Standardized Testing Essay

Research Paper On Standardized Testing
Standardized Testing Standardized testing is a collectively accepted aspect of education today, it is
used to evaluate if students of all ages are being shaped and educated up to the common standard set
by the government. Standardized testing can be seen in almost all educational settings from
kindergarten classes to exit exams for nurse practioners. Standardized testing came into play when
former President George Bush ran his campaign on being the education president and enacted the No
Child Left behind Act. Under this act all educational districts are subject to standards and core values
they must meet to receive accreditation and funding from the government. Just the other day many
students at Moorcroft high school student had to take a...show more content...
Many aspects of students' lives dwell on how they do on tests, such as the ACT, SAT, or even
their basic grades to be accepted in to college. The tests need to be designed to accurately gather
information on the knowledge of the student, the ACT only asks you a hand full of questions on
basic subject yet take math for instance there are thousands of areas in math to understand and
master. Not only are there more than very specific questions asked the tests do not take in to
account the different ways people solve problems such as having to write out question. Some
students such as myself cannot do mental math and it takes us longer to understand the question we
are being asked to evaluate, yet the ACT is a timed test. This creates a bias in the system that
students don't know math were the real problem could either be test anxiety or a lack of time given
to properly complete the test. Testing is deeply rooted in students' lives, making it an ever more
pressing matter to fix the issues that concern us
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Standardized Testing
I.Standardized tests can not accurately measure intellectual merit because racial and gender
stereotypes interfere with the intellectual functioning of those taking the tests, according to Stanford
Psychology Professor Claude Steele. The educational system in United States has been using
standardized tests to evaluate the performance of students. The first documented achievement test
took place in the period of 1840–1875. The earliest tests were meant for individual evaluation, but
the results were used to compare schools and students. Even though there has been controversy about
why it is so important for colleges to weigh their admissions on these tests that simply measures our
academic abilities the day they take the test. Yet,...show more content...
II.Doesn't completely evaluate a student's knowledge
a.Are we measuring intelligence and practical ability, or are we simply measuring test–taking
ability? Some students are at their highest intelligence in the afternoon, some are in the morning and
even at night. Standardized tests are usually in the morning, this is already a disadvantage to those
who aren't as prepared as they would be in the afternoon or night time. These tests usually put a lot
of pressure on a person, unless taught.
b.
c.Standardized testing, in most cases is a one day test. Sometimes a person can be having a bad day
and this might have a bad effect on their test–taking ability. If it were spread out through a couple of
days, a student may have a better chance of getting a better score.
d.Students shouldn't be judged on a single test measuring their ability. There are many students who
are smart in their individual class but when it comes to standardized testing they fall short of the
expectations. Those are the people which standardized testing is unfair to. This specifically pertains
to me, I do well on projects and assignments in class, but tests are a totally different story. I use
direct inference to answer questions that don't make sense to me.
III.Racial and Cultural Gap
a.The racial

Standardized Test Essay
Standardized test are one of the many measures profession school counselors use to assess students
performance and learning. When it come to making a decision about a student's educational
performance, school counselors prefer more than one criteria instead of just using a single test. The
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) established in 2001 stated that the academic achievement of all
student should be held accountable by the school. "High–stakes testing, which refers to the use of
standardized test scores to determine levels of student achievement, became the decision–making,
measurement vehicle. High–stakes test results are often used as a method to determine a student's:
academic placement, promotion and retention, graduation and intervention services....show more
content...
The NCLB act was put into place so that the school is held accountable for the passing or failing of
students. High stakes testing which is standardized testing where test scores is used to determine the
academic level of the students. If your school scored well or poorly on the test your school would
either receive increased or reduced funding. Using this standardized test helped the schools to see
where they needed to help the students whether it be changing the curriculum or changing the
teacher certification standards. The school counselor plays a role in the testing also. According to
the ASCA "professional school counselors recognize that standardized test results provide valuable
information related to student achievement. However, these results only provide a partial picture of
student learning. When important educational decisions are made, professional school counselors
advocate for the use of multiple criteria in the decision–making process. These criteria may include
but are not limited to:
standardized tests results

The Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing Essay
Standardized testing is a down fall to many students but also an opportunity for many others.
Standardized testing has its pros and its cons. It can be the make it or break it factor into getting
into colleges you are hoping to attend or the scholarships you want to earn. Some people may have
their opinions about the test, whether they hate it or not but the fact is that it's here to stay.
What exactly is standardized testing you may ask, it is a test which measures the knowledge among
different students. There are many different standardized test in many different forms. High school
standardized test include the SAT, ACT, and the awful dreaded FCAT. There are also standardized
test in many different fields such as Medical (MCATs)
...show more content...
For this reason we give standardized test so admission committees can look at results from their
standardized test knowing the students knowledge among other students. This is fair in most cases
since all students are receiving the same material and are offered the same opportunity as the other
students.
Standardized testing has many cons but it also has its pros. Standardized Testing can be a guideline
for teachers on what to teach their students and what they are learning and if they need help If they
are falling behind. Since all students around the state and county take standardized test such as the
ACT the SAT or the FCAT it can let parents know where there child stands compared to other
students around the state. One major cause standardized testing has to helping teachers is that it
allows us to track the students progression. For example it tells us if the student has improved over
the years , stayed consistent, or has fallen behind. We can track this because students take test like
the FCAT year–round which lets us calculate the progression of the student. Standardized test also
lets us compare how boys are doing compared to the girls.(Margie)
Standardized Testing has many cons compared to pros. The biggest con of all is the stress it puts on
students and teachers alike. The stress it puts on teachers is that sometimes teacher's teach according
to the test because they want to

Standardized Testing Argumentative Essay
The issue of whether students should take standardized tests in order to get selected by top tier
colleges has been a heated debate for quite some time now. In this essay, I will be examining
whether standardized testing is a fair assessment of one's overall knowledge or achievement in
one's educational career, and whether it has grounds to determine whether a person is qualified for
higher educational opportunities. The SAT and ACT are two of the most known standardized tests
which are used to measure and assess how well a student will do in his or her college life, however,
these tests do not seem to be good determinants for one's academic intelligence and actually deter
students from proper learning in the classroom by promoting a narrow...show more content...
Even at an early age, students are taught the importance of standardized tests which come later
down the road and have the idea of constantly studying and preparing for standardized tests
instilled into his or her minds. I myself, did really well in almost everyone of my classes in high
school due to my dedication and devotion to the courses and although I was able to graduate with a
fairly high GPA, my ACT and SATtest scores were not high enough for the university's I was
applying to, thus not meeting the requirement to even be considered for acceptance. This
occurrence made me wonder whether the use of a single test is fair or valid, considering someone
can do exceedingly well in their courses and have a solid understanding of the material but simply
do not have the proper test taking skills or other assets needed for scoring high on a standardized test.
Furthermore, this issue is compelling to me since I believe that there are better ways to evaluate or
assess a person's achievement, intelligence, and abilities as a student. Instead, the use of effective
teacher observation, documentation of a students work, as well as performance–based assessments
pertaining to the individuals courses, can all be a good source of directly evaluating real learning
tasks and provide useful material for parents, teachers, and the

Issues With Standardized Testing Essay
The Issue with Standardized Tests Imagine you are a student, sitting at a common desk in a dull
classroom. In front of you is an oversized timer seeming to dare you to feel the slightest bit of
comfort in its presence. From atop your mountain of stress you stare intently at the standardized test
that will have a say in your future as a student and as a functioning member of society. But despite
your teacher's plea for good test scores you start to wonder, do standardized tests effectively measure
our abilities? Standardized tests do not effectively measure our abilities because they prevent
teachers from individual teaching, do not reveal the true talents of students, and create the wrong
curriculum for teaching.
To begin, standardized tests do not effectively measure our abilities because they prevent teachers
from teaching students as individuals. To prepare students for the tests, teachers strive to teach all
students the same amount of information in the same amount of...show more content...
They also allow students with advanced learning abilities to skip grades, and in certain situations are
used as a communication device between teachers and students ("The Value of Standardized
Testing"). So it may seem necessary to spend each day preparing students for their futures in
education and life, right? As convincing as the benefits of standardized tests may seem, the
disadvantages continuously outweigh the advantages. In fact, many teachers are growing weary of
the countless lessons expected on standardized tests, causing some of the best educators to leave
their once loved profession. Due to this, the average teaching career now ends at around 20 years
("The Washington Post"). With our educators leaving their chosen career path, our students are given
substitutes, and their success rate

