Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

Ipmi

47.184 visualizaciones

Publicado el

IfNet Neutrality existed back then we would have had no chance to put together our multicast network

unfortunately when Yahoo killed it, it stayed dead. To this day there is no multicast network that rivaled what we did in 1999 for content

Publicado en: Internet
  • Inicia sesión para ver los comentarios

Ipmi

  1. broadcast.com multicast broadcast.com Multicast Affiliates Sprint broadcast.com MBGP/MSDP/PIM Peering to MBone and UUCast UUNet UUCast Phase I/II UUNet MBone AT&T Huges DirecPC Verio CyberRamp MindSpring Bell Atlantic IDT American Digital Network Lightspeed Net Nova Internet IIJ - Japan Inlink Comm. ZipLink Direct Peering MBGP/MSDP/PIM Peering to MBone Peering: Multihomed MBone connections. UUNet UUCast Phase I and Phase II Sprint Huges Network broadcast.com multicast affiliates
  2. broadcast.com multicast Ethernet Ethernet Public Internet Dialup Ports Dialup Ports Multicast Enabled Routers Internet Gateways broadcast.com Internet Gateway broadcast.com Core Multicast Router GRE Tunnel --> Tunnels: Allow multicast content to pass over the non native multicast Internet. Peering: MBGP/MSDP/PIM allow for efficient, scaleable interdomain routing and multicast content distribution.
  3. broadcast.com multicast • Pitfalls – Lack of support by equipment vendors. Large scale multicast requires interoperation and standardization – QOS. Larger scale deployment is coming. – Application limits in scaleable multicast and management
  4. broadcast.com multicast Why we do like we do: MBGP with MSDP and PIM are much more scaleable than the protocols of old. They offer more efficient routing between larger networks. Peering with smaller ISP’s does not have the demand of the lager networks. Networks are smaller and content distribution is more easily controlled. Tunnels work, but direct peering is obviously a better choice. The Internet is not perfect and as QOS becomes more prevalent it will become a necessity.
  5. broadcast.com multicast • What's next in 1999? – Lager Scale enterprise deployment of multicast – QOS improvements in both management and application. – A faster last mile. Creating more demand for high quality broadband content. – More standards based tools and protocols allowing for true interoperability.
  6. broadcast.com multicast • What's next in 1999? – Lager Scale enterprise deployment of multicast – QOS improvements in both management and application. – A faster last mile. Creating more demand for high quality broadband content. – More standards based tools and protocols allowing for true interoperability.

×