2. What is standardization?
The development and application of a
standard for a particular measures or
type of component or range of
measurements or proportions or rates.
The process by which you derive a
summary figure to compare health
outcomes of groups.
The process can be used for mortality
or morbidity data.
8/11/2015
2
3. 8/11/2015
3
What distinguishes standardization of
rates from other stratified methods of
controlling for confounding, is use of
an external standard as the basis for
comparison.
7. Crude rate
8/11/2015
7
Advantages
Actual Summary rates
Easy calculation for international comparisons
Disadvantages
Since population vary in composition (e.g.,
age)
differences in crude rates difficult to interpret
8. Specific Rate
8/11/2015
8
Advantages
Homogenous subgroups
Detailed rates useful for public health and
Epidemiological aims
Disadvantages
Cumbersome to compare subgroups of two or
more populations
9. Adjusted Rates
8/11/2015
9
Advantages
Summary statement
Differences in group composition “removed”
allows unbiased comparison
Disadvantages
Fictional rates
Absolute magnitude dependent on standard
population chosen
Opposing trends in subgroup masked
10. Direct Adjusted Rates
8/11/2015
10
Requires a standard population, to which the
estimated age-specific rates can be applied
Choice of the standard population may affect
the magnitude of the age-adjusted rates, but
not the ranking of the population
11. Direct Adjusted rates
8/11/2015
11
Multiply standard population by age-
specific rates for populations A and B
to determine the standardized rates
Compare standardized rates
12. Population, deaths, death rate by
community & by age
8/11/2015
12
Community A Community B
Age
(year)
Population Deaths Death Rate
(per 1000)
Population Deaths Death Rate
(per 1000)
Under 1 1,000 15 15.0 5,000 100 20.0
1 – 14 3,000 3 1.0 20,000 35 1.0
15 – 34 6,000 6 1.0 35,000 35 1.0
35 – 54 13,000 52 4.0 17,000 85 5.0
55 – 64 7,000 105 15.0 8,000 160 20.0
Over 64 20,000 1,600 80.0 15,000 1,350 90.0
All ages 50,000 1,781 35.6 100,000 1,740 17.4
13. Standard Population by Age and Age-
Specific Death Rates
8/11/2015
13
Age
(years)
Standard
populatio
n
Death
rate
in A
(per
1,000)
Expected
deaths
at
A’s rate
Death
rate
in B
(per
1,000)
Expected
deaths at
B’s rate
Under 1 6,000 15.0 90 20.0 120.0
1 – 14 23,000 1.0 23 0.5 11.5
15 – 34 41,000 1.0 41 1.0 41.0
35 – 54 30,000 4.0 120 5.0 150.0
55 – 64 15,000 15.0 225 20.0 300.0
Over 64 35,000 80.0 2,800 90.0 3,150
Total 150,000 35,6 3,299 17.4 3,772.5
Age –
adjusted
death
rate (per
1000)
22.0 25.0
14. Indirect Adjustment of Rates
8/11/2015
14
Used if age-specific rates cannot be
estimated
Mirror image of the direct method
15. Indirect Adjestment Of Rates
8/11/2015
15
Based on applying the age-specific
rates of the standard population to
the population of interest to
determine the number of “expected”
deaths.
Standardized Mortality ratio
17. Standardization Examples
o Direct Method requires
Age-specific rates in the sample
population
The age of each case
The population-at-risk for each age
group in the sample
Age structure (percentage of cases in
each age group) of a standard population
8/11/2015
17
18. Indirect Standardization
Instead of a standard population
structure, you utilize a standard rate
to adjust your sample
Indirect standardization does not
require that you know the stratum-
specific rates of your cases
The summary measure is the SMR or
standardized mortality/morbidity ratio
SMR = Observed X 100
Expected
8/11/2015
18
19. Standardize Mortality Rate
Expect a Healthy worker effect
Occupational studies should have SMRs <
100
Workers tend to be healthier than the
general population which comprises both
healthy and unhealthy individuals
You cannot compare SMRs
between studies -- only to
the standard population
8/11/2015
19
20. Standardization:
Age Adjustment (cont.)
Indirect method requires
Age structure of the sample population
at risk
Total cases in the sample population
(not ages of cases)
Age-specific rates for a standard
population
8/11/2015
20
21. Age Standerdization
Occurrence of disease in one area may
appear to be higher than in another
because:
population structures are different
one area is older than another
Standardisation used to adjust for the
effects of age on mortality rates or
other rates
Direct or Indirect
Involves the calculation of numbers of
expected events which are then compared
with numbers of observed events.