Standardized Testing Essay
Dating back to the mid–1800's, standardized testing has become the be–all and end–all solution in
determining a student's academic outlook. Originally designed to measure mere scholastic
knowledge, standardized tests, such as the Scholastic Intellectuality Measure and Purposeful
Likelihood Exam (SIMPLE), have expanded the horizons for quantifying a student's future
socioeconomic stature, qualifying their dominant personality traits, constructing appropriate social
peers, and deriving accurate career configurations for optimal societal benefit. SIMPLE applies
advanced modus operandi and a modernized approach to testing in order to construct a dynamic
portfolio of student prospect. A twenty first century innovation in standardized testing, SIMPLE
creates an unparalleled schooling experience, student individuality, and real–world success.
Derived out of decades of technical research,...show more content...
In order to configure a holistic overview of a student, kindergarteners complete a lengthy ten
question diagnostic test that corroborates an appropriate career, socioeconomic outlook, and their
likelihood for financial success, along with math and reading levels. This examination accurately
outlines the course a student will follow throughout high school, college, and early decades
proceeding their educational process. For example, Student A may state that their eyes are cerulean
blue and has a birthday during the interim of April and September. These vital details, as supported
by several scientific studies, identifies the individual as a prospective transportation professional,
such as a bus driver. However, Student B may have hazel brown eyes with a birthday between
January and March, which strongly indicates success in the fields of science or corporate business.
In preparation for the SIMPLE, which all high school seniors take, students in grades

For many years, it is known that each and every person on this plant are not identical. We all learn
by nurture, using what we have from nature, in widely different ways. Yet, we expect every person
in America's schools to take tests that are based off of the normal, the typical . Standardized tests
have set a bar for a normal society, a society that is not normal and not standard. Taking tests that are
meant for the normal human is wrong. Expecting humans to become normal; devalue their strengths
and weaknesses; and change school to be more about passing a class than learning from the class.
Standardized testing does not measure the capability of a certain individual and decreasing the funds
and benefits for the students who suffer from this...show more content...
The generic test is given out as an example of what should be the normal knowledge of a person.
Although a student may do well in a class with worksheets, in class discussions, or projects, but
lacks the grade in tests could be due to test anxiety. Research of 414 students by Rana and
Mahmood states, "out of the 116 males total test anxiety scale scores, the mean value is ranging
between a minimum of 38.91 for male students of department of Statistics to a maximum mean
score of 49.06 for male students of department of Mathematics," and " it is also found that
achievements is significantly inversely related to both emotional and worry scales as well." Rana
and Mahmood also reference the studies of Zollar, Ben–chain, and Spielberger: "It has been found
that students consistently perceive examination as a source of increase in anxiety and a situation
engulfed with uncertainty/unfairness in letting them demonstrate their true achievements." It has
been proven that test anxiety is truly affecting students ability because forty–nine out of one hundred
and sixty one males showed deficient due to anxiety, emotion, and worry (Claim of Fact). It limits
their achievement with grade point averages, scholarships, and entry into the school they would
rather have the ability to succeed greatly in. Standardized test should take into consideration the

Essay about Standardized Testing
Standardized Testing
The purposes of standardized tests are to instruct decision making, establish program eligibility,
evaluate course goals, evaluate program goals, and examine external curriculum. When a teacher
gives and assesses a standardized test, they gain information about their students that helps them
realize what concepts they have learned according to the agenda for the subject at hand. If the
assessment is performed in a sensible amount of time and given according to the directions, this
purpose should be fulfilled; however, it is a common belief that standardized tests do not work well
in establishing where a student stands in a specific curriculum. The test uses a general curriculum
that is the basis for the tests...show more content...
This allows for an error in measuring a particular school's curriculum since each curriculum changes.
(Costa and Kallick, 1995)
The evaluation of the program set by educators is a key purpose of standardized testing. Educators
develop a guideline for the amount of work that should be covered in each area of a curriculum. The
standardized test scores, in return, allow the educators to establish where a school fits and where it
stands in reference to other schools.
With this information, a region of schools can compare their results and figure out how well a
region is doing in comparison to other regions. However, this is not completely valid due to the
difference in assessment in each region. Therefore, they cannot be accurately compared to other
regions because of this difference. (Costa and Kallick, 1995)
Lastly, standardized tests are designed to examine external curriculum. This purpose takes into
account the fact that curriculums differ between schools. The people who make the actual tests take
a look and the validity of the results when comparing them with other schools. When challenging the
validity of comparing these results, many people believe that educators themselves complain about
the information on these tests saying that the information is not worthy of being taught in the
classroom. However, the common complaint of educators is that

Thesis Statement On Standardized Testing
Thesis: The effects of standardized testing have negatively impacted students across the United
States. High Stakes testing has led to a decrease in student motivation, high retention rate, and a
notable change in early dropout rates.
I.History of Standardized Testing
A. Standardized testing shows where a student stands academically.
B. High stake testing determines if a student will move forward a grade or not.
C. The legislatives thought high stake testing would improve student academics.
II.Lack of Student Motivation
A. According to the article, "Student Motivation: An Overlooked Piece of School Reform,"
Motivation can affect a student's outcome in class.
B. An absence of understudy inspiration can assume an essential part in an understudy...show more
content...
Although legislatives assumption was that high stakes testing would enhance understudy inspiration,
and raise understudy accomplishment, that supposition was completely incorrect. The effect of
standardized testing (high–stakes testing) has not been positive throughout the United States at all.
Due to the lack of motivation, the high retention rate, and notable change in dropout rate, it may be a
while until many states recover, especially for states like Louisiana. According to Nola, Louisiana is
tied with Florida for having one of the country's fifth lowest graduation rates, and one of the highest
dropout rates. Our society needs to come together and think of a plan that will help students, and
prevent the increasing number of kids who decide to give up on school. A system that will benefit
both students, and teachers should be created; making it better for both, students and teachers to
work together properly. With a new system student motivation may improve, the number of over
aged students sitting in the wrong grade will decrease, and the notable dropout rate will actually

Standardized Testing Essay example
Every year thousands upon thousands of children, ages seven and upwards sit down to take their
scheduled standardized tests. This generation has been classified as the most tested in history. 'Its
progress through childhood and adolescence' has been 'punctuated by targets, key stages, attainment
levels, and qualifications' ('Stalin in School' 8). Each year the government devises a new standard
and then finds a way to test how each student measures up to this standard. They have come to the
conclusion that the easiest way to chart the success of school reform is to follow the results of
standardized testing. But rating education strictly by the numbers is the wrong way to measure a
process as complex as learning,...show more content...
This being the case, the standardized tests are not conclusive and accurate of what education and
learning are.
However, many people feel that these tests do not measure any sort of knowledge, but rather
indicates the economic background the child came from. According to Kohn, a major spokesperson
on the damaging effects of standardized testing, ?What standardized tests actually measure best is
the economic backgrounds of the groups that take them? (Gallagher). If you broke down the income
of the test takers family and measured it in increments of $10,000 you would get a graph where for
each increment of income the students score would undoubtedly increase directly. This is because
higher income areas have more teaching resources readily available which gives the students a
varied and comprehensive learning environment and also attracts more qualified teachers. The high
salaries and vast resources available attract many well–qualified teachers vying for the space.
Therefore, the school district has an advantage of a larger pool in which to choose the most
qualified teacher. These factors can give the students an advantage which makes the standardized
tests a poor scale of students or schools progress but rather a good scale of their economic
background.
As the weight of standardized tests increase, so does the stress. Many students are feeling overly
stressed by the vast number of tests they are expected to take and pass. It is pounded into

Essay about Arguing Against Standardized Testing
To many students standardized testing has become another part of schooling that is dreaded.
Standardized testing has been a part of school since the nineteen–thirties; in those days it was used as
a way to measure students that had special needs. Since the time that standardized test have been in
American schools there has been many programs that have placed an importance on the idea of
standardized testing such as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Evans 1). Over the years the
importance of standardized testing has increased tremendously and so has the stakes, not only for
teachers but also students. All states in the United States of America have state test in order to
measure how much students learn, and help tell how well the...show more content...
Most standardized test do not measure emotional or mechanical intelligence, actually a lot of
educators argue that standardized test do not measure comprehension or actual intelligence but
rather memorization. While others may believe that standardized testing just needs a few
improvements, others believe that it is impossible to have a test that measures accurately the
capability of a diverse student population. Today's schooling depends heavily on the test scores from
standardized test. Standardized testing should not have so much weight put on them because they
have a negative impact on effective education, students' self–concept, and learning styles.
Although standardized testing has been a major part of schooling it has also had a negative impact
on effective education. Standardized has made a huge impact on public schooling so much that not
only does it affect the students but also the teachers. With the teachers now beginning to get raises or
having their jobs on the line if their students fail the test, many students have not been getting the
fullest education process that they could get. Students may not realize the impact that it has had on
the type of teaching style that they receive because they are so used to it. With so many teachers not
having a lot of time to teach what is on the test and the other things that they feel are important to
students to know, a lot of

Standardized test are in grave need of change. The way deduce whether our students are ready for
college or a job is inconclusive. The test are lacking of qualities that show how a student could
really perform in the work environment. This is the reason we should test our students in other ways
rather than the outdated, obsolete method we have so strongly chosen today. We rely on the score
our students achieve to determine whether or not they should be allowed into a college or not.
Standardized test not only determines college admissions, they may also determine whether or not
the applicant will get hired for a job. This is unfair for the students with more skills than recognition
of facts.
Standardized testing was created for a student to have to recall information previously learned by a
teacher. They are made in an "artificial learning environment: they're timed, you can't talk to a fellow
student, you can't ask questions, you can't use references or learning devices, you can't get up and
move around." –...show more content...
Yet this is not true. Thesetest only show what they are able to show. They don't help our students
advance in life. Teachers rely so largely on these test that they sometimes base their entire class on
a test. That means there is no leeway to arouse discussions on topics that could be helpful to a
student. Also, these test can show whether a teacher is performing their job well enough. With that,
how students perform on their test predicts whether a teacher keeps their job or not. If we always
have a teacher worrying if their students are ready for a test or not, that teacher may be willing to
provide cheats or use unhelpful methods to advance their students. This may be detrimental in the
long run for our students. If we have to rely in short term memory for a test. Then they are more
susceptible to long term memory

Standardized Testing Essay examples
Every year thousands upon thousands of children, ages seven and upwards sit down to take their
scheduled standardized tests. This generation has been classified as the most tested in history. "Its
progress through childhood and adolescence" has been "punctuated by targets, key stages, attainment
levels, and qualifications" ("Stalin in School" 8). Each year the government devises a new standard
and then finds a way to test how each student measures up to this standard. They have come to the
conclusion that the easiest way to chart the success of school reform is to follow the results of
standardized testing. But rating education strictly by the numbers is the wrong way to measure a
process as complex as learning,...show more content...
It is about motivating the student to think and come to logical conclusions and hypothesis on their
own. This being the case, the standardized tests are not conclusive and accurate of what education
and learning are.
However, many people feel that these tests do not measure any sort of knowledge, but rather
indicates the economic background the child came from. According to Kohn, a major spokesperson
on the damaging effects of standardized testing, "What standardized tests actually measure best is
the economic backgrounds of the groups that take them" (Gallagher). If you broke down the income
of the test takers family and measured it in increments of $10,000 you would get a graph where for
each increment of income the students score would undoubtedly increase directly. This is because
higher income areas have more teaching resources readily available which gives the students a
varied and comprehensive learning environment and also attracts more qualified teachers. The high
salaries and vast resources available attract many well–qualified teachers vying for the space.
Therefore, the school district has an advantage of a larger pool in which to

The Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing Essay
Argumentative Essay: Standardized Testing
"Standardized testing has become the arbiter of social mobility, yet there is more regulation of the
food we feed our pets that of the tests we give our kids " (Robert Schaeffer quotes)
Standardized tests have historically been used as measures of how students are compared with one
another or how much of a particular curriculum they have learned throughout the semester or year.
Consequently, standardized tests are being used to make major decisions about students, such as
grade promotion or high school graduation, and higher education evaluation. Various numbers of
students across America have had to repeat classes because of the way standardized tests are used to
pass or fail students. Although...show more content...
In various ways, standardized test are beneficial from tracking students' progress over the years to
not allowing teachers emotions to get in the way of the testing process. Standardized testing sets
expectations high for students and it does hold them accountable for the same standards, which
may lead to achievement gains. By looking at the students' performance they will be able to
determine how well they retain information. Also the school is able to learn what their students
are able to do and what they cannot do compared to other school districts, so they would be able to
improve their education system. When giving more personal assessments, it is very possible "that
the teacher or person assessing the student can let their emotions or biases affect how they score
that student" (Young). In most cases, standardized tests are objective. There are wrong or right
answers, and there is no room for feelings or emotions. Standardized testing gives teachers guidance
to help them determine what to teach students and when to teach it. Tests are highly accountable
and reliable as they judge the candidates on a common platform across states and nations.
Standardized testing is "a simplified way of timeline management" (A Look at the Pros and Cons of
Standardized Testing). Standardized testing gives parents a good idea of how their children are
doing as compared to students across the country and

Standardized Testing Outline
Are standardized tests a good way to measure intelligence in the United States? Nicholas Ao
Specific Purpose Statement: To invite my audience to consider the pros and cons of standardized
testing, specifically in high school in the United States. Thesis: Everyone who has grown up in
the United States has had to do standardized testing throughout their adolescent years. I would like
to talk about standardized testing and different viewpoints on standardized tests. Introduction
I.[Hook] To start this off, I would like to ask a simple question: who in here dreaded taking
standardized testing? II.[Reveal topic and relate to audience and thesis] Everyone who has grown
up in the United States has had to do standardized tests throughout their adolescents. III.[establish
credibility] If you were like me, which I can see everyone here is, you were told to bring two
number two pencils, an eraser, and go to your assigned classroom unless the test was taken as a
class in the gymnasium. A.Today I am going to discuss standardized testing in adolescence. First I
am going to give some brief information on standardized tests, and then give some viewpoints from
students and parents as well as teachers and administrators on standardized tests. Signpost: To begin,
I am going to talk about standardized testing. Body I.Here are some statistics on standardized testing.
A.According to CBSnews, students took on average 112 standardized tests between pre–K and 12th
grade. (CBS, 2015).

Persuasive Essay On Standardized Testing
Students are put under so much stress from their homework it is becoming insufferable. Six in 10
school psychologists said the Common Core learning standards, which includes state exams for
students in third through eighth grades each April, has increased students' anxiety (Spector). Most
parents and teachers don't understand how much stress students are put under from school.
Standardized testing needs to be abolished because students and educators spend too much time on
the test, the stakes are too high, and the tests may not reveal everything about how much a student
has learned. Students and educators spend too much time on the STAAR test. Schools spend too
much time preparing for middle–of–the–road exams, especially at low performance schools where
students could use better teaching (Garland). Most schools are only worried about teaching students
the curriculum they need to learn for the STAAR test, and not more about what they need to learn
for their future lives. A few watchers have realized that educating data by the test centers the
educational modules on vital substance and aptitudes dispenses with exercises that don't deliver
learning picks up, and dives instructors and understudies to allow more exertion ("Do Standardized
Tests"). Students are under a lot of stress because they have so much homework. Teachers give
students homework almost every night because they have so many lessons they need to teach to
Winkleman 2 prepare students for the STAAR test.

