Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

Parking myths

609 visualizaciones

Publicado el

Draft info flyer that I'm working on for Chicago aldermen

Publicado en: Educación
  • Sé el primero en comentar

Parking myths

  1. 1. Parking Myths Debunked MYTH: There’s not enough parking. More parking will solve this problem. REALITY: In higher density neighborhoods, there are more people per square mile than in lower density neighborhoods. If many residents have cars, there will be a high demand for a limited quantity of parking spaces. Increasing the supply of a good that is in high demand does not eliminate the demand. Parking garages are expensive (they average $30,000 per space, not including land costs). If street parking is free and a garage space is $30,000, most people will seek out the free parking. When parking is priced to manage demand, many households reduce the number of vehicles, taking more taxis and transit trips, and shift to using shared vehicles like I-Go and ZipCar. With more people living close together, transit becomes the most efficient way to move throughout the area. MYTH: If only there were more parking, businesses would get more customers. REALITY: Parking is not what brings people to a neighborhood. A great, vibrant neighborhood with a variety of stores and amenities in close proximity is the attraction. The City of Chicago has a variety of transit options, which can bring many more people to an area than private automobiles. There is also a huge supply of on-street parking, excellent coverage with car-sharing vehicles, taxicabs, and great bicycle networks. Areas with excessive parking diminish the attraction of the surrounding environment and encourage driving over healthier, more efficient and sustainable travel modes. Twenty-four people in a block: Traveling by car (bottom left), walking and bicycling (top right), and in a bus (bottom right).
  2. 2. MYTH: New developments should include more parking because we don’t have enough parking right now to accommodate the additional people they’ll bring into the community. REALITY: More parking means more traffic. If roads are already at capacity and parking is in high demand, adding more parking means that more cars will come to the area. If developers focus on building near transit and including shared cars, bike lockers, and Divvy bike share stations in and around their buildings, they could attract more people with fewer cars. For developments that include parking, it should be leased separate from housing so that individuals can choose whether or not they want to pay extra for a parking space. If on-street spaces are full most of the time, pricing is the simplest way to manage demand. Convert streets to residential permits; if it is already permitted, the price needs to be higher and there should be an exponentially increasing fee for the same address requesting multiple permits. MYTH: Charging for parking hurts low-income residents. REALITY: Lower-income residents have lower levels of car-ownership and are more likely to use transit. Since the cost of parking is built into the cost of everything we buy, free parking is subsidized by those who don’t drive or don’t drive as much as other people. MYTH: Raising the meter prices or extending the hours will kill businesses. REALITY: Not being able to find a parking space is more of a deterrent to potential customers than paying for a space near their destination. When pricing is set to match demand levels, like in parts of San Francisco (visit for more information), drivers can spend more time shopping and less time looking for parking. Drivers who don’t want to pay as much will park further from high-demand areas and walk, and drivers who don’t want to walk pay more for the convenience. SO WHAT CAN A NEIGHBORHOOD DO? • Reward and encourage walking, biking, car-share use and transit use. • Work with I-Go and ZipCar to get more shared vehicles in your Ward and provide membership discounts to Ward residents. • Work with owners of private parking lots to share or lease spaces (churches usually have different peak demands than businesses, schools can partner with restaurants and bars to share parking). • Improve the signage directing drivers to underutilized parking; encourage the use of apps like Spot Hero to help people find parking before they even get in their car. • Ask developers of new housing to provide each tenant with a one-year membership in a car-sharing organization like I-Go or ZipCar, as well as an on-site vehicle (allow curbside space to be used for this). • Ask developers of new housing to provide each tenant with a one-year CTA pass. • Allow developers to determine the appropriate amount of parking to provide rather than imposing specific requirements per unit and ask that parking be leased separate from the units at full cost so that new residents can consider the cost of bringing a car. • Do not allow residential driveways on public streets as this creates pedestrian conflict points and removes shared, curbside parking. Garages should face alleys. • Provide more bike lanes and bike racks; encourage community events focused on biking and walking. • Restrict the amount of free parking and use (6PM-6AM) residential permits along neighborhood streets. • Increase the cost of residential permits when supply is limited. Use an exponentially escalating fee for the price of permits at one address. • When the price that drivers are willing to pay to park on-street can cover the cost of creating additional supply, then creating a shared, centralized parking garage is a wise decision. The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) is assisting the Wicker Park Bucktown SSA with a plan for innovative parking management strategies through its Local Technical Assistance program. For more information, visit: