Presentation on the role of research in redesigning SFMOMA.org.

1. Click to edit Master title style
Do you know who your users are?
The role of research in redesigning SFMOMA.org
April 12, 2007
Museums and the Web
Dana Mitroff, SFMOMA
Katrina Alcorn, Hot Studio
Hot Studio

2. Introductions
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA)
Dana Mitroff
Head of Online Services
Hot Studio
Katrina Alcorn
Principal, Director of User Experience & Content
Page 2

3. Overview
How do we know who our current users are and what they want?
What we’re going to cover today:
• How our project came about
• Why user research?
• Our approach
• What we did
• What we learned
• What we’re doing about it
Page 3

4. Why a redesign?
SFMOMA home page today -- current site design is almost 10 years old!
Page 4

5. Project goals
We had some big questions to answer
• Who really uses our site?
• Should we think of our Web site as a destination unto itself?
• How knowledgeable are our current site users about modern
and contemporary art?
• How much detail do people need about our collection and
exhibitions? Do they even understand the distinction?
Page 5

6. Our approach to research
• We believe that research should be more than simply an
academic exercise
• As designers, we focus our efforts on research that
can improve design
turn it into a great idea
• Research = science + a good listener
• Research yields real information, but it takes
creative insight to turn it into a great idea
Page 6

7. Quantitative vs. qualitative
• Quantitative Research = Information presented in numeric
form.
• When should you use it? When you need to
generalize about people’s specific responses.
turn it into a great idea
• Qualitative Research = Exploration of people’s behaviors,
attitudes, opinions, and belief.
• When should you use it? To gain deep understanding
of the mindset of your target audience.
Page 7

8. How research fits into the overall design process
We are here
Page 8

9. What we did
Four months of research that included
• Museum Web site “think tank” session
• Best practices and heuristic evaluation
• Interviews with new and returning Web visitors
• Interviews with SFMOMA stakeholders
• Online survey
Page 9

10. Museum think tank session
Page 10

11. Best practices and heuristic evaluation
Page 11

12. Interviews
Page 12

13. Online survey
Page 13

14. What we learned
The majority of users:
• Come from a surprising variety of professions and
backgrounds
• Are interested, but not necessarily educated, about art
• Are fairly passive about Web 2.0-type features
• Don’t understand the difference between exhibitions and
collections
• Are not aware of the breadth of programs and content we
have
• Want to plan a physical visit to the Museum
Page 14

15. How we used this information
Our research Some of these These insights
revealed many findings led to inspired new and
detailed findings. insights about what creative design
the target audience ideas.
really needs.
Page 15

16. Example 1. What’s going on?
Finding: Most of our current users don’t differentiate between
exhibitions and the permanent collection, and they aren’t even
aware that the Museum programs events.
Insight: Users just want to find out “what’s going on”—whether it’s
a temporary exhibition, the permanent collection, or a public
program—so they can plan a visit to the Museum.
Page 16

17. Example 1. What’s going on? (cont.)
Design Idea: Create a one-stop section called “Exhibitions +
Events.” De-emphasize the collection in the main nav, and make it
part of the specialized auxiliary navigation.
Page 17

18. Example 2. Breadth and depth
Finding: Our audiences aren’t aware of all we have to offer, both
onsite and online.
Insight: We have an opportunity to showcase our public programs and
rich online resources.
Design Idea: New promotional areas and lots of cross-linking.
Page 18

19. Example 3. Web 2.0
Finding: Our current users expressed surprisingly little interest in Web 2.0 features.
Insight: Any features we incorporate into the site can’t rely too heavily on user
participation. We have to keep in mind that our ultimate goal is to make the artwork more
accessible.
Design Idea: Bring in informal, outside voices and perspectives that can succeed with
minimal user participation.
Page 19

20. Example 4. Layering information for diverse users
Finding: Our audience is
incredibly diverse: how can
we serve their needs?
Insight: General site visitors
are looking for very different
information than scholars and
academics. We must serve
both well.
Design Idea: Add detailed
information in tabs and
layers.
Page 20

21. Conclusion
Conclusions
• Just four examples of many of our findings
• Research methods can be applied in your own institution
• There are low-budget ways to do this yourself
• Please take a hand-out!
Thank you
Dana Mitroff, SFMOMA, dmitroff@sfmoma.org
Katrina Alcorn, Hot Studio, katrina@hotstudio.com
Page 21