Alarming is an understatement when it comes to the anxiety and stress standardized testing brings.
Students are told how vital these tests can be to college acceptance, class placement, and school
ranking, so it is no surprise that they lead students to become stressed out and anxious about taking
the assessments. According to education researcher Gregory J. Cizek, "illustrating how testing...
produces gripping anxiety in even the brightest students, and makes young children vomit or cry, or
both" (2). The affect standardized testing has on students is unacceptable, no students should be
anxious and uneasy about going to school due to a test. To continue, the Sacramento Bee reported
that "test–related jitters, especially among young students,...show more content...
If that is the case, why do schools believe all students test the same way? Giving every student the
same test or almost the same tests is simply acknowledging that some the students are being set up
to fail. If everyone is different than not everyone is going to test well on the same test setup. Some
students need to be able to demonstrate themselves as a whole. Multiple choice formatted tests are
an inadequate evaluation, " It encourages a simplistic way of thinking in which there are only right
and wrong answers, which doesn't apply in real–world situations. The format is also biased toward
male students, who studies have shown adapt more easily to the game–like point scoring of
multiple–choice questions" (Sacks 3). The idea that giving all students the same multiple choice
formatted tests is not as equal as it seems. Standardized test may boost IQ like abilities, but that does
not mean they are as acceptable at placing students in courses and determining their college

Problems With Standardized Testing Essay
In Standardized Testing and Its Victims, an article written for Education Week, Alfie Kohn states:
Standardized testing has swelled and mutated, like a creature in one of those old horror movies, to
the point that it now threatens to swallow our schools whole.... Our children are tested to an extent
that is unprecedented in our history and unparalleled anywhere else in the world. While previous
generations of American students have had to sit through tests, never have the tests been given so
frequently, and never have they played such a prominent role in schooling. (1)
Kohn accurately describes one of the main flaws in America's education system: standardized testing.
According to the article No Child Left Behind, legislation passed in...show more content...
In order for students to score higher, teachers edit the curriculum drastically, change teaching
methods, and sometimes resort to dishonesty (5–8). According to a 1990 survey cited by Katie
Young in her article, What's So Bad About Standardized Testing?, nine percent of teachers admitted
to cheating to raise test scores. Furthermore, many teachers unintentionally become angry and
frustrated with low scoring students, resulting in a more hostile and uncomfortable learning
environment. Both teachers and students feel discouraged and suddenly unmotivated after scoring
poorly, which eventually affects the entire learning atmosphere (4–5). In How Standardized Testing
Damages Education, an article by the National Center for Fair and Open Testing, standardized
testing is described as "developmentally inappropriate" (1). The overwhelming amount of pressure
that accompanies standardized testing can severely affect students, administration, and the school
system as a whole.
All of this pressure is caused by a single test that does not even truly display a student's intelligence.
Many researchers have found that the content on standardized test is much too narrow and the
multiple choice format limits creativity (Herman and Golan 3). There are so many other factors that
truly display a person's abilities and qualifications, such as involvement in the school, extracurricular
activities, and accomplishments in

Argumentative Essay On Standardized Testing
Testing Testing Many people in the United States are concerned with the role that standardized
testing has on education. Most of them have very strong views on this subject and as it usually
happens with large–scale issues these views are very diverse and often opposite. Some claim that
standardized testing is the best way to determine student's skills and qualities because they are
equally designed for everyone and not biased. Others, on the other hand, argue the fairness of these
tests. They believe that test scores do not represent student's knowledge. What is certain, in my
opinion, is that this subject needs more attention followed by actions that will actually make
difference in the education system. Most of the problems with standardized tests come from the fact
that the performance on one test usually determines graduation, or admission to university, or job
promotion. Thus, standardized testing appears to be a tool designed for these high stakes uses.
Whether or not the tool is useful is determined by two things: its design and the job that we ask it to
do. First, comes the design. People supporting the standardized testing claim that it is perfectly
created and meets all the criteria for objectiveness. They believe that multiple–choice tests are good
because they are graded by machines and therefore "are not subject to human subjectivity or bias."
(Phelps, 2002) What these people seem to overlook is the importance of individuality.
Multiple–choice questions

Standardized Testing Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Más de Best Online Paper Writing Service

Más de Best Online Paper Writing Service (20)

Último

Último (20)

Standardized Testing Essay