Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Media salience and the process of frame changing
1. Media salience and the process of framing Coverage of the Columbine school shootings A presentation by Logan Molyneux of Chyi, H. I., & McCombs, M. (2004). Media Salience and the Process of Framing: Coverage of the Columbine School Shootings. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 22-35.
2. Overview Attribute agenda setting and framing New measurement scheme Columbine coverage in The New York Times
3. Literature Agenda setting Attributes of an object Compare media, public agendas Framing Include or exclude elements of a story How is this framed?
4. Limitations Too specific No cross-object comparison Too general Thematic, episodic (Iyengar, 1991)
7. Columbine school shootings April 20, 1999 No. 2 news story of the year (Pew) Behind President Clinton’s impeachment 68 percent followed closely (Pew) Behind Rodney King and TWA flight 800 in the 1990s 170 articles from The New York Times over 30 days
8. Research questions RQ1: number and distribution of stories RQ2: use of space frames RQ3: use of time frames RQ4: relationship between time frames and space frames
13. Core frame Community and present "On 20 April 1999, two gunmen in Littleton, Colorado, killed twelve fellow students and a teacher before turning their guns on themselves.“ Original, not most common Only 24 percent of stories
14. Extended frames “Antique cookie cutters” (Darnton, 1975) 76 percent of all stories Greatest contributor to salience
Editor's Notes
The literature has shown an abundant connection between second-level agenda setting effects and framing. Studies of second level agenda setting tend to focus on a list of attributes that may be shared between the media and the public. And these attributes may show up