3. UAT by Functional Users Inputs data for various Scenarios Results with few defects Various modules of application Probability of neglecting defects in non critical functionalities is high Time to perform load and rigorous testing is short Test Key functionalities in the basic scenarios Bugs may remain undetected until months of usage in production Lacks training in testing complex systems Business Users
4. UAT by Lera QA Team Hybrid Approach of Testing Identifies all the defects in the critical functionalities. Various modules of application Critical Testing (Scenario Based Approach): 70% and Ad hoc Testing : 30% Customizes testing approach according to end user importance Equipped to test alternative and critical success scenarios Performs Functional and Non Functional Testing Dedicated team to perform rigorous testing with real time data Lera Technologies Testing Expert
6. UAT by Lera QA Team Project Initiation Planning Design Build and Implementation Execution Signoff Use Case Approach Adhoc Testing Project Initiation Execution Signoff Use Case Approach Adhoc Testing Lera UAT Typically done by Both Client and Lera QA Team UAT Methodology
7. UAT challenges faced by Client Test coverage Measuring application performance Lack of skilled Testers Test Prioritization Cost of freeing up resources Not sure about UAT approach
8. BUGS Bug Free code into Production Critical Areas of the applications are tested Strict adherence to the requirements Development team can’t influence on Testing Results Focus more on Functional/End User perspective Production outages reduces significantly Client benefits with Lera UAT
9. Independent Testing Organization Focus on quality Follows Industry Best Practices Lera Testing Practice Lera's Services On time delivery Usage of Test Automation Tools Specialized testing resources