8/11/2015
21
23. The problem…
The crude rates are not comparable
because the age structure of the
populations are different
What would the expected number of deaths
be in London and Camden if the age
structures were the identical?
This is DIRECT STANDARDISATION called
DIRECT STANDARDISED RATES
What would the expected number of deaths
be in London and Camden if the age
specific rates were identical?
This is INDIRECT STANDARDISATION called
STANDARDISED MORTALITY RATIO
8/11/2015
23
24. Direct standardisation – method
1. Decide which standard population to use –
EUROPEAN STANDARD POPULATION
2. Calculate expected deaths if both London
and Camden had the same population
structure as the European standard.
3. Express as a rate per 1,000 or 100,000
population
8/11/2015
24
28. Which Method To Use?
If want to compare several population groups
or several time periods use DIRECT as with
INDIRECT can only compare each population
group to the standard.
INDIRECT is useful to determine if disease
incidence is high or low in one area only.
If age specific rates for the population
groups are not available or unreliable use
INDIRECT.
If it is a rare event and therefore number
of deaths in population groups is small
(e.g. ward level CHD deaths) use INDIRECT.
8/11/2015
28
29. Issues in the use of standardization
Standardized rates are used for the
comparison of two or more populations;
they represent a weighted average of
the age specific rates taken from a
'standard population' and are not
actual rates.
The direct method of standardization
requires that the age-specific rates
for all populations being studied are
available and that a standard
population is defined.
8/11/2015
29
30. Continued....
The indirect method of standardization
requires the total number of cases
The ratio of two directly standardized
rates is called the Comparative
Incidence Ratio or Comparative
Mortality Ratio.
The ratio of two indirectly
standardized rates is called the
Standardized Incidence Ratio or the
Standardized Mortality Ratio.
8/11/2015
30
31. Continued....
Indirect standardization is more
appropriate for use in studies with
small numbers or when the rates are
unstable.
As the choice of a standard population
will affect the comparison between
populations, it should always be
stated clearly which standard
population has been applied.
8/11/2015
31
32. Continued....
Standardization may be used to adjust
for the effects of a variety of
confounding factors including age,
sex, race or socio-economic status.
8/11/2015
32
33. Pros Cons
Able to compare
different areas
with each other.
Can look at
trends through
time.
(Only if ALL use
the same standard
population)
Need local data
for all age bands
Rare diseases may
have no events in
specific age bands
so age specific
rates may be
unavailable
May need to merge
events from
different years or
combine age bands
Pros and Cons of DSRs
8/11/2015
33
34. Pros Cons
Can use where
diseases are rare
Don’t need local
event information
for all age
groups
Just need total
number of
observed and
expected counts
Cannot compare
SMRs with each
other unless
population
structures are
identical
Cannot look at
trends through
time
Pros and cons of SMRs
8/11/2015
34
35. Summery
Standardisation can be use in many areas
Although we’ve looked at mortality, the
technique can be applied in other ways:
Hospital admissions
Prevalence/incidence of disease
Prescriptions
Etc
● One type of rate is not necessarily more
important than another. Which you choose
depends on the information sought.
8/11/2015
35
36. Continued....
Standardized rates provide a kind of
“snapshot” of the overall risk of
disease or death, which can be
compared across
populations.
Standardization of rates can be
difficult to understand and is
explained in several different ways
depending on the literature source.
8/11/2015
36
37. Aknowledgement
Dr. Minakshi Khapre
Dr. Abhishek Ingole
Dr. Pramita Mutonde
All the PG’S in the department.
8/11/2015
37
38. References
1. Heinekens CH, Burring JE. Epidemiology in
Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1987.
2. Farmer, R. Lawperson, R. 2004. Lecture
notes in Epidemiology and Public Health
Medicine pp 67-68. Blackwell Publishing.
Text Book of Community Medicine
(Fourth Edition)- By. Dr. Kulkarni, Dr. P.P.
Doke, Dr. J.P Baride, Dr. P.Y. Mulay
Basic Concept & Methodology for the Health
Sciences (Ninth Edition)- By- Wayan W. Daniel
Community Medicine with recent Advances-
By- A.H. Suryakantha
Park’s Text Book of Preventive Social Medicine
(23rd Edition)- By_ Dr. K.Park
8/11/2015
38