Geospatial Narrative workshop intro (7 May 2015, Stanford)
1. Geospatial Narrative
Perspectives from the humanities,
cartography and GIScience
Center for Interdisciplinary Digital Research (CIDR)
Center for Spatial and Textual Analysis (CESTA)
May 7, 2015
2. panelists
• David O’Sullivan
– Professor of Geography, UC Berkeley
• Anne Knowles (w/Levi Westerveld)
– Professor of Geography, Middlebury College
• Erik Steiner
– Cartographer, Geographer; Creative Director, Spatial History Project
• Nicole Coleman
– Research Director, Humanities + Design
• Nicholas Bauch
– Geographer, Postdoc @ Spatial History
• Karl Grossner
– Geographer, DH Developer @ CIDR
3. questions
• Does historical simulation open significant untapped
avenues for new historical spatial narratives or is it too
reductionist to be accepted by/useful to humanists?
• Is there a place for performative art in the spatial
humanities? Or does art lack the empirical and
representational rigor that is necessary to comprehend
data and derive meaning?
• what does “spatial narrative” mean?
• how does it differ from verbal narrative: is that even a
meaningful distinction? a genuine binary?
• what’s missing or inadequate in existing tools, models,
methods?
4. Center for Interdisciplinary
Digital Research (CIDR)
• The Academic Technology Specialist team, working directly in and with
selected academic departments to improve teaching, learning, and
research by implementing and developing new technologies.
• Social Science Data and Software offers data, software, workshops, and
consultations for data-based social science research and teaching.
• Digital humanities research developers provide focused project support
for the Stanford scholarly community via an annual call for proposals. The
DH developer team maintains a rich gallery of projects both already
published and in-progress.
• The Humanities Text Service (hText) provides access to textual and other
digital resources for research and teaching.
5. Narrative
• account, story, tale, chronicle
• “An account of a series of events, facts, etc., given
in order and with the establishing of connections
between them”
• “A representation of a history, biography, process,
etc., in which a sequence of events has been
constructed into a story in accordance with a
particular ideology”
• geospatial narrative: one product of the practice
of both spatial history and historical geography
11. “…the intersection of qualitative geographic information
systems (GIS), narrative analysis, 3D GIS-based time-
geographic methods, and computer-aided qualitative
data analysis.”
12. “I suggest that the more successful examples
of critically informed GIS are those where
researchers informed by social theory have
been willing to engage with the technology,
rather than to criticize from the outside.”
18. questions
• Does historical simulation open significant untapped
avenues for new historical spatial narratives or is it too
reductionist to be accepted by/useful to humanists?
• Is there a place for performative art in the spatial
humanities? Or does art lack the empirical and
representational rigor that is necessary to comprehend
data and derive meaning?
• what does “spatial narrative” mean?
• how does it differ from verbal narrative: is that even a
meaningful distinction? a genuine binary?
• what’s missing or inadequate in existing tools, models,
methods?
Notas del editor
On May 7, 2015 Stanford Libraries’ Center for Interdisciplinary Digital Research (CIDR) hosted a 4 hour panel discussion on the topic of Geospatial Narrative. The panel coincided with a visit by UC Berkeley geographer David O’Sullivan, who gave a guest lecture later in the day, “Simple spatial models: Building blocks for process-based GIS?”
Only one non-geographer (most welcome of course) in the panel
Prior to the event a list of questions to be considered was developed by the panelists
The Center for Interdisciplinary Digital Research (CIDR) is a new organization within Stanford Libraries, which has brought together several existing groups supporting faculty-led research in the Humanities and Social Sciences
A few definitions from OED and elsewhere. There are several distinct senses of the term “narrative.”
The setting for the panel was CESTA, which includes Stanford’s Spatial History Project. Faculty, postdocs, and student researchers have produced dozens of geospatial narratives there over the last decade.
One important enabler of the work at Spatial History has been the Flash/Flex technical platform developed by Erik Steiner and refined over the years. While the rest of the world was waiting for web-based mapping to catch up, Spatial History folks were building great geospatial narrative applications. Now that web mapping has caught up, the technical platforms choices have expanded dramatically, and this form of scholarly production is available to many more people.
The application pattern for telling stories with maps has several prominent examples. Each has allows joining maps, timelines, text and imagery in interactive displays.
The pattern of “space, time, and theme” as the principle dimensions of geographic information was theorized and modeled by Berry 50 years ago.
And Berry’s matrix is reflected in all modern mapping narrative platforms listed earlier.
One of my current interests, and a motivation for organizing the panel, is a desire to see further interaction between humanities scholars exploring spatial (i.e. geographic) perspectives on their questions and practitioners of Geographic Information Science (GIScience), of which I am one.
In fact there has been a steady, if narrow, stream of qualitative and quantitative narrative work by geographers in the last couple of decades, for example by Mei-Po Kwan
Our guest is in his own words, “sitting at the boundary between quantitative and qualitative methods.” He is renowned for spatial analysis and simulation, as well as Critical GIS.
There is a discussion between humanities scholars and GIScientists, as in this day-long meeting several years ago, but it is minimal halting.
Some topics of interest to humanists, e.g. Place, have been of interest in GIScience…not hugely, but a steady stream. The concept of Place and “placial” is gaining traction in fact.
A few GIScience types – like May Yuan can be found (ir)regularly at DH and historical GIS venues
The Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO) recently encouraged formation of Special Interest Groups, and I co-found GeoHumanities SIG with Kathy Weimer, a map and geospatial data librarian, now at Rice University. The Association of Amrican Geographers (AAG) recently launched a new journal titled GeoHumanities, and the 2015 conference had GeoHumanities as a featured track, with 40+ relevant paper sessions
Back to the questions. Some of what was discussed will be found in the blog post these slides are situated in.