Presentation from the Design Network Conference, 21st May 2014

1. After the Farrell Review
How can Design Review Evolve?
Les Sparks

2. How can design review evolve?
Where has it come from?
Where is it now?
Where might it go?

3. Where has it come from
Local Architects’ Panels
•No presentations
•Conflicts of interest
•Narrow focus
RFAC
•Presentations but no discussion
•Response by letter
•Considered London-centric etc.

4. CABE’s Legacy
•Presentation followed by discussion
•Review by eminent practitioners
from a range of professions
•Development of best practice
•10 key principles established
•Training for panel members and
chairs

5. Where are we now
The Design Network
Strengths
• Regional coverage
• Consistency of
practice based on 10
principles
• Support through NPPF
Weaknesses
• Patchy take up
• Funding uncertainties
and organisational
insecurity
• Poorly promoted

6. Design Review or PLACE Review
What’s the difference?
Best practice in design review is already
• Inter-professional
• Collaborative, not judgemental
• Objective, not subjective
• Sensitive to context
• Independent

7. How might design review evolve
further?
• Open reviews; observation and
engagement of 3rd parties
• Strategic reviews; in depth analysis and
discussion
• Hands on assistance; design workshops
and charettes