts the user at the center of all design decisions.
Optimize a user’s experience of a system, product, or process.
Origin of UCD: Reaction to tools designed only for experts/engineers
Based on human factors principles
Designing with users at the center would have better usability and acceptance
Personas may not be necessary. A bulleted list of basic user attributes can work just well.
Research-driven creativity: it is not a black box magically converting raw information into design. The user research informs the prioritization and structure of the raw information. The user research also establishes the foundation of use cases for the design to support.
Quantitative inventory
A list of all existing content
ID, Title/Topic, URL, Format, Metadata, Usage Statistics, Last Update
Qualitative assessment
Accuracy
Usability
Style
Strategic goals
Quantitative inventory: what content exists today and what shape it is in.
A web content audit is an accounting of the content your organization currently has online.
With content audit, you can anticipate problems before they arise, and avoid derailing your project.
Qualitative audit: best practices assessment: A comparison of your content against industry best practices, usually done by a third-party, unbiased assessor.
Qualitative audit: strategic assessment: An invaluable, in-depth look at how your content measures up to your strategic goals (business or user)
A qualitative audit analyzes the quality and effectiveness of the content.
Qualitative audit factors: usability, knowledge level (how much prior knowledge your user needs to understand your content), fundability, actionability, audience, accuracy
For use in strategic assessments only: business value, message, brand/voice appropriateness
Visual perception: Can users notice the prominent information
Information hierarchy: Can users understand the priority of information
Acceptance: Does the page work for users? Will they use it? Is the page cluttered?
Task scenario: set up test tasks and ask users to come up with their own tasks
User goals: Can the website meet user goals
Workflow: Test navigation path, time, errors
Back to human factors principles: look for any kind of violation against those principles
Back to human factors principles: look for any kind of violation against those principles
Back to human factors principles: look for any kind of violation against those principles